Misplaced Pages

Isotopes of seaborgium

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Seaborgium-264)

Isotopes of seaborgium (106Sg)
Main isotopes Decay
abun­dance half-life (t1/2) mode pro­duct
Sg synth 8.5 s α Rf
Sg synth 14.4 s α Rf
Sg synth 9.8 min α Rf
Sg synth 100 s SF
Sg synth 13 s SF
Sg synth 5 min α Rf
SF
Sg synth 31 s α73% Rf
SF27%

Seaborgium (106Sg) is a synthetic element and so has no stable isotopes. A standard atomic weight cannot be given. The first isotope to be synthesized was Sg in 1974. There are thirteen known radioisotopes from Sg to Sg and five known isomers (Sg, Sg, Sg, Sg, and Sg). The longest-lived isotopes are Sg with a half-life of 9.8 minutes and Sg with a half-life of 5 minutes. Due to a low number of measurements, and the consequent overlapping measurement uncertainties at the confidence level corresponding to one standard deviation, a definite assignment of the most stable isotope cannot be made.

List of isotopes


Nuclide
Z N Isotopic mass (Da)
Half-life
Decay
mode

Daughter
isotope

Spin and
parity
Excitation energy
Sg 106 152 258.11298(44)# 2.7(5) ms
SF (various) 0+
Sg 106 153 259.11440(13)# 402(56) ms α Rf (11/2−)
β (<1%) Db
SF (rare) (various)
Sg 87 keV 226(27) ms α (97%) Sg (1/2+)
SF (3%) (various)
β (<1%) Db
Sg 106 154 260.114384(22) 4.95(33) ms SF (71%) (various) 0+
α (29%) Rf
Sg 106 155 261.115949(20) 183(5) ms α (98.1%) Rf (3/2+)
β (1.3%) Db
SF (0.6%) (various)
Sg 100(50)# keV 9.3(1.8) μs
IT Sg 7/2+#
Sg 106 156 262.11634(4) 10.3(1.7) ms SF (94%) (various) 0+
α (6%) Rf
Sg 106 157 263.11829(10)# 940(140) ms α (87%) Rf 9/2+#
SF (13%) (various)
Sg 51(19)# keV 420(100) ms α Rf 3/2+#
Sg 106 158 264.11893(30)# 37 ms SF (various) 0+
Sg 106 159 265.12109(13)# 8.5+2.6
−1.6 s
α Rf
Sg 14.4+3.7
−2.5 s
α Rf
Sg 106 160 266.12198(26)# 390(110) ms SF (various) 0+
Sg 106 161 267.12436(30)# 9.8+11.3
−4.5 min
α Rf 9/2#
Sg 110 keV# 100+92
−39 s
SF (various) 1/2#
Sg 106 162 268.12539(50)# 13+17
−4 s
SF (various) 0+
Sg 106 163 269.12863(39)# 5(2) min α Rf
SF (various)
Sg 106 165 271.13393(63)# 31+13
−7 s
α (73%) Rf 3/2+#
SF (27%) (various)
This table header & footer:
  1. Sg – Excited nuclear isomer.
  2. ( ) – Uncertainty (1σ) is given in concise form in parentheses after the corresponding last digits.
  3. # – Atomic mass marked #: value and uncertainty derived not from purely experimental data, but at least partly from trends from the Mass Surface (TMS).
  4. Modes of decay:
    SF: Spontaneous fission
  5. ^ # – Values marked # are not purely derived from experimental data, but at least partly from trends of neighboring nuclides (TNN).
  6. Not directly synthesized, occurs as decay product of Hs
  7. Not directly synthesized, occurs as decay product of Hs
  8. Not directly synthesized, occurs as decay product of Ds
  9. Not directly synthesized, occurs as decay product of Ds
  10. Not directly synthesized, occurs in the decay chain of Fl
  11. Not directly synthesized, occurs in the decay chain of Fl

Nucleosynthesis

Target Projectile CN Attempt result
Pb Cr Sg Successful reaction
Pb Cr Sg Successful reaction
Pb Cr Sg Failure to date
Pb Cr Sg Successful reaction
Bi V Sg Successful reaction
U Si Sg Successful reaction
Pu Mg Sg Reaction yet to be attempted
Cm Ne Sg Successful reaction
Cf O Sg Successful reaction

Cold fusion

This section deals with the synthesis of nuclei of seaborgium by so-called "cold" fusion reactions. These are processes that create compound nuclei at low excitation energy (~10–20 MeV, hence "cold"), leading to a higher probability of survival from fission. The excited nucleus then decays to the ground state via the emission of one or two neutrons only.

Pb(Cr,xn)Sg (x=1,2,3)

The first attempt to synthesise seaborgium in cold fusion reactions was performed in September 1974 by a Soviet team led by G. N. Flerov at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research at Dubna. They reported producing a 0.48 s spontaneous fission (SF) activity, which they assigned to the isotope Sg. Based on later evidence it was suggested that the team most likely measured the decay of Sg and its daughter Rf. The TWG concluded that, at the time, the results were insufficiently convincing.

The Dubna team revisited this problem in 1983–1984 and were able to detect a 5 ms SF activity assigned directly to Sg.

The team at GSI studied this reaction for the first time in 1985 using the improved method of correlation of genetic parent-daughter decays. They were able to detect Sg (x=1) and Sg and measured a partial 1n neutron evaporation excitation function.

In December 2000, the reaction was studied by a team at GANIL, France; they were able to detect 10 atoms of Sg and 2 atoms of Sg to add to previous data on the reaction.

After a facility upgrade, the GSI team measured the 1n excitation function in 2003 using a metallic lead target. Of significance, in May 2003, the team successfully replaced the lead-208 target with more resistant lead(II) sulfide targets (PbS), which will allow more intense beams to be used in the future. They were able to measure the 1n,2n and 3n excitation functions and performed the first detailed alpha-gamma spectroscopy on the isotope Sg. They detected ~1600 atoms of the isotope and identified new alpha lines as well as measuring a more accurate half-life and new EC and SF branchings. Furthermore, they were able to detect the K X-rays from the daughter rutherfordium isotope for the first time. They were also able to provide improved data for Sg, including the tentative observation of an isomeric level. The study was continued in September 2005 and March 2006. The accumulated work on Sg was published in 2007. Work in September 2005 also aimed to begin spectroscopic studies on Sg.

The team at the LBNL recently restudied this reaction in an effort to look at the spectroscopy of the isotope Sg. They were able to detect a new isomer, Sg, decaying by internal conversion into the ground state. In the same experiment, they were also able to confirm a K-isomer in the daughter Rf, namely Rf.

Pb(Cr,xn)Sg (x=1,2)

The team at Dubna also studied this reaction in 1974 with identical results as for their first experiments with a lead-208 target. The SF activities were first assigned to Sg and later to Sg and/or Rf. Further work in 1983–1984 also detected a 5 ms SF activity assigned to the parent Sg.

The GSI team studied this reaction for the first time in 1985 using the method of correlation of genetic parent-daughter decays. They were able to positively identify Sg as a product from the 2n neutron evaporation channel.

The reaction was further used in March 2005 using PbS targets to begin a spectroscopic study of the even-even isotope Sg.

Pb(Cr,xn)Sg

This reaction was studied in 1974 by the team at Dubna. It was used to assist them in their assignment of the observed SF activities in reactions using Pb-207 and Pb-208 targets. They were unable to detect any SF, indicating the formation of isotopes decaying primarily by alpha decay.

Pb(Cr,xn)Sg (x=1,2)

The team at Dubna also studied this reaction in their series of cold fusion reactions performed in 1974. Once again they were unable to detect any SF activities. The reaction was revisited in 2006 by the team at LBNL as part of their studies on the effect of the isospin of the projectile and hence the mass number of the compound nucleus on the yield of evaporation residues. They were able to identify Sg and Sg in their measurement of the 1n excitation function.

Bi(V,xn)Sg (x=2)

The team at Dubna also studied this reaction in their series of cold fusion reactions performed in 1974. Once again they were unable to detect any SF activities. In 1994, the synthesis of seaborgium was revisited using this reaction by the GSI team, in order to study the new even-even isotope Sg. Ten atoms of Sg were detected and decayed by spontaneous fission.

Hot fusion

This section deals with the synthesis of nuclei of seaborgium by so-called "hot" fusion reactions. These are processes that create compound nuclei at high excitation energy (~40–50 MeV, hence "hot"), leading to a reduced probability of survival from fission and quasi-fission. The excited nucleus then decays to the ground state via the emission of 3–5 neutrons.

U(Si,xn)Sg (x=3,4,5,6)

This reaction was first studied by Japanese scientists at the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI) in 1998. They detected a spontaneous fission activity, which they tentatively assigned to the new isotope Sg or Db, formed by EC of Sg. In 2006, the teams at GSI and LBNL both studied this reaction using the method of correlation of genetic parent-daughter decays. The LBNL team measured an excitation function for the 4n,5n and 6n channels, whilst the GSI team were able to observe an additional 3n activity. Both teams were able to identify the new isotope Sg, which decayed with a short lifetime by spontaneous fission.

Cm(Ne,xn)Sg (x=4?,5)

In 1993, at Dubna, Yuri Lazarev and his team announced the discovery of long-lived Sg and Sg produced in the 4n and 5n channels of this nuclear reaction following the search for seaborgium isotopes suitable for a first chemical study. It was announced that Sg decayed by 8.57 MeV alpha-particle emission with a projected half-life of ~20 s, lending strong support to the stabilising effect of the Z = 108, N = 162 closed shells. This reaction was studied further in 1997 by a team at GSI and the yield, decay mode and half-lives for Sg and Sg have been confirmed, although there are still some discrepancies. In the synthesis of Hs (see hassium), Sg was found to undergo exclusively SF with a short half-life (TSF = 360 ms). It is possible that this is the ground state, (Sg) and that the other activity, produced directly, belongs to a high spin K-isomer, Sg, but further results are required to confirm this.

A recent re-evaluation of the decay characteristics of Sg and Sg has suggested that all decays to date in this reaction were in fact from Sg, which exists in two isomeric forms. The first, Sg has a principal alpha-line at 8.85 MeV and a calculated half-life of 8.9 s, while Sg has a decay energy of 8.70 MeV and a half-life of 16.2 s. Both isomeric levels are populated when produced directly. Data from the decay of Hs indicates that Sg is produced during the decay of Hs and that Sg decays into the shorter-lived Rf isotope. This contradicts the assignment of the long-lived alpha activity to Sg, instead suggesting that Sg undergoes fission in a short time.

Regardless of these assignments, the reaction has been successfully used in the recent attempts to study the chemistry of seaborgium (see below).

Cf(O,xn)Sg (x=4)

The synthesis of seaborgium was first realized in 1974 by the LBNL/LLNL team. In their discovery experiment, they were able to apply the new method of correlation of genetic parent-daughter decays to identify the new isotope Sg. In 1975, the team at Oak Ridge were able to confirm the decay data but were unable to identify coincident X-rays in order to prove that seaborgium was produced. In 1979, the team at Dubna studied the reaction by detection of SF activities. In comparison with data from Berkeley, they calculated a 70% SF branching for Sg. The original synthesis and discovery reaction was confirmed in 1994 by a different team at LBNL.

Decay products

Isotopes of seaborgium have also been observed in the decay of heavier elements. Observations to date are summarised in the table below:

Evaporation Residue Observed Sg isotope
Lv, Fl, Cn Sg
Fl Sg
Ds, Hs Sg
Ds, Hs Sg
Hs Sg
Cn, Ds, Hs Sg
Ds, Hs Sg
Ds Sg
Ds, Hs Sg
Hs Sg

Chronology of isotope discovery

Isotope Year discovered discovery reaction
Sg 1994 Bi(V,2n)
Sg 1985 Pb(Cr,2n)
Sg 1985 Pb(Cr,2n)
Sg 1985 Pb(Cr,n)
Sg 2009 Pb(Cr,n)
Sg 2001 Pb(Ni,n)
Sg 1974 Cf(O,4n)
Sg 1994 Pb(Ni,n)
Sg 2006 U(Si,4n)
Sg 1993 Cm(Ne,5n)
Sg 2004 Cm(Mg,4n)
Sg 2004 Cm(Mg,3n)
Sg 2024 Th(Ca,5n)
Sg 2022 Th(Ca,4n)
Sg 2010 Pu(Ca,5n)
Sg unknown
Sg 2003 Pu(Ca,3n)

Isomerism

Sg

Initial work identified an 8.63 MeV alpha-decaying activity with a half-life of ~21 s and assigned to the ground state of Sg. Later work identified a nuclide decaying by 8.52 and 8.77 MeV alpha emission with a half-life of ~21 s, which is unusual for an even-even nuclide. Recent work on the synthesis of Hs identified Sg decaying by SF with a short 360 ms half-life. The recent work on Cn and Hs has provided new information on the decay of Sg and Rf. This work suggested that the initial 8.77 MeV activity should be reassigned to Sg. Therefore, the current information suggests that the SF activity is the ground state and the 8.52 MeV activity is a high spin K-isomer. Further work is required to confirm these assignments. A recent re-evaluation of the data has suggested that the 8.52 MeV activity should be associated with Sg and that Sg only undergoes fission.

Sg

The recent direct synthesis of Sg resulted in four alpha-lines at 8.94, 8.84, 8.76 and 8.69 MeV with a half-life of 7.4 seconds. The observation of the decay of Sg from the decay of Cn and Hs indicated that the 8.69 MeV line may be associated with an isomeric level with an associated half-life of ~ 20 s. It is plausible that this level is causing confusion between assignments of Sg and Sg since both can decay to fissioning rutherfordium isotopes.

A recent re-evaluation of the data has indicated that there are indeed two isomers, one with a principal decay energy of 8.85 MeV with a half-life of 8.9 s, and a second isomer that decays with energy 8.70 MeV with a half-life of 16.2 s.

Sg

The discovery synthesis of Sg resulted in an alpha-line at 9.06 MeV. Observation of this nuclide by decay of Ds,Ds and Hs has confirmed an isomer decaying by 9.25 MeV alpha emission. The 9.06 MeV decay was also confirmed. The 9.06 MeV activity has been assigned to the ground state isomer with an associated half-life of 0.3 s. The 9.25 MeV activity has been assigned to an isomeric level decaying with a half-life of 0.9 s.

Recent work on the synthesis of Ds was resulted in some confusing data regarding the decay of Hs. In one such decay, Hs decayed to Sg, which decayed by alpha emission with a half-life of ~ 6 s. This activity has not yet been positively assigned to an isomer and further research is required.

Spectroscopic decay schemes

Sg

This is the currently accepted decay scheme for Sg from the study by Streicher et al. at GSI in 2003–2006

Retracted isotopes

Sg

In the claimed synthesis of Og in 1999 the isotope Sg was identified as a daughter product. It decayed by 8.74 MeV alpha emission with a half-life of 22 s. The claim was retracted in 2001. This isotope was finally created in 2010.

Chemical yields of isotopes

Cold fusion

The table below provides cross-sections and excitation energies for cold fusion reactions producing seaborgium isotopes directly. Data in bold represents maxima derived from excitation function measurements. + represents an observed exit channel.

Projectile Target CN 1n 2n 3n
Cr Pb Sg
Cr Pb Sg 4.23 nb, 13.0 MeV 500 pb 10 pb
V Bi Sg 38 pb, 21.5 MeV
Cr Pb Sg 281 pb, 11.0 MeV

Hot fusion

The table below provides cross-sections and excitation energies for hot fusion reactions producing seaborgium isotopes directly. Data in bold represents maxima derived from excitation function measurements. + represents an observed exit channel.

Projectile Target CN 3n 4n 5n 6n
Si U Sg + 9 pb, 40.0 ~ 80 pb, 51.0 MeV ~30 pb, 58.0 MeV
Ne Cm Sg ~25 pb ~250 pb
O Cf Sg +

References

  1. ^ Kondev, F. G.; Wang, M.; Huang, W. J.; Naimi, S.; Audi, G. (2021). "The NUBASE2020 evaluation of nuclear properties" (PDF). Chinese Physics C. 45 (3): 030001. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddae.
  2. ^ Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Shumeiko, M. V.; et al. (2023). "New isotope Ds and its decay products Hs and Sg from the Th + Ca reaction". Physical Review C. 108 (024611). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024611.
  3. ^ Ibadullayev, Dastan (2024). "Synthesis and study of the decay properties of isotopes of superheavy element Lv in Reactions U + Cr and Pu + Ti". jinr.ru. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research. Retrieved 2 November 2024.
  4. ^ Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Ibadullayev, D.; et al. (2022). "Investigation of Ca-induced reactions with Pu and U targets at the JINR Superheavy Element Factory". Physical Review C. 106 (24612). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024612. S2CID 251759318.
  5. Antalic, S.; Heßberger, F. P.; Ackermann, D.; Heinz, S.; Hofmann, S.; Kindler, B.; Khuyagbaatar, J.; Lommel, B.; Mann, R. (14 April 2015). "Nuclear isomers in 259Sg and 255Rf". The European Physical Journal A. 51 (4): 41. Bibcode:2015EPJA...51...41A. doi:10.1140/epja/i2015-15041-0. ISSN 1434-601X. S2CID 254117522. Retrieved 2 July 2023.
  6. Haba, H.; Kaji, D.; Kudou, Y.; Morimoto, K.; Morita, K.; Ozeki, K.; Sakai, R.; Sumita, T.; Yoneda, A.; Kasamatsu, Y.; Komori, Y.; Shinohara, A.; Kikunaga, H.; Kudo, H.; Nishio, K.; Ooe, K.; Sato, N.; Tsukada, K. (21 February 2012). "Production of ${}^{265}$Sg in the ${}^{248}$Cm(${}^{22}$Ne,5$n$)${}^{265}$Sg reaction and decay properties of two isomeric states in ${}^{265}$Sg". Physical Review C. 85 (2): 024611. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.024611. Retrieved 2 July 2023.
  7. Dvorak, J.; Brüchle, W.; Chelnokov, M.; Düllmann, Ch. E.; Dvorakova, Z.; Eberhardt, K.; Jäger, E.; Krücken, R.; Kuznetsov, A.; Nagame, Y.; Nebel, F.; Nishio, K.; Perego, R.; Qin, Z.; Schädel, M.; Schausten, B.; Schimpf, E.; Schuber, R.; Semchenkov, A.; Thörle, P.; Türler, A.; Wegrzecki, M.; Wierczinski, B.; Yakushev, A.; Yeremin, A. (3 April 2008). "Observation of the 3n Evaporation Channel in the Complete Hot-Fusion Reaction 26Mg+248Cm Leading to the New Superheavy Nuclide 271Hs". Physical Review Letters. 100 (13): 132503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.132503. PMID 18517941. Retrieved 2 July 2023.
  8. ^ Oganessian, Yu. Ts.; Utyonkov, V. K.; Shumeiko, M. V.; et al. (6 May 2024). "Synthesis and decay properties of isotopes of element 110: Ds 273 and Ds 275". Physical Review C. 109 (5): 054307. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.054307. ISSN 2469-9985. Retrieved 11 May 2024.
  9. ^ Barber, R. C.; Greenwood, N. N.; Hrynkiewicz, A. Z.; Jeannin, Y. P.; Lefort, M.; Sakai, M.; Ulehla, I.; Wapstra, A. P.; Wilkinson, D. H. (1993). "Discovery of the transfermium elements. Part II: Introduction to discovery profiles. Part III: Discovery profiles of the transfermium elements (Note: for Part I see Pure Appl. Chem., Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 879–886, 1991)". Pure and Applied Chemistry. 65 (8): 1757. doi:10.1351/pac199365081757. S2CID 195819585.
  10. ^ Münzenberg, G.; Hofmann, S.; Folger, H.; Heßberger, F. P.; Keller, J.; Poppensieker, K.; Quint, B.; Reisdorf, W.; et al. (1985). "The isotopes 106,106, and 106". Zeitschrift für Physik A. 322 (2): 227–235. Bibcode:1985ZPhyA.322..227M. doi:10.1007/BF01411887. S2CID 101992619.
  11. Streicher, B.; Antalic, S.; Aro, S. S.; Venhart, M.; Hessberger, F. P.; Hofmann, S.; Ackermann, D.; Kindler, B.; Kojouharov, I.; et al. (2007). "Alpha-Gamma Decay Studies of Sg". Acta Physica Polonica B. 38 (4): 1561. Bibcode:2007AcPPB..38.1561S.
  12. Berryman, J. S.; Clark, R.; Gregorich, K.; Allmond, J.; Bleuel, D.; Cromaz, M.; Dragojević, I.; Dvorak, J.; Ellison, P.; Fallon, P.; Garcia, M. A.; Gros, S.; Lee, I. Y.; Macchiavelli, A. O.; Nitsche, H.; Paschalis, S.; Petri, M.; Qian, J.; Stoyer, M. A.; Wiedeking, M. (2010). "Electromagnetic decays of excited states in Sg (Z=106) and Rf (Z=104)". Physical Review C. 81 (6): 064325. Bibcode:2010PhRvC..81f4325B. doi:10.1103/PHYSREVC.81.064325.
  13. "Measurement of the Pb(Cr,n)Sg Excitation Function", Folden et al., LBNL Annual Report 2005. Retrieved 2008-02-29
  14. Ikezoe, H.; Ikuta, T.; Mitsuoka, S.; Nishinaka, I.; Tsukada, K.; Ohtsuki, T.; Kuzumaki, T.; Nagame, Y.; Lu, J. (1998). "First evidence for a new spontaneous fission decay produced in the reaction Si +U". The European Physical Journal A. 2 (4): 379–382. Bibcode:1998EPJA....2..379I. doi:10.1007/s100500050134. S2CID 121680462.
  15. "Production of seaborgium isotopes in the reaction of Si + U" Archived 2009-02-25 at the Wayback Machine, Nishio et al., GSI Annual Report 2006. Retrieved on 2008-02-29
  16. Nishio, K.; Hofmann, S.; Heßberger, F. P.; Ackermann, D.; Antalic, S.; Comas, V. F.; Gan, Z.; Heinz, S.; et al. (2006). "Measurement of evaporation residue cross-sections of the reaction Si + U at subbarrier energies". The European Physical Journal A. 29 (3): 281–287. Bibcode:2006EPJA...29..281N. doi:10.1140/epja/i2006-10091-y. S2CID 121653276.
  17. "New isotope Sg and decay properties of Sg", Gregorich et al., LBNL repositories. Retrieved 2008-02-29
  18. Lazarev, Yu. A.; Lobanov, YV; Oganessian, YT; Utyonkov, VK; Abdullin, FS; Buklanov, GV; Gikal, BN; Iliev, S; et al. (1994). "Discovery of Enhanced Nuclear Stability near the Deformed Shells N=162 and Z=108". Physical Review Letters. 73 (5): 624–627. Bibcode:1994PhRvL..73..624L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.624. PMID 10057496.
  19. ^ Ghiorso, A., Nitschke, J. M., Alonso, J. R., Alonso, C. T., Nurmia, M., Seaborg, G. T., Hulet, E. K., Lougheed, R. W.; Nitschke; Alonso; Alonso; Nurmia; Seaborg; Hulet; Lougheed (1974). "Element 106". Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (25): 1490–1493. Bibcode:1974PhRvL..33.1490G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.33.1490.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  20. Gregorich, K. E.; Lane, MR; Mohar, MF; Lee, DM; Kacher, CD; Sylwester, ER; Hoffman, DC (1994). "First confirmation of the discovery of element 106". Physical Review Letters. 72 (10): 1423–1426. Bibcode:1994PhRvL..72.1423G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1423. PMID 10055605. S2CID 32580307.
Isotopes of the chemical elements
Group 1 2   3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Period Hydrogen and
alkali metals
Alkaline
earth metals
Pnicto­gens Chal­co­gens Halo­gens Noble gases
Isotopes § ListH1 Isotopes § ListHe2
Isotopes § ListLi3 Isotopes § ListBe4 Isotopes § ListB5 Isotopes § ListC6 Isotopes § ListN7 Isotopes § ListO8 Isotopes § ListF9 Isotopes § ListNe10
Isotopes § ListNa11 Isotopes § ListMg12 Isotopes § ListAl13 Isotopes § ListSi14 Isotopes § ListP15 Isotopes § ListS16 Isotopes § ListCl17 Isotopes § ListAr18
Isotopes § ListK19 Isotopes § ListCa20 Isotopes § ListSc21 Isotopes § ListTi22 Isotopes § ListV23 Isotopes § ListCr24 Isotopes § ListMn25 Isotopes § ListFe26 Isotopes § ListCo27 Isotopes § ListNi28 Isotopes § ListCu29 Isotopes § ListZn30 Isotopes § ListGa31 Isotopes § ListGe32 Isotopes § ListAs33 Isotopes § ListSe34 Isotopes § ListBr35 Isotopes § ListKr36
Isotopes § ListRb37 Isotopes § ListSr38 Isotopes § ListY39 Isotopes § ListZr40 Isotopes § ListNb41 Isotopes § ListMo42 Isotopes § ListTc43 Isotopes § ListRu44 Isotopes § ListRh45 Isotopes § ListPd46 Isotopes § ListAg47 Isotopes § ListCd48 Isotopes § ListIn49 Isotopes § ListSn50 Isotopes § ListSb51 Isotopes § ListTe52 Isotopes § ListI53 Isotopes § ListXe54
Isotopes § ListCs55 Isotopes § ListBa56 1 asterisk Isotopes § ListLu71 Isotopes § ListHf72 Isotopes § ListTa73 Isotopes § ListW74 Isotopes § ListRe75 Isotopes § ListOs76 Isotopes § ListIr77 Isotopes § ListPt78 Isotopes § ListAu79 Isotopes § ListHg80 Isotopes § ListTl81 Isotopes § ListPb82 Isotopes § ListBi83 Isotopes § ListPo84 Isotopes § ListAt85 Isotopes § ListRn86
Isotopes § ListFr87 Isotopes § ListRa88 1 asterisk Isotopes § ListLr103 Isotopes § ListRf104 Isotopes § ListDb105 Isotopes § ListSg106 Isotopes § ListBh107 Isotopes § ListHs108 Isotopes § ListMt109 Isotopes § ListDs110 Isotopes § ListRg111 Isotopes § ListCn112 Isotopes § ListNh113 Isotopes § ListFl114 Isotopes § ListMc115 Isotopes § ListLv116 Isotopes § ListTs117 Isotopes § ListOg118
Isotopes § ListUue119 Isotopes § ListUbn120
1 asterisk Isotopes § ListLa57 Isotopes § ListCe58 Isotopes § ListPr59 Isotopes § ListNd60 Isotopes § ListPm61 Isotopes § ListSm62 Isotopes § ListEu63 Isotopes § ListGd64 Isotopes § ListTb65 Isotopes § ListDy66 Isotopes § ListHo67 Isotopes § ListEr68 Isotopes § ListTm69 Isotopes § ListYb70  
1 asterisk Isotopes § ListAc89 Isotopes § ListTh90 Isotopes § ListPa91 Isotopes § ListU92 Isotopes § ListNp93 Isotopes § ListPu94 Isotopes § ListAm95 Isotopes § ListCm96 Isotopes § ListBk97 Isotopes § ListCf98 Isotopes § ListEs99 Isotopes § ListFm100 Isotopes § ListMd101 Isotopes § ListNo102
Categories: