Misplaced Pages

Wiener v. United States

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

1958 United States Supreme Court case
Wiener v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 18, 1957
Decided June 30, 1958
Full case nameWiener v. United States
Citations357 U.S. 349 (more)
Holding
The Appointments Clause does not guarantee the President may remove at will an officer of the United States who exercises quasi-judicial authority
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas · Harold H. Burton
Tom C. Clark · John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan Jr. · Charles E. Whittaker
Case opinion
MajorityFrankfurter, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. art. II, ยง 2, cl. 2

Wiener v. United States, 357 U.S. 349 (1958), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Appointments Clause does not guarantee the President may remove at will an officer of the United States who exercises quasi-judicial authority.

References

External links

United States Appointments Clause case law
Appointment of Officers
Officers vs. Employees
Inferior Officers
Recess Appointments
Challenges to Appointments
Appointments by Congress
Removal of Officers
Limits on Removal Power
Removal by Congress
Jurisdiction stripping
Ratification


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: