Misplaced Pages

Shoemaker v. United States

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

1893 United States Supreme Court case
Shoemaker v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 28โ€“29, 1892
Decided January 18, 1893
Full case nameShoemaker v. United States
Citations147 U.S. 282 (more)
Holding
Congress may increase the duties of an existing office without rendering it necessary that the incumbent again be appointed as long as the new duties are germane to those the office already holds.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Melville Fuller
Associate Justices
Stephen J. Field · John M. Harlan
Horace Gray · Samuel Blatchford
Lucius Q. C. Lamar II · David J. Brewer
Henry B. Brown · George Shiras Jr.
Case opinion
MajorityShiras, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. art. II, ยง 2, cl. 2

Shoemaker v. United States, 147 U.S. 282 (1893), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States on the United States Constitution's Appointments Clause. The Court declared Congress may expand the duties of an existing office without rendering it necessary that the incumbent again be nominated, confirmed and appointed as long as the new duties are "germane" to those already held by the office.

See also

Notes and references

  1. Shoemaker v. United States, 147 U.S. 282 (1893)

External links

United States Appointments Clause case law
Appointment of Officers
Officers vs. Employees
Inferior Officers
Recess Appointments
Challenges to Appointments
Appointments by Congress
Removal of Officers
Limits on Removal Power
Removal by Congress
Jurisdiction stripping
Ratification


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: