Misplaced Pages

Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:20, 2 January 2015 view sourceFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,181 editsm Reverted edits by 95.220.133.212 (talk) to last version by Toddy1← Previous edit Revision as of 02:10, 24 December 2024 view source Citation bot (talk | contribs)Bots5,406,761 edits Removed parameters. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | #UCB_CommandLineNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|2014 annexation of Ukrainian territory}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2014}}
{{For|more details|Russian occupation of Crimea}}
{{Infobox event
{{Pp-move}}
| title = <!-- Title to display, if other than page name -->
{{pp-extended|small=yes}}
| image = Putin with Vladimir Konstantinov, Sergey Aksyonov and Alexey Chaly 4.jpeg
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2022}}
| caption = From left to right: ], ], ] and ] sign the "Restitution of Crimea and Sevastopol inside the Russian Federation" treaty on 18 March 2014
{{Use American English|date=March 2020}}
| date = 18 March—21 March 2014<br>(Treaty signing to ratification)
{{Infobox military conflict
| place = ]<!-- intervention and referendum --><br />], ]<!-- treaty -->
| conflict = Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation
| coordinates = <!-- {{coord|LAT|LON|region:XXXX_type:event|display=inline,title}} -->
| partof = the ]
| also known as = Incorporation of Crimea into Russia<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/29/crimea-moscow-time_n_5056293.html|title=Crimea Switches To Moscow Time|work=The Huffington Post}}</ref><br />Accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation<ref>{{cite web|url=http://english.pravda.ru/russia/politics/18-03-2014/127129-russia_crimea_unite-0/|title=Russia takes Crimea back|work=English pravda.ru}}</ref>
| image = ]
| participants = {{flag|Russia}}<hr />{{flagicon image|Flag of Crimea.svg}} ]
| caption = ] signs the treaty of accession with Russian-installed Crimean leaders in ], 18 March 2014
| outcome = * ] becomes the ], one of ]
| date = {{Bulleted list|Annexation: 18 March 2014|Military operation: 27 February{{NoteTag|There are "some contradictions and inherent problems" regarding the date on which the Russian operation began.<ref name="Disunited">{{Cite book|last=McDermott|first=Roger N.|title=The Return of the Cold War: Ukraine, the West and Russia|year=2016|isbn=978-1-138-92409-3|editor-last=Black|editor-first=J.L.|location=London|publisher=Routledge|pages=99–129|chapter=Brothers Disunited: Russia's use of military power in Ukraine|doi=10.4324/9781315684567-5|oclc=909325250|editor-last2=Johns|editor-first2=Michael|chapter-url=https://www.academia.edu/11853815}}</ref> The Ukrainian Government maintains, and the ] agrees, that Russia controlled Crimea from 27 February 2014,<ref>{{cite web|title=Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (decision)|url=https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=002-13090|publisher=]|date=January 2021|quote=The Ukrainian Government maintains that the Russian Federation has from 27 February 2014 exercised effective control over the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol ... There was sufficient evidence that during the relevant period the respondent State had exercised effective control over Crimea.}}</ref> when unmarked Russian special forces took control of its political institutions.<ref>{{cite book|last1=Sasse|first1=Gwendolyn|title=Russia's War Against Ukraine|date=2023|publisher=Wiley & Sons|page=2004|quote=Russia's war against Ukraine began with the annexation of Crimea on 27 February 2014. On that day, Russian special forces without any uniform insignia appeared in Crimea, quickly taking control of strategic, military and political institutions.}}</ref> The Russian Government later made 27 February "Special Operations Forces Day".<ref>{{cite book|last1=DeBenedictis|first1=Kent|title=Russian 'Hybrid Warfare' and the Annexation of Crimea|date=2022|publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing|page=140|quote=During the night of 26–27 February, Russian special forces without insignia departed Sevastopol ... They arrived at the Crimean Rada and Council of Ministers buildings in Simferopol, disarmed the security and took control of the buildings ... Putin later signed a decree designating 27 February as Special Operations Forces Day in Russia.}}</ref> In 2015, the ] officially designated 20 February 2014 as "the beginning of the ]",<ref>{{cite web|title='Няша' Поклонська обіцяє бійцям 'Беркута' покарати учасників Майдану|url=https://www.segodnya.ua/ua/regions/krym/nyasha-poklonskaya-obeshchaet-boycam-berkuta-nakazat-uchastnikov-maydana-700800.html|access-date=3 February 2022|website=www.segodnya.ua|language=uk}}</ref> citing the date inscribed on the Russian ].<ref>{{cite web|title=7683rd meeting of the United Nations Security Council. Thursday, 28 April 2016, 3 p.m. New York|url=https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/PV.7683&Lang=E|quote=Mr. Prystaiko (Ukraine): I have to remind the Council that the official medal that was produced by the Russian Federation for the so-called return of Crimea has the dates on it, starting with 20 February, which is the day before that agreement was brought to the attention of the Security Council by the representative of the Russian Federation. Therefore, the Russian Federation started – not just planned, but started – the annexation of Crimea the day before we reached the first agreement and while President Yanukovych was still in power.}}</ref> In 2018, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed that the earlier "start date" on the medal was due to a "technical misunderstanding".<ref>{{cite web|title=Russia's Orwellian 'diplomacy'|url=https://www.unian.info/politics/2347252-two-headed-orwell.html|access-date=30 January 2019|website=unian.info}}</ref> President Putin stated in a ] that he ordered the operation to "restore" Crimea to Russia following an all-night emergency meeting on 22–23 February 2014.<ref name="Disunited" /><ref name="auto">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-31796226|title=Putin reveals secrets of Russia's Crimea takeover plot|website=BBC News|date=9 March 2015}}</ref><ref name="auto2">{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/09/vladimir-putin-describes-secret-meeting-when-russia-decided-to-seize-crimea|title=Vladimir Putin describes secret meeting when Russia decided to seize Crimea|newspaper=The Guardian|agency=Agence France-Presse|date=9 March 2015|access-date=14 April 2016}}</ref>}}{{spaces}}– 26 March 2014<ref>{{cite book|url = https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1400/RR1498/RAND_RR1498.pdf|title = Lessons from Russia's Operations in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine.|first=Michael|last=Kofman|year=2017|publisher=RAND Corporation|isbn=978-0-8330-9617-3|location=Santa Monica|oclc=990544142|quote = By March 26, the annexation was essentially complete, and Russia began returning seized military hardware to Ukraine.}}</ref>}}
* ] becomes ]
* ] over ] | place = ]
| result = Russian victory
| blank_label = ] ratified
| blank_data = {{start date|2014|03|21|df=yes}} | combatant1 = {{ubl|'''{{flag|Russia}}'''}}
| combatant2 = {{ubl|'''{{flag|Ukraine}}'''}}
| blank1_label = Finalization
| commander1 = {{ubl|{{flagicon|Russia}} ''']'''|{{flagicon|Russia}} ]|{{flagicon|Russia}} ]|{{flagicon|Russia}} ]|{{flagicon|Russia}} ]|{{flagicon|Russia}} ]|{{flagicon|Russia}} ]|{{flagicon|Republic of Crimea}} ]|{{flagicon|Republic of Crimea}} ]|{{flagicon|Republic of Crimea}} ]|{{flagicon|Republic of Crimea}} ]|{{flagicon|Sevastopol}} ]}}
| blank1_data = {{end date|2015|01|01|df=yes}}
| commander2 = {{ubl|{{flagicon|Ukraine}} ''']'''|{{flagicon|Ukraine}} ]|{{flagicon|Ukraine}} ]|{{flagicon|Ukraine}} ]|{{flagicon|Ukraine}} ]|{{flagicon|Ukraine}} ]|{{flagicon|Ukraine}} ]|{{flagicon|Ukraine}} ]|{{flagicon|Autonomous Republic of Crimea}} ]|{{flagicon|Autonomous Republic of Crimea}} ]|] ]|] ]}}
| blank2_label = Status
| strength1 = '''Protesters'''
| blank2_data = disputed by ]; not recognized by the majority of the ] members
* {{nowrap|20,000 (])<ref name=MTS25214>{{cite news|url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/02/24/russian-citizen-elected-sevastopol-mayor-amid-pro-moscow-protests-in-crimea-a32401|title=Russian Citizen Elected Sevastopol Mayor Amid Pro-Moscow Protests in Crimea|work=]|date=24 February 2014}}</ref><ref name="EN25214">{{cite news|url=http://www.euronews.com/2014/02/25/ukraine-leader-turchynov-warns-of-danger-of-separatism/|title=Ukraine leader Turchynov warns of 'danger of separatism'|publisher=]|date=25 February 2014|access-date=10 March 2015|archive-date=4 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304073813/http://www.euronews.com/2014/02/25/ukraine-leader-turchynov-warns-of-danger-of-separatism/}}</ref>}}
* 10,000 (])<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.straitstimes.com/world/russian-flags-flood-crimean-capital-as-thousands-back-takeover-by-russia|title=Russian flags flood Crimean capital as thousands back takeover by Russia|work=]|date=9 March 2014|access-date=9 March 2014}}</ref>

'''Volunteer units'''<ref name="EN25214" /><ref name="WPC25214">{{cite news|url=http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/local/story/2014/feb/25/pro-russian-rally-crimea-decries-kiev-bandits/132770/|title=Pro-Russian rally in Crimea decries Kiev 'bandits'|newspaper=]|date=25 February 2014}}</ref>
* 5,000 (Sevastopol)
* 1,700 (Simferopol)

'''Russian military forces'''
* 20,000–30,000 troops<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.smh.com.au/world/russia-closing-door-on-crimea-as-troops-build-up-20140312-hvi0c.html|title=Russia closing door on Crimea as troops build up|last=Pollard|first=Ruth|date=13 March 2014|work=The Sydney Morning Herald|access-date=12 March 2014}}</ref>
| strength2 = '''Protesters'''
* 4,000–10,000 (Simferopol)<ref name="pRoCRU">{{cite news|url=http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/192882.html|title=Crimean Tatars, pro-Russia supporters approach Crimean parliament building|place=UA|agency=Interfax|date=20 October 2012}}</ref><ref name=guardian226>{{cite news|title=Russia puts military on high alert as Crimea protests leave one man dead|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/26/ukraine-new-leader-disbands-riot-police-crimea-separatism|work=The Guardian|date=26 February 2014|access-date=27 February 2014}}</ref>

{{nowrap|'''Ukrainian military forces'''}}
* {{nowrap|5,000–22,000 troops<ref>{{cite web|author=Ewen MacAskill, defence correspondent|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/28/ukraine-military-russia-crimea|title=Ukraine military still a formidable force despite being dwarfed by neighbour|newspaper=The Guardian|date=28 February 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url = https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=285549287|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140305005529/http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=285549287|archive-date=5 March 2014|title = Putin Talks Tough But Cools Tensions Over Ukraine|publisher=]|date=4 March 2014|access-date=19 March 2014}}</ref>}}
* 40,000 reservists, partly mobilised (outside Crimea)<ref>{{cite news|last=Faiola|first=Anthony|title=Ukraine mobilizes reservists but relies on diplomacy|url = https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/ukraine-activates-reserves-pledges-military-build-up-after-crimea-vote/2014/03/17/aa707502-adc1-11e3-96dc-d6ea14c099f9_story.html|access-date=24 March 2014|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=17 March 2014}}</ref>
| casualties1 = 1 Crimean SDF trooper killed<ref>{{cite news|author1=Heather Saul|author2=Kim Sengupta|url = https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-crisis-pro-russian-troops-storm-naval-base-as-clinton-warns-of-aggression-from-putin-9201317.html|title = Ukraine crisis: Pro-Russian troops storm naval base as Clinton warns of 'aggression' from Putin|newspaper=]|date=19 March 2014|access-date=24 March 2015}}</ref>
| casualties2 = {{plainlist|
* 2 soldiers killed<ref>{{cite news|url = https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-military-idUSBREA360GB20140407|title = Russian marine kills Ukraine navy officer in Crimea, says ministry|work=Reuters|access-date=2 October 2014}}</ref>
* 60–80 soldiers detained<ref>{{cite news|title = Ukraine military to pull out from Crimea|url = http://www.thesudburystar.com/2014/03/24/russian-troops-seize-ukraine-marine-base-in-crimea|access-date=24 March 2014|newspaper=The Sudbury Star|date=24 March 2014|author1=Aleksander Vasovic|author2=Gabriela Baczynska|agency=Reuters}}</ref>
* 9,268 military servicemen and 7,050 civilian employees defected<ref>{{cite web|url = https://tass.com/russia/727904|title = Russia employs over 16,000 former servicemen and personnel of Ukrainian armed forces|date=15 April 2014|agency=TASS|access-date=6 April 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url = http://new-sebastopol.com/news/flot/Bivshie_ukrainskie_voennoslugashchie_vlivayutsya_v_Voorugennie_Sili_RF|title = Бывшие украинские военнослужащие вливаются в Вооруженные Силы РФ|date=25 April 2014|website=Novyy Sevastopol (new-sebastopol.com)|trans-title = Former Ukrainian military join the Russian Armed Forces|access-date=6 April 2020}}</ref>}}
| casualties3 = 2 civilian deaths (during the protests),<ref name="RallyDeaths">{{cite news|url = http://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/ukraine/two-die-in-rallies-outside-crimean-parliament-says-ex-head-of-mejlis-337708.html|title = Two die in rallies outside Crimean parliament, says ex-head of Mejlis|newspaper=]|access-date=27 February 2014|date=26 February 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title = Unrest in Crimea leaves 2 dead; government buildings seized|url = http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2014/02/27/Unrest-in-Crimea-leaves-2-dead-government-buildings-seized/6371393516263/|author=JC Finley|work=]|date=27 February 2014|access-date=9 March 2014}}</ref> ]<ref>{{cite web|url = http://society.lb.ua/life/2014/03/17/259752_pogibshiy_krimskiy_tatarin_shel.html|script-title=ru:Погибший крымский татарин шел в военкомат, захваченный 'дружинниками'|trans-title=The deceased was a Crimean Tatar on his way to enlist when he was captured "vigilantes"|language=ru|website=LB.ua|date=17 March 2014|access-date=24 March 2015|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140318050317/http://society.lb.ua/life/2014/03/17/259752_pogibshiy_krimskiy_tatarin_shel.html|archive-date=18 March 2014}}</ref><ref name="censor">{{cite web|url = http://censor.net.ua/news/276351/zverski_ubitogo_krymskogo_tatarina_zvali_reshat_ametov_troe_maloletnih_deteyi_osiroteli_foto|script-title=ru:Зверски убитого крымского татарина звали Решат Аметов. Трое малолетних детей осиротели.|trans-title = Brutally murdered Crimean Tatar's name was Reshat Ametov. Three toddlers left orphaned.|language=ru|website=censor.net.ua|date=18 March 2014|access-date=3 April 2014}}</ref> (by Crimean SDF under command of a ])<ref> (''tr. "FSB and Crimean "losses""'') — RFEL, 13 June 2016</ref><ref> . Prosecutor's office of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol city, 10 September 2019</ref>
| units1 = '''Based in Crimea,<br />elements of'''<ref name=galeotti>{{cite book|last=Galeotti|first=Mark|title=Armies of Russia's War in Ukraine|publisher=Osprey Publishing|year=2019|isbn=978-1-4728-3344-0|series = Elite 228|location=Oxford|pages=11–12}}</ref>{{rp|11–12}}

Navy
* 510th Naval Inf Bde (Feodosiia)
* 810th Naval Inf Bde (Simferopol)

'''Deployed to Crimea, elements of'''

Ground Forces
* ] (Grozny)
* 291st Artillery Bde (Troitskaya)

(GRU command)
* ] (Tolyatti)
* 10th Spetsnaz Bde (Krasnodar)
* 16th Spetsnaz Bde (Tambov)
* ] (Stepnoy)
* 25th Spetsnaz Rgt (Stavropol)
* ]<br />(Kubinka, Moscow)

Airborne
* ] (Novorossiysk)
* ]<br />(Ulyanovsk)

Navy
* 382nd Naval Inf Bn (Temryuk)
* 727th Naval Inf Bn (Astrakhan)

Special Operations Forces
* ] (Prokhladny)
| units2 = '''Armed forces'''<ref name=galeotti />{{rp|11–12}}

Navy
* ] (at Perevalne)
** ] (Feodosiia)
** 56th Gds Bn (Sevastopol)
** ] (Kerch)
* 406th Artillery Bde (Simferopol)
* 37th Comms and Control Rgt (Sevastopol)
* ]<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141110175733/http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/03/22/7019918/ |date=10 November 2014 }}</ref>

'''Paramilitary'''

Interior troops
* 9th Bde (Simferopol)
* 15th Bn (Yevpatoriia)
* 18th Spec Mot Militia Bn (Haspra)
* 42nd Operational Rgt (Sevastopol)
* 47th Bde (Feodosiia)

Border guards
* Special-Purpose Border Guard Bn (Yalta)
}} }}
The '''] of Crimea by the Russian Federation''' was the March 2014 incorporation of most of the ], internationally recognized as part of ], by the ]. Starting 21 March 2014, Russia effectively administers ] as two ]—the ] and the ] of ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/724785|title=Putin signs laws on reunification of Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol with Russia|publisher=]|date=21 March 2014 |accessdate=21 March 2014}}</ref>


In February and March 2014, ] invaded the ], part of ], and then ] it. This took place in the relative ]<ref>, page 19, published by ] in 2017. "Ukraine's government was in transition following the ouster of Yanukovych. As a result, it did not react to the Russian operation when launched. Russia's task was made relatively easy by the confusion and chaos that generally follows an uprising, such as what happened in Kyiv. Moscow capitalized on the tensions and uncertainty in Crimea, as well as on the inexperience of Ukraine's provisional government. Meeting notes of the discussion among Ukrainian leadership reveal a great deal of anxiety, uncertainty, and unwillingness to take action for fear of escalation."</ref> immediately following the ]. It marked the beginning of the ].
The annexation occurred at culmination point in the ], caused by a ] into the ] and the city of ], both administrative divisions of Ukraine, earlier in March. ], identified as the ] by multiple worldwide sources, took over the ],<ref name=time1>{{cite news|url=http://time.com/19097/putin-crimea-russia-ukraine-aksyonov/|publisher=Time|title=Putin's Man in Crimea Is Ukraine's Worst Nightmare|quote="Before dawn on Feb. 27, at least two dozen heavily armed men stormed the Crimean parliament building and the nearby headquarters of the regional government, bringing with them a cache of assault rifles and rocket propelled grenades. A few hours later, Aksyonov walked into the parliament and, after a brief round of talks with the gunmen, began to gather a quorum of the chamber's lawmakers."}}</ref><ref name=reuters1>{{cite news |title=RPT-INSIGHT-How the separatists delivered Crimea to Moscow |url=http://in.reuters.com/article/2014/03/13/ukraine-crisis-russia-aksyonov-idINL6N0M93AH20140313 |newspaper=Reuters |date=March 13, 2014|quote=Only a week after gunmen planted the Russian flag on the local parliament, Aksyonov and his allies held another vote and declared parliament was appealing to Putin to annex Crimea}}</ref> which led to the installation of the pro-]n ] government in Crimea, the declaration of ] and the holding of a disputed, majorly unconstitutional ], that was described by ] reporter ] as a "remarkable, quick and mostly bloodless ]".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26644082|title=BBC News - Russia's Crimea plan detailed, secret and successful|work=BBC News}}</ref>

The ] that ousted Ukrainian president ] on 22 February 2014 sparked pro-Russian and anti-separatism<ref>{{cite news |title=Parliament of ARC is doing everything possible to separate Crimea from Ukraine, Chubarov said. |url=http://www.ukrinform.ua/ukr/news/parlament_ark_robit_use_moglive_dlya_vidtorgnennya_krimu_vid_ukraiini___chubarov_1912708 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150621105531/http://www.ukrinform.ua/ukr/news/parlament_ark_robit_use_moglive_dlya_vidtorgnennya_krimu_vid_ukraiini___chubarov_1912708 |archive-date=21 June 2015}}</ref> ]. At the same time, Russian president ] discussed Ukrainian events with security chiefs, remarking that "we must start working on returning Crimea to Russia". On 27 February, ]<ref>{{Cite news|last=Weaver|first=Courtney|date=15 March 2015|title=Putin was ready to put nuclear weapons on alert in Crimea crisis|work=]|url=https://www.ft.com/content/41873ed2-cb60-11e4-8ad9-00144feab7de|url-access=subscription|access-date=23 January 2022|archive-url=https://archive.today/20210211231429/https://www.ft.com/content/41873ed2-cb60-11e4-8ad9-00144feab7de|archive-date=11 February 2021|url-status=live}}</ref> seized strategic sites across Crimea.<ref name="time1">{{cite news|url=https://time.com/19097/putin-crimea-russia-ukraine-aksyonov/|title=Putin's Man in Crimea Is Ukraine's Worst Nightmare|author=Simon Shuster|date=10 March 2014|magazine=Time|access-date=8 March 2015|quote=Before dawn on Feb.{{spaces}}27, at least two dozen heavily armed men stormed the Crimean parliament building and the nearby headquarters of the regional government, bringing with them a cache of assault rifles and rocket propelled grenades. A few hours later, Aksyonov walked into the parliament and, after a brief round of talks with the gunmen, began to gather a quorum of the chamber's lawmakers.}}</ref><ref name="reuters1">{{cite news|last=De Carbonnel|first=Alissa|date=13 March 2014|title=RPT-INSIGHT-How the separatists delivered Crimea to Moscow|work=]|url=https://reuters.com/article/ukraine-crisis-russia-aksyonov-idINL6N0M93AH20140313|access-date=8 March 2015|quote=Only a week after gunmen planted the Russian flag on the local parliament, Aksyonov and his allies held another vote and declared parliament was appealing to Putin to annex Crimea}}</ref> Although Russia at first denied its military involvement,<ref name="auto1">{{cite web|last1=Baczynska|first1=Gabriela|last2=Toyer|first2=Julien|date=5 March 2014|editor-last=Gutterman|editor-first=Steve|title=Russia says cannot order Crimean 'self-defense' units back to base.|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-lavrov-spain-idUSBREA240NF20140305|website=]}}</ref> Putin later admitted that troops were deployed to "stand behind Crimea's self-defence forces".<ref name="revea">{{cite news|title=Putin reveals secrets of Russia's Crimea takeover plot|work=BBC News|date=9 March 2015|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-31796226|access-date=9 March 2015}}<br />{{cite news|last1=Soldatkin|first1=Vladimir|last2=Stamp|first2=David|date=9 March 2014|title=Putin says plan to take Crimea hatched before referendum|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-putin-crimea-idUSKBN0M51DG20150309|work=Reuters|access-date=10 March 2015}}</ref> As Russian troops ], it dismissed the ], installed the pro-Russian ] government, and announced a ]. The referendum was held ] and, according to the Russian-installed authorities, the result was overwhelmingly in favor of joining Russia. The next day, 17 March 2014, Crimea's authorities ] and requested to join Russia.<ref name="Washington Post" /><ref name="zakon">{{cite web|url=http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/891-18|script-title=uk:Про дострокове припинення повноважень Верховної Ради Автономної Республіки Крим|trans-title=On the dissolution of the Verkhovna Rada of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea|language=uk|website=Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine|date=15 March 2014}}</ref> Russia formally incorporated Crimea on 18 March 2014 as the ] and ] of ].<ref name="GovNo">{{cite web|url = https://www.regjeringen.no/en/aktuelt/crimea_annexion/id2593565/|title = Four years since Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea|website=]|date=14 March 2018|access-date=28 March 2019}}</ref><ref name="revea" /> Following the annexation,<ref>{{Cite web|date=29 March 2022|title=Annexation of Crimea|url=https://www.uawarexplained.com/annexation-of-crimea/?version=sixty-minutes|access-date=29 March 2022|website=UaWarExplained.com|archive-date=6 June 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220606022116/https://www.uawarexplained.com/annexation-of-crimea/?version=sixty-minutes}}</ref> Russia built up its military presence on the peninsula and warned against any outside intervention.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://thediplomat.com/2014/07/russia-threatens-nuclear-strikes-over-crimea/|date=11 July 2014|publisher=]|title="Russia Threatens Nuclear Strikes Over Crimea"|access-date=22 September 2021}}</ref>

Ukraine and ] condemned the annexation and consider it to be a violation of ] and Russian agreements safeguarding the ] of Ukraine. The annexation led to the other members of the ] suspending Russia from the group<ref>{{cite web|url = https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-temporarily-kicked-out-of-g8-club-of-rich-countries-2014-3|title = Russia Temporarily Kicked Out of G8 Club of Rich Countries|author1=Bruno Waterfield|author2=Peter Dominiczak|date=24 March 2014|work=Business Insider|access-date=8 March 2015|author3=David Blair|author4=The Daily Telegraph}}</ref> and introducing ]. The ] also rejected the referendum and annexation, adopting ] affirming the "territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognised borders",<ref name="CCTV UNR C=U">{{cite web|url=http://english.cntv.cn/2014/03/28/ARTI1395947928472439.shtml|title=UN General Assembly adopts resolution affirming Ukraine's territorial integrity|publisher=]|date=28 March 2014|access-date=8 March 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180304200543/http://english.cntv.cn/2014/03/28/ARTI1395947928472439.shtml|archive-date=4 March 2018}}</ref><ref name="UN_A_RES_68_262">{{cite web|url=https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/a_res_68_262.pdf|title=United Nations A/RES/68/262 General Assembly|date=1 April 2014|publisher=United Nations|access-date=24 April 2014}}</ref> and referring to the Russian action as a "temporary occupation".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N18/451/02/PDF/N1845102.pdf?OpenElement|title=ODS HOME PAGE|website=documents-dds-ny.un.org}}</ref>


The Russian government opposes the "annexation" label, with Putin defending the referendum as complying with the principle of the ] of peoples.<ref name=":0">{{cite news|url=https://news.yahoo.com/crimea-vote-joining-russia-moscow-wields-u-n-024050097--finance.html|title=Crimeans vote over 90 percent to quit Ukraine for Russia|author1=Mike Collett-White|date=16 March 2014|access-date=8 March 2015|agency=Reuters|author2=Ronald Popeski}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|ssrn=2627417|title=The Ukraine Crisis, Cold War II, and International Law|journal=The German Law Journal|date=6 July 2015|author=Boris N. Mamlyuk}}</ref>
The event ] and was condemned by many world leaders, as well as ], as an illegal ] of Ukrainian territory, in disrespect to the signing of the ] on its sovereignty and territorial integrity, by Russia.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/brookings-now/posts/2014/03/nato-secretary-general-russia-annexation-crimea-illegal-illegitimate|title=NATO Secretary-General: Russia's Annexation of Crimea Is Illegal and Illegitimate|publisher=]|date=19 March 2014<!-- 02:49pm-->}}</ref> It led to the other members of the then ] deciding to expel Russia from the group, thereby returning it to the previous ], then introducing ] against the country.{{fact|date=December 2014}} Moreover, the ], responsible for internal Ukrainian affairs at the time, confirmed at least seven constitutional violations of the process, including the dodged obligation of Crimea to request such restitution from Ukraine itself first, before being given the formal right to conduct any supra-political processes for the matter.


Russia opposes the "annexation" label,<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.vz.ru/news/2014/3/21/678310.html|script-title=ru:Лавров назвал оскорбительными заявления Запада об аннексии Крыма|date = 21 March 2014|website = ]|language = Russian}}</ref> with Putin defending the referendum saying it complied with international law.<ref> Reuters, 16 March 2014</ref> Ukraine disputes this, as it does not recognize the independence of the Republic of Crimea or the accession itself as legitimate.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1139-18 |title=Декларація "Про боротьбу за звільнення України" (Declaration "Of the Struggle for the Liberation of Ukraine") |author=Oleksandr Turchynov |publisher=Parliament of Ukraine |date=20 Mar 2014 |accessdate=24 Apr 2014|language=uk}}</ref> The ] also rejected the vote and annexation, adopting a ] ] affirming the "territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders".<ref name="CCTV UNR C=U">, ] (28 March 2014)</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N13/455/19/PDF/N1345519.pdf?OpenElement |title=United Nations A/RES/68/262 General Assembly |publisher=United Nations |date=1 Apr 2014 |accessdate=24 Apr 2014}}</ref>
{{TOC limit|limit=3}} {{TOC limit|limit=3}}


==Background== == Other names ==
=== In Ukraine ===
{{main|Historical background of the 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine#Crimea}}
The names of the Crimean annexation vary. In Ukraine, the annexation is known as the '''temporary occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol by Russia''' ({{langx|uk|тимчасова окупація Автономної Республіки Крим і Севастополя Росією|translit=tymchasova okupatsiia Avtonomnoi Respubliky Krym i Sevastopolia Rosiieiu}}), the '''illegal occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea''', the '''fall of Crimea''', and the '''invasion of Crimea'''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/1172021-37533|date=24 March 2021|work=Президента України|access-date=24 March 2021|archive-date=24 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210324193718/https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/1172021-37533|title=Указ Президента України «Про рішення Ради національної безпеки і оборони України від 11 березня 2021 року "Про Стратегію деокупації та реінтеграції тимчасово окупованої території Автономної Республіки Крим та міста Севастополя"» № 117/2021|trans-title=Decree of the President of Ukraine "On the decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine of March 11, 2021" On the Strategy of deoccupation and reintegration of the temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol № 117/2021}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ua.usembassy.gov/seven-years-of-illegal-occupation-of-the-autonomous-republic-of-crimea/|title=Seven Years of Illegal Occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea|date=4 March 2021}}</ref><ref> Jesse Granger 29 January 2015 ''http://www.army.mil'', accessed 27 February 2022</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://khpg.org/pda/files/docs/index.php?id=1425046486|title=Bitter Crimean Anniversary – Victims of Russian Annexation|work=khpg.org}}</ref>
From 1783, Crimea was a part of the ], incorporated into it as {{Link-interwiki|en = Taurida Oblast|lang = ru|lang_title = Таврическая область}}. In 1795, Crimea was merged into ], and in 1803, it was again separated from it into ]. A series of short-lived governments (], ], ]) were established during first stages of the ], but they were followed by ] (], later ]) and, finally, Soviet (]) incorporations of Crimea into their own states. After ] and the ], the Crimean ASSR was stripped of its autonomy in 1946 and was downgraded to the ] of an ].


=== In Russia ===
] laying wreaths at a monument to the defenders of ], April 2000]]
In the Russian Federation, it is also known as the '''accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation''' ({{langx|ru|присоединение Крыма к Российской Федерации|translit=prisoyedineniye Kryma k Rossiyskoy Federatsii}}), the '''return of Crimea''' ({{langx|ru|возвращение Крыма|translit=vozvrashcheniye Kryma}}), and the '''reunification of Crimea'''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gazeta.ru/politics/news/2014/03/25/n_6037281.shtml|title=Минобороны России учредило медаль "За возвращение Крыма"|trans-title=Ministry of Defense of Russia established a medal 'For the Return of Crimea'|language=ru|publisher=Gazeta.ru|date=25 March 2014|access-date=30 August 2014}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=18 March 2021|title=Right of Reply to Russia – "Seventh Anniversary of the Reunification of Crimea with Russia"|url=https://osce.usmission.gov/right-of-reply-to-russia-seventh-anniversary-of-the-reunification-of-crimea-with-russia/|access-date=27 February 2022|website=U.S. Mission to the OSCE}}</ref>
In 1954, the Crimean Oblast was ] from the ] to the ] by decree of the ] of the ]. However, it was unclear whether the transfer affected the peninsula's largest city of ], which enjoyed a special status in the postwar Soviet Union,<ref>See, for example, {{cite web|url = http://sevkrimrus.narod.ru/texstes/fedorov.htm#3-2|title = 3.2: Правовой статус Севастополя в составе РСФСР|series = Правовой статус Крыма. Правовой статус Севастополя|first = A. V.|last = Fedorov|publisher = ] Publishing|language = Russian|publication-place = ]|publication-date = 1997}}</ref> and in 1993, the ] claimed Sevastopol was part of ],<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.observer.materik.ru/observer/N21_93/21_01.HTM|script-title=ru:Севастополь: вчера и сегодня в документах|publisher = RAU Corporation|series = Обозреватель - Observer|publication-date = 1993|language = Russian}}</ref> resulting in a territorial dispute with Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.day.kiev.ua/ru/article/podrobnosti/sverhnaglost-srabotaet|script-title=ru:"Сверхнаглость" сработает? Севастополь: псевдоюридические аргументы Ю.М.Лужкова|website = day.kiev.ua|first = Igor|last = Losev|date = 19 September 2008|language = Russian}}</ref>


== Background ==
{{See also|Political status of Crimea#Status of Sevastopol}}
{{Main|2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine}}
{{See also|1954 transfer of Crimea|Crimea in the Soviet Union|Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Empire}}
{{Campaignbox Post-Soviet conflicts}}
] in Kyiv, 11 December 2013]]


Crimea was part of the ] from 1441 until it was ] by the ] in 1783 by a decree of ].<ref>Redhouse, J. W. Art. XI.—A Turkish Circle Ode, by Shahin-Ghiray, Khan of the Crimea. With Translation, Memoir of the Author, and a brief Account of the Khanate of the Crimea, its Connexion with Turkey, and its Annexation by Catherine the Second of Russia. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland 18, 400-415 (1861). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00013733</ref><ref>Schönle, A. Garden of the empire: Catherine's appropriation of the Crimea. Slavic Review 60, 1-23 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/2697641</ref><ref>{{Cite generic
In 1989, under ], the Supreme Soviet declared the deportation of the ] under ] had been illegal,<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.alexanderyakovlev.org/fond/issues-doc/67942|script-title=ru:Декларация Верховного Совета СССР "О признании незаконными и преступными репрессивных актов против народов, подвергшихся насильственному переселению, и обеспечении их прав"|year = 1989|language = Russian}}</ref> and the mostly ] ethnic group was allowed to return to Crimea.<ref>"The Crimean Tatars began repatriating on a massive scale beginning in the late 1980s and continuing into the early 1990s. The population of Crimean Tatars in Crimea rapidly reached 250,000 and leveled off at 270,000 where it remains as of this writing . There are believed to be between 30,000 and 100,000 remaining in places of former exile in Central Asia."
Griffiths, D. M.
Greta Lynn Uehling, ''The Crimean Tatars'' (Encyclopedia of the Minorities, Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn) </ref>
date = 2008
title = Catherine II discovers the Crimea
journal = Jahrbuecher fuer Geschichte Osteuropas
doi =
volume = 56
issue = Issue pages = 339-348
url = http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.2.041015
accessdate = 2013-02-05
}}</ref>


After the downfall of ] in ] during the first stages of the ] there were a series of short-lived independent governments (], ], ]). They were followed by ] governments (] and later ]).
In 1990, the Crimean Oblast Soviet proposed the restoration of the Crimean ASSR.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://sevkrimrus.narod.ru/ZAKON/1990obl.htm|script-title=ru:ДЕКЛАРАЦИЯ О ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОМ И ПРАВОВОМ СТАТУСЕ КРЫМА|year = 1990|language = Russian}}</ref> The oblast conducted a ] in 1991, which asked whether Crimea should be elevated into a signatory of the ] (that is, became a ] on its own). By that time, though, the ] was well underway. The Crimean ASSR was restored for less than a year as part of ] before ]. Newly independent ] maintained Crimea's ],<ref>{{cite web|url = http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1213%D0%B0-12|title = Про внесення змін і доповнень до Конституції... від 19.06.1991 № 1213а-XII|language = Ukrainian|date = 19 June 1991}}</ref> while the ] affirmed the peninsula's "state sovereignty".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/krym/show/rb001d002-91 |script-title=ru:Декларация о государственном суверенитете Крыма |author=Parliament of Ukraine |publisher=Government of Ukraine |date=17 Nov 1994 |accessdate=24 Apr 2014|language=ru}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/krym/show/rb0019002-92 |script-title=ru:О Республике Крым как официальном названии демократического государства Крым |author=Parliament of Ukraine |publisher=Government of Ukraine |date=20 Oct 1999 |accessdate=24 Apr 2014|language=ru}}</ref>


In October 1921, the Bolshevik ] gained control of the peninsula and instituted the ] as a member of Russian Federation. In the following year Crimea joined the ] as a part of Russia (the ]).
{{Further|Political status of Crimea#Background}}


After the ] and the 1944 ] by the Soviet government, the ] was stripped of its autonomy in 1946 and downgraded to the ] of an ] of the Russian SFSR. In 1954, the Crimean Oblast was ] from the ] to the ] by decree of the ] of the ] to commemorate the 300th anniversary of ].<ref>{{cite news|last=Ragozin|first=Leonid|title=Annexation of Crimea: A masterclass in political manipulation|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/annexation-crimea-masterclass-political-manipulation-190315174459207.html|publisher=Al Jazeera|date=16 March 2019}}</ref><ref> BBC News. Retrieved 30 December 2015</ref> In 1989, under ]'s ],<ref>{{Cite web|date=29 March 2022|title=gorbachev-perestroika|url=https://www.uawarexplained.com/gorbachev-perestroika/?version=sixty-minutes|access-date=29 March 2022|website=UaWaExplained.com}}</ref> the Supreme Soviet declared that the deportation of the ] under ] had been illegal<ref>{{cite web|url = https://www.alexanderyakovlev.org/fond/issues-doc/67942|year=1989|language=ru|script-title=ru:Декларация Верховного Совета СССР "О признании незаконными и преступными репрессивных актов против народов, подвергшихся насильственному переселению, и обеспечении их прав"|trans-title=Declaration of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR "On the recognition of illegal and criminal acts of repression against peoples subjected to forced resettlement, and ensuring their rights"|work=www.alexanderyakovlev.org}}</ref> and the mostly ] ethnic group was allowed to return to Crimea.<ref>"The Crimean Tatars began repatriating on a massive scale beginning in the late 1980s and continuing into the early 1990s. The population of Crimean Tatars in Crimea rapidly reached 250,000 and leveled off at 270,000 where it remains as of this writing . There are believed to be between 30,000 and 100,000 remaining in places of former exile in Central Asia." Greta Lynn Uehling, ''The Crimean Tatars'' (Encyclopedia of the Minorities, Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn) </ref>
On 21 May 1992, the Supreme Soviet of ] adopted a ], which declared Crimea's 1954 transfer invalid and called for trilateral negotiations on the peninsula's status. Confrontation between the president and parliament of Russia, which later ], prevented this declaration from having any actual effect in Crimea or Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.kp.ru/daily/26205/3091201|title = Руслан Хасбулатов – "КП": Передайте Обаме – Крым и Севастополь могли войти в Россию ещё 20 лет назад! // KP.RU|date = 12 March 2014|website = ]|last = Gamov|first = Alexander|language = Russian}}</ref>


In 1990, the ] of the Crimean Oblast proposed the restoration of the Crimean ASSR.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://sevkrimrus.narod.ru/ZAKON/1990obl.htm|script-title=ru:ДЕКЛАРАЦИЯ О ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОМ И ПРАВОВОМ СТАТУСЕ КРЫМА|trans-title=DECLARATION ON THE STATE AND LEGAL STATUS OF CRIMEA|year = 1990|language = ru}}</ref> The oblast conducted a ] in 1991, which asked whether Crimea should be elevated into a signatory of the ] (that is, become a ] on its own). By that time, though, the ] was well underway. The Crimean ASSR was restored for less than a year as part of Ukrainian SSR before the restoration of ].<ref>{{Cite web|date=29 March 2022|title=Dukrainian-independence-referendum|url=https://www.uawarexplained.com/ukrainian-independence-referendum/?version=sixty-minutes/|access-date=29 March 2022|website=UaWarExplained}}</ref> Newly independent Ukraine maintained Crimea's ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1213а-12|title=Про внесення змін і доповнень до Конституції... від 19 June 1991 № 1213а-XII|trans-title=On Amendments to the Constitution ... of 19 June 1991 № 1213a-XII|date=19 June 1991|language=uk}}</ref> while the ] affirmed the peninsula's "sovereignty" as a part of Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/krym/show/rb001d002-91|author=Parliament of Ukraine|date=17 November 1994|publisher=Government of Ukraine|language=ru|script-title=ru:Декларация о государственном суверенитете Крыма|trans-title=Declaration on State Sovereignty of Crimea|access-date=24 April 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/krym/show/rb0019002-92|author=Parliament of Ukraine|date=20 October 1999|publisher=Government of Ukraine|language=ru|script-title=ru:О Республике Крым как официальном названии демократического государства Крым|trans-title=On the Republic of Crimea as the official name of the democratic state of Crimea|access-date=24 April 2014}}</ref>
From 1992 to 1994, various pro-Russian political movements attempted to separate Crimea from Ukraine. The 1994 regional elections represented a high point for pro-Russian political factions in Crimea.<ref name="polunov">Полунов, Александр Юрьевич. . Государственное управление. Выпуск № 21. Декабрь 2009 года. {{ru icon}}</ref> But the elections came at a difficult time for Crimeans who wanted to rejoin Russia, as the Russian government was engaged in a rapprochement with the ] and the Ukrainian government was determined to safeguard its sovereignty. These factors enabled Ukrainian authorities to abolish the Crimean presidency and constitution by 1995,<ref> {{uk icon}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url = http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/92/95-%D0%B2%D1%80|script-title=uk:Про скасування Конституції і деяких законів Автономної Республіки Крим Верховна Рада України; Закон від 17.03.1995 № 92/95-ВР|date = 18 March 1995|language = Ukrainian}}</ref> without any meaningful interference or protest from Ukraine's eastern neighbor. Afterwards, pro-Russian movements largely waned, and in 1998, the separatists lost the Crimean Supreme Council election.<ref name="polunov" />


The confrontation between the government of Ukraine and Crimea deteriorated between 1992 and 1995. In May 1992 the regional parliament declared an independent "Crimean republic."<ref name=sasse/> In June 1992, the parties reached a compromise, that Crimea would have considerable autonomy but remain part of Ukraine.<ref>Subtelny, Orest (2009). Ukraine: A History Fourth Edition. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-0-8020-8390-6.</ref> ], a leader of the Russian movement was elected President of Crimea in 1994 and his party won a majority in the regional parliamentary elections in the same year. The pro-Russian movement was then weakened by internal disagreements and in March 1995 the Ukrainian government gained the upper hand. The office of the elected President of Crimea was abolished and a loyal head of region was installed instead of Meshkov; the 1992 constitution and a number of local laws were repealed.<ref name=sasse/> According to ] the conflict was defused due to Crimea's multi-ethnic population, fractures within the pro-Russian movement, Kyiv's policy of avoiding escalation and the lack of active support from Russia.<ref name=sasse>{{Cite book |last=Sasse |first=Gwendolyn |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OVjXEAAAQBAJ&dq=meshkov+crimea+president&pg=PA1989 |title=Russia's War Against Ukraine |date=2023-09-14 |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |isbn=978-1-5095-6061-5 |language=en}}</ref>
During the 2000s, as tensions between Russia and several of its neighbors rose, the likelihood of Russian-Ukrainian conflict around Crimea increased. A ] report released in 2009 outlined a scenario under which Russia could intervene in Crimea to protect "Russian compatriots", potentially with the backing of Crimean Tatars.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/CPA_contingencymemo_3.pdf|title = Crisis Between Ukraine and Russia|publisher = Center for Preventive Action of the Council on Foreign Affairs|last = Pifer|first = Steven|date = July 2009}}</ref>


During the 1990s, the dispute over control of the ] and Crimean naval facilities were ] between Russia and Ukraine. In 1992, ], then chairman of the ]'s Committee on Foreign Affairs, suggested that in order to pressure Ukraine to give up its claim to the Black Sea Fleet, Russia should question Ukrainian control over Crimea.<ref>, ], Victor Zaborsky, September 1995</ref> In 1998 the ] divided the fleet and gave Russia a naval base in Sevastopol, and the ] recognized the inviolability of existing borders. However, in ] issues over maritime border resurfaced.
== Euromaidan and 2014 Ukrainian revolution ==
{{main|Euromaidan|2014 Ukrainian revolution}}
The ] movement began in late November 2013 with protests in ] against President ], who won ] in 2010 with strong support in the ] and ] and ]. The Crimean government strongly supported Yanukovych and condemned the protests, saying they were "threatening political stability in the country". The ] supported the ]'s decision to suspend negotiations on the pending ] and urged Crimeans to "strengthen friendly ties with Russian regions".<ref> – ], 27 ноября 2013</ref><ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.rada.crimea.ua/act/11433|script-title=ru:Решение ВР АРК от 27.11.2013 № 1477-6/13 "О политической ситуации"|date = 27 November 2013|website = ]|language = Russian}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.rada.crimea.ua/act/11551|script-title=ru:Заявление ВР АРК от 22.01.2014 № 29-6/14-ВР "О политической ситуации"|date = 22 January 2014|website = ]|language = Russian}}</ref>


In September 2008, the ] ] accused Russia of giving ]s to the population in Crimea, and described it as a "real problem", given Russia's declared policy of military intervention abroad to protect Russian citizens.<ref>Tsukanova, Anya. '']'' (via ]). 6 September 2008.</ref>
On 4 February 2014, the Presidium of the Supreme Council considered holding a referendum on the peninsula's status and asking the ] to guarantee the vote.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.rada.crimea.ua/news/04_02_14_3|script-title=ru:Защитить статус и полномочия Крыма!|date = 4 February 2014|publisher = ]|language = Russian}}</ref> The ] responded by opening a ] to investigate the possible "subversion" of Ukraine's territorial integrity.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unian.net/politics/884848-kryimskie-tataryi-gotovyi-dat-otpor-popyitkam-ottorjeniya-avtonomii-ot-ukrainyi-chubarov.html |title=Крымские татары готовы дать отпор попыткам отторжения автономии от Украины – Чубаров. УНИАН, 16.02.2014 |publisher=Unian.net |accessdate=2014-04-10}}</ref>


On 24 August 2009, ] demonstrations were held in Crimea by ethnic Russian residents. ] (of the ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.taraskuzio.net/media13_files2F26.pdf|title=media13_files2F26.pdf (Archived copy)|website=www.taraskuzio.net|access-date=17 January 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200528230404/http://www.taraskuzio.net/media13_files2F26.pdf|archive-date=28 May 2020}}</ref> and then deputy speaker of the ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.taraskuzio.net/media24_files2F15.pdf|title=media24_files2F15.pdf (Archived copy)|website=www.taraskuzio.net|access-date=17 January 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200102195345/http://www.taraskuzio.net/media24_files2F15.pdf|archive-date=2 January 2020}}</ref>) said then that he hoped that Russia would treat Crimea the same way as it had treated ] and ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/28/world/europe/28crimea.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss|title=Russia and Ukraine in Intensifying Standoff|work=The New York Times|date=28 August 2009|access-date=28 February 2014|first=Clifford J.|last=Levy}}</ref> Crimea is populated by an ] majority and a minority of both ethnic ] and Crimean Tatars, and thus ] possessed one of Ukraine's largest ethnically Russian populations.<ref>". BBC News. 23 April 2014.</ref>
The Euromaidan protests reached a fever pitch in February 2014, and Yanukovych and many of his ministers fled the capital. After opposition factions and defectors from Yanukovych's ] cobbled together a parliamentary quorum in the ], the national legislature voted on 22 February to remove Viktor Yanukovich from his post on the grounds that he was unable to fulfill his duties,<ref name="EnUkrRev">{{cite news
| title = Archrival Is Freed as Ukraine Leader Flees
| work = ] | date = 22 February 2014 | url = http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/world/europe/ukraine.html?_r=0 | accessdate = 23 February 2014
}}</ref> although the legislative removal lacked the required three quarter vote of sitting MPs according to the constitution in effect at the time, which the Rada also voted to nullify.<ref>{{cite web|author=John Feffer |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-feffer/who-are-these-people-anyw_b_4964526.html |title=Who Are These 'People,' Anyway? &#124; John Feffer |publisher=Huffingtonpost.com |accessdate=2014-03-17}}</ref><ref name="interfax1">, ] (24 February 2014)</ref><ref name=RadioFreeEurope>{{cite web|last=Sindelar |first=Daisy |url=http://www.rferl.org/content/was-yanukovychs-ouster-constitutional/25274346.html |title=Was Yanukovych's Ouster Constitutional? |publisher=Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty (Rferl.org) |date=23 February 2014 |accessdate=25 February 2014}}</ref> This move was regarded as a ] by many within Ukraine and Russia,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://rt.com/news/lavrov-crimea-ukraine-west-181/ |title=Lavrov: If West accepts coup-appointed Kiev govt, it must accept a Russian Crimea — RT News |publisher=Rt.com |date=2014-03-30 |accessdate=2014-04-30}}</ref> although it was widely recognized internationally.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/23/ukraine-crisis-yanukovych-tymoshenko-live-updates|agency=The Guardian|title=Ukraine MPs appoint interim president as Yanukovych allies dismissed – 23 February as it happened|date=23 February 2014|accessdate=12 June 2014}}</ref>


As early as in 2010, some analysts already speculated that the Russian government had ] plans. ] said that "Russia has an even more impossible time recognizing Ukraine's sovereignty over the Crimea and the port of ] – as seen by public opinion in Russia, statements by politicians, including members of the ruling United Russia party, experts and journalists".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/372451918.pdf|title=The Crimea: Europe's Next Flashpoint?|website=Peacepalacelibrary.nl|access-date=11 April 2017|date=30 November 2010|archive-date=28 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160928203545/http://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/372451918.pdf}}</ref> In 2011, William Varettoni wrote that "Russia wants to annex Crimea and is merely waiting for the right opportunity, most likely under the pretense of defending Russian brethren abroad".<ref>{{cite journal|title=Crimea's Overlooked Instability|last=Varettoni|first=William|date= 21 June 2011|doi=10.1080/0163660X.2011.588128|journal=The Washington Quarterly|volume =34|issue=3|pages=87–99|s2cid=154003492 | issn=0163-660X }}</ref>
== Change of regional government and Russian intervention ==
{{main|2014 Crimean crisis|2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine}}
], took place in ] a day before the Crimean referendum.]]
The ] against Yanukovich triggered a ] in Crimea, which started as ] against new central authorities, but rapidly escalated due to ]'s overt support for separatist political factions.


=== Euromaidan and the Revolution of Dignity ===
On 27 February, unidentified troops widely suspected of being Russian commandos seized the ] of the Supreme Council of Crimea (the regional parliament) and the building of the Council of Ministers in ].<ref>http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/28/world/europe/crimea-ukraine.html?_r=0</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://estonianworld.com/security/lessons-identified-crimea-estonias-national-defence-model-meet-needs/|agency=Estonian World|title=Lessons identified in Crimea – does Estonia's national defence model meet our needs?|date=5 May 2014|accessdate=12 June 2014}}</ref> ] were raised over these buildings,<ref>{{cite web|url = http://edition.cnn.com/2014/02/27/world/europe/ukraine-politics/|title = Gunmen seize government buildings in Ukraine's Crimea, raise Russian flag|date = 27 February 2014|publisher = CNN|last = Gumuchian|first = Marie-Louise|last2 = Smith-Spark|first2 = Laura|last3 = Formanek|first3 = Ingrid}}</ref> and ]s were erected outside them.<ref name="LentaBerkut">{{cite web|url=http://lenta.ru/news/2014/02/27/berkut/|title=Lenta.ru: Бывший СССР: Украина: Украинский депутат объявил о бунте крымского «Беркута»|publisher=}}</ref> With the unidentified troops still occupying the government building in Simferopol, the Supreme Council of Crimea dissolved the old ] and designated ], leader of the minority ] party, to be Crimea's new ]. This appointment was declared illegal by Ukraine's new interim government.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://obozrevatel.com/politics/08249-turchinov-izdal-ukaz-o-nezakonnosti-izbraniya-novogo-premera-kryima.htm|script-title=uk:Турчинов издал указ о незаконности избрания нового премьера Крыма|date = 1 March 2014|language = Ukrainian}}</ref> Both Aksyonov and speaker Vladimir Konstantinov stated that they viewed Viktor Yanukovich as the ''de jure'' ], through whom they were able to ask Russia for assistance.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://lenta.ru/news/2014/02/27/truepresident/|script-title=ru:Крымские власти объявили о подчинении Януковичу|date = 28 February 2014|website = ]|language = Russian}}</ref> On the same day, more troops in unmarked uniforms, assisted this time by Crimean riot police known as '']'', established ]s on the ] and the ], which separate Crimea from the Ukrainian mainland.<ref name="LentaBerkut" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://vizit.ks.ua/news/post_chongar_kontroliruet_krymskij_berkut_podchinennyj_janukovichu/2014-02-27-3148|title=ПОСТ "ЧОНГАР" КОНТРОЛИРУЕТ КРЫМСКИЙ "БЕРКУТ" ПОДЧИНЕННЫЙ ЯНУКОВИЧУ видео) - 27 Февраля 2014 - "Новый Визит" Генический информационный портал|publisher=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.allcrimea.net/news/2014/2/27/na-chongarskom-perevale-dezhurit-berkut-i-nekie-grazhdanskie-litsa-6025/|title=-|publisher=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://armyansk.info/news/news-archive/120-2014/4592-pod-armyansk-styanulis-siloviki-iz-berkuta|title=Армянск Информационный - Под Армянск стянулись силовики из "Беркута"|author=Армянск Информационный|publisher=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://lenta.ru/news/2014/02/28/blockpost/|title=Lenta.ru: Бывший СССР: Украина: СМИ сообщили о блокпостах «Беркута» на въездах в Крым|publisher=}}</ref> Within hours, Ukraine had effectively been cut off from Crimea.
{{Main|Euromaidan|Revolution of Dignity}}
], Crimea, 9 May 2014]]


The ] protest movement began in ] in late November 2013 after President ], of the ], failed to sign the ].<ref>{{Cite web|date=29 March 2022|title=political-part-of-the-association-agreement-with-eu|url=https://www.uawarexplained.com/political-part-of-the-association-agreement-with-eu/|access-date=29 March 2022|website=UaWarExplained.com}}</ref> Yanukovych won <ref name="yanukovych">{{Cite web|date=29 March 2022|title=yanukovych|url=https://www.uawarexplained.com/yanukovych/?version=sixty-minutes/|access-date=29 March 2022|website=UaWarExplained.com}}</ref> the ] with strong support from voters in the ] and ] and ]. The Crimean autonomous government strongly supported Yanukovych and condemned the protests, saying they were "threatening political stability in the country". The ] said that it supported the ]'s decision to suspend negotiations on the pending association agreement and urged Crimeans to "strengthen friendly ties with Russian regions".<ref> (The Crimean parliament has decided to once again support Azarov and condemn the opposition) – ], 27 ноября 2013</ref><ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.rada.crimea.ua/act/11433|script-title=ru:Решение ВР АРК от 27 November 2013 № 1477-6/13 "О политической ситуации"|trans-title=Decision of the Verkhovna Rada of the ARC of November 27, 2013 № 1477–6 / 13 "On the political situation"|language=ru|website=rada.crimea.ua|date=27 November 2013|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140329215707/http://www.rada.crimea.ua/act/11433|archive-date=29 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.rada.crimea.ua/act/11551|script-title=ru:Заявление ВР АРК от 22 January 2014 № 29-6/14-ВР "О политической ситуации"|trans-title=Statement of the Verkhovna Rada of the ARC of 22 January 2014 № 29-6 / 14-VR "On the political situation"|language=ru|website=rada.crimea.ua|date=22 January 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140126041112/http://www.rada.crimea.ua/act/11551|archive-date=26 January 2014}}</ref>
On 1 March 2014, Aksyonov declared Crimea's new ''de facto'' authorities would exercise control of all Ukrainian military installations on the peninsula. He also asked Russian President ], who had been Yanukovych's primary international backer and guarantor, for "assistance in ensuring peace and public order" in Crimea.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://itar-tass.com/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/1013127|title = Премьер-министр Крыма попросил Путина о помощи|website = ]}}</ref> Putin promptly received authorization from the ] for a ] "until normalization of a socio-political environment in the country".<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.kremlin.ru/news/20353|script-title=ru:Владимир Путин внёс обращение в Совет Федерации|website = ]|language = Russian}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://council.gov.ru/media/documents/pdf/41d4c5222e07062d3f21.pdf|script-title=ru:Постановление Совета Федерации Федерального Собрания Российской Федерации от 1 марта 2014 года № 48-СФ "Об использовании Вооруженных Сил Российской Федерации на территории Украины"|website = ]|language = Russian}}</ref> Putin's swift maneuver prompted ] and ] against a Russian military campaign in Crimea. By 2 March, Russian troops moving from the country's naval base in ] and reinforced by troops, armor, and helicopters from mainland Russia exercised complete control over the Crimean Peninsula.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/world/russian-parliament-approves-use-of-force-in-crimea/article5739708.ece |title=Russian Parliament approves use of army in Ukraine.}}</ref><ref name="walker-the-guardian-2014-descend">{{cite news |last=Walker |first=Shaun |date=4 March 2014 |url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/04/ukraine-crisis-russian-troops-crimea-john-kerry-kiev |title=Russian takeover of Crimea will not descend into war, says Vladimir Putin |newspaper=] |accessdate=4 March 2014}}</ref><ref name="bloomberg-news-2014-request">{{cite news |url=http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-04/russia-calls-ukraine-intervention-legal-citing-yanukovych-letter.html |title=Russia Stays in Ukraine as Putin Channels Yanukovych Request |first1=Sangwon |last1=Yoon |first2=Daryna |last2=Krasnolutska |first3=Kateryna |last3=Choursina |date=4 March 2014 |newspaper=] |deadurl=no |accessdate=29 August 2014}}</ref> Russian troops operated in Crimea without insignia. Despite numerous media reports and statements by the Ukrainian and foreign governments describing the unmarked troops as Russian soldiers, government officials ] the identity of their forces, claiming they were local "self-defense" units over whom they had no authority.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/05/us-ukraine-crisis-lavrov-spain-idUSBREA240NF20140305 |title=Russia says cannot order Crimean 'self-defense' units back to base.}}</ref> As late as 17 April, Russian foreign minister Lavrov claimed that there are no spare armed forces in the territory of Crimea.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mid.ru/brp_4.nsf/0/F34A66F8958B302544257CBF00438FD7 |title=Speech by the Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and his answers to questions from the mass media summarising the meeting with EU, Russian, US and Ukrainian representatives, Geneva, 17 April 2014.}}</ref>


On 4 February 2014, the Presidium of the Supreme Council "promised" to consider holding a referendum on the peninsula's status. Speaker ] asked to appeal to the Russian government to "guarantee the preservation of Crimean autonomy".<ref name="Chronicles of Alienation">, ] (16 March 2015)</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rada.crimea.ua/news/04_02_14_3|script-title=ru:Защитить статус и полномочия Крыма!|trans-title=Protect the status and powers of Crimea!|language=ru|website=rada.crimea.ua|date=4 February 2014|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140303033017/http://www.rada.crimea.ua/news/04_02_14_3|archive-date=3 March 2014}}</ref>{{Importance inline|reason=Overview reliable sources needed|date=July 2024}} The ] (SBU) responded by opening a ] to investigate the possible "subversion" of Ukraine's territorial integrity.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.unian.net/politics/884848-kryimskie-tataryi-gotovyi-dat-otpor-popyitkam-ottorjeniya-avtonomii-ot-ukrainyi-chubarov.html|title=Крымские татары готовы дать отпор попыткам отторжения автономии от Украины – Чубаров.|trans-title=Crimean Tatars are ready to repel attempts to reject autonomy from Ukraine – Chubarov.|date=16 February 2014|agency=Ukrainian Independent Information Agency|access-date=10 April 2014}}</ref> On 20 February 2014, during a visit to ], ] ] stated that the ] from the ] to the ] had been a mistake.<ref name="Chronicles of Alienation" />
Russian officials eventually admitted to their troops' presence. On 17 April 2014, Putin acknowledged the Russian military backed Crimean separatist militias, stating that Russia's intervention was necessary "to ensure proper conditions for the people of Crimea to be able to freely express their will".<ref>{{cite web|url = http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/7034|title = Direct Line with Vladimir Putin|website = ]|date = 17 April 2014}}</ref> Defense Minister ] said the country's military actions in Crimea were undertaken by forces of the ] and were justified by "threat to lives of Crimean ]s" and danger of "takeover of Russian military infrastructure by ]".<ref>{{cite web|url = http://itar-tass.com/politika/1097051|script-title=ru:Шойгу: действия Минобороны РФ в Крыму были вызваны угрозой жизни мирного населения|publisher = ]|date = 4 April 2014|language = Russian}}</ref> Ukraine complained that by increasing its troop presence in Crimea, Russia violated the agreement under which it headquartered its Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.ukrinform.ua/eng/news/russia_redeploys_ships_of_baltic_and_northern_fleets_to_sevastopol_violates_agreement_with_ukraine_317983|title = Russia redeploys ships of Baltic and Northern fleets to Sevastopol, violates agreement with Ukraine|date = 3 March 2014|website = ]}}</ref> and violated the country's ].<ref name="blogs.telegraph.co.uk">{{cite web|url=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/charlescrawford/100262865/vladimir-putins-illegal-occupation-of-crimea-is-an-attempt-to-put-europes-borders-up-for-grabs/|title=telegraph.co.uk: "Vladimir Putin's illegal occupation of Crimea is an attempt to put Europe's borders up for grabs" (Crawford) 10 Mar 2014|work=blogs.telegraph.co.uk}}</ref> The ] and ] also accused Russia of breaking the terms of the ], by which Russia, the U.S., and the UK had reaffirmed their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the ] or political independence of Ukraine.<ref>. ]</ref> The Russian government said the Budapest Memorandum did not apply due to "complicated internal processes" in Crimea.<ref>]]</ref><ref>]]</ref>


The Euromaidan protests came to a head in late February 2014, and Yanukovych and many of his ministers fled the capital on 22 February.<ref name="Ukraine crisis timeline BBC">{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-26248275|title=Ukraine crisis: Timeline|date=13 November 2014|access-date=20 October 2015|work=BBC News}}</ref> After his flight, opposition parties and defectors from the Party of Regions put together a parliamentary quorum in the ] (the Ukrainian parliament), and voted on 22 February to remove Yanukovych from his post on the grounds that he was unable to fulfill his duties.<ref name="EnUkrRev">{{cite news|title=Archrival Is Freed as Ukraine Leader Flees|newspaper=]|date=22 February 2014|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/23/world/europe/ukraine.html|access-date=23 February 2014}}</ref><ref name="interfax1">{{cite news|url=http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/192030.html|title=Rada removes Yanukovych from office, schedules new elections for May{{spaces}}25|agency=]|date=22 February 2014|access-date=25 February 2015}}</ref><ref name=RadioFreeEurope>{{cite web|last=Sindelar|first=Daisy|url=http://www.rferl.org/content/was-yanukovychs-ouster-constitutional/25274346.html|title=Was Yanukovych's Ouster Constitutional?|publisher=Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty|website = Rferl.org|date=23 February 2014|access-date=25 February 2014}}</ref> ] was appointed by the Rada to serve as the head of a ] until new presidential and parliament elections could be held. This ] was recognised internationally. Russian government and ] have described these events as a "]" and have said that the caretaker government was illegitimate,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/23/ukraine-crisis-yanukovych-tymoshenko-live-updates|newspaper=The Guardian|title=Ukraine MPs appoint interim president as Yanukovych allies dismissed – 23{{spaces}}February as it happened|date=23 February 2014|access-date=12 June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=RICHTER|first1=ANDREI G.|date=2015|url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=110802762&site=eds-live&scope=site|journal=International Journal of Communication (19328036)|volume=9|pages=3125–3126}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Gerber|first1=Theodore P|last2=Zavisca|first2=Jane|date=Summer 2016|title=Does Russian Propaganda Work?|journal=Washington Quarterly|volume=39|issue=2|pages=79–98|doi=10.1080/0163660X.2016.1204398}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last1=Tomkiw|first1=Lydia|title=For Ukraine's Wartime Fact-Checkers, the Battle Rages On.|url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=31h&AN=128469796&site=eds-live&scope=site|journal=Wilson Quarterly|volume=Winter2018|page=1}}</ref> while researchers consider the subsequent annexation of Crimea to be a true ], because the Russian military seized Crimea's parliament and government buildings and instigated the replacement of its government with Russian proxies.<ref name="26436575Putin2">, ] (4 March 2014)</ref><ref name="idUSBREA4M05420140524">, ] (24 March 2014)</ref><ref name="PopovaEntangled">{{cite book|author=Maria Popova, Oxana Shevel|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MmTiEAAAQBAJ&dq=Aksyonov+Mohyliov+crimea&pg=PT123|title=Russia and Ukraine: Entangled Histories, Diverging States|date=2023-11-08|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1-5095-5738-7|edition=|series=|volume=|location=|page=|pages=|at=|chapter=|format=|chapter-url=|orig-year=|agency=}}</ref><ref name="WilsonCrisis">{{cite book|last=Wilson|first=Andrew|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NMK2BAAAQBAJ&dq=Fast-forward+to+2014,+and+there+was+a+coup+in+Ukraine,+involving+masked+men+with+guns&pg=PA108|title=Ukraine Crisis: What It Means for the West|date=2014-11-18|publisher=Yale University Press|isbn=978-0-300-21292-1|pages=108, 110}}</ref><ref name="MaidanWar">{{cite book|author=Mychailo Wynnyckyj|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9TFVEAAAQBAJ&dq=Republic+of+Crimea+and+supervised+an+illegitimate+and+falsified&pg=PA25|title=Ukraine's Maidan, Russia's War|date=2019-04-30|publisher=BoD – Books on Demand|isbn=978-3-8382-1327-9|edition=|series=|volume=|location=|pages=28|chapter=|format=|chapter-url=|orig-year=|agency=}}</ref>
== Legal obstacles to Russian annexation ==
{{see also|Declaration of Independence of Crimea}}


== Annexation ==
{{Anchor|Declaration of Independence: a letter of intent}}According to the Constitution of Russia, the admission of new federal subjects is governed by federal constitutional law (art. 65.2).<ref name=":2">{{cite web|url = http://constitution.garant.ru/english/|title = Constitution of the Russian Federation}}</ref> Such a law was adopted in 2001, and it postulates that admission of a foreign state or its part into Russia shall be based on a mutual accord between the Russian Federation and the relevant state and shall take place pursuant to an international treaty between the two countries; moreover, it must be initiated by the state in question, not by its subdivision or by Russia.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2014)004-e|title = Opinion on "Whether Draft Federal constitutional Law No. 462741-6 on amending the Federal constitutional Law of the Russian Federation on the procedure of admission to the Russian Federation and creation of a new subject within the Russian Federation is compatible with international law" endorsed by the Venice Commission at its 98th Plenary Session (Venice, 21-22 March 2014)|publisher = ]|date = 21–22 March 2014}}</ref> This law would have seemed to require that Ukraine initiate any negotiations involving a Russian annexation of Crimea.
{{See also|Anti-Maidan|Russo-Ukrainian War}}
{{Further|Timeline of the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation}}


=== Russian invasion of Crimea ===
On 28 February 2014, Russian MP ], along with certain other members of the Duma, introduced a bill to alter Russia's procedure for adding federal subjects. According to the bill, accession could be initiated by a subdivision of a country, provided that there is "absence of efficient sovereign state government in foreign state"; the request could be made either by subdivision bodies on their own or on the basis of a referendum held in the subdivision in accordance with corresponding national legislation.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-REF(2014)011-e |title=Draft Federal Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation "amending the Federal Constitutional Law on the Procedure of Admission to the Russian Federation and creation of a new subject of the Russian Federation in its composition" of the Russian Federation (translation) |date=10 March 2014}}</ref> The ] stated that the bill violated "in particular, the principles of territorial integrity, national sovereignty, non-intervention in the internal affairs of another state and ]" and was therefore incompatible with ].<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2014)004-e|title = CDL-AD(2014)004-e Opinion on "Whether Draft Federal constitutional Law No. 462741-6 on amending the Federal constitutional Law of the Russian Federation on the procedure of admission to the Russian Federation and creation of a new subject within the Russian Federation is compatible with international law" endorsed by the Venice Commission at its 98th Plenary Session (Venice, 21-22 March 2014)|publisher = ]|date=March 2014}}</ref>
]
] (Ukrainian flag on the left, Crimean Tatar flag on the right) during the Russian military intervention in Crimea, 9 March 2014]]
] ] ({{Langx|ru|За возвращение Крыма}}), 20 February – 18 March 2014]]


The February 2014 ] that ousted Ukrainian president ] sparked a political crisis in Crimea, which initially manifested as ] against the new ],<ref name=crimea_1902> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201128202347/https://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/02/19/7014965/|date=28 November 2020}}19 February 2014</ref> but rapidly escalated. In January 2014, the ] city council had already called for formation of "people's militia" units to "ensure firm defence" of the city from "extremism".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://nv.ua/publications/rokirovki-v-sbu-kto-takie-malikov-ostafiychuk-i-frolov-55722.html|date=25 June 2015|work=Novoe Vremia|language=ru|script-title=ru:Рокировки в СБУ. Кто такие Маликов, Остафийчук и Фролов|trans-title=Castling the SBU. Who are Malikov, Ostafiychuk and Frolov|access-date=1 January 2016}}</ref>
On 11 March 2014, both the Supreme Council of Crimea and the Sevastopol City Council adopted a ], which stated their intent to declare independence and request full accession to Russia in case the pro-Russian answer received the most votes during the scheduled status referendum. The declaration directly referred to the ], by which the ]-populated ] declared independence from Russia's ally ] as the ] in 2008—a unilateral action Russia ]. Many analysts saw the Crimean declaration as an overt effort to pave the way for Crimea's annexation by Russia.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/news/23794101/verhovnyj-sovet-kryma-prinyal-deklaraciyu-nezavisimosti|script-title=ru:Крым определился, каким способом войдет в Россию|date = 11 March 2014|publisher = ]|language = Russian}}</ref>


On February 20 several buses with Crimean license plates were stopped at a pro-Maidan checkpoint in a town in ]. Their passengers were violently intimidated and some buses were burned. This incident was subsequently used by Russian propaganda which made unsubstantiated claims that the passengers were killed in gruesome ways.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Arel |first1=Dominique |last2=Driscoll |first2=Jesse |title=Ukraine's Unnamed War: Before The Russian Invasion of 2022 |date=5 January 2023 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=9781316511497 |pages=105–106}}</ref>
Crimean authorities' stated plans to declare independence from Ukraine made the Mironov bill unnecessary. On 20 March 2014, two days after the ] was signed, the bill was withdrawn by its initiators.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/%28SpravkaNew%29?OpenAgent&RN=462741-6&02|script-title=ru:Законопроект № 462741-6 О внесении изменений в Федеральный конституционный закон "О порядке принятия в Российскую Федерацию и образования в ее составе нового субъекта Российской Федерации" (в части расширения предмета правового регулирования названного Федерального конституционного закона)|website = ]|language = Russian}}</ref>


The ] members called for an extraordinary meeting on 21 February. In response to Russian separatist sentiment, the ] (SBU) said that it would "use severe measures to prevent any action taken against diminishing the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine".{{NoteTag|It also noted that "certain politicians, local government officials, leaders of civil society organizations, and radically inclined individuals have attempted to create grounds for escalating the civil conflict, and have spread autonomous and separatist attitudes among the people, which could lead to the demise of our as a united nation and loss of its national sovereignty." In addition, the statement said that certain lawmakers of every level have begun separatist negotiations with representatives of foreign nations. "Open consultations are being held on the possible division of the country into separate parts in violation of the Ukrainian constitution," read the statement. "This could lead to an escalation of conflict between different sectors of society, inciting ethnic or religious hatred and military conflict."<ref name=kp21live>{{cite news|url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/kyiv/euromaidan-rallies-in-ukraine-feb-21-live-updates-337287.html|title=EuroMaidan rallies in Ukraine|newspaper=Kyiv Post|date=21 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140221182944/http://www.kyivpost.com/content/kyiv/euromaidan-rallies-in-ukraine-feb-21-live-updates-337287.html|archive-date=21 February 2014}}</ref>}}{{clarify|"against diminishing" seems wrong, mistranslation? From context, one of those words should go.|date=April 2022}} The party with the largest number of seats in the Crimean parliament (80 of 100), the ] of Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych, did not discuss Crimean secession, and were supportive of an agreement between President Yanukovych<ref name="yanukovych"/> and ] activists to end the unrest that was struck on the same day in ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/52929.html|title=Regions Party gets 80 of 100 seats on Crimean parliament|date=11 November 2010|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201194141/http://www.interfax.com.ua/eng/main/52929/|archive-date=1 December 2008|agency=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/191667.html|title=Regions of Crimea meeting didn't address separation of Crimea from Ukraine – deputy prime minister of Crimea|date=21 February 2014|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201194141/http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/191667.html|archive-date=1 December 2008|agency=Interfax-Ukraine}}</ref>
== Crimean status referendum ==
{{Main|Crimean status referendum, 2014}}
On 27 February, following the takeover of its building, the ] voted to hold a ] on 25 May, with the initial question as to whether Crimea should upgrade its autonomy within Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rada.crimea.ua/act/11610 |title=Постановление ВР АРК "Об организации и проведении республиканского (местного) референдума по вопросам усовершенствования статуса и полномочий Автономной Республики Крым" |publisher=Rada.crimea.ua |accessdate=2014-04-10}}</ref> The referendum date was later moved from 25 May to 30 March.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.interfax.ru/world/362023|script-title=ru:Аксенов: перенос референдума в Крыму связан с тем, что конфликт вышел за пределы разумного|website = ]|language = Russian}}</ref> A Ukrainian court declared the referendum to be illegal.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unian.net/politics/892973-sud-priznal-nezakonnyimi-naznachenie-aksenova-premerom-i-provedenie-referenduma-v-kryimu.html |title=Суд признал незаконными назначение Аксенова премьером и проведение референдума в Крыму |publisher=Unian.net |accessdate=2014-04-10}}</ref>


Russia was concerned that the new government avowedly committed to closer relations with the West put its strategic positions in Crimea at risk. On 22–23 February{{NoteTag|The date was given by Putin in Russian film commemorating the annexation of Crimea, however, the inscription on the Medal "For the Return of Crimea", awarded by the Russian Ministry of Defence state put 20 February as the starting date}}, Russian president ]<ref>{{Cite web|date=29 March 2022|title=putin-as-heir-of-yeltsin|url=https://www.uawarexplained.com/uk/putin-as-heir-of-yeltsin/?version=sixty-minutes/|access-date=29 March 2022|website=UaWarExplained.com}}</ref> convened an all-night meeting with security services chiefs to discuss extrication of the deposed Ukrainian president, Viktor Yanukovych, and at the end of that meeting Putin had remarked that "we must start working on returning Crimea to Russia".<ref name="auto"/><ref name="auto2"/> After that ] and ] began negotiating deals with local sympathizers to ensure that when the operation began there would be well‑armed "local self‑defense groups" on the streets for support.<ref name=galeotti />{{rp|11}} On 23 February ] were held in the Crimean city of Sevastopol.
On 4 March, Russian President ] claimed Russia was not considering annexing Crimea. He said of the peninsula that "only citizens themselves, in conditions of free expression of will and their security can determine their future".<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.interfax.ru/362633|script-title=ru:Россия не рассматривает вариант присоединения Крыма к России|date = 4 March 2014|publisher = ]|language = Russian}}</ref> Putin later acknowledged that in early March there were "secret opinion polls" held in Crimea, which, according to him, reported overwhelming popular support for Russian annexation of Crimea.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://itar-tass.com/politika/1111359|script-title=ru:Путин: Россия не планировала присоединять Крым|date = 10 April 2014|publisher = ]|language = Russian}}</ref>


Crimean prime minister ] said that his government recognised the new provisional government in Kyiv, and that the Crimean autonomous government would carry out all laws passed by the Ukrainian parliament.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/25274524.html|date=23 February 2014|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201194141/http://www.radiosvoboda.org/content/article/25274524.html|archive-date=1 December 2008|publisher=Radio Svoboda|language=uk|script-title=uk:Прем'єр Криму Могильов заявляє, що виконуватиме нові закони|trans-title=Crimean Prime Minister Mogilev says it will comply with new laws}}</ref> In ], following a pro-Russian demonstration the previous day where protesters had replaced the Ukrainian flag over the parliament with a Russian flag,<ref>{{cite news| title=Protesters set a flag of Russia on the building of Crimean Parliament.| url=http://www.unian.ua/politics/889804-mitinguvalniki-vstanovili-prapor-rosiji-na-budivli-parlamentu-krimu-foto.html}}</ref> a pro-Euromaidan rally of between 5,000 and 15,000 was held in support of the new government, and demanding the resignation of the Crimean parliament; attendees waved Ukrainian, Tatar, and European Union flags.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.radiosvoboda.org/content/article/25274499.html|script-title=uk:У Криму вимагають розпуску парламенту автономії і знесення пам'ятника Леніну|trans-title=Crimea demands the dissolution of the parliament of autonomy and the demolition of the monument to Lenin|language=uk|publisher=Radio Svoboda|date=23 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201194141/http://www.radiosvoboda.org/content/article/25274499.html|archive-date=1 December 2008}}</ref> Meanwhile, in Sevastopol, thousands protested against the new Ukrainian government, voted to establish a parallel administration, and created civil defence squads with the support of the Russian ] motorcycle club. Protesters waved Russian flags, chanted "Putin is our president!" and said they would refuse to further pay taxes to the Ukrainian state.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/23/ukraine-crisis-secession-russian-crimea|title=Ukraine crisis fuels secession calls in pro-Russian south|newspaper=]|date=24 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201194141/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/23/ukraine-crisis-secession-russian-crimea|archive-date=1 December 2008|url-status = live}}</ref><ref name=russiarally>{{cite news|author=Bogdan Huzar|url=http://blogi.newsweek.pl/Tekst/swiat/684527,rosja-przygotowuje-sie-do-zbrojnej-interwencji-na-ukrainie.html|title=Rosja przygotowuje się do zbrojnej interwencji na Ukrainie?|trans-title=Russia is preparing for military intervention in Ukraine?|language=pl|work=]|date=23 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140224033624/http://blogi.newsweek.pl/Tekst/swiat/684527%2Crosja-przygotowuje-sie-do-zbrojnej-interwencji-na-ukrainie.html|archive-date=24 February 2014}}</ref> Russian military convoys were also alleged to be seen in the area.<ref name=russiarally />
On 6 March, the Supreme Council moved the ] date to 16 March and changed its scope to ask a new question: whether Crimea should accede to Russia or restore the 1992 constitution within Ukraine, which the Ukrainian government had previously invalidated. This referendum, unlike one announced earlier, contained no option to maintain the ''status quo'' of governance under the 1998 constitution.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.golos-ameriki.ru/content/world-ukraine-crisis-referendum/1869197.html|script-title=ru:Референдум в Крыму: ответ "нет" не предусмотрен|website = ]|language = Russian}}
</ref>


In ], pro-Russian protesters attempted to remove the Ukrainian flag from atop city hall and replace it with the flag of Russia. Over 200 attended, waving Russian, ], and the ] party flags. Mayor Oleh Osadchy attempted to disperse the crowd and police eventually arrived to defend the flag. The mayor said "This is the territory of Ukraine, Crimea. Here's a flag of Crimea," but was accused of treason and a fight ensued over the flagpole.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.unian.net/politics/888686-v-kerchi-mitinguyuschie-sorvali-ukrainskiy-flag-i-merii-i-povesili-rossiyskiy.html|title=В Керчи митингующие сорвали украинский флаг и мэрии и повесили российский: Новости УНИАН|trans-title=In Kerch, protesters tore down the Ukrainian flag and the mayor's office and hung up the Russian one: News from UNIAN|agency=Ukrainian Independent Information Agency|access-date=24 February 2014}}</ref> On 24 February, more rallied outside the Sevastopol city state administration.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/02/24/7016127/|title=У Севастополі вимагають віддати владу ''вибраному'' на мітингу ''меру ''; Українська правда|trans-title=In Sevastopol demand to hand over power to the "chosen" at the "mayor" rally; Ukrainian Pravda|work=Ukrayinska Pravda|access-date=24 February 2014}}</ref> Pro-Russian demonstrators accompanied by neo-] demanded the election of a Russian citizen as mayor and hoisted Russian flags around the city administration; they also handed out leaflets to sign up for a self-defence militia, warning that the "]-] Europlague is knocking".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.interpretermag.com/ukraine-liveblog-day-7-decoding-documents-indicting-dictators/#2308|title=Ukraine Liveblog: Day 7 – Decoding Documents & Indicting Dictators|work=The Interpreter|date=24 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140301065847/http://www.interpretermag.com/ukraine-liveblog-day-7-decoding-documents-indicting-dictators/#2308|archive-date=1 March 2014}}</ref>
On 14 March, the Crimean status referendum was deemed unconstitutional by the ],<ref>{{cite web|url = http://24tv.ua/home/showSingleNews.do?ks_priznal_nekonstitutsionnim_postanovlenie_o_provedenii_referenduma_v_krimu&objectId=420886&lang=ru|title = КС признал неконституционным постановление о проведении референдума в Крыму - Видео}}</ref> and a day later, the ] formally dissolved the Crimean parliament.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/891-18|script-title=uk:Про дострокове припинення повноважень Верховної Ради Автономної Республіки Крим|language = Ukrainian}}</ref>


], head of Sevastopol administration, announced his resignation, citing the "decision of the city's inhabitants" made at a pro-Russian rally, and while caretaker city administration initially leaned towards recognition of new Ukrainian government,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.unian.ua/politics/889104-vlada-sevastopolya-viznala-novu-verhovnu-radu.html|website=unian.ua|language=uk|script-title=uk:Влада Севастополя визнала нову Верховну Раду|trans-title=Sevastopol authorities recognised new Verkhovna Rada|access-date=30 January 2019}}</ref> continued pressure from pro-Russian activists forced local authorities to concede.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://sevnews.info/rus/view-news/Sevastopolcy-chut-ne-razgromili-administraciyu-no-vse-zhe-dobilis-obeshaniya-peredat-vse-dela-Alekseyu-CHalomu/13540|date=24 February 2014|website=News of Sevastopol|language=ru|script-title=ru:Севастопольцы чуть не разгромили администрацию, но все же добились обещания передать все дела Алексею Чалому|trans-title=Sevastopolitans nearly destroyed city administration, but got a promise to hand all affairs over to Chaly|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161017182928/http://sevnews.info/rus/view-news/Sevastopolcy-chut-ne-razgromili-administraciyu-no-vse-zhe-dobilis-obeshaniya-peredat-vse-dela-Alekseyu-CHalomu/13540|archive-date=17 October 2016|access-date=30 January 2019}}</ref> Consequently, ] illegally elected ], a Russian citizen, as mayor. Under the law of Ukraine, it was not possible for Sevastopol to elect a mayor, as the ''Chairman of the Sevastopol City State Administration'', appointed by the ], functions as its mayor.<ref name=YavlinskyUkr>{{cite book|author=Mark Nordberg|editor=Taras Kuzio|title=Contemporary Ukraine: Dynamics of Post-Soviet Transformation|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tedMMgz3RV8C&pg=PA44|year=1998|publisher=M.E. Sharpe|isbn=978-0-7656-3150-3|page=44|chapter=3. State and Institution Building in Ukraine}}</ref> A thousand protesters present chanted "A Russian mayor for a Russian city".<ref name=SevastopolInstalls />
The referendum was held despite the opposition from Kiev. Official results reported about 95% of participating voters in Crimea and Sevastopol were in favor of joining Russia.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/03/16/polls-open-in-crimea-referendum-amid-high-tensions/|title=Crimea referendum Wide condemnation after region votes to split from Ukraine Fox News|publisher=]|date=16 March 2014}}</ref> The results of referendum are questioned,<ref>{{cite news|last=Halimah|first=Halimah|title=Crimea's vote: Was it legal?|url=http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/17/world/europe/ukraine-vote-legality/|accessdate=19 March 2014|newspaper=CNN|date=17 March 2014}}</ref> Another report by Evgeny Bobrov, a member of the Russian President's Human Rights Council, suggested the official results were inflated and only 15% to 30% of Crimeans actually voted for the Russian option.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2014/05/05/putins-human-rights-council-accidentally-posts-real-crimean-election-results-only-15-voted-for-annexation/|title=Putin's 'Human Rights Council' Accidentally Posts Real Crimean Election Results|author=Paul Roderick Gregory|date=May 5, 2014|work=Forbes}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/05/06/russian-government-agency-reveals-fraudulent-nature-of-the-crimean-referendum-results/|title=Russian government agency reveals fraudulent nature of the Crimean referendum results|work=Washington Post}}</ref><ref> {{ru icon}}</ref>


On 25 February, several hundred pro-Russian protesters blocked the Crimean parliament demanding non-recognition of the central government of Ukraine and a referendum on Crimea's status.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.e-crimea.info/news/ot-parlamenta-kryma-potrebovali-provesti-referendum-ob-otdelenii-ot-ukrainy|date=25 February 2014|website="e-Crimea" News agency|language=ru|script-title=ru:От парламента Крыма потребовали провести референдум об отделении от Украины|trans-title= demand that Crimean parliament hold referendum on separation from Ukraine|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140303184134/http://www.e-crimea.info/news/ot-parlamenta-kryma-potrebovali-provesti-referendum-ob-otdelenii-ot-ukrainy|archive-date=3 March 2014|access-date=30 January 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.e-crimea.info/news/protivniki-centralnoy-vlasti-prigrozili-zahvatom-parlamenta-kryma|date=25 February 2014|website="e-Crimea" News agency|language=ru|script-title=ru:Противники центральной власти пригрозили захватом парламента Крыма|trans-title=Opponents of the central government threatened to seize Crimean parliament|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140308063238/http://www.e-crimea.info/news/protivniki-centralnoy-vlasti-prigrozili-zahvatom-parlamenta-kryma|archive-date=8 March 2014|access-date=30 January 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://censor.net.ua/photo_news/272784/prorossiyiskie_sily_zablokirovali_vr_kryma_trebuyut_referenduma_o_nezavisimosti_parlament_sobiraetsya|script-title=ru:Пророссийские силы заблокировали ВР Крыма, требуют референдума о независимости: парламент собирается на внеочередное заседание.|trans-title=Pro-Russian forces blocked the Verkhovna Rada of Crimea demanding an independence referendum: Parliament to meet in an extraordinary session.|language=ru|publisher=censor.net.ua|date=25 February 2014}}</ref> On the same day, crowds gathered again outside Sevastopol's city hall on Tuesday as rumours spread that security forces could arrest Chaly, but police chief Alexander Goncharov said that his officers would refuse to carry out "criminal orders" issued by Kyiv. Viktor Neganov, a Sevastopol-based adviser to the Internal Affairs Minister, condemned the events in the city as a coup. "Chaly represents the interests of the Kremlin which likely gave its tacit approval," he said. Sevastopol City State Administration chairman Vladimir Yatsuba was booed and heckled on 23 February, when he told a pro-Russian rally that Crimea was part of Ukraine. He resigned the next day.<ref name=SevastopolInstalls>{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/25/ukraine-sevastopol-installs-pro-russian-mayor|title=Ukraine: Sevastopol installs pro-Russian mayor as separatism fears grow|author=Howard Amos|work=The Guardian|date=25 February 2014}}</ref> In Simferopol, the Regional State Administration building was blockaded with hundreds of protesters, including neo-Cossacks, demanding a referendum of separation; the rally was organized by the '']''.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rbc.ru/politics/25/02/2014/907178.shtml|script-title=ru:Активисты Крыма требуют отделения полуострова от Украины|trans-title=Activists demand separation of Crimea from Ukraine|language=ru|publisher=rbc.ru|date=25 February 2014|access-date=21 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151223120800/http://www.rbc.ru/politics/25/02/2014/907178.shtml|archive-date=23 December 2015}}</ref>
The means by which the referendum was conducted were widely criticized by foreign governments and in the Ukrainian and international press, with reports that anyone holding a Russian passport regardless of residency in Crimea was allowed to vote. However, Russia defended the integrity of the voting process, and a group of ] observers, principally from ] and ] political parties aligned with Putin, said the referendum was conducted in a free and fair manner.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.opendemocracy.net/od-russia/anton-shekhovtsov/kremlin%E2%80%99s-marriage-of-convenience-with-european-far-right|agency=oDR|title=The Kremlin's marriage of convenience with the European far right|date=28 April 2014|accessdate=12 June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://deredactie.be/cm/vrtnieuws/buitenland/1.1908165|agency=De Redactie|language=Dutch|title=Extreemrechtse partijen uitgenodigd op referendum Krim|date=13 March 2014|accessdate=12 June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.dw.de/referendum-day-in-crimeas-simferopol/a-17500378|agency=Deutsche Welle|title=Referendum day in Crimea's Simferopol|date=16 March 2014|accessdate=12 June 2014}}</ref>


On 26 February, near the ] building, 4,000–5,000 ] and supporters of the ]-Crimea movement faced 600–700 supporters of pro-Russian organizations and the ] Party.<ref>, ] (26 February 2014)</ref> Tatars leaders organised the demonstration in order to block the sitting of the Crimean parliament which is "doing everything to execute plans of separation of Crimea from Ukraine". ] Chairman ] said that the Crimean parliament would not consider separation from Ukraine, and that earlier reports that parliament would hold a debate on the matter were provocations.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/02/26/7016360/|script-title=uk:У парламенті Криму заявили, що не планують відділятись від України|trans-title=Crimean parliament stated they did not plan to separate from Ukraine|language=uk|work=Ukrayinska Pravda|date=26 February 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| title=Crimean Parliament doesn't raise a question of separation from Ukraine, speaker said.| url=http://www.unian.ua/politics/890147-u-vr-krimu-ne-stavlyat-pitannya-pro-vidokremlennya-spiker.html}}</ref> Tatars created self-defence groups, encouraged collaboration with Russians, Ukrainians, and people of other nationalities, and called for the protection of churches, mosques, synagogues, and other important sites.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/02/26/7016376/|script-title=uk:Татари розійшлися створювати самооборону, щоб захищати Крим|trans-title=Tartars dispersed to organise themselves to defend Crimea|language=uk|work=Ukrayinksa Pravda|date=26 February 2014}}</ref> By nightfall the Crimean Tatars had left; several hundred Russian Unity supporters rallied on.<ref>, ] (26 February 2014)</ref>
== Breakaway republic ==
On 17 March, following the official announcement of the ] results, the ] declared the formal independence of the '''Republic of Crimea''', comprising the territories of both the ] and the city of ], which was granted special status within the breakaway republic.<ref name=":0">{{cite web|url = http://www.rada.crimea.ua/act/11748|script-title=ru:Постановление Верховной Рады Автономной Республики Крым от 17 марта 2014 года № 1745-6/14 "О независимости Крыма"|website = www.rada.crimea.ua|language = Russian}}</ref> The Crimean parliament declared the "partial repeal" of Ukrainian laws and began nationalizing private and Ukrainian state property located on the Crimean Peninsula, including Ukrainian ]s<ref>{{cite web|url = http://nbnews.com.ua/ru/news/115865/|script-title=ru:Парламент Крыма национализировал порты полуострова и их имущество|website = nbnews.com.ua|language = Russian|date = 17 March 2014}}</ref> and property of ].<ref>{{cite web|url = http://glavred.info/ekonomika/krym-nacionaliziroval-chernomorneftegaz-274301.html|script-title=ru:Крым национализировал "Черноморнефтегаз"|website = glavred.info|date = 17 March 2014|language = Russian}}</ref> Parliament also formally requested that the ] admit the breakaway republic into Russia.<ref name="guardian20140317">{{cite news|url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/17/ukraine-crimea-russia-referendum-complain-result|title=Crimea applies to be part of Russian Federation after vote to leave Ukraine|publisher=The Guardian|date=17 March 2014}}</ref> On same day, the ''de facto'' Supreme Council renamed itself the Crimean State Council,<ref>{{cite web|url = http://ria.ru/world/20140317/999851464.html#ixzz2x3HYXyPo|script-title=ru:Крым начал процедуру присоединения к РФ, объявив о независимости|publisher = ]|language = Russian|date = 17 March 2014}}</ref> declared the ] an official currency alongside the ],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://en.itar-tass.com/economy/723938"|title=Russian ruble announced Crimea's official currency|publisher=]|date=17 March 2014}}</ref> and announced that Crimea would switch to ] (]) on 30 March.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://lenta.ru/news/2014/03/17/time/|script-title=ru:Названа дата перехода Крыма на московское время|website = ]|date = 17 March 2014|language = Russian}}</ref>


The ]'s acting Internal Affairs Minister ] tasked Crimean law enforcement agencies not to provoke conflicts and to do whatever necessary to prevent clashes with pro-Russian forces; and he added "I think, that way – through a dialogue – we shall achieve much more than with standoffs".<ref>, ] (26 February 2014)</ref> New ] (SBU) chief ] requested that the ] provide around-the-clock monitoring of the security situation in Crimea.<ref>, ] (26 February 2014)</ref> Russian troops took control of the main route to ] on orders from Russian president ]. A military checkpoint, with a Russian flag and Russian military vehicles, was set up on the main highway between the city and ].<ref name=globe26>{{cite news|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/tension-in-crimea-as-pro-russia-and-pro-ukraine-groups-stage-competing-rallies/article17110382/#dashboard/follows/|title=Globe in Ukraine: Russian-backed fighters restrict access to Crimean city|work=The Globe and Mail|author=Mark MacKinnon|date=26 February 2014}}</ref>
Putin officially recognized the Republic of Crimea by ]<ref>{{cite news|url=http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/6884|agency=Kremlin|title=Executive Order on recognising Republic of Crimea|date=17 March 2014|accessdate=17 March 2014}}</ref> and approved the admission of Crimea and Sevastopol as ].<ref>{{Wayback |date=20140318095051 |url=http://pravo.gov.ru:8080/page.aspx?92062 |title=Распоряжение Президента Российской Федерации от 17.03.2014 № 63-рп "О подписании Договора между Российской Федерацией и Республикой Крым о принятии в Российскую Федерацию Республики Крым и образовании в составе Российской Федерации новых субъектов"}} at ] {{ru icon}}</ref>


=== Russian takeover ===
== Accession treaty and immediate aftermath ==
On 27 February, unmarked Russian forces in cooperation with local nationalist paramilitaries took over the ] and ], with ]<ref>{{cite news|url=http://estonianworld.com/security/lessons-identified-crimea-estonias-national-defence-model-meet-needs/|agency=Estonian World|title=Lessons identified in Crimea – does Estonia's national defence model meet our needs?|date=5 May 2014|access-date=26 June 2022|quote=about 30–50 Russian special forces members entered and occupied the parliament and government buildings of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea}}</ref> ] the ] and the building of the Council of Ministers in ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/28/world/europe/crimea-ukraine.html|title=Gunmen Seize Government Buildings in Crimea|author=Andrew Higgins|author2=Steven Erlanger|work=The New York Times|date=27 February 2014|access-date=25 February 2015}}</ref> ] were raised over these buildings<ref>{{cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2014/02/27/world/europe/ukraine-politics/|title=Gunmen seize government buildings in Ukraine's Crimea, raise Russian flag|date=27 February 2014|publisher=CNN|last1=Gumuchian|first1=Marie-Louise|last2=Smith-Spark|first2=Laura|last3=Formanek|first3=Ingrid}}</ref> and ]s were erected outside them.<ref name="LentaBerkut">{{cite web|url=http://lenta.ru/news/2014/02/27/berkut/|title=Бывший СССР: Украина: Украинский депутат объявил о бунте крымского "Беркута"|trans-title=Former USSR: Ukraine: Ukrainian MP announces riot of Crimean "Golden eagle"|website=]}}</ref> Pro-Russian forces also occupied several localities in ] on the ], which is geographically a part of Crimea.
{{Main|Republic of Crimea|Crimean Federal District|Political status of Crimea}}
{{See also|Crimean speech of Vladimir Putin}}
{{Commons category|Crimean accession March 17 to 21|Formal admission ceremony and Russian legislation, 17 to 21 March 2014}}
{{Wikisourcelang|ru|Договор о принятии в Российскую Федерацию Республики Крым и образовании в составе Российской Федерации новых субъектов|Treaty on Accession of the Republic of Crimea to Russia}}
The Treaty on Accession of the Republic of Crimea to Russia was signed between representatives of the Republic of Crimea (including Sevastopol, with which the rest of Crimea briefly unified) and the Russian Federation on 18 March 2014 to lay out terms for the immediate admission of the ] and ] as ] and part of the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://kremlin.ru/news/20605 |title=Договор между Российской Федерацией и Республикой Крым о принятии в Российскую Федерацию Республики Крым и образовании в составе Российской Федерации новых субъектов |publisher=Kremlin.ru |accessdate=2014-04-10}}</ref><ref>, ], 18 March 2014</ref> It was ratified by the ] by March 21.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://rt.com/news/russia-parliament-crimea-ratification-293/|agency=RT|title=Crimea, Sevastopol officially join Russia as Putin signs final decree|date=22 March 2014|accessdate=9 April 2014}}</ref>


Whilst the "]" were occupying the Crimean parliament building, the parliament held an emergency session.<ref name=interfax27feb>{{Cite web|url=https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/193292.html|title=Number of Crimean deputies present at referendum resolution vote unclear|website=Interfax-Ukraine|access-date=28 August 2022}}</ref><ref name="reuters13mar">{{Cite news|last=De Carbonnel|first=Alissa|date=13 March 2014|title=RPT-INSIGHT-How the separatists delivered Crimea to Moscow|work=]|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/ukraine-crisis-russia-aksyonov-idINL6N0M93AH20140313|access-date=28 November 2020}}</ref> It voted to terminate the Crimean government, and replace Prime Minister ] with ].<ref name="The Christian Science Monitor">, (27 February 2014).</ref> Aksyonov belonged to the ] party, which received 4% of the vote in the last election.<ref name=reuters13mar /> According to the ], the prime minister of Crimea is appointed by the Supreme Council of Crimea in consultation with the ].<ref name="Yanu'snewPMC">, ] (7 November 2011).</ref><ref>{{in lang|uk}} , ] (27 February 2014).</ref> Both Aksyonov and speaker ] stated that they viewed Viktor Yanukovych as the ''de jure'' president of Ukraine, through whom they were able to ask Russia for assistance.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://lenta.ru/news/2014/02/27/truepresident/|script-title=ru:Крымские власти объявили о подчинении Януковичу|date=28 February 2014|website=]|language=ru|trans-title=Crimean authorities declared submission to Yanukovych}}</ref>
On 19 March Putin submitted to the State Duma, the lower house of parliament, a treaty of Crimea's reunification with Russia and a constitutional amendment on setting up two new constituent territories of the Russian Federation.<ref>{{cite web|author= |url=http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/724381 |title=Putin submits Treaty on Crimea's accession, new constitutional amendment to State Duma |publisher=En.itar-tass.com |accessdate=19 March 2014}}</ref> Russian Constitutional Court found that treaty is in compliance with Constitution of Russia. The court sat in an emergency session following a formal request by President Vladimir Putin to assess the constitutionality of the treaty.<ref>{{cite web|author= |url=http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/724320 |title=Treaty on Crimea's accession to Russia corresponds to Russian Constitution |publisher=En.itar-tass.com |accessdate=19 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://en.ria.ru/russia/20140319/188570695/Russian-Constitutional-Court-Backs-Crimea-Reunification.html |title=Russian Constitutional Court Backs Crimea Reunification, RIA NOVOSTI |publisher=En.ria.ru |accessdate=19 March 2014}}</ref>


The parliament also voted to hold a referendum on greater autonomy set for 25 May. The troops had cut all of the building's communications, and took MPs' phones as they entered.<ref name=interfax27feb /><ref name=reuters13mar /> No independent journalists were allowed inside the building while the votes were taking place.<ref name=reuters13mar /> Some MPs said they were being threatened and that votes were cast for them and other MPs, even though they were not in the chamber.<ref name=reuters13mar /> ] reported "it is impossible to find out whether all the 64 members of the 100-member legislature who were registered as present at when the two decisions were voted on or whether someone else used the plastic voting cards of some of them" because due to the armed occupation of parliament it was unclear how many MPs were present.<ref name="IUCR27214">, ] (27 February 2014).</ref>
After the Russian Constitutional Court upheld the constitutionality of the treaty, the State Duma ratified it on 20 March.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/724601|title=State Duma ratifies treaty on admission of Crimea into Russia|publisher=]|date=20 March 2014 |accessdate=20 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rg.ru/2014/03/20/zakon-krim.html|title=Госдума приняла закон о присоединении Крыма|publisher=]|date=20 March 2014 |accessdate=20 March 2014}}</ref> The Duma also approved the draft federal constitutional law admitting Crimea and Sevastopol and establishing them as federal subjects.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://vote.duma.gov.ru/vote/85091 |title=Справка о голосовании по вопросу:О проекте федерального конституционного закона № 475944-6 "О принятии в Российскую Федерацию Республики Крым и образовании в составе Российской Федерации новых субъектов - Республики Крым и города федерального значения Севастополя" (первое чтение) |publisher=Vote.duma.gov.ru |accessdate=2014-03-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://vote.duma.gov.ru/vote/85092 |title=Справка о голосовании по вопросу: О проекте федерального конституционного закона № 475944-6 "О принятии в Российскую Федерацию Республики Крым и образовании в составе Российской Федерации новых субъектов - Республики Крым и города федерального значения Севастополя" (в целом) |publisher=Vote.duma.gov.ru |date=2014-03-20 |accessdate=2014-04-10}}</ref> ]'s ] was the only State Duma member to vote against the measures. A day later, the treaty itself and the required amendment to article 65 of the Russian Constitution (which lists the ]) were ratified by the ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/724749|title=Russian Federation Council ratifies treaty on Crimea's entry to Russia|publisher=]|date=21 March 2014 |accessdate=21 March 2014}}</ref> and almost immediately signed into law by Putin.<ref> ] {{ru icon}}</ref> Crimea's admission to the Russian Federation was considered retroactive to 18 March, when Putin and Crimean leaders signed the draft treaty.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://base.garant.ru/70618342/|title = Федеральный конституционный закон от 21 марта 2014 г. N 6-ФКЗ "О принятии в Российскую Федерацию Республики Крым и образовании в составе Российской Федерации новых субъектов - Республики Крым и города федерального значения Севастополя"|quote = Article 1.<...>3. Republic of Crimea shall be considered admitted to the Russian Federation since date of signing of the Agreement between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea on the Accession of the Republic of Crimea to the Russian Federation and the Formation of New Federal Constituent Entities within the Russian Federation|language = Russian}}</ref>


The head of parliament's information and analysis department, Olha Sulnikova, had phoned from inside the ] to journalists and had told them 61 of the registered 64 deputies had voted for the referendum resolution and 55 for the resolution to dismiss the government.<ref name="IUCR27214" /> Donetsk People's Republic separatist ] said in January 2015 that Crimean members of parliament were held at gunpoint, and were forced to support the annexation.<ref name="KP11MA2015">{{cite news|url=https://www.kyivpost.com/content/kyiv-post-plus/putins-narrative-on-crimea-annexation-takes-an-evolutionary-leap-383183.html|title=Putin's narrative on Crimea annexation takes an evolutionary leap|work=Kyiv Post|date=11 March 2015|access-date=12 March 2015}}</ref> These actions were immediately declared illegal by the Ukrainian interim government.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://obozrevatel.com/politics/08249-turchinov-izdal-ukaz-o-nezakonnosti-izbraniya-novogo-premera-kryima.htm|script-title=uk:Турчинов издал указ о незаконности избрания нового премьера Крыма|trans-title=Turchynov issued a decree on the illegality of the election of a new prime minister of Crimea|date=1 March 2014|language=uk}}</ref>
On 24 March, Ukraine ordered the full withdrawal of all of its armed forces from Crimea.<ref>{{cite web| url =http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/24/world/europe/ukraine-crisis/| date= 24 March 2014| accessdate = 24 March 2014| title = Ukraine orders Crimea troop withdrawal as Russia seizes naval base| publisher =CNN}}</ref> The Ukrainian Ministry of Defense reported about half of Ukraine's troops in Crimea defected to Russia.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://un.ua/eng/article/500186.html |title=Ukrainian News - Defense Ministry: 50% Of Ukrainian Troops In Crimea Defect To Russia |publisher=Un.ua |date=2014-03-24 |accessdate=2014-04-01}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Jonathan Marcus |url=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26713727 |title=BBC News - Ukrainian forces withdraw from Crimea |publisher=Bbc.com |date=2014-03-24 |accessdate=2014-04-01}}</ref>


On the same day, more troops in unmarked uniforms, assisted this time by what appeared to be local '']'' riot police (as well as Russian troops from the ] dressed in Berkut uniforms),<ref>{{cite web|url=https://informnapalm.org/en/how-ukrainian-berkut-officer-from-russian-ulyanovsk-assaulted-crimean-parliament-back-in-2014/|title=How 'Ukrainian Berkut Officer' from Russian Ulyanovsk Assaulted Crimean Parliament Back in 2014|publisher=]|date=9 July 2015|access-date=20 October 2015}}</ref> established ]s on the ] and the ], which separate Crimea from the Ukrainian mainland.<ref name="LentaBerkut" /><ref>{{cite web|url=http://vizit.ks.ua/news/post_chongar_kontroliruet_krymskij_berkut_podchinennyj_janukovichu/2014-02-27-3148|title=ПОСТ "ЧОНГАР" КОНТРОЛИРУЕТ КРЫМСКИЙ "БЕРКУТ" ПОДЧИНЕННЫЙ ЯНУКОВИЧУ видео) – 27 Февраля 2014 – "Новый Визит" Генический информационный портал|trans-title=POST "CHONGAR" CONTROLS CRIMEAN "BERKUT" SUBJECT TO YANUKOVYCH (video) – February 27, 2014 – "New Visit" Genetic Information Portal|work=vizit.ks.ua|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140314131955/http://vizit.ks.ua/news/post_chongar_kontroliruet_krymskij_berkut_podchinennyj_janukovichu/2014-02-27-3148|archive-date=14 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.allcrimea.net/news/2014/2/27/na-chongarskom-perevale-dezhurit-berkut-i-nekie-grazhdanskie-litsa-6025/|script-title=ru:На Чонгарском перешейке дежурит «Беркут» и некие гражданские лица|trans-title="Berkut" and some civilians act as sentries at Chongarsky Isthmus|language=ru|publisher=news.allcrimea.net|date=27 February 2014|access-date=24 March 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://armyansk.info/news/news-archive/120-2014/4592-pod-armyansk-styanulis-siloviki-iz-berkuta|title=Армянск Информационный – Под Армянск стянулись силовики из "Беркута"|trans-title=Armyansk Informational – Security forces from "Berkut" gathered near Armyansk|author=Армянск Информационный (Armyansk Informational)}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://lenta.ru/news/2014/02/28/blockpost/|title=Lenta.ru: Бывший СССР: Украина: СМИ сообщили о блокпостах "Беркута" на въездах в Крым|trans-title=Former USSR: Ukraine: media reported about Berkut checkpoints at the entrances to Crimea|website=]}}</ref> Within hours, Ukraine had been cut off from Crimea. Shortly afterwards, Ukrainian TV channels became unavailable for Crimean viewers, and some of them were replaced with Russian stations.
On 27 March, the ] adopted a ] ], which declared the Crimean referendum and subsequent status change invalid, by a vote of 100 to 11, with 58 abstentions and 24 absent.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=47443&Cr=Ukraine&Cr1= |title=United Nations News Centre - Backing Ukraine's territorial integrity, UN Assembly declares Crimea referendum invalid |publisher=Un.org |accessdate=2014-04-01}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Charbonneau |first=Louis |url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/27/us-ukraine-crisis-un-idUSBREA2Q1GA20140327 |title=U.N. General Assembly declares Crimea secession vote invalid |publisher=Reuters |accessdate=2014-04-01}}</ref>


]
Crimea and Sevastopol switched to ] at the end of March.<ref name="Crimean time change">{{cite news|title=В 22.00 в Крыму и в Севастополе стрелки часов переведут на два часа вперёд – на московское время|url=http://www.1tv.ru/news/social/255292|accessdate=29 March 2014|date=29 March 2014}}</ref><ref name="Time switch">{{cite news|title=Crimea to set clocks to Russia time|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/crimea-to-set-clocks-to-russia-time-114033000014_1.html}}</ref>
On 1 March 2014, Aksyonov said that he would exercise control of all Ukrainian military and security installations on the peninsula. He also asked Putin for "assistance in ensuring peace and tranquillity" in Crimea.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Mirovalev|first=Mansur|date=1 March 2014|title=Crimea PM Takes Control Of Army, Police And Seeks Russian Help|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/ukraine-crisis/crimea-pm-takes-control-army-police-seeks-russian-help-n41826|access-date=19 June 2021|website=]}}</ref> Putin promptly received authorisation from the ] for a ] until the "political-social situation in the country is normalized".<ref>{{Cite web|date=1 March 2014|title=Federation Council Approves Putin's Request for Troop Deployment in Ukraine|url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/03/01/federation-council-approves-putins-request-for-troop-deployment-in-ukraine-a32583|access-date=19 June 2021|website=]}}</ref><ref name="Federation 2014">. ]. 1 March 2014.</ref> Putin's swift manoeuvre prompted protests of some Russian intelligentsia and ] against a Russian military campaign in Crimea. By 2 March, Russian troops moving from the country's naval base in ] and reinforced by troops, armour, and helicopters from mainland Russia exercised complete control over the Crimean Peninsula.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/world/russian-parliament-approves-use-of-army-in-ukraine/article5739708.ece|title=Russian Parliament approves use of army in Ukraine.|newspaper=The Hindu|date=March 2014|last1=Radyuhin|first1=Vladimir}}</ref><ref name="walker-the-guardian-2014-descend">{{cite news|last=Walker|first=Shaun|date=4 March 2014|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/04/ukraine-crisis-russian-troops-crimea-john-kerry-kiev|title=Russian takeover of Crimea will not descend into war, says Vladimir Putin|newspaper=]|access-date=4 March 2014}}</ref><ref name="bloomberg-news-2014-request">{{cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-03-04/russia-calls-ukraine-intervention-legal-citing-yanukovych-letter|title=Russia Stays in Ukraine as Putin Channels Yanukovych Request|first1=Sangwon|last1=Yoon|first2=Daryna|last2=Krasnolutska|first3=Kateryna|last3=Choursina|date=4 March 2014|newspaper=]|access-date=29 August 2014}}</ref> Russian troops operated in Crimea without insignia. On 3 March they ].


On 4 March, ] said there were units of the ], ] and ] deployed and operating in Crimea, instead of ] personnel, which violated international agreements signed by Ukraine and Russia.<ref name="zsu_henshtab">{{cite news|url=http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/03/5/7017615/|script-title=uk:Генштаб ЗСУ: у Криму – не лише військові з частин Чорноморського флоту|trans-title=General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces: in Crimea{{spaces}}– not just soldiers from units of Black Sea Fleet|newspaper=]|language=uk|date=5 March 2014|access-date=30 December 2014}}</ref><ref name="zsu_interfax">{{cite news|url=https://interfax.com.ua/news/general/194412.html|date=4 March 2014|access-date=30 December 2014|language=ru|script-title=ru:В Крыму находятся российские военнослужащие не только из частей ЧФ РФ, утверждают в Генштабе ВСУ|trans-title=The Black Sea Fleet are not the only Russian fighting forces to be found in Crimea, says the General Staff of AF of Ukraine}}</ref> At a press conference on the same day, Russian president Vladimir Putin said that Russia had no plans to annex Crimea.<ref name="de">{{Cite report|url=https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1400/RR1498/RAND_RR1498.pdf|title=Lessons from Russia's Operations in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine|last1=Kofman|first1=Michael|last2=Migacheva|first2=Katya|publisher=RAND Corporation|location=Santa Monica|pages=14–15|last3=Nichiporuk|first3=Brian|last4=Radin|first4=Andrew|last5=Tkacheva|first5=Olesya|last6=Oberholtzer|first6=Jenny|year=2017}}</ref> He also said that it had no plans to invade Ukraine, but that it might intervene if Russians in Ukraine were threatened.<ref name="de"/> This was part of a pattern of public denials of the ongoing Russian military operation.<ref name="de"/>
On 2 April, Russia formally ] the ] and ].<ref> ] {{ru icon}}</ref> Putin cited "the accession of the ] and Sevastopol into Russia" and resulting "practical end of ] relationships" as his reason for the denunciation.<ref>See {{ru icon}}</ref> On the same day, he signed a decree formally rehabilitating the Crimean Tatars, who were ] in 1944, and the Armenian, German, Greek, and Bulgarian minority communities in the region that ] also ordered removed in the 1940s.


Numerous media reports and statements by the Ukrainian and foreign governments noted the identity of the unmarked troops as Russian soldiers, but Russian officials ] the identity of their forces, claiming they were local "self-defence" units over whom they had no authority.<ref name="auto1"/> As late as 17 April, Russian foreign minister ] said that there were no "excessive Russian troops" in Ukraine.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=McCarthy|first1=Tom|last2=Tran|first2=Mark|date=17 April 2014|title=Ukraine crisis: Obama says Russia has 'hand' in 'disruption and chaos'|work=]|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/17/ukraine-diplomats-meet-in-geneva-in-bid-to-ease-crisis-live-coverage|access-date=19 June 2021|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> At the same press conference, Putin said of the peninsula that "only citizens themselves, in conditions of free expression of will and their security can determine their future".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.interfax.ru/russia/362633|script-title=ru:Россия не рассматривает вариант присоединения Крыма к России|trans-title=Russia is not considering the option of annexing Crimea to Russia|date=4 March 2014|agency=]|language=ru}}</ref> Putin later acknowledged that he had ordered "work to bring Crimea back into Russia" as early as February.<ref name="revea"/> He also acknowledged that in early March there were "secret opinion polls" held in Crimea, which, according to him, reported overwhelming popular support for Crimea's incorporation into Russia.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://tass.ru/politika/1111359|script-title=ru:Путин: Россия не планировала присоединять Крым|trans-title=Putin: Russia did not plan to annex Crimea|date=10 April 2014|agency=]|language=ru}}</ref>
On 11 April, the Constitution of the Republic of Crimea and City Charter of Sevastopol were adopted,<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2451537|script-title=ru:Крым и Севастополь ожидают представления свыше|date = 12 March 2014|publisher = ]|language = Russian|last = Nikiforov|first = Vadim|accessdate = 23 April 2014}}</ref> and on same day, the new federal subjects were enumerated in a newly published revision of the Russian Constitution.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.mk.ru/politics/russia/article/2014/04/11/1012747-kryim-propisalsya-v-konstitutsii-rossii.html|script-title=ru:Крым прописался в конституции России|date = 11 April 2014|website = mk.ru|last = Nezamyatnyj|first = Ivan|language = Russian}}</ref>

{{multiple image
Russia eventually admitted its troops' presence.<ref>{{Cite web|date=17 April 2014|title=Путин: наши военные "встали за спиной" самообороны Крыма|trans-title=Putin: our military "stood behind the back" of the self-defense of Crimea|url=https://www.bbc.com/russian/russia/2014/04/140417_putin_phone_line|access-date=19 June 2021|website=]|language=ru}}</ref> Defence Minister ] said the country's military actions in Crimea were undertaken by forces of the ] and were justified by "threat to lives of Crimean ]s" and danger of "takeover of Russian military infrastructure by ]".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://tass.ru/politika/1097051|script-title=ru:Шойгу: действия Минобороны РФ в Крыму были вызваны угрозой жизни мирного населения|trans-title=Shoigu: the actions of the Russian Defense Ministry in Crimea were caused by a threat to the lives of civilians|agency=]|date=4 April 2014|language=ru}}</ref>{{Better source needed|date=June 2021}} Ukraine complained that by increasing its troop presence in Crimea, Russia violated the agreement under which it headquartered its Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-politics/1626422-russia_redeploys_ships_of_baltic_and_northern_fleets_to_sevastopol_violates_agreement_with_ukraine_317983.html|title=Russia redeploys ships of Baltic and Northern fleets to Sevastopol, violates agreement with Ukraine|date=3 March 2014|agency=]|access-date=21 October 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151126044846/http://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-politics/1626422-russia_redeploys_ships_of_baltic_and_northern_fleets_to_sevastopol_violates_agreement_with_ukraine_317983.html|archive-date=26 November 2015}}</ref> and violated the country's ].<ref name="blogs.telegraph.co.uk">{{cite web|url=http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/charlescrawford/100262865/vladimir-putins-illegal-occupation-of-crimea-is-an-attempt-to-put-europes-borders-up-for-grabs/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140310214230/http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/charlescrawford/100262865/vladimir-putins-illegal-occupation-of-crimea-is-an-attempt-to-put-europes-borders-up-for-grabs/|archive-date=10 March 2014|author=Charles Crawford|title=Vladimir Putin's illegal occupation of Crimea is an attempt to put Europe's borders up for grabs|date=10 March 2014|work=The Daily Telegraph|access-date=24 March 2015}}</ref> The United States and United Kingdom accused Russia of breaking the terms of the ], by which Russia, the US, and the UK had reaffirmed their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the ] or political independence of Ukraine.<ref name="USStatement"/> The Russian government said the ]<ref name="budapest-memorandum">{{Cite web|date=29 March 2022|title=budapest-memorandum|url=https://www.uawarexplained.com/budapest-memorandum/?version=sixty-minutes/|access-date=29 March 2022|website=UaWarExplained.com}}</ref> did not apply due to "circumstances resulting from the action of internal political or socio-economic factors".<ref>{{cite web|date=20 May 2014|title=Медведев: Россия не гарантирует целостность Украины|trans-title=Medvedev: Russia does not guarantee the integrity of Ukraine|url=https://www.bbc.com/russian/rolling_news/2014/05/140520_rn_medvedev_ukraine.shtml|access-date=19 June 2021|website=]|language=ru}}</ref> In March 2015, retired Russian Admiral {{Interlanguage link|Igor Kasatonov|ru}} stated that according to his information the Russian troop deployment in Crimea included six helicopter landings and three landings of an ] with 500 people.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Urbanskaya|first=Tatyana|date=22 February 2018|title=Operation "Crimea is Ours"|url=https://www.unian.info/politics/10017818-operation-crimea-is-ours.html|website=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=13 March 2015|title=Касатонов: Черноморский флот был плацдармом для аннексии Крыма|trans-title=Kasatonov: the Black Sea Fleet was a springboard for the annexation of Crimea|url=https://www.currenttime.tv/a/26899211.html|website=]|language=ru}}</ref>
| direction = vertical

| image1 = Federal Law On Ratifying the Agreement between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea on Admitting to the Russian Federation.pdf
=== Legal issues ===
| caption1 = Federal Law on Ratifying the Agreement between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea on Admitting to the Russian Federation the Republic of Crimea and Establishing within the Russian Federation New Constituent Entities.
{{See also|Declaration of Independence of Crimea}}
| image2 = Federal Constitutional Law On Admitting to the Russian Federation the Republic of Crimea.pdf
{{Crimean Crisis of 2014}}
| caption2 = Federal Constitutional Law on Admitting to the Russian Federation the Republic of Crimea and Establishing within the Russian Federation the New Constituent Entities of the Republic of Crimea and the City of Federal Importance Sevastopol.

}}
The obligations between Russia and Ukraine with regard to ] and the prohibition of the use of force are laid down in a number of multilateral or bilateral agreements to which Russia and Ukraine are signatories.<ref name="UkraineStatement"/><ref name="NATOStatement"/><ref name="USStatement"/><ref name="International Law">{{cite journal|url=https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2520530|title=The Crimea Crisis – An International Law Perspective|date=17 April 2014|journal=Heidelberg Journal of International Law|ssrn=2520530|access-date=7 November 2014|last=Marxsen|first=Christian}}</ref>

] said that Russian troops in the Crimean Peninsula were aimed "to ensure proper conditions for the people of Crimea to be able to freely express their will,"<ref>{{cite web|url = http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20796|title=Direct Line with Vladimir Putin|date=17 April 2014|website=kremlin.ru|access-date=17 April 2014}}</ref> whilst Ukraine and other nations argue that such intervention is a violation of ].<ref name="blogs.telegraph.co.uk" />

In the 1994 ]<ref name="budapest-memorandum"/> Russia was among those who affirmed to respect the territorial integrity of Ukraine (including Crimea) and to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine.<ref name="USStatement">{{cite web|url=http://mfa.gov.ua/en/news-feeds/foreign-offices-news/20572-spilyna-zajava-ukrajini-ta-spoluchenih-shtativ-ameriki|title=Joint Statement by the United States and Ukraine|website=mfa.gov.ua|date=25 March 2014|access-date=24 March 2015|archive-date=19 April 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140419014331/http://mfa.gov.ua/en/news-feeds/foreign-offices-news/20572-spilyna-zajava-ukrajini-ta-spoluchenih-shtativ-ameriki}}</ref><ref name="International Law"/> The 1997 Russian–Ukrainian ] again reaffirmed the inviolability of the borders between both states,<ref name="International Law"/> and required Russian forces in Crimea to respect the sovereignty of Ukraine, honor its legislation and not interfere in the internal affairs of the country.<ref name="BoundByTreaty"/>

The Russian–Ukrainian ] signed in 1997 and prolonged in 2010, determined the status of Russian military presence in Crimea and restricted their operations,<ref name="International Law"/> including requirement to show their "military identification cards" when crossing the international border and that operations beyond designated deployment sites was permitted only after coordination with Ukraine.<ref name="BoundByTreaty">{{Cite web|date=11 March 2014|title=Bound by treaty: Russia, Ukraine and Crimea|url=https://www.dw.com/en/bound-by-treaty-russia-ukraine-and-crimea/a-17487632|access-date=17 December 2020|website=Deutsche Welle}}</ref> According to Ukraine usage of navigation stations and troop movements were improperly covered by the treaty and were violated many times as well as related court decisions. February's troop movements were in "complete disregard" of the treaty.<ref name="Yeroshko">{{cite news|last=Yeroshko|first=Iryna|title=Ukraine: Russia shows 'complete disregard' for Black Sea Fleet agreement in Crimea|url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/what-parts-of-the-black-sea-fleet-agreement-is-russia-violating-338358.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140305020550/http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/what-parts-of-the-black-sea-fleet-agreement-is-russia-violating-338358.html|archive-date=5 March 2014|newspaper=Kyiv Post|date=4 March 2014}}</ref>{{NoteTag|Dilanian (2014) on 3 March, "CIA director John Brennan told a senior lawmaker Monday that a 1997 treaty between Russia and Ukraine allows up to 25,000 Russia troops in the vital Crimea region, so Russia may not consider its recent troop movements to be an invasion, U.S. officials said."<ref name="Dilanian">{{cite news|url = https://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-us-intelligence-russia-ukraine-20140303-story.html|title = CIA reportedly says Russia sees treaty as justifying Ukraine moves|newspaper=]|date=3 March 2014|access-date=12 March 2014|first=Ken|last=Dilanian}}</ref>}}

]" and trucks after the seizure of ] military base, 9 March 2014]]

{{Anchor|Declaration of Independence: a letter of intent}}According to the Constitution of Russia, the admission of new federal subjects is governed by federal constitutional law (art. 65.2).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://constitution.garant.ru/english/|title=Constitution of the Russian Federation|website=Official site|date=30 December 2008|access-date=3 January 2016}}</ref> Such a law was adopted in 2001, and it postulates that admission of a foreign state or its part into Russia shall be based on a mutual accord between the Russian Federation and the relevant state and shall take place pursuant to an international treaty between the two countries; moreover, it must be initiated by the state in question, not by its subdivision or by Russia.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2014)004-e|title=Opinion on "Whether Draft Federal constitutional Law No. 462741-6 on amending the Federal constitutional Law of the Russian Federation on the procedure of admission to the Russian Federation and creation of a new subject within the Russian Federation is compatible with international law" Endorsed by the Venice Commission at Its 98th Plenary Session (Venice, 21–22&nbsp;March 2014)|publisher=]|date=21–22 March 2014}}</ref>

On 28 February 2014, Russian MP ], along with other members of the ], introduced a bill to alter Russia's procedure for adding federal subjects. According to the bill, accession could be initiated by a subdivision of a country, provided that there is "absence of efficient sovereign state government in foreign state"; the request could be made either by subdivision bodies on their own or on the basis of a referendum held in the subdivision in accordance with corresponding national legislation.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-REF(2014)011-e|title = Draft Federal Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation 'amending the Federal Constitutional Law on the Procedure of Admission to the Russian Federation and creation of a new subject of the Russian Federation in its composition' of the Russian Federation (translation)|date=10 March 2014}}</ref>

On 11 March 2014, both the ] and the ] adopted a ], which stated their intent to declare independence and request full accession to Russia should the pro-Russian option<!-- reword because both options were pro-Russian --> receive the most votes during the scheduled status referendum. The declaration directly referred to the ], by which the ]-populated ] declared independence from Russia's ally ] as the ] in 2008—a unilateral action Russia ]. The Russian government used ] precedent as a legal justification for the annexation of Crimea<ref name="auto3">{{Cite web|url=https://www.e-ir.info/2019/03/18/the-kosovan-precedent-for-the-annexation-of-crimea/|title=The Kosovan Precedent for the Annexation of Crimea|first=Daniel|last=Millar|date=18 March 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Jusufa |first=Elvina |date=2015 |title=The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea |url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=442265 |journal=ILIRIA International Review |language=English |volume=5 |issue=1 |pages=267–286 |doi=10.21113/iir.v5i1.20 |issn=2192-7081}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Rossi |first=Christopher R. |date=2015–2016 |title=Impaled on Morton's Fork: Kosovo, Crimea, and the Sui Generis Circumstance |url=https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/emint30&id=369&div=&collection= |journal=Emory International Law Review |volume=30 |pages=353}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2461153|title=Has the Advisory Opinion's finding that Kosovo's Declaration of Independence was not Contrary to International Law Set an Unfortunate Precedent? by Anne Peters :: SSRN|ssrn=2461153 }}</ref> Many analysts saw the Crimean declaration as an overt effort to pave the way for Crimea's annexation by Russia<ref>{{cite news|url = http://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2014/03/11/verhovnyj-sovet-kryma-prinyal-deklaraciyu-nezavisimosti|script-title=ru:Крым определился, каким способом войдет в Россию|trans-title=Crimea decided how to enter Russia|date=11 March 2014|newspaper=]|language=ru}}</ref> and reject Russia's Kosovo precedent justification as being different compared to Crimea events,<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Šućur |first=Adam |date=2014 |title=Observing the Question of Secession in the Wake of Recent Events in Kosovo, Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Crimea |url=https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/209344 |journal=Zagrebačka pravna revija |language=en |volume=3 |issue=3 |pages=275–301 |issn=1848-6118}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Kosumi |first=Vebi |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hs5QDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT31 |title=Can Crimea Claim Secession and Accession to Russian Federation in Light of Kosovo'S Independence? |date=2018-02-27 |publisher=AuthorHouse |isbn=978-1-5462-8888-6 |pages= |language=en}}</ref> comparing the annexation to the ]'s ] and Czechoslovak ] instead.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2014-03-19 |title=Преса Британії: Путін запозичив аргументи фюрера? |url=https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/press_review/2014/03/140319_uk_press_yg |access-date=2024-09-10 |website=BBC News Україна |language=uk}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-09-30 |title=Мюнхенское согласие на аннексию: земля Чехословакии в обмен на мир с Гитлером |url=https://ruski.radio.cz/myunhenskoe-soglasie-na-anneksiyu-zemlya-chehoslovakii-v-obmen-na-mir-s-gitlerom-8762879 |access-date=2024-09-10 |website=Radio Prague International |language=ru}}</ref>

Crimean authorities' stated plans to declare independence from Ukraine made the Mironov bill unnecessary. On 20 March 2014, two days after the ] was signed, the bill was withdrawn by its initiators.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/%28SpravkaNew%29?OpenAgent&RN=462741-6&02|script-title=ru:Законопроект № 462741-6 О внесении изменений в Федеральный конституционный закон "О порядке принятия в Российскую Федерацию и образования в ее составе нового субъекта Российской Федерации" (в части расширения предмета правового регулирования названного Федерального конституционного закона)|trans-title=Draft Law No. 462741-6 On Amendments to the Federal Constitutional Law "On the Procedure for Admission to the Russian Federation and the Formation of a New Subject of the Russian Federation within it" (in terms of expanding the subject of legal regulation of the named Federal Constitutional Law)|website=]|language=ru|access-date=3 May 2014|archive-date=3 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141103193822/http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/%28SpravkaNew%29?OpenAgent&RN=462741-6&02}}</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=June 2021}}

At its meeting on 21–22 March, the ]'s ] stated that the Mironov bill violated "in particular, the principles of territorial integrity, national sovereignty, non-intervention in the internal affairs of another state and ]" and was therefore incompatible with ].<ref>{{Cite web|date=22 March 2014|title=Venice Commission gives damning verdict on Crimean|url=http://khpg.org//en/1395450934|access-date=19 June 2021|website=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2014)004-e|title = CDL-AD(2014)004-e Opinion on "Whether Draft Federal constitutional Law No. 462741-6 on amending the Federal constitutional Law of the Russian Federation on the procedure of admission to the Russian Federation and creation of a new subject within the Russian Federation is compatible with international law" endorsed by the Venice Commission at its 98th Plenary Session (Venice, 21–22&nbsp;March 2014)|publisher=]|date=March 2014}}</ref>

=== Crimean status referendum ===
{{Main|2014 Crimean status referendum}}
On 27 February 2014, following the takeover of its building and replacement of Ukrainian-elected officials with Russian-controlled actors by Russian special forces,<ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last1=Coynash |first1=Halya |last2=Charron |first2=Austin |date=2019-01-02 |title=Russian-occupied Crimea and the state of exception: repression, persecution, and human rights violations |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15387216.2019.1625279 |journal=Eurasian Geography and Economics |language=en |volume=60 |issue=1 |pages=28–53 |doi=10.1080/15387216.2019.1625279 |issn=1538-7216 |quote=... The referendum was a transparent attempt to validate a violent coup of the Crimean government, and was accordingly held under hostile occupation by the military of a foreign state aided by Russian and pro-Russian paramilitary forces. ...}}</ref> the ] voted to hold a ] on 25 May, with the initial question as to whether Crimea should upgrade its autonomy within Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rada.crimea.ua/act/11610|script-title=ru:Постановление ВР АРК "Об организации и проведении республиканского (местного) референдума по вопросам усовершенствования статуса и полномочий Автономной Республики Крым"|trans-title=Decree of the Verkhovna Rada of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea "On organizing and holding a republican (local) referendum on improving the status and powers of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea"|language=ru|website=rada.crimea.ua|date=9 March 2014|access-date=10 April 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140329214951/http://www.rada.crimea.ua/act/11610|archive-date=29 March 2014}}</ref>{{Primary source inline|date=June 2021}} The referendum date was later moved from 25 May to 30 March.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.interfax.ru/world/362023|script-title=ru:Аксенов: перенос референдума в Крыму связан с тем, что конфликт вышел за пределы разумного|trans-title=Aksyonov: referendum postponement in Crimea is due to the fact that the conflict went beyond reasonable limits|agency=]|language=ru}}</ref> A Ukrainian court declared the referendum to be illegal.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.unian.net/politics/892973-sud-priznal-nezakonnyimi-naznachenie-aksenova-premerom-i-provedenie-referenduma-v-kryimu.html|title=Суд признал незаконными назначение Аксенова премьером и проведение референдума в Крыму|trans-title=The court ruled that Aksenov's appointment as prime minister and the holding of a referendum in Crimea were illegal|agency=Ukrainian Independent Information Agency|access-date=10 April 2014}}</ref>

On 6 March, the Supreme Council moved the referendum date to 16 March and changed its scope to ask a new question: whether Crimea should apply to join Russia as a ] or restore the ] within Ukraine, which the Ukrainian government had previously invalidated. This referendum, unlike one announced earlier, contained no option to maintain the ''status quo'' of governance under the 1998 constitution.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.golos-ameriki.ru/content/world-ukraine-crisis-referendum/1869197.html|script-title=ru:Референдум в Крыму: ответ "нет" не предусмотрен|trans-title=Referendum in Crimea: the answer "no" is not provided|publisher=]|language=ru|access-date=22 April 2014|archive-date=5 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305090114/http://www.golos-ameriki.ru/content/world-ukraine-crisis-referendum/1869197.html}}</ref> Ukraine's acting president, ], stated that "The authorities in Crimea are totally illegitimate, both the parliament and the government. They are forced to work under the barrel of a gun and all their decisions are dictated by fear and are illegal".<ref name="reutersgun">{{cite news|date=6 March 2014|title=Crimean authorities work under barrel of a gun – Ukraine leader|work=]|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/ukraine-crisis-crimea-gun-idUSL6N0M32QY20140306|access-date=8 May 2014}}</ref>

On 14 March, the Crimean status referendum was deemed unconstitutional by the ],<ref>{{cite web|url = http://24tv.ua/ru/ks_priznal_nekonstitutsionnim_postanovlenie_o_provedenii_referenduma_v_krimu_n420886|title = КС признал неконституционным постановление о проведении референдума в Крыму – Видео| date=14 March 2014|trans-title=The Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional the decision to hold a referendum in Crimea – Video}}</ref> and a day later, the ] formally dissolved the Crimean parliament.<ref name="zakon" /> With a referendum looming, Russia massed troops near the Ukrainian eastern border,<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/14/world/europe/ukraine.html| title="Russian Troops Mass at Border With Ukraine"| website=]| date=13 March 2014| last1=Myers| first1=Steven Lee| last2=Smale| first2=Alison}}</ref> likely to threaten escalation and stymie Ukraine's response.

The referendum was held despite the opposition from the Ukrainian government. Official results reported about 95.5% of participating voters in Crimea (turnout was 83%) were in favour of seceding from Ukraine and joining Russia.<ref name=":0" /><ref name="Collett-White">{{cite news|last1=Collett-White|first1=Mike|last2=Popeski|first2=Ronald|title=Crimeans vote over 90 percent to quit Ukraine for Russia|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis/crimeans-vote-over-90-percent-to-quit-ukraine-for-russia-idUSBREA1Q1E820140316|work=Reuters|date=15 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.foxnews.com/world/crimea-referendum-wide-condemnation-after-region-votes-to-split-from-ukraine/|title=Crimea referendum Wide condemnation after region votes to split from Ukraine Fox News|publisher=]|date=16 March 2014}}</ref> Crimean Tatars mostly boycotted the referendum.<ref>{{cite news|last=Halimah|first=Halimah|title=Crimea's vote: Was it legal?|url=http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/17/world/europe/ukraine-vote-legality/|access-date=19 March 2014|publisher=CNN|date=17 March 2014}}</ref> A report by Evgeny Bobrov, a member of the ], suggested the official results were inflated and between 50 and 60% of Crimeans voted for the reunification with Russia, with the turnout of 30-50%, meaning that 15% to 30% of Crimeans eligible to vote voted for the Russian annexation (the support was higher in administratively separate Sevastopol).<ref name=":3" /><ref name="Washington Post" /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2014/05/05/putins-human-rights-council-accidentally-posts-real-crimean-election-results-only-15-voted-for-annexation/|title=Putin's 'Human Rights Council' Accidentally Posts Real Crimean Election Results|author=Paul Roderick Gregory|date=5 May 2014|work=Forbes}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |website=Совет при Президенте РФ|title=Проблемы жителей Крыма |url=http://www.president-sovet.ru/structure/gruppa_po_migratsionnoy_politike/materialy/problemy_zhiteley_kryma.php |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141008041908/http://www.president-sovet.ru/structure/gruppa_po_migratsionnoy_politike/materialy/problemy_zhiteley_kryma.php |archive-date=8 October 2014 |language=ru}}</ref> According to a survey carried out by ] in 2014, 54% of Crimean residents supported the right of regions to secede, 91% believed the referendum was free and fair and 88% believed that the government in Kyiv ought to recognize the results of the vote.<ref>{{Cite web |date=May 8, 2014 |title=Despite Concerns about Governance, Ukrainians Want to Remain One Country |url=http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/05/08/despite-concerns-about-governance-ukrainians-want-to-remain-one-country/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151001152520/http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/05/08/despite-concerns-about-governance-ukrainians-want-to-remain-one-country/ |archive-date=October 1, 2015 |access-date=May 19, 2014 |publisher=Pew Research Center}}</ref>

The means by which the referendum was conducted were widely criticised by foreign governments<ref name="BBC Voters">{{cite news|title=Crimea referendum: Voters 'back Russia union'|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26606097|work=BBC News|date=16 March 2014}}</ref> and in the Ukrainian and international press, with reports that anyone holding a Russian passport regardless of residency in Crimea was allowed to vote.<ref name=fast>{{cite news|title=Declaring victory, Crimean and Russian officials pledge fast integration|url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/voting-in-crimean-referendum-starts-even-as-ukraine-government-declares-it-illegitimate-339523.html|newspaper=Kyiv Post|date=17 March 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140317082713/http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/voting-in-crimean-referendum-starts-even-as-ukraine-government-declares-it-illegitimate-339523.html|archive-date=17 March 2014}}</ref> ] refused to send observers to the referendum, stating that invitation should have come from an OSCE member state in question (i.e. Ukraine), rather than local authorities.<ref>{{Cite news|date=11 March 2014|script-title=ru:Наблюдатели ОБСЕ не приедут на референдум в Крым|language=ru-RU|trans-title=OSCE observers won't monitor referendum in Crimea|agency=]|url=https://www.dw.com/ru/%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BB%D1%8E%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8-%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%81%D0%B5-%D0%BD%D0%B5-%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B5%D0%B4%D1%83%D1%82-%D0%BD%D0%B0-%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%84%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BC-%D0%B2-%D0%BA%D1%80%D1%8B%D0%BC/a-17488704|access-date=27 September 2021}}</ref> Russia invited a group of observers from various European ] political parties aligned with Putin, who stated the referendum was conducted in a free and fair manner.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://deredactie.be/cm/vrtnieuws/buitenland/1.1908165|agency=De Redactie|language=nl|title=Extreemrechtse partijen uitgenodigd op referendum Krim|trans-title=Far-right parties invited to Crimea referendum|date=13 March 2014|access-date=12 June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.dw.com/en/referendum-day-in-crimeas-simferopol/a-17500378|publisher=Deutsche Welle|title=Referendum day in Crimea's Simferopol|date=16 March 2014|access-date=12 June 2014}}</ref>

=== Proclamations of independence of the Republic of Crimea ===
{{Redirect|Republic of Crimea (country)|other uses|Republic of Crimea (disambiguation)}}
{{See also|Declaration of Independence of the Republic of Crimea}}
The Republic of Crimea was short lived. On 17 March, following the official announcement of the ] results, the ] declared the formal independence of the Republic of Crimea, comprising the territories of both the ] and the city of ], which was granted ] within the breakaway republic.<ref name="res1745">{{cite web|url=http://www.rada.crimea.ua/act/11748|script-title=ru:Постановление ГС РК № 1745-6/14 – О независимости Крыма|trans-title=Resolution State Council Republic of Crimea № 1745-6/14 – On the independence of Crimea|language=ru|publisher=rada.crimea.ua|date=17 March 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140319060200/http://www.rada.crimea.ua/act/11748|archive-date=19 March 2014}}</ref> The Crimean parliament declared the "partial repeal" of Ukrainian laws and began nationalising private and Ukrainian state property located on the Crimean Peninsula, including Ukrainian ]s<ref>{{cite web|url=http://nbnews.com.ua/ru/news/115865/|script-title=ru:Парламент Крыма национализировал порты полуострова и их имущество|trans-title=The Parliament of Crimea nationalized the ports of the peninsula and their property|publisher=nbnews.com.ua|language=ru|date=17 March 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140407073203/http://nbnews.com.ua/ru/news/115865/|archive-date=7 April 2014}}</ref> and property of ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://glavred.info/ekonomika/krym-nacionaliziroval-chernomorneftegaz-274301.html|script-title=ru:Крым национализировал "Черноморнефтегаз"|trans-title=Crimea nationalized "Chernomorneftegaz"|publisher=glavred.info|date=17 March 2014|language=ru}}</ref> Parliament also formally requested that the ] admit the breakaway republic into Russia,<ref name="guardian20140317">{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/17/ukraine-crimea-russia-referendum-complain-result|title=Crimea applies to be part of Russian Federation after vote to leave Ukraine|work=The Guardian|date=17 March 2014}}</ref> with Sevastopol asking to be admitted as a "city of federal significance".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/world/europe/european-union-ukraine.html?hpw&rref=world&_r=0|work=The New York Times|title=Lawmakers in Crimea Move Swiftly to Split From Ukraine|date=17 March 2014|access-date=17 March 2014|first1=David M.|last1=Herszenhorn|first2=Alan|last2=Cowell}}</ref> On the same day, the '']'' Supreme Council renamed itself the ],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://ria.ru/world/20140317/999851464.html|script-title=ru:Крым начал процедуру присоединения к РФ, объявив о независимости|trans-title=Crimea began the process of joining the Russian Federation, declaring independence|agency=]|language=ru|date=17 March 2014}}</ref> declared the ] an official currency alongside the ],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://tass.ru/en/economy/723938|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141201221944/http://tass.ru/en/economy/723938|url-status = live|archive-date=1 December 2014|title=Russian ruble announced Crimea's official currency|agency=]|date=17 March 2014}}</ref> and in June the Russian ruble became the only form of legal tender.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-06-01/crimea-adopts-ruble-as-ukraine-continues-battling-rebels.html| work=Bloomberg| first=Volodymyr| last=Verbyany| title=Crimea Adopts Ruble as Ukraine Continues Battling Rebels| date=1 June 2014|access-date=25 June 2022}}</ref>

Putin officially recognised the Republic of Crimea 'as a sovereign and independent state' by ] on 17 March.<ref>{{cite news|title=Putin Approves Draft Treaty On Crimea|url=https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-putin-crimea/25300414.html|access-date=17 February 2021|website=RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20596|agency=Kremlin|title=Executive Order on recognising Republic of Crimea|date=17 March 2014|access-date=17 March 2014}}</ref>

On 21 March the Republic of Crimea became a federal ].

==={{Anchor|Accession treaty and finalisation of the annexation}}Accession treaty and finalization of the annexation ===
{{See also|Republic of Crimea (Russia)|Crimean Federal District|Political status of Crimea}}
], ] and ] at the Kremlin, 18 March 2014]]
The Treaty on Accession of the Republic of Crimea to Russia was signed between representatives of the Republic of Crimea (including Sevastopol, with which the rest of Crimea briefly unified) and the Russian Federation on 18 March 2014 to lay out terms for the immediate admission of the ] and ] as ] and part of the Russian Federation.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Myers|first1=Steven Lee|last2=Barry|first2=Ellen|author-link2=Ellen Barry (journalist)|date=18 March 2014|title=Putin Reclaims Crimea for Russia and Bitterly Denounces the West|work=]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/19/world/europe/ukraine.html|access-date=19 June 2021|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=18 March 2014|title=Ukraine crisis: Putin signs Russia-Crimea treaty|work=]|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26630062|access-date=19 June 2021}}</ref>{{NoteTag|The treaty between Russia and pro-Russian Aksyonov government of Crimea, signed on that date, specified that Crimea would be considered incorporated into Russia since the date of signing. The document entered into force on 1 April 2014,<ref name="trea">{{cite web|url=http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20605|script-title=ru:Договор между Российской Федерацией и Республикой Крым о принятии в Российскую Федерацию Республики Крым и образовании в составе Российской Федерации новых субъектов|trans-title=Treaty between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea on the acceptance of the Republic of Crimea into Russian Federation and education of new subjects of the Russian Federation|language=ru|publisher=Kremlin.ru|date=18 March 2014|access-date=2 January 2016}} (and a of signed document)</ref> but pending that was ] since very signing.<ref name="trea" />}} On 19 March, the ] decided that the treaty is in compliance with the ].<ref>{{Cite web|date=19 March 2014|title=Constitutional Court Approves Russia-Crimea Treaty|url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/03/19/constitutional-court-approves-russia-crimea-treaty-a33133|access-date=19 June 2021|website=]}}</ref> The treaty was ratified by the ] and ] by 21 March.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Pifer|first=Steven|author-link=Steven Pifer|date=18 March 2019|title=Five years after Crimea's illegal annexation, the issue is no closer to resolution|url=https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/03/18/five-years-after-crimeas-illegal-annexation-the-issue-is-no-closer-to-resolution/|access-date=19 June 2021|website=]}}</ref> ]'s ] was the only ] member to vote against the treaty.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Conrad|first=Naomi|date=1 May 2014|title=The deputy who voted against annexing Crimea|url=https://www.dw.com/en/the-deputy-who-voted-against-annexing-crimea/a-17605965|access-date=19 June 2021|website=]}}</ref> The ] and the ] of Sevastopol became the 84th and 85th ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://pravo.gov.ru:8080/page.aspx?92062|script-title=ru:Распоряжение Президента Российской Федерации от 17 March 2014 No. 63-рп 'О подписании Договора между Российской Федерацией и Республикой Крым о принятии в Российскую Федерацию Республики Крым и образовании в составе Российской Федерации новых субъектов'|access-date=25 June 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140318095051/http://pravo.gov.ru:8080/page.aspx?92062|archive-date=18 March 2014}}</ref>

During ] on 18 March, some Ukrainian sources said that armed gunmen that were reported to be Russian special forces allegedly stormed the base. This was contested by Russian authorities, who subsequently announced the arrest of an alleged Ukrainian sniper in connection with the killings,<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26637296|title=Ukraine officer 'killed in attack on Crimea base'|publisher=BBC|access-date=18 March 2014|quote=Crimean police later said both Ukrainian and pro-Russian forces had been fired on from a single location ... None of the accounts can be independently confirmed.}}</ref> but later denied the arrest had occurred.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/197041.html|title=Crimean prosecutors do not confirm info on Simferopol shooter detention|agency=Interfax-Ukraine|access-date=15 July 2017}}</ref>

The two casualties had a joint funeral attended by both the Crimean and Ukrainian authorities, and both the ] and Russian paramilitary "self-defence volunteer" were mourned together.<ref>{{cite news|author=Roland Oliphant|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10716412/Ukraines-unlikeliest-funeral-the-only-two-foes-to-die-in-Russias-Crimea-takeover-are-mourned-together.html|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10716412/Ukraines-unlikeliest-funeral-the-only-two-foes-to-die-in-Russias-Crimea-takeover-are-mourned-together.html|archive-date=11 January 2022|url-access=subscription|url-status=live|title=Ukraine's unlikeliest funeral: the only two foes to die in Russia's Crimea takeover are mourned together|work=The Daily Telegraph|date=22 March 2014|access-date=2 January 2016}}{{cbignore}}</ref> As of March 2014 the incident was under investigation by both the Crimean authorities and the Ukrainian military.<ref>"Joint Funeral2" , '']'', 22 March 2014</ref><ref>"Joint Funeral3" , ], 22 March 2014</ref>

In response to shooting, Ukraine's then acting defense minister ] authorised Ukrainian troops stationed in Crimea to use deadly force in life-threatening situations. This increased the risk of bloodshed during any takeover of Ukrainian military installations, yet the ensuing Russian operations to seize the remaining Ukrainian military bases and ships in Crimea did not bring new fatalities, although weapons were used and several people were injured. The Russian units involved in such operations were ordered to avoid usage of deadly force when possible. Morale among the Ukrainian troops, which for three weeks were blockaded inside their compounds without any assistance from the Ukrainian government, was very low, and the vast majority of them did not offer any real resistance.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Brothers Armed: Military Aspects of the Crisis in Ukraine|last=Lavrov|first=Anton|publisher=East View Press|year=2015|isbn=978-1-879944-65-7|edition=Second|location=Minneapolis|chapter=Russian Again: The Military Operation for Crimea|oclc=921141500|editor-last=Pukhov|editor-first=Ruslan}}</ref>

On 24 March, the ] ordered the full withdrawal of all of its armed forces from Crimea.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/24/world/europe/ukraine-crisis/|date=24 March 2014|access-date=24 March 2014|title=Ukraine orders Crimea troop withdrawal as Russia seizes naval base|publisher=CNN}}</ref> Approximately 50% of the Ukrainian soldiers in Crimea had defected to the Russian military.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://un.ua/eng/article/500186.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140326090516/http://un.ua/eng/article/500186.html|archive-date=26 March 2014|title=Defense Ministry: 50% Of Ukrainian Troops in Crimea Defect To Russia|agency=Ukrainian News Agency|date=24 March 2014|access-date=20 April 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=Jonathan Marcus|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26713727|title=Ukrainian forces withdraw from Crimea|publisher=BBC|date=24 March 2014|access-date=20 April 2014}}</ref> On 26 March the last Ukrainian military bases and ] ships were captured by ].<ref name="140326_RcC">{{in lang|uk}} , ] (26 March 2014)</ref>

=== Occupation ===
] parade in ], 1 May 2019.]]
{{Main|Russian occupation of Crimea}}
On 27 March, the ] adopted a ] ], which declared the Crimean referendum and subsequent status change invalid, by a vote of 100 to 11, with 58 abstentions and 24 absent.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=47443&Cr=Ukraine&Cr1=|title=United Nations News Centre – Backing Ukraine's territorial integrity, UN Assembly declares Crimea referendum invalid|date=27 March 2014|publisher=United Nations|access-date=1 April 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Charbonneau|first1=Louis|last2=Donath|first2=Mirjam|editor=Chizu Nomiyama|editor2=Tom Brown|date=27 March 2014|title=U.N. General Assembly declares Crimea secession vote invalid|work=]|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-un-idUSBREA2Q1GA20140327|access-date=1 April 2014}}</ref>

Crimea and Sevastopol switched to ] at 10 p.m. on 29 March.<ref name="Crimean time change">{{cite news|title=В 22.00 в Крыму и в Севастополе стрелки часов переведут на два часа вперёд – на московское время|trans-title=At 22.00 in the Crimea and in Sevastopol, the clock hands will be moved two hours ahead – to Moscow time|url=http://www.1tv.ru/news/social/255292|access-date=29 March 2014|date=29 March 2014}}</ref><ref name="Time switch">{{Cite news|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/crimea-to-set-clocks-to-russia-time-114033000014_1.html|title=Crimea to set clocks to Russia time|newspaper=Business Standard India|date=30 March 2014|via=Business Standard}}</ref>

On 31 March, Russia unilaterally ] the ]<ref>{{Cite web|date=29 March 2022|title=kharkiv-agreements|url=https://www.uawarexplained.com/kharkiv-agreements/?version=sixty-minutes/|access-date=29 March 2022|website=UaWarExplained.com}}</ref> and ].<ref>{{Cite web|date=31 March 2014|title=Россия денонсировала соглашения с Украиной о флоте|trans-title=Russia denounced the agreements with Ukraine on the fleet|url=https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/ukraine_russian/2014/03/140331_ru_s_russia_ukraine_agreements|access-date=19 June 2021|website=]|language=ru}}{{Dead link|date=May 2023|bot=InternetArchiveBot|fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> Putin cited "the accession of the ] and Sevastopol into Russia" and resulting "practical end of ] relationships" as his reason for the denunciation.<ref>See {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171019030057/http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/(ViewDoc)?OpenAgent&work%2Fdz.nsf%2FByID&FB317FAF2E70539D43257CAA0031A71B|date=19 October 2017}} {{in lang|ru}}</ref> On the same day, he signed a decree formally rehabilitating the ], who were ] in 1944, and the Armenian, German, Greek, and Bulgarian minority communities in the region that ] also ordered removed in the 1940s.

Also on 31 March 2014, the Russian ] ] announced a series of programmes aimed at swiftly incorporating the territory of Crimea into Russia's ] and ]. Medvedev announced the creation of a new ministry for Crimean affairs, and ordered Russia's top ministers who joined him there to make coming up with a development plan their top priority.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/medvedev-visits-crimea-vows-development-aid-2014-03-31|title=Medvedev visits Crimea, vows development aid|author=Lukas I. Alpert, Alexander Kolyandr|work=]}}</ref> On 3 April 2014, the Republic of Crimea and the city of ] became parts of Russia's ].{{citation needed|date=May 2023}} On 7 May 2015, Crimea switched its phone code system from the ] to the ].<ref>, ] (7 May 2015)</ref>

On 11 April, the ] and City Charter of Sevastopol were adopted by their respective legislatures,<ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2451537|script-title=ru:Крым и Севастополь ожидают представления свыше|trans-title=Crimea and Sevastopol await submission from above|date=12 March 2014|magazine=]|language=ru|last=Nikiforov|first=Vadim|access-date=23 April 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://en.ria.ru/russia/20140411/189159776/Crimean-Parliament-Approves-New-Constitution.html|title=Crimean Parliament Approves New Constitution|author=Sputnik|date=11 April 2014|work=ria.ru}}</ref> coming into effect the following day in addition the new federal subjects were enumerated in a newly published revision of the Russian Constitution.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mk.ru/politics/russia/article/2014/04/11/1012747-kryim-propisalsya-v-konstitutsii-rossii.html|script-title=ru:Крым прописался в конституции России|trans-title=Crimea registered in the Russian constitution|date=11 April 2014|publisher=mk.ru|last=Nezamyatnyj|first=Ivan|language=ru}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|author=Thomas D. Grant|title=Annexation of Crimea|journal=The American Journal of International Law|volume=109|issue=1|date=1 January 2015|pages=68–95|jstor=amerjintelaw.109.1.0068|doi=10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.1.0068|s2cid=146943718}}</ref>

On 14 April, ] announced that he would open a ruble-only account with ] and would make it the primary bank in the newly annexed Crimea as well as giving the right to service payments on Russia's $36{{spaces}}billion wholesale electricity market – which gave the bank $112{{spaces}}million annually from commission charges alone.<ref>{{cite news|last=Hobson|first=Peter|date=14 April 2014|title=Sanctioned Bank Rossiya to Service $36Bln Domestic Electricity Market|work=]|url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/04/14/sanctioned-bank-rossiya-to-service-36bln-domestic-electricity-market-a33944}}</ref>
]
Russia withdrew its forces from southern ] in December 2014.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ukrinform.ua/rus/news/rossiya_ubrala_voyska_s_arabatskoy_strelki|agency=Ukrinform|script-title=ru:Россия убрала войска с Арабатской стрелки|trans-title=Russian troops removed from the Arabat Spit|language=ru|date=9 December 2014|access-date=14 April 2016}}</ref>

In July 2015, Russian prime minister, ], declared that Crimea had been fully integrated into Russia.<ref>{{cite web|author=Jess McHugh|url=http://www.ibtimes.com/putin-eliminates-ministry-crimea-region-fully-integrated-russia-russian-leaders-say-2009463|work=International Business Times|title=Putin Eliminates Ministry of Crimea, Region Fully Integrated into Russia, Russian Leaders Say|date=15 July 2015|access-date=13 April 2016}}</ref> Until 2016 these new subjects were grouped in the ].

On 8 August 2016, Ukraine reported that Russia had increased its military presence along the demarcation line.<ref>{{cite web|last=Sharkov|first=Damien|url=http://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-reports-russian-military-activity-crimea-border-armored-column-488283|title=Ukraine Reports Russian Military Activity on Crimea Border|work=Newsweek|date=31 July 2016|access-date=11 December 2017}}</ref> In response to this military buildup Ukraine also deployed more troops and resources closer to the border with Crimea.<ref>{{cite web|last=Kaplan|first=Allison|url=http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/1.736052|title=Ukraine prepares for Russian 'attack' by moving troops to the border with Crimea|work=Haaretz|date=9 August 2016|access-date=11 December 2017}}</ref> The Pentagon has downplayed a Russian invasion of Ukraine, calling Russian troops along the border a regular military exercise.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/08/20/world/pentagon-downplays-talk-russian-troop-buildup-near-ukraine-putin-visits-crimea/|title=pentagon-downplays-talk-russian-troop-buildup-near-ukraine-putin-visits-crimea|website=Japan Times}}</ref> On 10 August, Russia claimed two servicemen were killed in clashes with Ukrainian commandos, and that Ukrainian servicemen had been captured with a total of 40{{spaces}}kg of explosives in their possession.<ref>{{cite news|author=Shaun Walker in Moscow|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/aug/10/russia-accuses-ukraine-of-armed-crimea-incursion|title=Putin raises stakes over alleged Ukrainian terror plot in Crimea|newspaper=The Guardian|access-date=11 December 2017}}</ref> Ukraine denied that the incident took place.<ref>{{cite news|author=Roland Oliphant|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/10/russia-reports-two-dead-in-ukrainian-raid-on-crimea/|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/10/russia-reports-two-dead-in-ukrainian-raid-on-crimea/|archive-date=11 January 2022|url-access=subscription|url-status=live|title=Putin accuses Ukraine of 'terror' over alleged Crimea raid|newspaper=The Telegraph|date=10 August 2016|access-date=11 December 2017}}{{cbignore}}</ref>

Russian accounts claimed that Russian ] detained "Ukrainian saboteurs" and "terrorists" near ]. The ensuing gunfight left one ] officer and a suspect dead. A number of individuals were detained, including Yevhen Panov, who is described by Russian sources as a Ukrainian military intelligence officer and leader of the sabotage group. The group was allegedly planning terror attacks on important infrastructure in Armiansk, Crimea.<ref name=":1">{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/11/europe/ukraine-high-alert-russia-crimea/index.html|title=Ukraine troops on high alert amid growing tension with Russia|author=Sheena McKenzie|publisher=CNN|access-date=12 August 2016}}</ref><ref name=":2">{{cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/russias-putin-discusses-additional-security-measures-for-crimea-1470908089|title=Dispute Between Russia and Ukraine Over Crimea Accusations Escalates|last1=Moscow|first1=Laura Mills in|date=11 August 2016|last2=Cullison|first2=Alan|newspaper=The Wall Street Journal|issn=0099-9660|last3=Washington|first3=Carol E. Lee in|access-date=12 August 2016}}</ref>

Ukrainian media reported that Panov was a military volunteer fighting in the east of the country, however he has more recently been associated with a charitable organization. Russia also claimed that the alleged border infiltration was accompanied by "heavy fire" from Ukrainian territory, resulting in the death of a Russian soldier.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":2" /> The Ukrainian government called the Russian accusations "cynical" and "senseless" and argued that since Crimea was Ukrainian territory, it was Russia which "has been generously financing and actively supporting terrorism on Ukrainian territory".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-10/putin-warns-ukraine-russia-will-respond-to-terror-in-crimea|title=Putin Accuses Ukraine of Terror as Crimea Tensions Escalate|newspaper=Bloomberg.com|publisher=Bloomberg|date=10 August 2016|access-date=11 December 2017}}</ref>
], Crimea, 29 April 2022]]
In 2017, a survey performed by the Centre for East European and International Studies showed that 85% of the non-Crimean Tatar respondents believed that if the referendum would be held again it would lead to the same or "only marginally different" results. Crimea was fully integrated into the Russian media sphere, and links with the rest of Ukraine were hardly existent.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/74635|title=What Is the Public Mood Like in Crimea?|last=Sasse|first=Gwendolyn|date=6 November 2017|publisher=]|access-date=19 November 2017}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.zois-berlin.de/fileadmin/media/Dateien/ZOiS_Reports/ZOiS_Report_3_2017.pdf|title=ZOiS Report № 3. Terra Incognita: The public mood in Crimea|date=November 2017|access-date=31 January 2019|archive-date=24 February 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190224203617/https://www.zois-berlin.de/fileadmin/media/Dateien/ZOiS_Reports/ZOiS_Report_3_2017.pdf}}</ref>

On 26 November 2018, lawmakers in the Ukraine Parliament overwhelmingly backed the imposition of martial law along Ukraine's coastal regions and those bordering Russia in response to the ] a day earlier. A total of 276 lawmakers in Kyiv backed the measure, which took effect on 28 November 2018 and was ended on 26 December.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-ukraine-live-latest-update-martial-law-black-sea-ships-navy-crisis-a8651736.html|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220507/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-ukraine-live-latest-update-martial-law-black-sea-ships-navy-crisis-a8651736.html|archive-date=7 May 2022|url-access=subscription|url-status=live|title=Kiev declares martial law after Russian seizure of Ukrainian ships in Black Sea|work=The Independent|access-date=26 November 2018}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-ends-martial-law/29677677.html|title=Poroshenko Ends Martial Law in Ukraine As Tensions With Russia Continue|date=26 December 2018|access-date=27 December 2018|publisher=]}}</ref>

On 28 December 2018, Russia completed a high-tech security fence marking the de facto border between Crimea and Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46699807| title=Ukraine conflict: Russia completes Crimea security fence|publisher=BBC|date=28 December 2018|access-date=31 December 2018}}</ref>

In 2021, Ukraine launched the ], a diplomatic initiative aimed at protecting the rights of Crimean inhabitants and ultimately reversing the annexation of Crimea.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.euronews.com/2021/08/23/crimea-is-ukraine-zelenskyy-opens-inaugural-crimea-summit|title='Crimea is Ukraine': Zelenskyy opens inaugural Crimea summit|date=23 August 2021|publisher=euronews|access-date=29 August 2021}}</ref>

== Transition and aftermath ==
=== Economic implications ===
{{See also|Economic history of the Russian Federation|Russian financial crisis (2014–2016)}}
Initially after the annexation, salaries rose, especially those of government workers{{Citation needed|date=June 2021}}. This was soon offset by the increase in prices caused by the ]. Wages were cut back by 30% to 70% after Russian authority became established{{Citation needed|date=June 2021}}. Tourism, previously Crimea's main industry, suffered in particular, down by 50% from 2014 in 2015.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://edition.cnn.com/2015/03/20/opinions/crimea-anniversary/|title=Back in the USSR? Spying and control in the new Crimea|author=Christian Streib|date=20 March 2015|access-date=3 January 2016|publisher=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ukraine/2015-09-08/paradise-lost-crimea|title=Paradise Lost in Crimea: How Russia Is Paying for the Annexation|last=Berman|first=Ilan|date=8 September 2015|magazine=Foreign Affairs|access-date=31 August 2016}}</ref> Crimean agricultural yields were also significantly impacted by the annexation{{Citation needed|date=June 2021}}. Ukraine cut off supplies of water through the ], {{Failed verification span|which supplies 85% of Crimea's fresh water,|date=June 2024}} causing the 2014 rice crop to fail, and greatly damaging the ] and ] crops.<ref name="6ME">{{cite news|url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/05/06/crimea-rice-crop-fails-over-water-war-with-ukraine-a35082|title=Crimea Rice Crop Fails Over Water War With Ukraine|date=6 May 2014|work=The Moscow Times|access-date=3 January 2016}}</ref> The annexation had a negative influence on Russians working in Ukraine and Ukrainians working in Russia.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Naidenova|first1=Iuliia|last2=Nesseler|first2=Cornel|last3=Parshakov|first3=Petr|last4=Chusovliankin|first4=Aleksei|date=2020|title=After the Crimea crisis: Employee discrimination in Russia and Ukraine|journal=PLOS ONE|volume=15|issue=10|pages=e0240811|doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0240811|pmid=33112927|pmc=7592748|bibcode=2020PLoSO..1540811N|doi-access=free}}</ref>

The number of tourists visiting Crimea in the 2014 season was lower than in the previous years due to a combination of "Western sanctions", ethical objections by Ukrainians, and the difficulty of getting there for Russians.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-28688478|title=Tourism takes a nosedive in Crimea|last1=Ash|first1=Lucy|work=BBC News Magazine|date=8 August 2014|access-date=29 December 2015}}</ref> The Russian government attempted to stimulate the flow of tourists by subsidizing holidays in the peninsula for children and state workers from all Russia<ref>{{cite news|url=http://ria56.ru/posts/45547575473754735.htm|title=Крым готовится к референдуму и ожидает Русских сезонов|trans-title=Crimea prepares for a referendum and expects Russian seasons|publisher=РИА Оренбуржье|date=17 March 2014|access-date=17 March 2014|archive-date=9 November 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141109162758/http://ria56.ru/posts/45547575473754735.htm}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.vz.ru/society/2014/3/17/677499.html|title=Снова в "Артек"|trans-title=Back to Artek|publisher=Vzglyad|date=17 March 2014}}</ref>{{Better source needed|date=June 2021}} which worked mostly for state-owned hotels. In 2015, overall 3 million tourists visited Crimea according to official data, while before annexation it was around 5.5{{spaces}}million on average. The shortage is attributed mostly to stopped flow of tourists from Ukraine. Hotels and restaurants are also experiencing problems with finding enough seasonal workers, who were most arriving from Ukraine in the preceding years. Tourists visiting state-owned hotels were complaining mostly about low standard of rooms and facilities, some of them still unrepaired from Soviet times.<ref>{{cite web|last=Titov|first=Evgeny|date=11 September 2015|title=Полуостров в тени материка|trans-title=Peninsula in the shadow of the mainland|url=https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2015/09/11/65560-poluostrov-v-teni-materika|access-date=12 September 2015|website=]|language=ru}}</ref>

According to the German newspaper '']'', the annexation of Crimea is economically disadvantageous for the Russian Federation. Russia will have to spend billions of euros a year to pay salaries and pensions. Moreover, Russia will have to undertake costly projects to connect Crimea to the Russian water supply and power system because Crimea has no land connection to Russia and at present (2014) gets water, gas and electricity from mainland Ukraine. This required building ] and a pipeline across the ]. Also, Novinite claims that a Ukrainian expert told ''Die Welt'' that Crimea "will not be able to attract tourists".<ref>{{cite news|last=Steiner|first=Eduard|date=17 March 2014|title=Krim-Annexion wird zur Milliardenlast für Russland|language=de|trans-title=The annexation of Crimea is becoming a billion dollar burden for Russia|work=]|url=https://www.welt.de/print/die_welt/politik/article125869962/Krim-Annexion-wird-zur-Milliardenlast-fuer-Russland.html}}</ref>

The then first Deputy to ] of Russian Federation ] said that the decision to annex Crimea was made by Vladimir Putin exclusively, without consulting ].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.unian.info/politics/1052109-decision-to-annex-crimea-taken-by-putin-personally.html|title=Decision to annex Crimea 'taken by Putin personally'|publisher=]|date=3 March 2015}}</ref>


The Russian ] '']'' expresses an opinion that Russia will not acquire anything economically from "accessing" Crimea, which is not very developed industrially, having just a few big factories, and whose yearly gross product is only $4{{spaces}}billion. The newspaper also says that everything from Russia will have to be delivered by sea, higher costs of transportation will result in higher prices for everything, and to avoid a decline in living standards Russia will have to subsidise Crimean people for a few months. In total, Kommersant estimates the costs of integrating Crimea into Russia in $30{{spaces}}billion over the next decade, i.e. $3{{spaces}}billion per year.<ref name="kommersant20140207">{{cite news|url=http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2425287|title=Расходный полуостров|trans-title=Expendable Peninsula|newspaper=]|date=7 March 2014}}</ref>
==Transition and aftermath==


Western oil experts{{who|date=June 2021}}estimate that Russia's seizing of Crimea, and the associated control of an area of ] more than three times its land area gives it access to oil and gas reserves potentially worth trillions of dollars.<ref>{{cite news|last=Broad|first=William|date=17 March 2014|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/18/world/europe/in-taking-crimea-putin-gains-a-sea-of-fuel-reserves.html|title=In Taking Crimea, Putin Gains a Sea of Fuel Reserves|newspaper=]}}</ref> It also deprives Ukraine of its chances of energy independence. Moscow's acquisition may alter the route along which the ] pipeline would be built, saving Russia money, time and engineering challenges{{Citation needed|date=June 2021}}. It would also allow Russia to avoid building in Turkish territorial waters, which was necessary in the original route to avoid Ukrainian territory.<ref name="In taking Crimea, Putin gains a sea of fuel reserves">{{cite web|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/europe/In-taking-Crimea-Putin-gains-a-sea-of-fuel-reserves/articleshow/35312595.cms?|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140519140005/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/europe/In-taking-Crimea-Putin-gains-a-sea-of-fuel-reserves/articleshow/35312595.cms|archive-date=19 May 2014|title=In taking Crimea, Putin gains a sea of fuel reserves|work=The Times of India|access-date=18 May 2014}}</ref> This pipeline was later canceled in favour of ], however.
The number of tourists visiting Crimea in the 2014 season is expected to be lower than in the previous years due to worries about the political situation.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.kp.ru/daily/26207.5/3092655/|title=Российские туристы поедут в Крым, если ...смогут туда добраться|newspaper=]|date=July 17, 2013}}</ref> The Crimean government members hope that Russian tourists will flow in.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://ria56.ru/posts/45547575473754735.htm|title=Крым готовится к референдуму и ожидает Русских сезонов|publisher=РИА Оренбуржье|date=17 March 2014}}</ref> The Russian government is planning to promote Crimea as a resort and provide subsidized holidays to the peninsula for children and state workers.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.vz.ru/society/2014/3/17/677499.html|title=Снова в "Артек"|publisher=Vzglyad|date=17 March 2014}}</ref>


] before the opening of the ] in May 2018]]
The ] news agency Novinite claims that according to the German newspaper '']'', the annexation of Crimea is economically disadvantageous for the Russian Federation. Russia will have to spend billions of euros a year to pay salaries and pensions. Moreover, Russia will have to undertake costly projects to connect Crimea to the Russian water supply and power system because Crimea has no land connection to Russia and at present gets water, gas and electricity from mainland Ukraine. This will require building ] and a pipeline across the ]. Also, Novinite claims that a Ukrainian expert told ''Die Welt'' that Crimea "will not be able to attract tourists".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.novinite.com/articles/159004/Die+Welt%3A+Crimea's+Accession+Will+Cost+Russia+Billions|title=Die Welt: Crimea's Accession Will Cost Russia Billions|publisher=Novinite|date=17 March 2014}}</ref>
The ] (Roskomnadzor) warned about a transition period as Russian operators have to change the numbering capacity and subscribers. ] will be replaced from the ] to ]. Codes in Crimea start with ], but in the area of ] the 6 is given to Kazakhstan which shares former Soviet Union +7 with Russia, so city codes have to change. The regulator assigned 869 ] to Sevastopol and the rest of the peninsula received a 365 code.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.1prime.biz/news/telecommunications/_Ctrl_Telegraph_to_set_Russian_tariffs_on_telegrams_in_Crimea_Apr_3/0/%7B49A072BC-07C5-44F4-8296-74340FE93120%7D.uif|title=Central Telegraph to set Russian tariffs on telegrams in Crimea Apr{{spaces}}3|work=Prime|date=26 March 2014|access-date=30 March 2014|archive-date=31 October 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211031035351/http://www.1prime.biz/news/telecommunications/_Ctrl_Telegraph_to_set_Russian_tariffs_on_telegrams_in_Crimea_Apr_3/0/%7B49A072BC-07C5-44F4-8296-74340FE93120%7D.uif|url-status=dead}}</ref> At the time of the unification with Russia, telephone operators and Internet service providers in Crimea and Sevastopol are connected to the outside world through the territory of Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.comnews.ru/node/81207|title=Крымчанам придется поменять номера телефонов и SIM-карты|trans-title=Crimeans will have to change phone numbers and SIM cards|publisher=comnews.ru|date=19 March 2014|access-date=19 March 2014}}</ref> ] of Russia, ] announced on his ] account that ] in Crimea will now have six-figures: to the existing five-digit number the number two will be added at the beginning. For example, the Simferopol postal code 95000 will become 295000.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.comnews.ru/node/81297|title="Почта России" переводит почтовое сообщение с Крымом на российские тарифы|trans-title="Post of Russia" translates postal communication with the Crimea to Russian tariffs|website=comnews.ru|date=25 March 2014|access-date=25 March 2014}}</ref>


In the area that now forms the border between Crimea and Ukraine mining the ] inlets from the sea that constitute the natural borders, and in the spit of land left over stretches of no-man's-land with wire on either side was created.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/melikkaylan/2014/05/30/sneaking-into-crimea-or-maybe-not/|title=Sneaking into Crimea – Or Maybe Not|work=]|date=30 May 2014|access-date=31 May 2014}}</ref> On early June that year ] ] signed a ] No.961<ref>О пунктах пропуска через государственную границу России в Республике Крым и городе Севастополе</ref> dated 5 June 2014 establishing air, sea, road and railway checkpoints. The adopted decisions create a legal basis for the functioning of a checkpoint system at the ] in the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://government.ru/en/docs/12922/|title=Government Order on checkpoints at the Russian border in the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol|publisher=Government of Russia|date=7 June 2014|access-date=7 June 2014}}</ref>{{Third-party inline|date=June 2021}}
The Russian ] '']'' expresses an opinion that Russia will not acquire anything economically from "accessing" Crimea, which is not very developed industrially, having just a few big factories, and whose yearly gross product is only $4 billion. The newspaper also says that everything from Russia will have to be delivered by sea, higher costs of transportation will result in higher prices for everything, and in order to avoid a decline in living standards Russia will have to subsidize Crimean people for a few months. In total, Kommersant estimates the costs of integrating Crimea into Russia in $30 billion over the next decade, i.e. $3 billion per year.<ref name="kommersant20140207">{{cite news|url=http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2425287|title=Расходный полуостров|newspaper=]|date=7 March 2014}}</ref>


In the year following the annexation, armed men seized various Crimean businesses, including banks, hotels, shipyards, farms, gas stations, a ], a dairy, and Yalta Film Studio.<ref name=AP141202>{{cite news|url = http://bigstory.ap.org/article/166097f662ec4e6e899b14c12e9a0c58/change-leadership-crimea-means-property-grab|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20141203004052/http://bigstory.ap.org/article/166097f662ec4e6e899b14c12e9a0c58/change-leadership-crimea-means-property-grab|archive-date=3 December 2014|title=Change of leadership in Crimea means property grab|first1=Laura|last1=Mills|first2=John-Thor|last2=Dahlburg|agency=Associated Press|date=2 December 2014}}</ref><ref name=NYT150110>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/world/seizing-assets-in-crimea-from-shipyard-to-film-studio.html|title=Seizing Assets in Crimea, From Shipyard to Film Studio|first=Neil|last=MacFarquhar|newspaper=The New York Times|date=10 January 2015}}</ref><ref name=AFP150227>{{cite news|url=https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/under-russia-isolated-crimea-twilight-060215014.html|title=Under Russia, isolated Crimea is twilight zone for business|first=Maria|last=Antonova|agency=]|website=Yahoo News|date=27 February 2015|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150301041453/https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/under-russia-isolated-crimea-twilight-060215014.html|archive-date=1 March 2015|url-status = live}}</ref> Russian media have noted this trend as "returning to the 90's," which is perceived as a period of anarchy and rule of gangs in Russia.<ref>{{cite web|last=Murtazin|first=Irek|author-link=Irek Murtazin|date=3 September 2015|title=На часах – "девяностые"|trans-title="Nineties" on the clock|url=https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2015/09/04/65471-na-chasah-8212-171-devyanostye-187|access-date=12 September 2015|website=]|language=ru}}</ref>
On the other hand western oil experts estimate that Russia's seizing of Crimea, and the associated control of an area of Black Sea more than three times its land area gives it access to oil and gas reserves potentially worth trillions of dollars. It also deprives Ukraine of its chances of energy independence. Most immediately however, analysts say, Moscow's acquisition may alter the route along which the ] pipeline would be built, saving Russia money, time and engineering challenges. It would also allow Russia to avoid building in Turkish territorial waters, which was necessary in the original route in order to avoid Ukrainian territory.<ref name="In taking Crimea, Putin gains a sea of fuel reserves">{{cite web|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140519140005/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/europe/In-taking-Crimea-Putin-gains-a-sea-of-fuel-reserves/articleshow/35312595.cms?|title=In taking Crimea, Putin gains a sea of fuel reserves|publisher=Times of India|accessdate=18 May 2014}}</ref><ref>. ''Counterpunch.org''. 23–25 May 2014.</ref>


After 2014 the Russian government invested heavily in the peninsula's infrastructure—repairing roads, modernizing hospitals and building the ] that links the peninsula to the Russian mainland. Development of new sources of water was undertaken, with huge difficulties, to replace closed Ukrainian sources.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.rferl.org/a/new-maps-appear-to-show-crimea-is-drying-up/29361889.html|title=New maps appear to show Crimea is drying up|newspaper=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty|date=13 July 2018}}</ref> In 2015, the Investigative Committee of Russia announced a number of theft and corruption cases in infrastructure projects in Crimea, for example; spending that exceeded the actual accounted costs by a factor of three. A number of Russian officials were also arrested for corruption, including head of federal tax inspection.<ref>{{cite news|date=30 June 2015|title=Second Russian Official in 2 Days Arrested in Crimea Over Corruption|newspaper=]|url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2015/06/30/second-russian-official-in-2-days-arrested-in-crimea-over-corruption-a47787|access-date=12 September 2015}}</ref>
Russian/] businessman ] announced he is ready to invest 12 billion rubles into the construction of a modern sea resort in Crimea, which is expected to create about 1,300 jobs. ], the ], said that other Chechen businessmen are planning to invest into Crimea as well.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://top.rbc.ru/economics/17/03/2014/911475.shtml |title=Оздоровлением курортов Крыма займется Руслан Байсаров |publisher=Top.rbc.ru |accessdate=2014-03-21}}</ref>


(According to February 2016 official Ukrainian figures) after Russia's annexation 10% of ] personnel left Crimea; accompanied by 6,000 of the pre-annexation 20,300 people strong ].<ref>{{in lang|uk}} , '']'' (8 February 2016)</ref>
The ] (Roskomnadzor) warned about a transition period as Russian operators have to change the numbering capacity and subscribers. ] will be replaced from the ] to ]. Codes in Crimea start with ], but in the area of ] the 6 is given to Kazakhstan which shares former Soviet Union +7 with Russia, so city codes have to change. The regulator assigned 869 ] to Sevastopol and the rest of the peninsula received a 365 code.<ref>{{cite web| url =http://www.1prime.biz/news/telecommunications/_Ctrl_Telegraph_to_set_Russian_tariffs_on_telegrams_in_Crimea_Apr_3/0/%7B49A072BC-07C5-44F4-8296-74340FE93120%7D.uif| title =
Central Telegraph to set Russian tariffs on telegrams in Crimea Apr 3| work =Prime |date=26 March 2014 | accessdate = 30 March 2014}}</ref> At the time of the unification with Russia, telephone operators and Internet service providers in Crimea and Sevastopol are connected to the outside world through the territory of Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web| url =http://www.comnews.ru/node/81207| title =Крымчанам придется поменять номера телефонов и SIM-карты| work =comnews.ru |date=19 March 2014 | accessdate = 19 March 2014}}</ref> ] of Russia, ] announced on his ] account that ] in Crimea will now have six-figures: to the existing five-digit number the number two will be added at the beginning. For example, the Simferopol postal code 95000 will become 295000.<ref>{{cite web| url =http://www.comnews.ru/node/81297| title =
"Почта России" переводит почтовое сообщение с Крымом на российские тарифы| work =comnews.ru |date=25 March 2014 | accessdate = 25 March 2014}}</ref>


As result of the disputed political status of Crimea, Russian mobile operators never expanded their operations into Crimea and all mobile services are offered on the basis of "internal roaming," which caused significant controversy inside Russia. Telecoms however argued that expanding coverage to Crimea will put them at risk of Western sanctions and, as result, they will lose access to key equipment and software, none of which is produced locally.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://krymsos.com/en/news/cherez-sanktsiyi-v-krimu-ne-bude-velikikh-operatoriv-zvyazku-rf/|title=Crimea will not have large telecom operators of Russian Federation because of sanctions|work=CrimeaSOS|access-date=10 July 2018|archive-date=11 July 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180711022744/http://krymsos.com/en/news/cherez-sanktsiyi-v-krimu-ne-bude-velikikh-operatoriv-zvyazku-rf/}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://mts-guide.ru/rouming-mts-v-krymu.html|script-title=ru:Роуминг МТС в Крыму: есть или нет в 2018 году|trans-title=MTS roaming in Crimea: yes or no in 2018|website=mts-guide.ru|language=ru|access-date=10 July 2018|archive-date=11 July 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180711030651/https://mts-guide.ru/rouming-mts-v-krymu.html}}</ref>
Regarding Crimea's borders, the head of Russian Federal Agency for the Development of the State Border Facilities (Rosgranitsa) Konstantin Busygin, who was speaking at a meeting led by Russian Deputy Prime Minister ] in ], the capital of Crimea said the ] in the north of Crimea which, according to his claims, now forms part of the ], will be fully equipped with necessary facilities.<ref>{{cite web| url =http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/729980| title =Russian state border in north Crimea to be fully equipped in early May| work =]|date=29 April 2014 | accessdate = 30 April 2014}}</ref> In the area that now forms the border between Crimea and Ukraine mining the salt lake inlets from the sea that constitute the natural borders, and in the spit of land left over stretches of no-man's-land with wire on either side was created.<ref>{{cite web| url =http://www.forbes.com/sites/melikkaylan/2014/05/30/sneaking-into-crimea-or-maybe-not/| title =Sneaking into Crimea - Or Maybe Not| work =]|date=30 May 2014 | accessdate = 31 May 2014}}</ref> On early June that year ] ] signed a ] №961<ref>О пунктах пропуска через государственную границу России в Республике Крым и городе Севастополе</ref> dated 5 June 2014 establishing air, sea, road and railway checkpoints. The adopted decisions create a legal basis for the functioning of a checkpoint system at the ] in the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol.<ref>{{cite web| url =http://government.ru/en/docs/12922| title =Government Order on checkpoints at the Russian border in the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol| work =Government of Russia official website|date=7 June 2014 | accessdate = 7 June 2014}}</ref>


The first five years of Crimean occupation cost Russia over $20 billion, roughly equal to two years of Russia's entire education budget.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-03-19/russia-vs-ukraine-crimea-s-water-crisis-is-an-impossible-problem-for-putin| title=Crimea's Water Crisis Is an Impossible Problem for Putin| newspaper=Bloomberg.com|publisher=Bloomberg|date=19 March 2021|access-date=30 August 2021}}</ref>
In December 2014, the ] reported on seizures of Crimean businesses by armed men.<ref name=AP141202>{{cite news |url= http://bigstory.ap.org/article/166097f662ec4e6e899b14c12e9a0c58/change-leadership-crimea-means-property-grab |title= Change of leadership in Crimea means property grab |first= Laura |last= Mills |first2= John-Thor |last2= Dahlburg |work= ] |date= 2 December 2014 }}</ref>


=== Human rights situation === === Human rights situation ===
According to the ] and multiple ], Russia is responsible for multiple ] abuses, including torture, ], ]s and instances of discrimination, including ] of ] in Crimea since the illegal annexation.<ref name="urlCrimea: Persecution of Crimean Tatars Intensifies| Human Rights Watch">{{cite web|url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/11/14/crimea-persecution-crimean-tatars-intensifies|title = Crimea: Persecution of Crimean Tatars Intensifies &#124; Human Rights Watch|date=14 November 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url = https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-ukraine-crimea-putin-human-rights-abuses-un-accusations-claims-a7421406.html|title = UN accuses Russia of multiple human rights abuses|date=16 November 2016|newspaper=The Independent|access-date=21 June 2017}}</ref> The ] has documented multiple human rights violations in Crimea. Noting that minority Crimean Tatars have been disproportionately affected.<ref name=OHCHR18>{{cite news|url=https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Countries/UA/CrimeaThematicReport10Sept2018_EN.pdf|title=Report on the situation of human rights in the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol|publisher=]|date=30 June 2018|access-date=24 September 2021}}</ref><ref name=OHCHR20>{{cite news|url=https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=25681&LangID=E|title=Human Rights Situation in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol|publisher=]|date=6 March 2020|access-date=24 September 2021}}</ref> In December 2016, the ] voted on a resolution on human rights in occupied Crimea. It called on the Russian Federation "to take all measures necessary to bring an immediate end to all abuses against residents of Crimea, in particular reported discriminatory measures and practices, arbitrary detentions, torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment, and to revoke all discriminatory legislation". It also urged Russia to "immediately release Ukrainian citizens who were unlawfully detained and judged without regard for elementary standards of justice".<ref>{{cite news|url = https://www.unian.info/politics/1687011-un-general-assembly-votes-for-resolution-on-human-rights-in-crimea.html|title = UN General Assembly votes for resolution on human rights in Crimea|access-date=21 June 2017}}</ref>
On 9 May 2014 the new ] amendment to the ], passed in December 2013, came into force. Article 280.1 designated incitement of violation of territorial integrity of the Russian Federation<ref name="UKRF280-1"> {{ru icon}}</ref> (incl. calls for secession of Crimea from Russia<ref>{{cite web|author=Автор статьи: Мария Макутина |url=http://rbcdaily.ru/politics/562949990932895 |title=За призывы вернуть Крым Украине можно будет лишиться свободы сроком до пяти лет - РБК daily |publisher=Rbcdaily.ru |accessdate=2014-04-01}}</ref>) as a criminal offence in Russia, punishable by a fine of 300 thousand roubles or imprisonment up to 3 years. If such statements are made in public media or the internet, the punishment could be obligatory works up to 480 hours or imprisonment up to five years.<ref name="UKRF280-1" />


After the annexation, Russian authorities banned Crimean Tatar organizations, filed criminal charges against Tatar leaders and journalists, and targeted the Tatar population. The ] have described this as the practice of collective punishment, and therefore as a ] prohibited under international humanitarian law and ].<ref>{{cite web| url=https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/russias-collective-punishment-of-the-crimean-tatars-is-a-war-crime/| title=Russia's collective punishment of the Crimean Tatars is a war crime| date=25 February 2021}}</ref>{{better source needed|date=May 2023}}
<section begin=HumanRights />Following the annexation of Crimea, according to report released on the Russian government run President of Russia's Council on Civil Society and Human Rights website, Tatars who were opposed to Russian rule have been persecuted, Russian law restricting freedom of speech has been imposed, and the new pro-Russian authorities "liquidated" the Kiev Patriarchate Orthodox church on the peninsula.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/05/06/russian-government-agency-reveals-fraudulent-nature-of-the-crimean-referendum-results/|title=Russian government agency reveals fraudulent nature of the Crimean referendum results|work=Washington Post}}</ref>


In March 2014, ] reported that pro-Ukrainian activists and journalists had been attacked, abducted, and tortured by "self-defense" groups.<ref name=HRW140314>{{cite news|url=https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/03/14/crimea-attacks-disappearances-illegal-forces|title=Crimea: Attacks, 'Disappearances' by Illegal Forces|publisher=]|date=14 March 2014}}</ref> Some Crimeans were simply "disappeared" with no explanation.<ref name="News" />
After the annexation, on May 16 the new Russian authorities of Crimea issued a ban on the annual commemorations of the anniversary of the ] by Stalin in 1944, citing "possibility of provocation by extremists" as a reason.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2014/05/17_a_6037401.shtml|title=70-|work=.Ru}}</ref> Previously, when Crimea was controlled by Ukraine, these commemorations had taken place every year.<!-- without incident or controversy. - needs a source that it was "without incident", not in reuters link given-->The pro-Russian Crimean authorities also banned ], a human rights activist, Soviet dissent, member of the Ukrainian parliament, and former Chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatars from entering Crimea.<ref name="ft">{{cite news | url=http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/93ded53c-de99-11e3-b46b-00144feabdc0.html#axzz328ZgPvxe | title=Crimean Tatars defy ban on rallies to commemorate deportation | work=Financial Tims | date=18 May 2014 | accessdate=19 May 2014 | author=Hille, Katherine}}</ref> Additionally, Mejlis reported, that officers of Russia's ] (FSB) raided Tatar homes in the same week, on the pretense of "suspicion of terrorist activity".<ref name="reut">{{cite news | url=http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/18/us-ukraine-crisis-crimea-tatars-idUSBREA4H06S20140518 | title=Crimean Tatars commemorate Soviet deportation despite ban | work=Reuters | date=18 May 2014 | agency=Reuters | accessdate=19 May 2014 | author=Winning, Alexander}}</ref> The Tatar community eventually did hold commemorative rallies in defiance of the ban.<ref name="ft"/><ref name="reut"/> In response Russian authorities flew helicopters over the rallies in an attempt to disrupt them.<ref name="bbc2">{{cite news | url=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27461159 | title=Crimea helicopters try to disrupt Tatar rallies | work=BBC | date=18 May 2014 | agency=BBC | accessdate=19 May 2014}}</ref><section end=HumanRights />

On 9 May 2014, the new "anti-]" ] to the ], passed in December 2013, came into force. Article 280.1 designated incitement of violation of territorial integrity of the Russian Federation<ref name="UKRF280-1"> {{in lang|ru}} </ref> (incl. calls for secession of Crimea from Russia<ref>{{cite web|author=Автор статьи: Мария Макутина|url=http://rbcdaily.ru/politics/562949990932895|title=За призывы вернуть Крым Украине можно будет лишиться свободы сроком до пяти лет – РБК daily|trans-title=For calls to return the Crimea to Ukraine, it will be possible to lose freedom for up to five years– RBC daily|website=Rbcdaily.ru|access-date=1 April 2014}}</ref>) as a criminal offense in Russia, punishable by a fine of 300 thousand ] or imprisonment up to 3 years. If such statements are made in public media or the internet, the punishment could be obligatory works up to 480 hours or imprisonment up to five years.<ref name="UKRF280-1" />

<section begin=HumanRights />According to a report released on the Russian government-run President of Russia's Council on Civil Society and Human Rights website, Tatars who were opposed to Russian rule have been persecuted, Russian law restricting freedom of speech has been imposed, and the new Russian authorities "liquidated" the Kyiv Patriarchate Orthodox church on the peninsula.<ref name="unpoTimeline">{{cite web|url=https://unpo.org/article/17122|title=Timeline: Escalation of The Crisis in Crimea|work=]|date=2 November 2009 |access-date=24 September 2021}}</ref><ref name="Washington Post">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/05/06/russian-government-agency-reveals-fraudulent-nature-of-the-crimean-referendum-results/|title=Russian government agency reveals fraudulent nature of the Crimean referendum results|newspaper=The Washington Post|author=Ilya Somin|date=6 May 2014}}</ref> The Crimean Tatar television station was also shut down by the Russian authorities.<ref name="News">{{cite news|title=Ukraine crisis: Crimean Tatars uneasy under Russia rule|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34042938|work=BBC News|access-date=2 January 2016|first=Sarah|last = Rainsford|date=25 August 2015}}</ref>
], 16 May 2014]]
On 16 May the new Russian authorities of Crimea issued a ban on the annual commemorations of the anniversary of the ] by Stalin in 1944, citing "possibility of provocation by extremists" as a reason.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gazeta.ru/politics/2014/05/17_a_6037401.shtml|script-title=ru:Крымским татарам запретили митинговать|trans-title=Crimean Tatars have been banned from holding protest rallies|language=ru|website=gazeta.ru|date=17 May 2014|access-date=24 March 2014}}</ref> Previously, when Crimea was controlled by Ukraine, these commemorations had taken place every year. The Russian-installed Crimean authorities also banned ], a human rights activist, ], member of the Ukrainian parliament, and former chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatars from entering Crimea.<ref name="ft">{{cite news|url = http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/93ded53c-de99-11e3-b46b-00144feabdc0.html|title=Crimean Tatars defy ban on rallies to commemorate deportation|work=Financial Times|date=18 May 2014|access-date=19 May 2014|last=Hille|first = Katherine}}</ref> Additionally, Mejlis reported, that officers of Russia's ] (FSB) raided Tatar homes in the same week, on the pretense of "suspicion of terrorist activity".<ref name="reut">{{cite news|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-crimea-tatars-idUSBREA4H06S20140518|title=Crimean Tatars commemorate Soviet deportation despite ban|date=18 May 2014|work=Reuters|access-date=19 May 2014|author=Winning, Alexander|archive-date=18 May 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140518215141/http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/18/us-ukraine-crisis-crimea-tatars-idUSBREA4H06S20140518|url-status=live}}</ref> The Tatar community eventually did hold commemorative rallies in defiance of the ban.<ref name="ft" /><ref name="reut" /> In response Russian authorities flew helicopters over the rallies in an attempt to disrupt them.<ref name="bbc2">{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-27461159|title=Crimea helicopters try to disrupt Tatar rallies|work=BBC News|date=18 May 2014|access-date=19 May 2014}}</ref><section end=HumanRights />

In May 2015, a local activist, Alexander Kostenko, was sentenced to four years in a ]. His lawyer, Dmitry Sotnikov, said that the case was fabricated and that his client had been beaten and starved. Crimean prosecutor ] accused Kostenko of making ] gestures during the Maidan protests, and that they were judging "not just , but the very idea of ] and Nazism, which are trying to raise their head once again". Sotnikov responded that "There are fabricated cases in Russia, but rarely such humiliation and physical harm. A living person is being tortured for a political idea, to be able to boast winning over fascism".<ref name="AFP150515">{{cite news|date=15 May 2015|title=Russia jails Crimea activist for 4 years over Kiev protest allegations|newspaper=|agency=]|url=https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/russia-jails-crimea-activist-alexander-kostenko-for-4-years-over-kiev-protest-allegations-763392|access-date=8 December 2021|via=]}}</ref> In June 2015, ] released a report compiling human rights abuses in Crimea.<ref name=Razom150615>{{cite web|url=http://razomforukraine.org/crimeareport|title=Human Rights on Occupied Territory: Case of Crimea|first1=Ivanna|last1=Bilych|first2=Andreas|last2=Neumann|first3=Victor C.|last3=Okpara|first4=Ajitha|last4=Pichaipillai|first5=Matheus|last5=de Moura Sena|first6=Olena|last6=Sharvan|publisher=]|date=15 June 2015}}</ref><ref name=DB150623>{{cite news|url = http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/06/23/crimean-gangland-putin-s-seaside-mafia-state.html|title=Crimean Gangland: Putin's Seaside Mafia State|first=Andrea|last=Chalupa|newspaper=]|date=23 June 2015}}</ref> In its 2016 annual report, the ] made no mention of human rights abuses in Crimea because Russia had not allowed its monitors to enter.<ref name=KP160621>{{cite news|url=http://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/ukraine-politics/ukrainian-lawmakers-fume-over-omission-of-ukraine-from-human-rights-report-416833.html|title=Ukrainian lawmakers fume over omission of Ukraine from human rights report|first=Veronika|last=Melkozerova|newspaper=]|date=21 June 2016}}</ref>

In February 2016 human rights defender ] from Crimea was arrested and accused of belonging to the Islamist organization ] although he denies any involvement in this organization. ] has called for his immediate release.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://khpg.org/en/index.php?id=1530645336|title = Jailed Crimean Tatar Human Rights Activist on Hunger Strike in Russian World Cup city|date=4 July 2018|website=]|access-date=18 October 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2018/02/crimean-tatar-hrd-emir-usein-kuku/|title=CRIMEAN TATAR: NEVER SILENT IN THE FACE OF INJUSTICE|date=February 2018|publisher=]|access-date=18 October 2019}}</ref>

On 24 May 2014, Ervin Ibragimov, a former member of the ] Town Council and a member of the World Congress of Crimean Tatars went missing. CCTV footage from a camera at a nearby shop documents that Ibragimov had been stopped by a group of men and that he is briefly speaking to the men before being forced in their van.<ref>{{cite web|url = https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/EUR5041212016ENGLISH.pdf|title=URGENT ACTION: CRIMEAN TATAR ACTIVIST FORCIBLY DISAPPEARED|date=25 May 2016|publisher=Amnesty International}}</ref> According to the ] Russian authorities refuse to investigate the disappearance of Ibragimov.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://khpg.org/en/index.php?id=1522112890|title=Russia refuses to investigate the abduction of prominent Crimean Tatar activist Ervin Ibragimov|work=Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group}}</ref>

In May 2018 ], the founder and coordinator of the human rights movement Crimean Solidarity was imprisoned by Russian authorities and charged with "membership of a terrorist organisation". ] and ] demand his immediate release.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur46/1470/2019/en/|title=Russian Federation/Ukraine: Further information: Rights defender facing trumped-up charges: Server Mustafayev|website=Amnesty International|date=29 November 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.frontlinedefenders.org/en/case/arrest-server-mustafayev|title=ARREST OF SERVER MUSTAFAYEV|date=23 September 2020}}</ref>

On 12 June 2018, Ukraine lodged a ] weighing about 90{{spaces}}kg, consisting of 17,500 pages of text in 29 volumes to the UN's ] about ] by Russian authorities in occupied Crimea and state financing of terrorism by Russian Federation in ].<ref name="urlUAWire - Ukraine files memorandum with UN Court of Justice containing evidence of Russias involvement in financing of terrorism">{{cite web|url = https://uawire.org/ukraine-files-memorandum-with-un-court-containing-evidence-of-russia-involvement-in-financing-terrorism|title = UAWire – Ukraine files memorandum with UN Court of Justice containing evidence of Russia's involvement in 'financing of terrorism'}}</ref><ref name="urlUkraine submits to ICJ evidence of Russian crimes in Crimea, Donbas| UNIAN">{{cite web|url = https://www.unian.info/politics/10149827-ukraine-submits-to-icj-evidence-of-russian-crimes-in-crimea-donbas.html|title = Ukraine submits to ICJ evidence of Russian crimes in Crimea, Donbas &#124; UNIAN}}</ref>

Between 2015 and 2019 over 134,000 people living in Crimea applied for and were issued Ukrainian passports.<ref>{{cite web|url = https://newizv.ru/news/society/21-03-2019/bolee-sta-tysyach-krymchan-poluchili-ukrainskie-zagranpasporta|title = Более ста тысяч крымчан получили украинские загранпаспорта {{!}} Новые Известия|trans-title=More than a hundred thousand Crimeans received Ukrainian passports {{!}} Novye Izvestia|website=newizv.ru|language=ru|access-date=21 March 2019}}</ref>

=== Crimean public opinion ===
], Crimea, 18 March 2019]]

Prior to Russian occupation, support for joining Russia was 23% in a 2013 poll, down from 33% in 2011.<ref name="IRI_CrimeaPoll2013">{{cite web|title=Public Opinion Survey Residents of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea May 16 – 30, 2013|url=https://www.iri.org/sites/default/files/2013%20October%207%20Survey%20of%20Crimean%20Public%20Opinion,%20May%2016-30,%202013.pdf|website=International Republican Institute|access-date=31 January 2022|page=17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220412004739/https://www.iri.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy/iri.org/2013%20October%207%20Survey%20of%20Crimean%20Public%20Opinion,%20May%2016-30,%202013.pdf|archive-date=12 April 2022|url-status=live}}</ref> A joint survey by American government agency ] and polling firm ] was taken during April 2014.<ref name="FFS6464" /> It polled 500 residents of Crimea. The survey found that 82.8% of those polled believed that the results of the ] reflected the views of most residents of Crimea, whereas 6.7% said that it did not. 73.9% of those polled said that they thought that the annexation would have a positive impact on their lives, whereas 5.5% said that it would not. 13.6% said that they did not know.<ref name="FFS6464">{{cite web|url=http://www.bbg.gov/wp-content/media/2014/06/Ukraine-slide-deck.pdf|title=News-gathering and policy perceptions in Ukraine|publisher=Broadcasting Board of Governors|date=3 June 2014|access-date=23 March 2015}}</ref>

A comprehensive poll released on 8 May 2014 by the ] surveyed local opinions on the annexation.<ref name="PewReport">{{cite press release|url = http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2014/05/Pew-Global-Attitudes-Ukraine-Russia-Report-FINAL-May-8-2014.pdf|title = Despite Concerns about Governance, Ukrainians Want to Remain One Country|publisher=Pew Research Centre|date=8 May 2014|access-date=8 May 2014|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140509001422/http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2014/05/Pew-Global-Attitudes-Ukraine-Russia-Report-FINAL-May-8-2014.pdf|archive-date=9 May 2014}}</ref> Despite international criticism of 16 March referendum on Crimean status, 91% of those Crimeans polled thought that the vote was free and fair, and 88% said that the Ukrainian government should recognise the results.<ref name="PewReport" />

In a survey completed in 2019 by a Russian company FOM 72% of surveyed Crimean residents said their lives have improved since annexation. At the same time only 39% Russians living in the mainland said the annexation was beneficial for the country as a whole which marks a significant drop from 67% in 2015.<ref>{{cite web|url = https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/03/15/russians-conflicted-over-crimea-annexations-value-a64817|title=Russians Conflicted Over Crimea Annexation's Value|author=The Moscow Times|date=15 March 2019|website=The Moscow Times|access-date=17 March 2019}}</ref>

Whilst the Russian government actively cited local opinion polls to argue that the annexation was legitimate (i.e. supported by the population of the territory in question),<ref>{{cite journal|last1=O'Loughlin|first1=John|last2=Toal|first2=Gerard|date=28 February 2019|title=The Crimea conundrum: legitimacy and public opinion after annexation|journal=Eurasian Geography and Economics|volume=60|pages=6–27|doi=10.1080/15387216.2019.1593873|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last1=Toal|first1=Gerard|last2=O'Loughlin|first2=John|last3=Bakke|first3=Kristin M.|date=18 March 2020|title=Analysis {{!}} Six years and $20 billion in Russian investment later, Crimeans are happy with Russian annexation|newspaper=]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/03/18/six-years-20-billion-russian-investment-later-crimeans-are-happy-with-russian-annexation/|access-date=29 December 2020|issn=0190-8286}}</ref> some authors have cautioned against using surveys concerning identities and support for the annexation conducted in "oppressive political environment" of Russian-held Crimea.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Charron|first=Austin|date=2016|title=Whose is Crimea? Contested Sovereignty and Regional Identity|journal=Region|volume=5|issue=2|pages=225–256|issn=2166-4307|jstor=24896628}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Knott|first=Eleanor|title=Kin majorities: identity and citizenship in Crimea and Moldova|date=2022|isbn=978-0-2280-1150-7|location=Montreal|publisher=McGill-Queen's University Press|oclc=1280277016}}</ref>


== Ukrainian response == == Ukrainian response ==
{{See also|Do not buy Russian goods!|Boycott Russian Films|Putin khuylo!|Day of Resistance to Occupation of Crimea and Sevastopol}}
Immediately after the treaty of accession was signed in March, the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned the Provisional Principal of Russia in Ukraine to present '']'' of protest against Russia's recognition of the Republic of Crimea and its subsequent annexation.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.unn.com.ua/ru/news/1318642-mzs-viklikalo-timchasovogo-povirenogo-u-spravakh-rf-v-ukrayini-dlya-vruchennya-noti-protestu|script-title=ru:МИД вызвал Временного поверенного в делах РФ в Украине для вручения ноты-протеста|date = 18 March 2014|website = unn.com.ua|language = Russian}}</ref> Two days later, the ] condemned the treaty<ref>{{cite web|url = http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1139-18|script-title=uk:Декларація "Про боротьбу за звільнення України"|website = ]|language = Ukrainian}}</ref> and called Russia's actions "a gross violation of ]". The Rada called on the international community to avoid recognition of the "so-called Republic of Crimea" or the ] of Crimea and Sevastopol to Russia as new federal subjects.

Immediately after the treaty of accession was signed in March, the ] summoned the Provisional Principal of Russia in Ukraine to present '']'' of protest against Russia's recognition of the Republic of Crimea and its subsequent annexation.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.unn.com.ua/ru/news/1318642-mzs-viklikalo-timchasovogo-povirenogo-u-spravakh-rf-v-ukrayini-dlya-vruchennya-noti-protestu|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140319072412/http://www.unn.com.ua/ru/news/1318642-mzs-viklikalo-timchasovogo-povirenogo-u-spravakh-rf-v-ukrayini-dlya-vruchennya-noti-protestu|archive-date=19 March 2014|script-title=ru:МИД вызвал Временного поверенного в делах РФ в Украине для вручения ноты-протеста|trans-title=The Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned the Charge d'Affaires of the Russian Federation in Ukraine to present a protest note|date=18 March 2014|publisher=unn.com.ua|language=ru}}</ref> Two days later, the ] condemned the treaty<ref>{{cite web|url=http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1139-18|script-title=uk:Декларація "Про боротьбу за звільнення України"|trans-title=Declaration "On the Struggle for the Liberation of Ukraine"|publisher=]|language=uk}}</ref> and called Russia's actions "a gross violation of ]". The Rada called on the international community to avoid recognition of the "so-called Republic of Crimea" or the annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol by Russia as new federal subjects.

On 15 April 2014, the Verkhovna Rada declared the ] to be under "provisional ]" by the Russian military<ref>{{cite web|url=http://iportal.rada.gov.ua/news/Novyny/Povidomlennya/91559.html|script-title=uk:Верховна Рада України ухвалила Закон "Про забезпечення прав і свобод громадян та правовий режим на тимчасово окупованій території України"|trans-title=The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted the Law "On Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and the Legal Regime in the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Ukraine"|date=15 April 2014|publisher=]|language=uk|access-date=30 April 2014|archive-date=24 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210924132545/https://iportal.rada.gov.ua/news/Novyny/Povidomlennya/91559.html}}</ref> and imposed ] on Ukrainians visiting Crimea.<ref name="apr15">{{cite news|title=Ukraine Parliament declares Crimea temporarily occupied territory|url=http://news.biharprabha.com/2014/04/ukraine-parliament-declares-crimea-temporarily-occupied-territory/|agency=Indo-Asian News Service|website=news.biharprabha.com|access-date=15 April 2014}}</ref> The territories were also deemed "inalienable parts of Ukraine" subject to Ukrainian law. Among other things, the special law approved by the Rada restricted foreign citizens' movements to and from the Crimean Peninsula and forbade certain types of entrepreneurship.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://rada.gov.ua/ru/news/Novosty/Soobshchenyya/91573.html|script-title=ru:Верховная Рада Украины приняла Закон "Об обеспечении прав и свобод граждан и правовом режиме на временно оккупированной территории Украины"|trans-title=The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted the Law "On Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and the Legal Regime in the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Ukraine"|date=15 April 2014|publisher=]|language=ru|access-date=30 April 2014|archive-date=25 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150925100215/http://rada.gov.ua/ru/news/Novosty/Soobshchenyya/91573.html}}</ref> The law also forbade activity of government bodies formed in violation of Ukrainian law and designated their acts as ].<ref>{{cite news|url = http://www.vz.ru/news/2014/4/15/682175.html|script-title=ru:Рада приняла закон о защите прав граждан "оккупированного Крыма"|trans-title=The Rada adopted a law on the protection of the rights of citizens of the "occupied Crimea"|date=15 April 2014|website=]|language=ru}}</ref>{{Better source needed|date=June 2021|reason=Vzglyad is unreliable in this page. See Misplaced Pages:New_page_patrol_source_guide#Russia}}
], which provided 85% of Crimea's drinking water.<ref>{{cite news|title=Dam leaves Crimea population in chronic water shortage|url=https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2017/1/4/dam-leaves-crimea-population-in-chronic-water-shortage|work=Al-Jazeera|date=4 January 2017}}</ref>]]
Ukrainian authorities greatly reduced the volume of ] via the ] due to huge debt for water supplied in the previous year, threatening the viability of the peninsula's agricultural crops, which are heavily dependent on irrigation.<ref>{{cite news|date=25 April 2014|access-date=26 April 2014|title=Russia fears Crimea water shortage as supply drops|url = https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-27155885|work=BBC News}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Pray For Rain: Crimea's Dry-Up A Headache For Moscow, Dilemma For Kyiv|url=https://www.rferl.org/a/pray-for-rain-crimea-s-dry-up-a-headache-for-moscow-dilemma-for-kyiv/30515986.html|work=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty|date=29 March 2020}}</ref>

The Ukrainian National Council for TV and Radio Broadcasting instructed all cable operators on 11 March 2014 to stop transmitting a number of Russian channels, including the international versions of the main state-controlled stations, ], ] and ], as well as news channel ].<ref>{{cite web|last=Ennis|first=Stephen|url = https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26546083|title=Ukraine hits back at Russian TV onslaught|publisher=BBC|date=12 March 2014|access-date=20 April 2014}}</ref>

In March 2014, activists began organising ]s in supermarkets to urge customers ] and to boycott Russian ], banks, and concerts. In April 2014, some ] in ], ], and ] began ].<ref>{{Cite web|last=Цензор.НЕТ|date=2014-04-11|title=Некоторые кинотеатры Киева, Львова и Одессы объявили бойкот российской кинопродукции|trans-title=Some cinemas in Kyiv, Lviv and Odesa announced a boycott of Russian film production|url=https://censor.net/ru/news/280504/nekotorye_kinoteatry_kieva_lvova_i_odessy_obyavili_boyikot_rossiyiskoyi_kinoproduktsii|access-date=2023-06-05|website=Цензор.НЕТ|language=ru-UA}}</ref>

On 2 December 2014, Ukraine created a ], with one of its goals being, according to first Minister of Information, ], to counteract "Russian information aggression".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/kyiv-post-plus/journalists-media-rights-activists-demand-abolishing-of-newly-formed-ministry-of-truth-374003.html|title=Journalists, free speech activists demand abolishing of newly-formed 'Ministry of Truth'|newspaper=Kyiv Post|date=4 December 2014|access-date=1 January 2016}}</ref>

In December 2014, Ukraine halted all train and bus services to Crimea.<ref>{{cite news|date=8 January 2015|title=Ukraine conflict: Crimea hit by shortages|url = https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30713665|work=BBC News}}</ref>

On 16 September 2015, the ] voted for the law that sets 20 February 2014 as the official date of the Russian temporary occupation of the Crimean Peninsula.<ref>. ]. 16 September 2015</ref><ref>. '']''. 15 September 2015</ref> On 7 October 2015, the ] signed the law into force.<ref>. ]. 7 October 2015</ref>

The ] was established by the Ukrainian government on 20 April 2016 to manage occupied parts of ] regions affected by Russian military intervention of 2014.<ref name=NMC20416>{{in lang|uk}} , '']'' (20 April 2016)</ref> By 2015, the number of ] registered in Ukraine who had fled from Russian-occupied Crimea was 50,000.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Years After Crimea's Annexation, Integration of Ukraine's Internally Displaced Population Remains Uneven – Ukraine|url=https://reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/years-after-crimea-s-annexation-integration-ukraine-s-internally-displaced-population|access-date=14 March 2022|website=ReliefWeb|date=19 September 2019}}</ref>

== Russian response ==
{{See also|Crimean speech of Vladimir Putin|2022 Moscow rally}}

], which took place in ] a day before the Crimean referendum.|248x248px]]
In a poll published on 24 February 2014 by the state-owned ], only 15% of those Russians polled said 'yes' to the question: "Should Russia react to the overthrow of the legally elected authorities in Ukraine?"<ref>{{cite magazine|url = https://time.com/11952/putin-ukraine-crimea-russia/|title = 4 Reasons Putin Is Already Losing in Ukraine|magazine=]|date=3 March 2014}}</ref>

The ] Committee on ] Affairs, headed by ], visited ] on 25 February 2014 and said: "If the parliament of the Crimean autonomy or its residents express the wish to join the Russian Federation, Russia will be prepared to consider this sort of application. We will be examining the situation and doing so fast".<ref name="Rothkopf">{{cite web|last=Rothkopf|first=David|url = https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/02/25/all-not-quiet-on-ukraines-eastern-front/|title=All (Not) Quiet on Ukraine's Eastern Front|work=Foreign policy|date=25 February 2014}}</ref> They also stated that in the event of a ] for the Crimea region joining the Russian Federation, they would consider its results "very fast".<ref name="gordonua.com">{{cite news|title=Российские паспорта и присоединение к РФ: Депутаты Госдумы прибыли в Крым (Rossiyskiye pasporta i prisoyedineniye k RF: Deputaty Gosdumy pribyli v Krym)|trans-title=Russian passports and joining Russia: State Duma deputies arrived in Crimea|url = http://gordonua.com/news/politics/Rossiyskie-pasporta-i-prisoedinenie-k-RF-Deputaty-Gosdumy-pribyli-v-Krym-11430.html|language=uk|newspaper=Gordonua|date=25 February 2014}}</ref> Later Slutsky announced that he was misunderstood by the Crimean press, and no decision regarding simplifying the process of acquiring Russian citizenship for people in Crimea had been made yet.<ref name="aif.ru">{{cite news|title = В Госдуме опровергли данные о выдаче паспортов РФ жителям Крыма (V Gosdume oprovergli dannyye o vydache pasportov RF zhitelyam Kryma)|trans-title=The State Duma has denied information about issuing passports to residents of Crimea RF|url = http://www.aif.ru/euromaidan/uanews/1112843|language=uk|newspaper=]|date=25 February 2014}}</ref> He also added that if "fellow Russian citizens are in jeopardy, you understand that we do not stay away".<ref>{{cite web|language=uk|url=http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/02/25/7016276/|title=Росія обіцяє втрутитися, якщо ''росіянам в Україні буде загроза'' (Rosiya obitsyaye vtrutytysya, yakshcho ''rosiyanam v Ukrayini bude zahroza'')|trans-title=Russia promises to intervene if the Russians in Ukraine ''threatened''|work=Українська правда (Ukrayins'ka pravda) |location=UA|date=25 February 2014}}</ref> On 25 February, in a meeting with Crimean politicians, he stated that Viktor Yanukovych was still the legitimate president of Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/02/25/7016292/|title=У Росії Януковича все ще вважають президентом – Слуцький (U Rosiyi Yanukovycha vse shche vvazhayut' prezydentom – Sluts'kyy)|trans-title=In Russia Yanukovych's still the president – Slutsky|work=Українська правда (Ukrayins'ka pravda) |location=UA|date=25 February 2014}}</ref> That same day, the Russian Duma announced it was determining measures so that ] who "did not want to break from the ]" could acquire Russian citizenship.<ref name="Интерфакс Interfax">{{cite web|url=http://www.interfax.ru/world/361055|title=Госдума России обсуждает меры по защите крымчан (Gosduma Rossii obsuzhdayet mery po zashchite krymchan)|trans-title=Russian State Duma discusses measures to protect the Crimean|publisher=Интерфакс (Interfax)|location=RU}}</ref>

On 26 February, Russian president ] ordered the ] to be "put on alert in the ] as well as units stationed with the 2nd Army ] Command involved in aerospace defence, airborne troops and long-range military transport". Despite media speculation that this was in reaction to the events in Ukraine, Russian ] ] said it was for reasons separate from the unrest in Ukraine.<ref name="Alpert">{{cite news|last=Alpert|first=Lukas I.|url = https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304709904579406310892324006|title=Russia Orders Military Exercises Amid Ukraine Tension|work=The Wall Street Journal|date=27 February 2014}}</ref> On 27 February 2014, the Russian government dismissed accusations that it was in violation of the basic agreements regarding the ]: "All movements of armored vehicles are undertaken in full compliance with the basic agreements and did not require any approvals".<ref>{{cite news|url = http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/02/27/7016538/|title=Russian Foreign Ministry commented on the movement of armored vehicles in Crimea|newspaper=]|date=27 February 2014}}</ref>

On 27 February, the Russian governing agencies presented the new law project on granting citizenship.<ref>{{Cite news|date=28 February 2014|title=Ukraine crisis: Russia mulls new land-grab law|work=]|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26381454|access-date=19 June 2021}}</ref>

The ] called on the West and particularly ] to "abandon the provocative statements and respect the neutral status of Ukraine".<ref name="mid_accusations">{{cite news|url = http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/02/27/7016548/|title = MID of Russia made another statement on Ukraine: militants, NATO, provocations|newspaper=]|date=27 February 2014}}</ref> In its statement, the ministry claims that the ], which was signed on 21 February and was witnessed by foreign ministries from Germany, Poland and France had to this date, not been implemented<ref name="mid_accusations" /> (] from Russia had not signed it<ref name="CTV News">{{cite news|url = http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/tensions-high-at-kyiv-protest-camp-despite-ground-breaking-deal-1.1697154|title=Tensions high at Kiev protest camp despite ground-breaking deal|publisher=]|date=21 February 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081201194141/http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/tensions-high-at-kyiv-protest-camp-despite-ground-breaking-deal-1.1697154|archive-date=1 December 2008}}</ref>).

On 28 February, according to ], the ] discontinued further talks with Ukraine in regards to the ] project.<ref>{{cite news|url = http://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-abroad/1625012-rosiya_pripinila_peregovori_z_ukraiinoyu_za_proektom_kerchenskogo_mostu_1912965.html|title=Russia has suspended negotiations with Ukraine on the project of Kerch bridge|agency=]|date=28 February 2014}}</ref> However, on 3 March ], then ], signed a ] creating a subsidiary of Russian Highways (]) to build a bridge at an unspecified location along the ].<ref>{{Cite web|date=3 March 2014|title=Medvedev Signs Decree Creating Contractor for Kerch Strait Bridge Project|url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/03/03/medvedev-signs-decree-creating-contractor-for-kerch-strait-bridge-project-a32624|website=]}}</ref><ref name="TV Rain">{{cite news|date=3 March 2014|title=Медведев распорядился создать компанию для строительства моста через Керченский пролив|language=ru|trans-title=Medvedev ordered to create a company to build a bridge across the Kerch Strait|newspaper=]|location=Russia|url=https://tvrain.ru/teleshow/novosti_sajta/medvedev_rasporjadilsja_sozdat_kompaniju_dlja_stroitelstva_mosta_cherez_kerchenskij_proliv-364255/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=29 March 2022|title= Kerch Dam|url=https://www.uawarexplained.com/kerch-dam/?version=sixty-minutes/|access-date=29 March 2022|website=UaWarExplained.com}}</ref>

On Russian social networks, there was a movement to gather volunteers who served in the Russian army to go to Ukraine.<ref>{{cite news|url = http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2014/02/28/7016603/|title = In Russia there are gathering "tourists" to Ukraine who served in the military|newspaper=]|date=28 February 2014}}</ref> Many political researchers consider that after the annexation a social period in Russia coined as "]" begun, during which the "]" effect was observed in the population.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022-11-30 |title=After the Crimean Consensus - The American Interest |url=https://www.the-american-interest.com/2019/01/02/after-the-crimean-consensus/ |access-date=2024-11-20 |archive-date=30 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221130172251/https://www.the-american-interest.com/2019/01/02/after-the-crimean-consensus/ |url-status=bot: unknown }}</ref>

On 28 February, President Putin stated in telephone calls with key ] leaders that it was of "extreme importance of not allowing a further escalation of violence and the necessity of a rapid normalisation of the situation in Ukraine".<ref name="CrimeaRussiaOccupation">{{cite news|title=Ukraine crisis live: Russia admits its troops are moving in Crimea|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10666893/Ukraine-crisis-live-President-Barack-Obama-warns-of-costs-for-any-violation-of-Ukraine.html|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10666893/Ukraine-crisis-live-President-Barack-Obama-warns-of-costs-for-any-violation-of-Ukraine.html|archive-date=11 January 2022|url-access=subscription|url-status=live|access-date=28 February 2014|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Already on 19 February the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs had referred to the Euromaidan revolution as the "]".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://lenta.ru/news/2014/02/19/brown/|title=Russian Foreign Ministry called the Ukrainian revolution "brown"|newspaper=]|location=RU|date=19 February 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url = http://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2014/02/19/7014748/|title=Russian Foreign Ministry: In Ukraine the "brown" revolution, we will apply all the influence|newspaper=]|place=UA|date=19 February 2014}}</ref>

In Moscow, on 2 March, an estimated 27,000 rallied in support of the Russian government's decision to intervene in Ukraine.<ref name="csmmoscow">{{cite news|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2014/0302/Vladimir-Putin-sees-small-protests-mass-support-for-troops-in-Ukraine-video|title=Vladimir Putin sees small protests, mass support for troops in Ukraine (+video)|work=The Christian Science Monitor|date=2 March 2014}}</ref> The rallies received considerable attention on Russian state TV and were officially approved by the government.<ref name=csmmoscow />

Meanwhile, on 1 March, five people who were picketing next to the Federation Council building against the invasion of Ukraine were arrested.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.unian.ua/politics/891669-u-rosiji-zatrimali-aktivistiv-yaki-protestuvali-proti-viyni-z-ukrajinoyu.html|title=In Russia were detained activists who protested against the war with Ukraine|agency=]|date=1 March 2014}}</ref> The next day about 200 people protested at the building of the Russian Ministry of Defence in Moscow against Russian military involvement.<ref name="Utro">{{cite web|url = http://www.utro.ru/articles/2014/03/02/1179378.shtml|title = На антивоенных акциях в Москве задержаны 300 человек (Na antivoyennykh aktsiyakh v Moskve zaderzhany 300 chelovek)| date=2 March 2014|trans-title=At the anti-war actions in Moscow detained 300 people|publisher=Utro|location=RU|language=ru|access-date=2 March 2014}}</ref> About 500 people also gathered to protest on the ] in Moscow, and the same number of people on the ] in ].<ref name="investigator.org.ua">{{cite web|url=http://investigator.org.ua/news/120579/|title = В Москве и Перебурге проходят митинги против российской оккупации Крыма. Уже есть задержанные (V Moskve i Peterburge prokhodyat mitingi protiv rossiyskoy okkupatsii Kryma. Uzhe yest' zaderzhannyye)|date = 2 March 2014|trans-title=In Moscow and St. Petersburg rallies against the Russian occupation of the Crimea. Already have detained|language=ru|publisher=Центр журналистских расследований (Tsentr zhurnalistskikh rassledovaniy) |access-date=2 March 2014}}</ref> On 2 March, about eleven protesters demonstrated in ] against Russian involvement, with some wrapped in the Ukrainian flag.<ref name="kp.ru">{{cite web|url=http://www.kp.ru/online/news/1674924/|title=Жители Екатеринбурга провели пикеты против ввода российских войск в Крым (Zhiteli Yekaterinburga proveli pikety protiv vvoda rossiyskikh voysk v Krym)|trans-title=Inhabitants of Ekaterinburg picketed against Russian troops in the Crimea|work=]|date=2 March 2014|location=RU|language=ru|access-date=2 March 2014}}</ref> Protests were also held in ] on the same day.<ref name="ura.ru">{{cite web|url = http://ura.ru/news/1052176002|title="Сколько детей ты готов похоронить, чтобы Крым стал частью России?" Первые антивоенные пикеты прошли на Урале ("Skol'ko detey ty gotov pokhoronit', chtoby Krym stal chast'yu Rossii?" Pervyye antivoyennyye pikety proshli na Urale)|date=2 March 2014|trans-title="How many children are you willing to bury to Crimea became part of Russia?" First anti-war pickets were held in the Urals|publisher=Ura|location=RU|language=ru|access-date=2 March 2014}}</ref> Opposition to the military intervention was also expressed by rock musician ], who wrote in particular: "You want war with Ukraine? It will not be the way ]: the folks on the Maidan have been hardened and know what they are fighting for – for their country, their independence. ... We have to live with them. Still neighborly. And preferably in friendship. But it's up to them how they want to live".<ref name="novayagazeta.ru">{{cite web|date=4 March 2014|title=Не стреляй! Антивоенные реплики Юрия Шевчука, Бориса Гребенщикова, Андрея Макаревича|trans-title=Do not shoot! Antiwar remarks by Yuri Shevchuk, Boris Grebenshchikov, Andrey Makarevich|url=https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2014/03/04/58605-ne-strelyay-antivoennye-repliki-yuriya-shevchuka-borisa-grebenschikova-andreya-makarevicha|access-date=4 March 2014|work=]|language=ru}}</ref> The Professor of the Department of Philosophy at the ] ] was fired for his article in '']'', criticising Russian military intervention.<ref name="Bershidsky">{{cite news|last=Bershidsky|first=Leonid|author-link=Leonid Bershidsky|date=25 March 2014|title=Comparing Putin to Hitler Will Get You Fired|work=]|publisher=]|url=http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-03-25/comparing-putin-to-hitler-will-get-you-fired|access-date=25 March 2014}}</ref>

On 2 March, one Moscow resident protested against Russian intervention by holding a "Stop the war" banner, but he was immediately harassed by passers-by. Police then proceeded to arrest him. A woman came forward with a fabricated charge against him, of beating up a child; however, her claim, due to lack of a victim and obviously false, was ignored by the police.<ref name="opposed">{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26531310|title=Ukraine crisis: Russians opposed to Putin|work=BBC News Magazine|date=12 March 2014}}</ref> Andrei Zubov, a professor at the ], who compared Russian actions in Crimea to the 1938 ] by ], was threatened. Alexander Chuyev, the leader of the pro-Kremlin ] party, also objected to Russian intervention in Ukraine. ], a popular Russian writer, predicted that Russia's moves would lead to political and economic isolation.<ref name="opposed" />

] (seated, middle) speaks to the press on 4 March 2014, denouncing the ] as an "unconstitutional coup", and insisting that Moscow has a right to protect Russians in Ukraine.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/putin-reserves-the-right-to-use-force-in-ukraine/2014/03/04/92d4ca70-a389-11e3-a5fa-55f0c77bf39c_story.html|title=Putin defends Ukraine stance, cites lawlessness|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=4 March 2014}}</ref>]]

President Putin's approval rating among the Russian public increased by nearly 10% since the crisis began, up to 71.6%, the highest in three years, according to a poll conducted by the ], released on 19 March.<ref name="approval">{{cite news|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/03/18/crimea-ukraine-putin-russia/6564263/|title=Putin's move on Crimea bolsters popularity back home|newspaper=USA Today|date=19 March 2014|access-date=20 March 2014}}</ref><ref name="theguardian.com">{{cite news|first=Alec|last=Luhn|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/18/red-square-rally-vladimir-putin-crimea|title=Red Square rally hails Vladimir Putin after Crimea accession|work=The Guardian|location=Moscow|date=18 March 2014|access-date=14 April 2016}}</ref> Additionally, the same poll showed that more than 90% of Russians supported unification with the Crimean Republic.<ref name=approval /> According to a 2021 study in the '']'', "three quarters of those who rallied to Putin after Russia annexed Crimea were engaging in at least some form of dissembling and that this rallying developed as a rapid cascade, with social media joining television in fueling perceptions this was socially desirable".<ref>{{cite journal|last=Hale|first=Henry E.|date=2021|title=Authoritarian Rallying as Reputational Cascade? Evidence from Putin's Popularity Surge after Crimea|journal=American Political Science Review|volume=116|issue=2|pages=580–594|doi=10.1017/S0003055421001052|s2cid=239196888|issn=0003-0554|doi-access=free}}</ref>

On 4 March, at a press conference in ], President Putin expressed his view on the situation that if a revolution took place in Ukraine, it would be a new country with which Russia had not concluded any treaties.<ref name="putin_renounced">{{cite news|url=http://dt.ua/POLITICS/putin-podilyaye-dumku-scho-yakscho-v-ukrayini-revolyuciya-to-na-yiyi-teritoriyi-vzhe-nova-derzhava-138899_.html|title=Putin shares the view that if in Ukraine "revolution" – then on its territory is a new state|newspaper=]|date=4 March 2014}}</ref> He offered an analogy with the events of 1917 in Russia, when as a result of the revolution the ] fell apart and a new state was created.<ref name="putin_renounced" /> However, he stated Ukraine would still have to honour its debts.
]
Russian politicians speculated that there were already 143,000 Ukrainian refugees in Russia.<ref name="refugees">{{cite web|url=http://www.9news.com.au/world/2014/03/02/07/46/russia-claims-thousands-fleeing-ukraine|title=Russia claims thousands fleeing Ukraine|newspaper=Nine MSN|location=AU|date=2 March 2014}}</ref> The ] refuted those claims of refugee increases in Russia.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-society/1627698-mzs_ukraiini_sprostuvalo_zrostannya_kilkosti_bigentsiv_do_rosiii_1914722.html|title=мзс україні спростувало зростання кількості бігентсив до росії (MZS Ukrayini sprostuvalo zrostannya kil'kosti bihent·syv do rosiyi)|trans-title=Ukraine Foreign Ministry refuted the growing number of refugees in Russia|agency=]|date=4 March 2014}}</ref> At a briefing on 4 March 2014, the director of the department of information policy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine ] said that Russia was misinforming its own citizens as well as the entire international community to justify its own actions in the Crimea.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-abroad/1627705-mzs_putin_prodovgue__dezinformuvati_uves_svit_zaradi_vipravdannya_svoiih_diy_1914726.html|place=UA|title=мзс путін продовґуе дезінформувати весь світ заради виправдання своїх дії (MZS Putin prodovgue dezinformuvaty ves' svit zarady vypravdannya svoyikh diyi)|trans-title=Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Putin continues to mislead the whole world for justification of own actions|agency=]|date=4 March 2014}}</ref>

On 5 March, an anchor of the Russian-controlled TV channel ], ], criticized her employer's biased coverage of the military invervention.<ref>{{Cite web|date=5 March 2014|title=Russia Today presenter hits out at Moscow over Ukraine|url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/05/russia-today-abby-martin-crimea-ukraine|access-date=19 June 2021|website=]}}</ref><ref name="Piers">{{cite video|title=Abby Martin: Russia Today supports me|url=http://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2014/03/05/pmt-intv-martin-russia-critique.cnn|publisher=CNN|date=5 March 2014}}</ref> Also on 5 March 2014, another RT America anchor, ], of the network's Washington, DC bureau, resigned on air, explaining that she could not be "part of a network that whitewashes the actions of Putin" and citing her Hungarian ancestry and the memory of the Soviet repression of the ] as a factor in her decision.<ref name="Kirchick">{{cite web|last=Kirchick|first=James|title=Exclusive: RT Anchor Liz Wahl Explains Why She Quit|work=The Daily Beast|access-date=6 March 2014|date=5 March 2014|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/03/05/exclusive-rt-today-anchor-liz-wahl-explains-why-she-quit.html}}</ref>

In early March, Igor Andreyev, a 75-year-old survivor of the ], attended an anti-war rally against the Russian intervention in Crimea and was holding a sign that read "Peace to the World". The riot police arrested him, and a local pro-government lawyer then accused him of being a supporter of "fascism". The retiree, who lived on a 6,500-ruble monthly pension, was fined 10,000 rubles.<ref>{{cite web|last=Dolgov|first=Anna|date=7 March 2014|title=Leningrad Blockade Survivor Arrested, Fined For Anti-War Protest|url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/03/07/leningrad-blockade-survivor-arrested-fined-for-anti-war-protest-a32780|work=]}}</ref>

Prominent dissident ] said that Crimea should stay within Ukraine with broader autonomy.<ref name="Interfax">{{cite news|url=http://www.interfax.com/newsinf.asp?id=487296|title=Khodorkovsky: Crimea should stay within Ukraine with broad autonomous status|agency=Interfax|date=10 March 2014|access-date=10 March 2015|archive-date=2 April 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402145602/http://www.interfax.com/newsinf.asp?id=487296}}</ref>

], a republic within Russia populated by ], has sought to alleviate concerns about the treatment of Tatars by Russia, as Tatarstan is an oil-rich and economically successful republic in Russia.<ref name="aljazeera.com">{{cite web|url=http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/03/crimea-crisis-tatarstan-factor-2014314143349496558.html|title=Crimea crisis: The Tatarstan factor|publisher=Al Jazeera|access-date=20 April 2014}}</ref> On 5 March, ] ] signed an agreement on co-operation between Tatarstan and the Aksyonov government in Crimea that implied collaboration between ten government institutions as well as significant financial aid to Crimea from Tatarstan businesses.<ref name="aljazeera.com" /> On 11 March, Minnikhanov was in Crimea on his second visit and attended as a guest in the Crimean parliament chamber during the vote on the declaration of sovereignty pending 16 March referendum.<ref name="aljazeera.com" /> The Tatarstan's Mufti ] invited Crimean Tatars to study in madrasas in ], and declared support for their "brothers in faith and blood".<ref name="aljazeera.com" /> ], a former leader of the ], believed that forces that were suspected to be Russian forces should leave the Crimean Peninsula,<ref name="aljazeera.com" /> and asked the ] to send peacekeepers into the region.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rferl.org/content/ukraine-crimean-tatar-un-peacekeepers/25317014.html|title=Crimean Tatar Leader Calls For UN Peacekeeping Troops|publisher=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty|date=1 April 2014|access-date=3 January 2016}}</ref>

], Crimea, 2015]]
On 15 March, thousands of protesters (estimates varying from 3,000 by official sources up to 50,000 claimed by the opposition) in Moscow marched against Russian involvement in Ukraine, many waving Ukrainian flags.<ref>{{cite news|author1=Huw Griffith|author2= Anna Malpas|url=https://news.yahoo.com/thousands-moscow-protest-russias-action-crimea-003037662.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140315144618/http://news.yahoo.com/thousands-moscow-protest-russias-action-crimea-003037662.html|title=50,000 rally in Moscow against Crimea intervention|date=15 March 2014|archive-date=15 March 2014|work=Yahoo News|agency=Agence France-Presse}}</ref> At the same time, a pro-government (and pro-referendum) rally occurred across the street, counting in the thousands as well (officials claiming 27,000 with the opposition claiming about 10,000).

In February 2015, the leading independent Russian newspaper {{Lang|ru-latn|]}} obtained documents,<ref name="Novaya_predstavlyaetsya">{{cite news|author=Lipsky|first=Andrey|date=24 February 2015|title="Представляется правильным инициировать присоединение восточных областей Украины к России"|language=ru|trans-title=«It seems right to initiate the accession of eastern regions of Ukraine to Russia»|work=]|issue=19|url=https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2015/02/24/63168-171-predstavlyaetsya-pravilnym-initsiirovat-prisoedinenie-vostochnyh-oblastey-ukrainy-k-rossii-187|access-date=1 January 2016}}</ref> allegedly written by oligarch ] and others, which provided the Russian government with a strategy in the event of Viktor Yanukovych's removal from power and the break-up of Ukraine, which were considered likely. The documents outline plans for annexation of Crimea and the eastern portions of the country, closely describing the events that actually followed after Yanukovych's fall. The documents also describe plans for a public relations campaign that would seek to justify Russian actions.<ref>{{cite web|author=Matthew Schofield|url=http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/article24780370.html|title=Russian news report: Putin approved Ukraine invasion before Kiev government collapsed|publisher=McClatchy DC|date=21 February 2015|access-date=3 January 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.voanews.com/content/ukraine-rebels-agree-to-begin-withdrawing-weapons/2653786.html|title=Report to Allege Direct Kremlin Link to Ukraine Invasion|publisher=Voice of America|date=15 February 2014|access-date=24 February 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.inquisitr.com/1866019/world-war-3-vladimir-putin-plotted-ukraine-invasion-early-as-february-2014-new-report-says/|title=World War 3: Vladimir Putin Plotted Ukraine Invasion Early As February 2014, New Report Says|website=Inquisitr.com|date=22 February 2015|access-date=24 February 2015}}</ref>

In June 2015 ] stated that all Russian Duma decisions on Crimea annexation were illegal from the international point of view and the annexation was provoked by false accusations of discrimination of Russian nationals in Ukraine.<ref>{{cite news|author=Mikhail Sokolov|newspaper=Радио Свобода|url=http://www.svoboda.org/content/transcript/27066473.html|script-title=ru:Михаил Касьянов: "Все решения по Крыму незаконны"|trans-title=Mikhail Kasyanov: "All decisions about Crimea are unlawful"|language=ru|publisher=Radio Svoboda|date=12 June 2015|access-date=3 January 2016}}</ref>

As of January 2019, ] through his ] and his companies building the ] along with ] and ] through their ] have become the most important investors in Russia's development of the annexed Crimea.<ref name="Insru29012019">{{cite news|last=Vasiliev|first=Andrey|date=25 January 2019|title=После Ротенберга хоть камни с неба. Как Крым стал прибыльным бизнесом для друзей Путина|language=ru|trans-title=After Rotenberg, even stones from the sky. How Crimea became a profitable business for Putin's friends|work=]|url=https://theins.ru/korrupciya/137605|url-status=live|access-date=20 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201128210413/https://theins.ru/korrupciya/137605|archive-date=28 November 2020}}</ref>

== International response ==
{{Main|International reactions to the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation}}
{{Further|Political status of Crimea|United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262}}
{{See also|Crimea Platform}}

[[File:Crimea reaction clean.svg|thumb|International reaction to the 2014 Crimean crisis according to official governmental statements.{{NoteTag|If an official position can be sorted in more than one category, the "strongest" position was marked (from the "call for a peaceful resolution" to "interpretation as a military intervention" consecutively). For the sources see the image description.}}
{{legend|#1b6565|Condemnation of Russian actions as a military intervention or invasion}}{{legend|#289797|Condemnation of Russian actions}}{{legend|#57d2d2|Support for Ukrainian territorial integrity}}{{legend|#efef8f|Statements only voicing concern or hope for peaceful resolution to the conflict}}{{legend|#f08080|Recognition of Russian interests}}{{legend|#d93cd9|Support for Russian actions and/or condemnation of the Ukrainian interim government}}
----
{{legend|#497bd7|Ukraine}}{{legend|#6a1f1f|Russia}}{{legend|#CDCDCD|No official statements / No data available}}]]

There has been a range of international reactions to the annexation. In March 2014, the ] passed a non-binding resolution 100 in favour, 11 against and 58 abstentions in the 193-nation assembly that declared Crimea's Moscow-backed referendum invalid.<ref name="CHARBONNEAU AND DONATH">{{cite news|last1 = Charbonneau|last2 = Donath|first1 = Mirjam|first2 = Louis|title = U.N. General Assembly declares Crimea secession vote invalid|url = https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-un-idUSBREA2Q1GA20140327|work = Reuters|date = 27 March 2014|access-date = 30 June 2017|archive-date = 1 October 2015|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20151001105549/http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/27/us-ukraine-crisis-un-idUSBREA2Q1GA20140327|url-status = live}}</ref> In a move supported by the Lithuanian president,<ref name="CNBC">{{cite news|date=20 March 2014|title=Russia sanctions 9 US officials in response to US sanctions on Russian officials|work=]|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2014/03/20/obama-authorizes-new-sanctions-on-russia-over-crimea.html}}</ref> the United States government imposed sanctions against persons they deem to have violated or assisted in the violation of Ukraine's sovereignty.<ref name="EO13660">{{cite press release|url = https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/03/06/executive-order-blocking-property-certain-persons-contributing-situation|title=Executive Order 13660 – Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine|publisher=White House Office of the Press Secretary|date=6 March 2014|access-date=6 March 2014}}</ref> The ] suspended talks with Russia on economic and visa-related matters, and is considering more stringent sanctions against Russia in the near future, including asset freezes.<ref name="EUsanctions">{{cite news|url = https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/eu-leaders-weighing-sanctions-russia-22795279|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140306170908/http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/eu-leaders-weighing-sanctions-russia-22795279|archive-date=6 March 2014|title = EU Slaps Initial Sanctions on Russia|agency=Associated Press|date=6 March 2014|work=ABC News|access-date=7 March 2014}}</ref><ref name="mainichi.jp">{{cite news|url = http://mainichi.jp/english/english/newsselect/news/20140304p2g00m0in014000c.html|title=Sanctions threat grows as Ukraine tensions rise|location=Japan|work=Mainichi Shimbun|date=4 March 2014}}{{dead link|date=February 2016}}{{cbignore}}</ref> while Japan announced sanctions which include suspension of talks relating to military, space, investment, and visa requirements.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.foxnews.com/world/japan-imposes-sanctions-against-russia-over-crimea-independence/|title=Japan imposes sanctions against Russia over Crimea independence|publisher=Fox News Channel|date=18 March 2014|access-date=20 April 2014}}</ref> The United Kingdom qualified the referendum vote in Crimea of being "farcical", "illegal" and "illegitimate".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/infographics/2014-03-14/countries-react-to-russian-intervention-in-crimea.html|title=Position of the United Kindown about the Crimean referendum|website=]|agency=Bloomberg|date=14 March 2014|access-date=26 July 2014}}</ref>

Ukraine and other countries claim that Russia has signed a number of treaties guaranteeing Ukrainian territorial integrity. These include the 1991 ] that established the ], the 1975 ], the 1994 ]<ref>{{Cite web|date=29 March 2022|title= Budapest Memorandum|url=https://www.uawarexplained.com/budapest-memorandum/|access-date=29 March 2022|website=UaWarExplained.com}}</ref> and the 1997 ].<ref name="UkraineStatement">{{cite web|url=https://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1139-18|author=Oleksandr Turchynov|date=20 March 2014|publisher=Parliament of Ukraine|language=uk|script-title=uk:Декларація "Про боротьбу за звільнення України"|trans-title=Declaration "On the struggle for the liberation of Ukraine"|access-date=24 April 2014}}</ref><ref name="NATOStatement">{{cite news|url=https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2014/03/19/nato-secretary-general-russias-annexation-of-crimea-is-illegal-and-illegitimate/|title=NATO Secretary-General: Russia's Annexation of Crimea Is Illegal and Illegitimate|author=Fred Dews|date=19 March 2014|access-date=8 March 2015|publisher=]}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=29 March 2022|title=Treaty of Friendship|url=https://www.uawarexplained.com/russian-ukrainian-friendship-treaty/?version=tenMin/|access-date=29 March 2022|website=UaWarExplained.com}}</ref>

The ] decided on 11 March 2014 to enter into a full free-trade agreement with Ukraine within the year.<ref>{{cite news|last=Baker|first=Luke|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-ukraine-trade-idUSBREA2A10D20140311|title=EU to offer 500 million euros of trade benefits to Ukraine|work=Reuters|access-date=11 March 2014|archive-date=11 March 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140311195024/http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/11/us-eu-ukraine-trade-idUSBREA2A10D20140311|url-status=live}}</ref> On 12 March, the ] rejected the upcoming referendum on independence in Crimea, which they saw as manipulated and contrary to international and Ukrainian law.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/content/20140312STO38705/html/Ukraine-MEPs-call-for-firm-action-on-Russia-to-prevent-further-escalation|title = Ukraine: MEPs call for firm action on Russia to prevent further escalation|work=European Parliament|date=12 March 2014|access-date=24 March 2015}}</ref> The ] bloc of developed nations (the ] minus Russia) made a joint statement condemning Russia and announced that they would suspend preparations for ] in ] in June.<ref>{{cite news|work=Political ticker|publisher=CNN|url = http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/03/02/lawmakers-call-for-suspension-of-russia-from-g8-swift-action-against-putin/|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140303140910/http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/03/02/lawmakers-call-for-suspension-of-russia-from-g8-swift-action-against-putin/|url-status = dead|archive-date = 3 March 2014|title=Lawmakers call for suspension of Russia from G8, swift action against Putin|type=] log|date=2 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/02/john-kerry-russia-putin-crimea-ukraine|title = Russia G8 status at risk over 'incredible act of aggression' in Crimea, says Kerry|newspaper=The Guardian|date=2 March 2014|location=UK}}</ref> NATO condemned Russia's military escalation in Crimea and stated that it was a breach of international law<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_107681.htm|title=North Atlantic Council statement on the situation in Ukraine|website=Nato.int|access-date=3 March 2014}}</ref> while the ] expressed its full support for the territorial integrity and national unity of Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/News/News-View-EN.asp?newsid=4908&lang=2&cat=17|title = PACE: News|website = Assembly.coe.int|date = 22 November 2013|access-date = 20 April 2014|archive-date = 19 February 2015|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150219072453/http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/News/News-View-EN.asp?newsid=4908&lang=2&cat=17}}</ref> The ] has issued a joint statement urging Russia to respect Ukraine's territorial integrity and for Ukraine to take into account its minority groups to not further break fragile relations. It has urged for Russia to respect Ukrainian and international law and in line with the provisions of the ].<ref name=Visegrad>{{cite press release|url = http://www.kormany.hu/en/prime-minister-s-office/news/statement-of-the-prime-ministers-of-the-visegrad-countries-on-ukraine|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140305035324/http://www.kormany.hu/en/prime-minister-s-office/news/statement-of-the-prime-ministers-of-the-visegrad-countries-on-ukraine|archive-date=5 March 2014|location=Hungary|publisher=Prime Minister's Office|title=Statement of the Prime Ministers of the Visegrád Countries on Ukraine}}</ref>

China said "We respect the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine". A spokesman restated China's belief of non-interference in the internal affairs of other nations and urged dialogue.<ref name=ibtbacchi1>{{cite news|last=FlorCruz|first=Jaime|title=Russia may find ally in China – albeit a passive one for now|url = http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/world/asia/china-russia-ukraine-analysis/|access-date=5 March 2014|publisher=CNN|date=6 March 2014}}</ref><ref name=ibtbacchi2>{{cite news|last=Economy|first=Elizabeth|title = China's Soft 'Nyet' To Russia's Ukraine Intervention|url = https://www.forbes.com/sites/elizabetheconomy/2014/03/05/chinas-soft-nyet-to-russias-ukraine-intervention/|access-date=5 March 2014|newspaper=Forbes|date=6 March 2014}}</ref>

The Indian government called for a peaceful resolution of the situation.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Bhattacherjee|first=Kallol|date=27 January 2017|title=Ukraine lauds India for support over Crimea|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/Ukraine-lauds-India-for-support-over-Crimea/article17098891.ece|access-date=19 June 2021|issn=0971-751X}}</ref> Both ] and ] openly support Russian military action. Syrian president ] said that he supports Putin's efforts to "restore security and stability in the friendly country of Ukraine", while Venezuelan President ] condemned Ukraine's "ultra-nationalist" coup.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.euronews.com/2014/03/06/bashar-al-assad-letter-of-support-to-putin/|title = Syria's Assad expresses support to Putin on Ukraine|publisher=euronews|date=18 May 2013}}</ref><ref name="SFGATE">{{cite web|url = http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/Putin-on-Ukraine-Supported-by-5311093.php|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140313004027/http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/Putin-on-Ukraine-Supported-by-5311093.php|archive-date=13 March 2014|title = Putin on Ukraine Supported by China-Syria-Venezuela Minority|agency=Bloomberg News|date=12 March 2014|access-date=12 March 2014}}</ref> Sri Lanka described Yanukovych's removal as unconstitutional and considered Russia's concerns in Crimea as justified.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/sri-lanka-regrets-removal-of-ukrainian-president-114031300031_1.html|title=Sri Lanka regrets removal of Ukrainian president|date=13 March 2014|work=Business Standard|access-date=24 March 2015}}</ref>

Polish prime minister ] called for a change in EU energy policy as Germany's dependence on Russian gas poses risks for Europe.<ref name="EU 2014">{{cite web| title=Tusk warns Merkel against Russian gas addiction| website=www.euractiv.com| date=11 Mar 2014| url=https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/tusk-warns-merkel-against-russian-gas-addiction/| access-date=25 Feb 2023}}</ref>

On 13 March 2014, German Chancellor ] warned the Russian government it risks massive damage to Russia, economically and politically, if it refuses to change course on Ukraine,<ref name="GuardianRussiaMerkel">{{cite news|url = https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/13/russia-political-economic-damage-ukraine-merkel|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140411094020/http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/13/russia-political-economic-damage-ukraine-merkel|archive-date=11 April 2014|title=Russia risks political and economic damage over Ukraine, says Merkel|work=The Guardian|date=13 March 2014}}</ref> though close economic links between Germany and Russia significantly reduce the scope for any sanctions.<ref>{{cite news|last=Bryant|first=Chris|date=27 March 2014|title=German business concerns grow over Russia ties|url = http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ccc5cfd8-b449-11e3-bac4-00144feabdc0.html|work=]|access-date=27 March 2014|quote = German entities have invested roughly €20bn in Russia and some 6,200 companies – mostly small and medium-sized Mittelstand businesses – are active there. Last year trade between the two countries totalled more than €76bn. ... Russia supplies 35 per cent of German gas and 30 per cent of its oil.}}</ref>

After Russia moved to formally incorporate Crimea, some worried whether it may do the same in other regions.<ref name=Transdniester>{{cite news|last=Freeman|first=Colin|title=Russian troops poised to 'run' into Moldova, Nato commander warns|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/moldova/10717260/Russian-troops-poised-to-run-into-Moldova-Nato-commander-warns.html|archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/moldova/10717260/Russian-troops-poised-to-run-into-Moldova-Nato-commander-warns.html|archive-date=11 January 2022|url-access=subscription|url-status=live|access-date=24 March 2014|newspaper=The Telegraph|date=24 March 2014}}{{cbignore}}</ref> US deputy national security advisor ] said that the Russian troops massed on the eastern Ukrainian border may be preparing to enter the country's eastern regions. Russian officials stated that Russian troops would not enter other areas.<ref name=Transdniester /> US Air Force Gen. ], NATO's supreme allied commander in Europe, warned that the same troops were in a position to take over the separatist Russian-speaking ]n province of ].<ref name=Transdniester /> ] ] warned Russia with not attempting to do this to avoid damaging its international status further.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://moldova.europalibera.org/a/25301569.html|title=Președintele Nicolae Timofti avertizează Rusia să nu încerce să anexeze regiunea transnistreană|trans-title=President Nicolae Timofti warns Russia not to try to annex the Transnistrian region|newspaper=Radio Europa Liberă Moldova|date=18 March 2014|language=ro}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.dw.com/ro/chi%C5%9Fin%C4%83ul-vrea-s%C4%83-%C5%9Ftie-unde-se-va-opri-rusia/a-17506283|title=Chișinăul vrea să știe unde se va opri Rusia|trans-title=Chisinau wants to know where Russia will stop|first=Vitalie|last=Călugăreanu|newspaper=]|date=19 March 2014|language=ro}}</ref>


On 9 April, the ] deprived Russia of voting rights.<ref>{{cite web|author=Rfe/Rl|url=http://www.rferl.org/content/russia-ukraine-pace-/25327665.html|title=PACE Deprives Russia of Voting Rights|publisher=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty|date=10 April 2014|access-date=20 April 2014}}</ref>
On 15 April 2014, the Verkhovna Rada declared the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol to be under "provisional ]" by the Russian military.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://iportal.rada.gov.ua/news/Novyny/Povidomlennya/91559.html|script-title=uk:Верховна Рада України ухвалила Закон "Про забезпечення прав і свобод громадян та правовий режим на тимчасово окупованій території України"|date = 15 April 2014|publisher = ]|language = Ukrainian}}</ref> The territories were also deemed "inalienable parts of Ukraine" subject to Ukrainian law. Among other things, the special law approved by the Rada restricted foreign citizens' movements to and from the Crimean Peninsula and forbade certain types of entrepreneurship.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://rada.gov.ua/ru/news/Novosty/Soobshchenyya/91573.html|script-title=ru:Верховная Рада Украины приняла Закон "Об обеспечении прав и свобод граждан и правовом режиме на временно оккупированной территории Украины"|date = 15 April 2014|publisher = ]|language = Russian}}</ref> The law also forbade activity of government bodies formed in violation of Ukrainian law and designated their acts as ]. The voting rights of Crimea in national Ukrainian elections were also suspended.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.vz.ru/news/2014/4/15/682175.html|script-title=ru:Рада приняла закон о защите прав граждан "оккупированного Крыма"|date = 15 April 2014|website = ]|language = Russian}}</ref> The law had little to no actual effect in Crimea itself due to the mutual non-recognition between Kiev and Simferopol.


On 14 August, while visiting Crimea, Vladimir Putin ruled out pushing beyond Crimea. He undertook to do everything he could to end the conflict in Ukraine, saying Russia needed to build calmly and with dignity, not by confrontation and war which isolated it from the rest of the world.<ref name="PutinConciliatory">{{cite news|title=Putin talks of peace in annexed Crimea|url=http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-08-14/vladimir-putin-delivers-speech-in-crimea/5672208|date=14 August 2014|access-date=15 August 2014|publisher=ABC (AU)}}</ref>
==International response==
{{Further|Political status of Crimea|International reactions to the 2014 Crimean crisis|United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262}}


=== United Nations Resolutions === === United Nations resolutions ===
{{multiple image {{multiple image
| direction = vertical | direction = vertical
Line 173: Line 469:
| image1 = 2014 UN Security Council vote to condemn Crimean referendum.png | image1 = 2014 UN Security Council vote to condemn Crimean referendum.png
| caption1 = ] vote on a draft resolution condemning the 2014 Crimean referendum. | caption1 = ] vote on a draft resolution condemning the 2014 Crimean referendum.
{{legend|#287cfe|Voted in favor of the resolution}} {{legend|#287cfe|Voted in favour of the resolution}}
{{legend|#007f00|Abstained}} {{legend|#007f00|Abstained}}
{{legend|#ff0000|Vetoed the resolution}} {{legend|#ff0000|Vetoed the resolution}}
| image2 = UN Resolution regarding the territorial integrity of Ukraine.svg | image2 = UN Resolution regarding the territorial integrity of Ukraine.svg
| caption2 = UN General Assembly vote on the resolution condemning the 2014 Crimean referendum. | caption2 = UN General Assembly vote on the resolution condemning the 2014 Crimean referendum.
{{legend|#74C365|In favor of considering the referendum illegal}} {{legend|#74C365|In favour of considering the referendum illegal}}
{{legend|#ab4e52|Against adopting the resolution}}
{{legend|#FADA5E|Abstained}} {{legend|#FADA5E|Abstained}}
{{legend|#89CFF0|Absent when the vote took place}} {{legend|#89CFF0|Absent when the vote took place}}
{{legend|#ab4e52|Against adopting the resolution}}
| image3 =
| caption3 =
}} }}
{{Main list|List of vetoed United Nations Security Council resolutions}}


On 15 March 2014, a US-sponsored resolution that went to a vote in the ] ] to reaffirm that council's commitment to Ukraine's "sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity" was not approved. Though a total of 13 council members voted in favour of the resolution and China abstained, Russia vetoed the resolution.<ref>{{cite news|url = https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/03/15/russia-vetoes-un-resolution-crimea/6456495/|title = Russia vetoes U.N. resolution on Crimea's future|agency=]|date=15 March 2014|newspaper=]|access-date=28 March 2014}}</ref>
==== Security Council Resolution ====


On 27 March 2014, the UN General Assembly approved a ] describing the ] leading to annexation of Crimea by Russia as illegal.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.un.org/press/en/2014/ga11493.doc.htm|title=General Assembly Adopts Resolution Calling upon States Not to Recognize Changes in Status of Crimea Region|date=27 March 2014|publisher=United Nations|access-date=28 March 2014}}</ref> The draft resolution, which was titled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine", was co-sponsored by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland, Ukraine and the US. It affirmed the council's commitment to the "sovereignty, political independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognised borders". The resolution tried to underscore that 16 March referendum held in Crimea and the city of Sevastopol has no validity and cannot form the basis for any alteration of the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or of the city of Sevastopol. The resolution got 100 votes in its favour, while 11 nations voted against and 58 countries abstained from the vote. The resolution was non-binding and the vote was largely symbolic.<ref>{{cite news|url = https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26776416|title = Ukraine: UN condemns Crimea vote as IMF and US back loans|date=27 March 2014|work=BBC News|access-date=28 March 2014}}</ref>
On 15 March 2014 a U.S.-sponsored resolution was put forward to vote in the ] ] to reaffirm council's commitment to Ukraine's "sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity."
A total of 13 council members voted in favour of the resolution, China abstained, while Russia vetoed the U.N. resolution declaring ], on the future of Crimean Peninsula, as illegal.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/03/15/russia-vetoes-un-resolution-crimea/6456495/ |title=Russia vetoes U.N. resolution on Crimea's future |author=USA TODAY Research and Ashley M. Williams |date=15 March 2014 |website=www.usatoday.com |publisher=usatoday |accessdate=28 March 2014}}</ref>


Since 2014, the ] has voted several times, most recently in December 2019,<ref name="un2019"/> to affirm Ukraine's territorial integrity, condemn the 'temporary occupation' of Crimea, and reaffirm nonrecognition of its annexation.<ref name="un2019"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220215105911/https://undocs.org/pdf?symbol=en%2FA%2FRES%2F74%2F168|date=15 February 2022}} on 18 December 2019], ]</ref>
==== General Assembly Resolution ====


=== International recognition ===
On 27 March 2014, The ] ] approved a ]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2014/ga11493.doc.htm |title=GENERAL ASSEMBLY ADOPTS RESOLUTION CALLING UPON STATES NOT TO RECOGNIZE CHANGES IN STATUS OF CRIMEA REGION |date=27 March 2014 |website=www.un.org |publisher=UN |accessdate=28 March 2014}}</ref> describing the ] leading to annexation of Crimea by Russia as illegal. The draft resolution, which was titled 'Territorial integrity of Ukraine' was co-sponsored by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland, Ukraine and the US. It affirmed council's commitment to the "sovereignty, political independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognised borders." The resolution tried to underscore that the March 16 referendum held in Crimea and the city of Sevastopol has no validity and cannot form the basis for any alteration of the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or of the city of Sevastopol. The resolution got 100 votes in its favor, while 11 nations voted against and 58 countries abstained from the vote. The resolution was non-binding and the vote was largely symbolic.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26776416 |title=Ukraine: UN condemns Crimea vote as IMF and US back loans |date=27 March 2014 |website=www.bbc.com |publisher=BBC |accessdate=28 March 2014}}</ref>
<!-- MAP IS NOT ACCURATE. E.G. Serbia does not recognise Crimea's annexation. Sub-state entities have no recognition powers --
{{Wide image|Riconoscimento della Crimea.png|800px|Recognition of Crimea as part of Russia:<br />{{Legend inline|#800026|]}}<br />{{Legend inline|#fc4e2a|Local authorities of UN member states}}<br />{{Legend inline|#ffa07a|Non-member states}}<br />{{Legend inline|#8e388e|Crimea}} ]} -->
], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ] have recognised the result of the ].<ref>{{cite news|title=Afghan president Hamid Karzai backs Russia's annexation of Crimea|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/24/afghan-president-hamid-karzai-backs-russia-annexation-crimea|access-date=30 November 2014|newspaper=The Guardian|date=24 March 2014}}<br />{{cite web|url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/03/31/visiting-russia-fidel-castros-son-scoffs-at-us-sanctions-over-crimea-a33481|title=Visiting Russia, Fidel Castro's Son Scoffs at U.S. Sanctions Over Crimea|work=The Moscow Times|date=31 March 2014}}<br />{{cite news|title=Kyrgyzstan Says Crimea Referendum 'Legitimate'|url=http://www.rferl.org/content/kyrgyzstan-recognition-crimea-referendum-ukraine-russia/25304439.html|newspaper=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty|date=20 March 2014|access-date=2 June 2016}}<br />{{cite web|url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/nicaragua-recognizes-crimea-as-part-of-russia-341102.html|title=Nicaragua recognizes Crimea as part of Russia|work=Kyiv Post|date = 27 March 2014}}<br />{{cite web|url = http://tass.ru/politika/4641164|title = В КНДР издали атлас мира, где Крым находится в составе России:Как пояснили посольству РФ в МИД республики, Пхеньян "уважает результаты состоявшегося в Крыму референдума о вхождении полуострова в состав Российской Федерации"|trans-title=North Korea published an atlas of the world, where Crimea is part of Russia: As the Russian Foreign Ministry explained to the Russian Embassy, Pyongyang "respects the results of the referendum held in Crimea on the peninsula joining the Russian Federation"|agency=]|date = 12 October 2017}}</ref>


Four ] recognised the results of the referendum: ], ], ] and ]. The Transnistrian foreign minister, Nina Shtanski, recognized Crimea's annexation by Russia.<ref>{{cite web| url=https://adevarul.ro/stiri-externe/rusia/nina-stanski-ministrul-de-externe-de-la-1523321.html| title=Nina Ştanski, "ministrul de Externe" de la Tiraspol, îi cere lui Vladimir Putin să anexeze Transnistria| date=24 March 2014}}</ref> ] sent a request on 18 March 2014 ] following the Crimean example and in compliance with the Admission Law provisions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://vestnikkavkaza.net/news/politics/52743.html|title=Transnistria wants to merge with Russia|publisher=Vestnik Kavkaza|date=18 March 2014|access-date=18 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26627236|title=Moldova's Trans-Dniester region pleads to join Russia|publisher=BBC|date=18 March 2014|access-date=18 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://tass.ru/en/world/724121|title=Dniester public organizations ask Russia to consider possibility of Transnistria accession|agency=Information Telegraph Agency of Russia|date=18 March 2014|access-date=18 March 2014}}</ref> The regional councils of Italy's northern regions ], ] and ] adopted a non-binding resolution on recognizing Crimea as part of Russia, but they revoked it in 2022 after ].<ref>{{Cite web|date=6 July 2016|title=Italian Region of Lombardy Joins Liguria and Veneto in Recognizing Crimea as Part of Russia|url=http://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2016/07/6/7113849/|access-date=19 June 2021|website=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Lombardia revoca mozione su annessione Crimea. Astuti: "C'è voluta una guerra per far ravvedere la Lega"|url=https://www.varesenoi.it/2022/03/30/leggi-notizia/argomenti/politica-20/articolo/lombardia-revoca-mozione-su-annessione-crimea-astuti-ce-voluta-una-guerra-per-far-ravvedere-la.html|access-date=13 September 2022|work=Varese Noi|date=30 March 2022|language=it-IT}}</ref>
===Recognition===
The vast majority of the international community has not recognized the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol as part of Russia. Most nations located in ], ], ], ], ], as well as non-former-Soviet-Union ] have openly rejected the referendum and the accession, and instead consider Crimea and Sevastopol to be administrative divisions of Ukraine. The remainder have largely remained neutral. The vote on ] (supporting the position that Crimea and Sevastopol remain part of Ukraine) was 100 to 11 in favor, with 58 states abstaining and a further 24 of the 193 member states not voting through being absent when the vote took place. The 100 states voting in favor represented about 34% of the world's population, the 11 against represented about 4.5%, the 58 abstentions represented about 58%, and the 24 absents represented about 3.5%.


=== Sanctions ===
Several members of the United Nations have made statements about their recognition of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol as federal subjects of Russia:
{{Further|International sanctions during the Ukrainian crisis|List of individuals sanctioned during the Ukrainian crisis}}
{{col-list|2|
], entering Kherson Oblast from Russian-occupied Crimea.]]
* {{flag|Afghanistan}}<ref>{{cite news|title=Afghan president Hamid Karzai backs Russia's annexation of Crimea|url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/24/afghan-president-hamid-karzai-backs-russia-annexation-crimea|accessdate=30 November 2014|work=The Guardian|date=24 March 2014}}</ref>

* {{flag|Cuba}}<ref name="moscow-times-497144">{{cite web|url=http://www.themoscowtimes.com/article.php?id=497144.html|title=Visiting Russia, Fidel Castro's Son Scoffs at U.S. Sanctions Over Crimea - News|work=The Moscow Times}}</ref>
Sanctions were imposed to prevent officials and politicians from travelling to Canada, the United States, or the European Union. They were the most wide-ranging applied to Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union.<ref name="Katakey">
* {{flag|Nicaragua}}<ref name="kyiv-post-341102">{{cite web |url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/nicaragua-recognizes-crimea-as-part-of-russia-341102.html |title=Nicaragua recognizes Crimea as part of Russia|publisher=Kyiv Post|date = 27 March 2014}}</ref>
{{cite news
* {{flag|North Korea}}<ref>. ''Lenta.ru''. 2014-12-30.</ref>
|author=Rakteem Katakey
* {{flag|Russia}}<ref name="itar-tass-724749">. itar-tass.com. 21 March 2014</ref>
|date=25 March 2014
* {{flag|Syria}}<ref name="NYT">{{cite news| url = http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/28/world/europe/crimea-ukraine.html |title=Gunmen Seize Government Buildings in Crimea|work=The New York Times|date= 27 February 2014|accessdate= 1 March 2014 |quote = Masked men with guns seized government buildings in the capital of Ukraine's Crimea region on Thursday, barricading themselves inside and raising the Russian flag after mysterious overnight raids that appeared to be the work of militant Russian nationalists who want this volatile Black Sea region ruled from Moscow.}}</ref>
|title=Russian Oil Seen Heading East Not West in Crimea Spat
* {{flag|Venezuela}}<ref name=NYT />
|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-03-25/russian-oil-seen-heading-east-not-west-in-crimea-spat
|publisher=Bloomberg
|access-date=2 January 2016
}}
*{{cite web|url=http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/OFAC-Enforcement/Pages/20140320_33.aspx|title=Ukraine-related Designations: Specially Designated Nationals List Update
|work=US Department of the Treasury
|date=20 March 2014
|access-date=27 February 2016
}}
*{{cite web
|url=https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/SDN-List/Pages/default.aspx
|title=Specially Designated Nationals List (SDN)
|work=US Department of the Treasury|date=16 February 2016
|access-date=27 February 2016
}} }}
*{{cite news|title=Treasury Sanctions Russian Officials, Members of the Russian Leadership's Inner Circle, And An Entity For Involvement in the Situation in Ukraine
Position of ] is vague: it includes "Ukraine should remain an integral, indivisible, non-aligned state" and "As for Crimea, I do not like it when the integrity and independence of a country are broken", on the one hand, and "Today Crimea is part of the Russian Federation. No matter whether you recognize it or not, the fact remains." and "Whether Crimea will be recognized as a region of the Russian Federation de-jure does not really matter", on the other hand.<ref>. president.gov.by. 23 March 2014.</ref>
|url=http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl23331.aspx
|work=United States Treasury Department|date=20 March 2014
|access-date=20 March 2014}}</ref><ref name=Sanctions>{{cite web
|author=Peter Shuklinov
|script-title=ru:Ближний круг Путина: кто попал в новый список санкций США
|trans-title=Putin's inner circle: who's in the new list of US sanctions|url=https://news.liga.net/articles/politics/1066761-blizhniy_krug_putina_kto_popal_v_novyy_spisok_sanktsiy_ssha.htm|website=liga.net|language=ru
|date=21 March 2014|access-date=20 February 2016
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150207152258/http://news.liga.net/articles/politics/1066761-blizhniy_krug_putina_kto_popal_v_novyy_spisok_sanktsiy_ssha.htm|archive-date=7 February 2015
}}</ref>


Japan announced milder sanctions than the US and EU. These include suspension of talks relating to military, space, investment, and visa requirements.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.foxnews.com/world/japan-imposes-sanctions-against-russia-over-crimea-independence/|title=Japan imposes sanctions against Russia over Crimea independence|publisher=Fox News Channel|agency=Associated Press|date=18 March 2014|access-date=2 January 2016}}</ref>
Three ] recognized the results of the referendum: ], ], and ]. A fourth, ], sent a request on 18 March to join the Russian Federation following the Crimean example and in compliance with the Admission Law provisions.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://vestnikkavkaza.net/news/politics/52743.html |title=Transnistria wants to merge with Russia |publisher=Vestnik Kavkaza |date=18 March 2014 |accessdate=18 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26627236 |title=Moldova's Trans-Dniester region pleads to join Russia |publisher=Bbc.com |date=18 March 2014 |accessdate=18 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author= |url=http://en.itar-tass.com/world/724121 |title=Dniester public organizations ask Russia to consider possibility of Transnistria accession |publisher=En.itar-tass.com |date=18 March 2014 |accessdate=18 March 2014}}</ref> On 16 April Transnistria urged Russia and the United Nations to recognize its independence.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/transnistria-urges-kremlin-un-recognise-independence-1445126|title=Transnistria Urges Kremlin and UN to Recognise Independence|publisher=''International Business Times''|author=Gianluca Mezzofiore|date=16 April 2014|accessdate=6 May 2014}}</ref> Putin is aware of Transnistria's recognition request, according to ].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/peskov-putin-aware-of-transnistrias-request-on-independence-recognition-343896.html|title=Peskov: Putin aware of Transnistria's request on independence recognition|date=17 April 2014|accessdate=6 May 2014|publisher=''KyivPost''}}</ref>


In response to the sanctions introduced by the US and EU, the ] unanimously passed a resolution asking for all members of the Duma to be included on the sanctions list.<ref>
=== Commentary ===
{{Cite news
{{#section:2014 Crimean crisis|CommentaryOnAnnexation}}
|last1=Gutterman
|first1=Steve
|last2=Grove
|first2=Thomas
|last3=Tsvetkova
|first3=Maria
|last4=Piper
|first4=Elizabeth
|last5=Soldatkin
|first5=Vladimir
|date=18 March 2014
|title=Russia scoffs at Western sanctions over Crimea
|work=]
|publication-place=Moscow
|editor-last=Boulton
|editor-first=Ralph
|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-ukraine-crisis-russia-sanctions-idUKBREA2H1FE20140318
}}</ref> Head of the ] party ] said he was proud of being included on the sanctions list: "It is with pride that I have found myself on the black list, this means they have noticed my stance on Crimea".<ref>
{{Cite web
|date=18 March 2014|title='I don't need a visa to hear Tupac': Russians mock sanctions
|url=https://www.channel4.com/news/russia-sanctions-ukraine-usa-eu-mocked-tupac-obama
|website=]
}}</ref> Russian companies started pulling billions of dollars out of Western banks to avoid having their asset frozen.<ref name="FT freeze">
{{cite news
|author1=Patrick Jenkins|author2=Daniel Schäfer|author3=Courtney Weaver
|author4=Jack Farchy
|date=14 March 2014
|title=Russian companies withdraw billions from west, say Moscow bankers
|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ffea2660-ab9e-11e3-aad9-00144feab7de.html
|newspaper=Financial Times
|access-date=27 March 2014
|url-access=subscription
}}</ref>


Three days after the lists were published, the ] published a reciprocal sanctions list of US citizens, which consisted of 10 names, including ] ], Senator ], and two advisers to President Obama. The ministry said in a statement: "We have repeatedly warned that sanctions are a double-edged instrument and would hit the United States like a boomerang".<ref name="CNBC" /> Several of those sanctioned responded with pride at their inclusion on the list, including John Boehner,<ref name="WaPo">
{{#section:2014 Crimean crisis|CommentaryOnAnnexation2}} German Federal Minister of Finance ], Chancellor Angela Merkel and Minister of Foreign Affairs Frank-Walter Steinmeier all stated, that such comparisons are unacceptable.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://top.rbc.ru/politics/04/04/2014/915613.shtml|script-title=ru:Глава Минфина ФРГ: Я не сравнивал Россию с нацистской Германией|date = 4 April 2014|website = top.]|language = Russian}}</ref> However Chancellor Merkel also said "The so-called referendum…, the declaration of independence …, and the absorption into the Russian Federation (were), in our firm opinion,…against international law"<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thelocal.de/20140318/merkel-crimea-grab-against-international-law|title=Merkel: Crimea grab 'against international law'|publisher=}}</ref> and that it was "shameful" for Russia to compare the independence of Kosovo with the referendum for independence in Crimea.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://euobserver.com/foreign/123454|title=EUobserver / Merkel: Comparing Crimea to Kosovo is 'shameful'|publisher=}}</ref>
{{cite news
|author1=Wesley Lowery
|author2=Ed O'Keefe
|title=Reacting to sanctions, Russians ban Reid, Boehner and four other lawmakers|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news`wmakers/|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=20 March 2014|access-date=2 January 2016}}</ref> John McCain,<ref name="WaPo" /> ],<ref>
{{cite news
|author=Darryl Isherwood
|title=Bob Menendez is banned from Russia|url=http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/03/bob_menendez_is_banned_from_russia.html
|newspaper=NJ|date=20 March 2014
|access-date=2 January 2016
}}</ref> ],<ref name="WaPo" /> ], and ].<ref>
{{cite news
|author=David Weigel
|title=Senators Celebrate Being Sanctioned by Russia
|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2014/03/20/senators_celebrate_being_sanctioned_by_russia.html|newspaper=Slate
|date=20 March 2014
|access-date=2 January 2016
}}</ref>


On 24 March, Russia imposed retaliatory sanctions on 13 Canadian officials including members of the ],<ref name="chaseglobeandmail">
British prime minister David Cameron said "No amount of sham and perverse democratic process or skewed historical references can make up for the fact that this is an incursion into a sovereign state and a land grab of part of its territory with no respect for the law of that country or for international law."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/18/ukraine-uk-push-sanctions-russia-crimea|title=Ukraine: UK to push for tougher sanctions against Russia over Crimea|author=Nicholas Watt|work=the Guardian}}</ref>
{{cite news
|author=Steven Chase
|url=https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/russia-bans-entry-to-13-canadians-in-retaliation-for-ottawas-sanctions/article17635115/|title=Russia imposes sanctions on 13 Canadians, including MPs|newspaper=The Globe and Mail
|date=24 March 2014
|access-date=2 January 2016
}}</ref> banning them from entering Russia. Foreign Affairs Minister ], said the sanctions were "a badge of honour".<ref>
{{cite news
|author=Susana Mas|url=http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/russian-sanctions-against-canadians-a-badge-of-honour-1.2584137|title=Russian sanctions against Canadians a 'badge of honour'
|date=24 March 2014
|access-date=2 January 2016
|publisher=]}}</ref> Former ] ] also said that he considered the sanctions a badge of honour, not a mark of exclusion.<ref name="chaseglobeandmail" />


"The good news is that so far, Russia has shown no inclination to use the ] as leverage in the wake of US retaliation for its troop movements in Crimea".<ref>
President Obama commented, "the Crimean 'referendum,' which violates the Ukrainian constitution and occurred under duress of Russian military intervention, would never be recognized by the United States and the international community."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/16/world/europe/ukraine-crisis/|title=Ukraine crisis: Early results show Crimea votes to join Russia|author=Laura Smith-Spark, Diana Magnay and Nick Paton Walsh, CNN|date=March 16, 2014|work=CNN}}</ref>
{{cite web
|author=Anna Mulrine
|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/2014/0304/Punish-Russia-Why-some-Pentagon-officials-would-prefer-restraint.-video
|title=Punish Russia? Why some Pentagon officials would prefer restraint
|work=]
|date=4 March 2014
|access-date=2 January 2016
}}</ref>


Expanded Western sanctions in mid-March coursed through financial markets, hitting the business interests of some of Russia's richest people.<ref name="FT share prices">{{cite news|author1=Jack Farchy|author2=Neil Hume|date=21 March 2014|title=Russian share prices drop as sanctions bite|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9ffba124-b0d6-11e3-9f6f-00144feab7de.html|work=]|access-date=21 March 2014|url-access=subscription}}</ref> The Americans centred on the heart of Moscow's leadership,<ref>{{cite news|author=Neil Buckley|date=21 March 2014|title=Putin feels the heat as sanctions target president's inner circle|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c8859528-b11c-11e3-bbd4-00144feab7de.html|newspaper=]|access-date=21 March 2014|url-access=subscription}}</ref> though the EU's initial list shied from targeting Putin's inner circle.<ref>{{cite news|author=Ian Traynor|date=22 March 2014|title=European Union prepares for trade war with Russia over Crimea|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/21/eu-mobilises-trade-war-russia-crimea-ukraine|newspaper=The Guardian|access-date=2 January 2016}}</ref> As ratings agencies ] and ] downgraded Russia's credit outlook,<ref name="Bloomberg downgrade">{{cite news|author=Olga Tanas|date=21 March 2014|title=Russia's Credit Outlook Cut as U.S., EU Widen Sanction Lists|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-03-20/russia-outlook-cut-to-negative-by-s-p-as-obama-widens-sanctions|publisher=]|access-date=2 January 2016}}</ref> Russian banks warned of a sanctions-induced recession,<ref>{{cite news|author1=Andra Timu|author2=Henry Meyer|author3=Olga Tanas|title=Russia Staring at Recession on Sanctions That Could Get Tougher|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-23/russia-staring-at-recession-on-sanctions-that-could-get-tougher.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140323231710/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-23/russia-staring-at-recession-on-sanctions-that-could-get-tougher.html|archive-date=23 March 2014|agency=Bloomberg|date=23 March 2014}}</ref> the country braced for capital outflows for the first three months of 2014 to reach $70{{spaces}}billion,<ref>{{cite news|author1=Kathrin Hille|author2=Richard McGregor|date=24 March 2014|title=Russia braced for $70bn in outflows|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/19b9ad88-b37c-11e3-bc21-00144feabdc0.html|newspaper=]|access-date=24 March 2014|url-access=subscription}}</ref> more than the entirety of outflows for 2013,<ref>{{cite news|author1=Courtney Weaver|author2=Jack Farchy|date=25 March 2014|title=Funds cut Russian holdings after sanctions|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b67f8da4-b3f4-11e3-a102-00144feabdc0.html|work=]|access-date=27 March 2014|url-access=subscription|quote=Deputy economy minister Andrei Klepach estimates that Russian capital outflows will total up to $70bn in the first quarter, more than the $63bn that left the country during the whole of 2013.}}</ref> and Russian government-bond issues plummeted by three-quarters compared with the same period the previous year.<ref>{{cite news|author1=Jack Farchy|author2=Martin Arnold|date=18 April 2014|title=Banks retreat from Moscow deals|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/36e988ea-c576-11e3-89a9-00144feabdc0.html|work=Financial Times|access-date=19 April 2014|url-access=subscription}}</ref> ], Russia's second-largest gas producer, saw $2.5bn in market value wiped out when its shares sank by nearly 10%, rendering Putin's close friend ], who has a 23% stake in the company, $575m poorer.<ref name="FT share prices" /> "I do hope that there is some serious diplomatic activity going on behind the scenes," said one Russian banker,<ref>{{cite news|author1=Jack Farchy|author2=Kathrin Hille|author3=Courtney Weaver|date=21 March 2014|title=Russian executives quake as US sanctions rattle markets|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3f35068a-b119-11e3-9548-00144feab7de.html|newspaper=Financial Times|access-date=21 March 2014|url-access=subscription}}</ref> though others were more sanguine on the question of whether the sanctions would have any enduring effect,<ref name="Bloomberg downgrade" /><ref>{{cite news|author=Halia Pavliva|date=23 March 2014|title = EU's Muted Crimea Response Triggers Russian Stock Rebound|url= https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-23/eu-s-muted-crimea-response-triggers-russian-stock-rebound.html|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20140323230622/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-23/eu-s-muted-crimea-response-triggers-russian-stock-rebound.html|archive-date=23 March 2014|agency=]|access-date=23 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|author1=Eric Matzen|author2=Michelle Martin|date=21 March 2014|title=Russian sanctions ripple through corporate boardrooms|url=http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-europe-sanctions-idUKBREA2K1VD20140321|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160204201723/http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-europe-sanctions-idUKBREA2K1VD20140321|url-status=dead|archive-date=4 February 2016|work=]|access-date=21 March 2014}}</ref> and Russians, top and bottom, seemed defiant.<ref>{{cite news|author=Kathrin Hille|date=21 March 2014|title=Putin boosted by defiant tone at top and among people|url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1dca5172-b122-11e3-9548-00144feab7de.html|newspaper=Financial Times|access-date=21 March 2014|url-access=subscription}}</ref> The official Russian response was mixed.<ref>{{cite news|author1=Paul Sonne|author2=Sarah Kent|date=21 March 2014|title=Russia Sends Mixed Signals in Response to U.S. Sanctions|url=https://www.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303802104579452751446729822|work=The Wall Street Journal|access-date=21 March 2014|url-access=subscription}}</ref>
The European Council and the European Commission made the joint statement "The European Union does neither recognise the illegal and illegitimate referendum in Crimea nor its outcome."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-14-74_en.htm|title=European Commission - PRESS RELEASES - Press release - Joint statement on Crimea by the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, and the President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso|publisher=}}</ref>


The then ] ] said that introduction of sectoral sanctions will lead to a serious decline of the Russian economy: economic growth of Russia will become seriously negative, the growth of volumes of investment will be even more negative, inflation will rise, and government revenues and reserves will go down.<ref>{{cite news|author=Mishchenko|first=Olga|date=28 June 2014|title=Минэкономразвития РФ опасается негативного влияния западных санкций|language=ru|trans-title=Ministry for Economic Development of the Russian Federation fears the negative impact of Western sanctions|work=]|url=http://www.dw.com/ru/%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%8D%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D1%80%D1%84-%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%81%D1%8F-%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE-%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%8F%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BD%D1%8B%D1%85-%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%B9/a-17743705|access-date=2 January 2016}}</ref>
{{#section:2014 Crimean crisis|CommentaryOnAnnexation3}}


As well as differences between the United States and Europe as a whole as to how to respond to the Russian-backed incursion, those same differences have played out among Eastern European countries.<ref>{{cite news|author=John Fraher|title=Energy Needs Curb Eastern EU Hunger for Russian Sanctions|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-04-18/putin-gas-splits-eastern-eu-over-russia-sanctions|agency=Bloomberg|date=18 April 2014|access-date=2 January 2016}}</ref>
] President ] said: "Even though I understand the interests of Crimea’s Russian-speaking majority, which was annexed to Ukraine by Khrushchev, we have our experience with the 1968 Russian military invasion."<ref>"". Bloomberg. 3 March 2014</ref>


A number of Russian citizens reported that they have been denied European visas after they visited Crimea after annexation.<ref>
Former ] leader ] has defended the referendum that led to Russia's annexation of Crimea: "While Crimea had previously been joined to Ukraine based on the Soviet laws, which means party laws, without asking the people, now the people themselves have decided to correct that mistake."<ref>"". ]. 18 March 2014.</ref>
{{cite news
|url=https://www.rbc.ru/politics/22/06/2015/558804e59a7947af523f6180|author=Maria Bondarenko
|date=22 June 2015
|access-date=3 January 2016|website=rbc.ru|language=ru|script-title=ru:Правозащитники рассказали об отказах в выдаче виз после поездок в Крым|trans-title=Human rights activists have reported visa denials after trips to Crimea}}
</ref> A Russian consumer protection watchdog OZPP published a warning for Russian tourists about this risk, explaining that from the international law point of view, Crimea is an occupied territory, after which ] blocked the OZPP website "for threatening territorial integrity of Russian Federation".<ref>
{{cite news
|url=https://tvrain.ru/news/roskomnadzor_rasporjadilsja_zablokirovat_sajt_obsc-389724/
|script-title=ru:Роскомнадзор распорядился заблокировать сайт Общества защиты прав потребителей\|trans-title=Roskomnadzor ordered the blocking of the Consumer Rights Protection Society site|language=ru|website=tvrain.ru|date=22 June 2015|access-date=3 January 2016}}</ref>


In response to having its voting rights revoked, Russia in June 2017 suspended its budget payments to the ], with Russian foreign minister ] stating payments would not resume until all rights of Russia's delegation were fully restored.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-russia-council-of-europe-payments/russia-suspends-payments-to-council-of-europe-over-crimea-row-idUKKBN19L220|title=Russia suspends payments to Council of Europe over Crimea row|work=uk.reuters.com|access-date=19 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171226023147/https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-russia-council-of-europe-payments/russia-suspends-payments-to-council-of-europe-over-crimea-row-idUKKBN19L220|archive-date=2017-12-26}}</ref> Council Secretary General ] has suggested lifting the sanctions to avoid the impact of mounting budgetary restraints. However, Council members such as Ukraine and its supporters have argued that readmitting Russia without demanding concessions in return would amount to "caving to Russian 'blackmail'".<ref>{{cite news|url = https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-fears-council-of-europe-caving-russian-blackmail/28882603.html|title = Ukraine 'Extremely Concerned' Council of Europe Caving To Russian 'Blackmail'|newspaper=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty| date=27 November 2017|access-date=19 September 2018| last1=Miller| first1=Christopher}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url = https://www.ft.com/content/3cccaf92-d12c-11e7-b781-794ce08b24dc|title=Russia tests Council of Europe in push to regain vote|last=Buckley|first=Neil|date=26 November 2017|website=Financial Times}}</ref>
=== Sanctions ===
{{further|List of individuals sanctioned during the 2014 pro-Russian conflict in Ukraine}}
]" names. I think I'd be wise to keep my distance from them."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://eng.kremlin.ru/transcripts/6911 |title=President of Russia |publisher=Eng.kremlin.ru |date=2014-03-21 |accessdate=2014-05-18}}</ref>]]


=== Mapping ===
Sanctions were imposed to prevent number of Russian and Crimean officials and politicians to travel to Canada, the United States, and the European Union.
{{further|Cartographic aggression}}
] within Russia in 2014.]]
* The ] maps Crimea as belonging to Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web|date=March 2014|title=Map of Ukraine|url=https://www.un.org/geospatial/content/ukraine|access-date=27 May 2024|website=]}}</ref>
* ] stated that their policy is "to portray current reality" and "Crimea, if it is formally annexed by Russia, would be shaded gray", but also further remarked that this step does not suggest recognising the legitimacy of such.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://press.nationalgeographic.com/2014/03/19/statement-regarding-the-mapping-of-crimea/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140320222357/http://press.nationalgeographic.com/2014/03/19/statement-regarding-the-mapping-of-crimea/|archive-date=20 March 2014|title=Statement Regarding the Mapping of Crimea|publisher=]|date=19 March 2014|access-date=2 January 2016}}</ref> As of April 2014, Crimea was still displayed as part of Ukraine.<ref name="hitechmaps">{{cite web|url=https://hi-tech.mail.ru/news/new-krym-maps/|script-title=ru:Крым на картах мира: ситуация поменялась|trans-title=Crimea on maps of the world: the situation has changed|language=ru|website=hi-tech.]|date=11 April 2014|access-date=2 January 2016}}</ref>
* {{As of|April 2014}}, ] displays Crimea as a disputed territory to most viewers.<ref name="hitechmaps" /> For the Russian and Ukrainian versions of the website, Crimea is marked as belonging to the corresponding country (Russia or Ukraine respectively).<ref name="hitechmaps" /> Google stated that it "work(s) with sources to get the best interpretation of the border or claim lines".<ref>{{cite news|author1=J. Kyle O'Donnell|author2=Julie Johnsson|url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-03-21/russian-cartographers-add-crimea-to-maps-amid-sanctions|title=Russian Cartographers Add Crimea to Maps Amid Sanctions|publisher=]|date=22 March 2014|access-date=2 January 2016}}</ref>
* ] displays Crimea as part of Russia for .ru and .com domains since the end of March 2014.<ref>{{Cite news|title=BMW обозначила на своих картах Крым российским. Как поступают другие производители?|trans-title=BMW marked Crimea as Russian on its maps. How are other manufacturers doing?|language=ru|work=BBC News Русская служба|url=https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-54886561|access-date=20 June 2021}}</ref> According to the official statement, the company works with users from different countries and "displays reality that surrounds them".<ref>{{cite web|author=Daniil Aleksandrov|title=Republic.ru|url=http://slon.ru/fast/world/yandeks-pokazyvaet-raznye-karty-v-rossii-i-na-ukraine-1074691.xhtml|script-title=ru:"Яндекс" показывает разные карты в России и на Украине|trans-title="Yandex" displays different maps in Russia and in Ukraine|language=ru|website = slon.ru|date=22 March 2014|access-date=2 January 2016}}</ref>
* {{As of|March 2014}}, ],<ref>{{cite news|url = http://tass.ru/en/russia/725342|title=Parliament challenges mapmakers to mark Crimea Russian territory|agency=]|date=26 March 2014|access-date=2 January 2016}}</ref> ] and ] displayed Crimea as belonging to Ukraine.<ref name="hitechmaps" /> In particular, OpenStreetMap requested its users to refrain from editing borders and administrative relations of subdivisions located in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol until 31 May 2014.<ref name="hitechmaps" /> On 5 June 2014, OpenStreetMap switched to a territorial dispute option, displaying Crimea as a disputed territory belonging to both countries.<ref>{{cite web|url = https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/Working_Group_Minutes/DWG_2014-06-05_Special_Crimea|title=Statement by the DWG on edit conflicts in Crimea|date=5 June 2014|publisher=OpenStreetMap Foundation|access-date=2 January 2016|quote = In the short-term Crimea shall remain in both the Ukraine and Russia administrative relations, and be indicated as disputed. We recognize that being in two administrative relations is not a good long-term solution, although the region is likely to be indicated as disputed for some time.}}</ref>
* In 2015, on the ] website, a Russian-language map was visible for a few days that depicted Crimea as a part of Russia.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://fortune.com/2016/01/21/ukraine-investigates-coca-cola-and-pepsi-over-crimea-map-row/|title=Ukraine investigates Coca Cola and Pepsi|year=2016|magazine=Fortune|access-date=7 July 2016}}</ref>
* The 2016 edition of a French atlas published by ] shows Crimea as part of Russian territory: ], Ukrainian Ambassador to France, expressed shock.<ref>{{cite web|url = https://news.yahoo.com/ukraines-france-ambassador-slams-atlas-placing-crimea-russia-193953372.html|title=Ukraine's France ambassador slams atlas for placing Crimea in Russia|publisher=Yahoo! News|date=13 October 2016|access-date=9 January 2016}}</ref> Shortly after, Larousse changed the map to reflect Crimea as part of Ukraine on the Atlas on their internet version.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie/autre-region/Crim%C3%A9e/115181|title=Larousse official Internet website|publisher=Larousse|access-date=7 July 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://geopolis.francetvinfo.fr/quand-le-larousse-place-la-crimee-en-russie-83775|title=Official position of Larousse on Crimea|year=2015|access-date=7 July 2016}}</ref>
* The Italian-language ] of ] '']'' maps Crimea as a part of Russia since December 2015.<ref>, ''Russia's military activism in 2015'', '']''</ref> Following protests from the Ukrainian embassy in Italy, the magazine editor Lucio Caracciolo wrote that "the map reflects reality. When Crimea and Sevastopol will be back under effective Ukrainian sovereignty, we will produce a map that reflects such reality".<ref>, ''Because Limes represents Crimea under the sovereignty of Russia '' 11 January 2016 '']'', accessed 28 February 2022</ref>
* The Russian version of Apple's ] began to show Crimea as part of Russia on 27 November 2019.<ref>{{Cite news|date=27 November 2019|title=Apple changes Crimea map to meet Russian demands|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50573069|access-date=19 June 2021}}</ref>


== Analysis ==
Japan announced milder sanctions than the US and EU. These include suspension of talks relating to military, space, investment, and visa requirements.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/03/18/japan-imposes-sanctions-against-russia-over-crimea-independence/ |title=Japan imposes sanctions against Russia over Crimea independence |publisher=Fox News |date=2014-03-18 |accessdate=2014-04-01}}</ref>
Researchers consider the subsequent annexation of Crimea to be a ], because the Russian military seized Crimea's parliament and government buildings and instigated the replacement of its government with Russian proxies.<ref name="26436575Putin2" /><ref name="idUSBREA4M05420140524" /><ref name="PopovaEntangled" /><ref name="WilsonCrisis" /><ref name="MaidanWar" /> In particular, political scientist Olga Burlyuk defines Crimea events as "a coup d’état of a regional scale".<ref>{{Cite book|last1=Hamid|first1=Linda|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7LMTEAAAQBAJ&dq=%22a+coup+d%E2%80%99%C3%A9tat+of+a+regional+scale%22&pg=PA73|title=Rule of Law and Areas of Limited Statehood: Domestic and International Dimensions|last2=Wouters|first2=Jan|date=2021-01-29|publisher=Edward Elgar Publishing|isbn=978-1-78897-904-7|pages=73}}</ref>


== See also ==
Lithuanian President ] praised the U.S.'s decision to sanction Russia, saying Obama had set an example.<ref name=CNBC/>
* ]
* ] (2022)
* ]
* ]
* ] (1783)
* ]
* ]
* ]
** ]
** ]
** ]
* ]
* ]


== Notes ==
In response to the sanctions introduced by the U.S. and EU, the ] unanimously passed a resolution asking for all members of the Duma to be included on the sanctions list.<ref name="dumasanctions">{{cite news|url=http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_03_18/All-Russian-MPs-volunteer-to-be-subject-to-US-EU-sanctions-7889/|title=All Russian MPs volunteer to be subject to US, EU sanctions|publisher=2014-03-18|accessdate=2014-03-20}}</ref> Head of the opposition ] party ] said he was proud of being included on the sanctions list, "It is with pride that I have found myself on the black list, this means they have noticed my stance on Crimea."<ref name=dumasanctions/>
{{NoteFoot}}


== References ==
Three days after the lists were published, the ] published a reciprocal sanctions list of US citizens, which consisted of 10 names, including House of Representatives Speaker ], Senator ], and two advisers to President Obama.<ref> '']'' Retrieved on 20 March 2014</ref> Several of those sanctioned responded with pride at their inclusion on the list, including ] who, through his spokesperson Michael Steel, said, "The Speaker is proud to be included on a list of those willing to stand against Putin's aggression.";<ref name=WaPo>{{cite news|last=Lowery & O'Keefe|first=Wesley & Ed|title=Reacting to sanctions, Russians ban Reid, Boehner and four other lawmakers|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/03/20/reacting-to-sanctions-russians-ban-reid-boehner-and-7-other-lawmakers/|newspaper=Washington Post|date=20 March 2014}}</ref><ref name=NJ>{{cite news|last=Isherwood|first=Darryl|title=Bob Menendez is banned from Russia|url=http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/03/bob_menendez_is_banned_from_russia.html|newspaper=NJ|date=20 March 2014}}</ref> ] who tweeted, "I'm proud to be sanctioned by Putin - I'll never cease my efforts & dedication to freedom & independence of Ukraine, which includes Crimea.";<ref name=CNBC>{{cite news|title=Russia sanctions 9 US officials in response to US sanctions on Russian officials|url=http://www.cnbc.com/id/101489046|newspaper=CNBC|date=20 March 2014}}</ref><ref name=WaPo/><ref name=NJ/> ];<ref name=WaPo/><ref name=NJ/> ];<ref name=CNBC/><ref name=WaPo/><ref name=NJ/><ref name=NJ/><ref name=Slate>{{cite news|last=Weigel|first=David|title=Senators Celebrate Being Sanctioned by Russia|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2014/03/20/senators_celebrate_being_sanctioned_by_russia.html|newspaper=Slate|date=20 March 2014}}</ref> ]<ref name=Slate/> and ].<ref name=Slate/>
{{Reflist}}


== Further reading ==
According to the '']'' on Friday, 21 March 2014, "As recently as the start of the week, some of Moscow's financial elite were blasé about the prospect of sanctions. But Russia's businessmen were no longer smiling by after expanded US sanctions rippled through financial markets hitting the business interests of some of the country's richest people."<ref name = "FT share prices">{{Cite news |last1 = Farchy |first1 = Jack |last2 = Hume |first2 = Neil |date = 21 March 2014 |title = Russian share prices drop as sanctions bite |url = http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9ffba124-b0d6-11e3-9f6f-00144feab7de.html |work = ] |accessdate = 21 March 2014 }}</ref> The Americans centered on the heart of Moscow's leadership,<ref name = "FT inner circle">{{Cite news |last = Buckley|first = Neil |date = 21 March 2014 |title = Putin feels the heat as sanctions target president's inner circle |url = http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c8859528-b11c-11e3-bbd4-00144feab7de.html |work = ] |accessdate = 21 March 2014 }}</ref> though the EU initial list shied from targeting Putin's inner circle.<ref name = "EU trade war">{{Cite news |last = Traynor |first = Ian |date = 21 March 2014 |title = European Union prepares for trade war with Russia over Crimea |url = http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/21/eu-mobilises-trade-war-russia-crimea-ukraine |work = ] |accessdate = 22 March 2014 }}</ref> As ratings agencies ] and ] downgraded Russian credit outlook,<ref name = "Bloomberg downgrade">{{Cite news |last = Tanas |first = Olga |date = 21 March 2014 |title = Russia's Credit Outlook Cut as U.S., EU Widen Sanction Lists |url = http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-20/russia-outlook-cut-to-negative-by-s-p-as-obama-widens-sanctions.html |work = ] |accessdate = 21 March 2014 }}</ref> Novatek, Russian second-largest gas producer, saw $2.5bn in market value wiped out when its shares sank by nearly 10%, rendering Putin's close friend ], who has a 23% stake in the company, $575m poorer.<ref name = "FT share prices"/> "I do hope that there is some serious diplomatic activity going on behind the scenes," said one Russian banker quoted by the newspaper,<ref name = "FT executives">{{Cite news |last1 = Farchy |first1 = Jack |last2 = Hille |first2 = Kathrin |last3 = Weaver |first3 = Courtney |date = 21 March 2014 |title = Russian executives quake as US sanctions rattle markets |url = http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3f35068a-b119-11e3-9548-00144feab7de.html |work = ] |accessdate = 21 March 2014 }}</ref> though others were more sanguine on the question of whether the sanctions would have any enduring effect<ref name = "Bloomberg downgrade"/>—"What has been announced so far is really nothing. It's purely cosmetic," said a French banker based in Moscow<ref>{{Cite news |last1 = Matzen |first1 = Eric |last2 = Martin |first2 = Michelle |date = 21 March 2014 |title = Russian sanctions ripple through corporate boardrooms |url = http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/03/21/uk-europe-sanctions-idUKBREA2K1VD20140321 |agency = ] |accessdate = 21 March 2014 }}</ref>—and Russians, top and bottom, seemed defiant.<ref name = "FT defiant">{{Cite news |last = Hille |first = Kathrin |date = 21 March 2014 |title = Putin boosted by defiant tone at top and among people |url = http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1dca5172-b122-11e3-9548-00144feab7de.html |work = ] |accessdate = 21 March 2014 }}</ref> The official Russian response was mixed.<ref>{{Cite news |last1 = Alpert |first1 = Lukas I. |last2 = Sonne |first2 = Paul |date = 21 March 2014 |title = Russia Sends Mixed Signals in Response to U.S. Sanctions |url = http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303802104579452751446729822 |work = ] |accessdate = 21 March 2014 }}</ref>
{{See also|Bibliography of Ukrainian history|List of Slavic studies journals}}
* {{cite journal|editor-last1 = Pynnöniemi|editor-first1= Katri|editor-last2 = Rácz|editor-first2= András|title=Fog of Falsehood: Russian Strategy of Deception and the Conflict in Ukraine|journal=Fiia Report|location=Helsinki|publisher=]|year=2016|isbn=978-951-769-485-8|series=FIIA Report, 45|issn=2323-5454|url = http://www.fiia.fi/fi/publication/588/fog_of_falsehood/|access-date=1 June 2016|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171109024305/http://www.fiia.fi/fi/publication/588/fog_of_falsehood/|archive-date=9 November 2017}}
* {{cite web|title=Myths and misconceptions in the debate on Russia|url=https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/05/myths-and-misconceptions-debate-russia/|website=]|date=13 May 2021|access-date=25 June 2022}}


== Cartographic response == == External links ==
{{Sister project links
* ] stated, that their policy is "to portray current reality" and "Crimea, if it is formally annexed by Russia, would be shaded gray", but also further remarked that this step does not suggest recognizing legitimacy of such annexation.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://press.nationalgeographic.com/2014/03/19/statement-regarding-the-mapping-of-crimea/|title = Statement Regarding the Mapping of Crimea|date = 19 March 2014|publisher = ]}}</ref> As of April 2014 Crimea is still displayed as part of Ukraine.<ref name=":1">{{cite web|url = http://hi-tech.mail.ru/news/new-krym-maps.html|script-title=ru:КРЫМ НА КАРТАХ МИРА: СИТУАЦИЯ ПОМЕНЯЛАСЬ|date = 11 April 2014|website = hi-tech.]|language = Russian}}</ref>
|b=no|commons=Category:Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation|d=yes|m=no|mw=no|n= no|q=yes|s=Treaty on the Accession of the Republic of Crimea to Russia
* ] will paint Crimea as disputed territory for most of visitors.<ref name=":1" /> For Russian and Ukrainian versions of website Crimea will be marked as belonging to corresponding country (Russia or Ukraine respectively).<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{cite web|url = http://lenta.ru/news/2014/04/11/googlecrimea/|title = Google сделала Крым российским на картах для рунета|website = ]|date = 11 April 2014|language = Russian}}</ref> Google stated, that it "work with sources to get the best interpretation of the border or claim lines".<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-03-21/russian-cartographers-add-crimea-to-maps-amid-sanctions.html|title = Russian Cartographers Add Crimea to Maps Amid Sanctions|last = Kyle O'Donnell and Julie Johnsson|date = 22 March 2014|website = ]}}</ref>
|v=no|voy=no|wikt=no
* ] Maps displays Crimea according to official position of user's country. Users visiting Yandex.ru from Russia will see Crimea displayed as Russian territory. Users visiting Yandex.ua or Yandex.ru from Crimea will see peninsula as belonging to corresponding country (Ukraine or Russia). Users visiting yandex.ua from Ukraine will see Crimea as Ukrainian and all other users (from other countries) will see Crimea as Russian territory.<ref name=":1" /> According to official statement, the company works with users from different countries and "displays reality that surrounds them".<ref>{{cite web|url = http://slon.ru/fast/world/yandeks-pokazyvaet-raznye-karty-v-rossii-i-na-ukraine-1074691.xhtml|script-title=ru:"Яндекс" показывает разные карты в России и на Украине|date = 22 March 2014|website = slon.ru|language = Russian}}</ref>
}}
* ],<ref>{{cite web|url = http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/725342|title = Parliament challenges mapmakers to mark Crimea Russian territory|date = 26 March 2014|website = ]}}</ref> ] and ] display Crimea as belonging to Ukraine.<ref name=":1" /> In particular, Open Street Map requested its users to refrain from editing borders and administrative relations of subdivisions located in Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol until 31 May 2014.<ref name=":1" /> On 5 June 2014 ] switched to a territorial dispute option, displaying Crimea as a disputed territory belonging to both countries.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.osmfoundation.org/Working_Group_Minutes/DWG_2014-06-05_Special_Crimea|title = Statement by the DWG on edit conflicts in Crimea|publisher = OpenStreetMap Foundation|date = 2014-06-05|quote = In the short-term Crimea shall remain in both the Ukraine and Russia administrative relations, and be indicated as disputed. We recognize that being in two administrative relations is not a good long-term solution, although the region is likely to be indicated as disputed for some time.}}</ref>
*
* ] maps display Crimea as part of Russia<ref name=":1" /><ref>{{cite web|url = http://ria.ru/world/20140319/1000202184.html|title = Mail.ru и Yandex изменят карты в связи с присоединением Крыма к России|publisher = ]|date = 19 March 2014|language = Russian}}</ref>
* (video 11:21), ], 26 February 2016 <small>(in Russian, subtitles in English)</small>
{{clear}}


{{Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation}}
==See also==
{{Irredentism}}
*]
{{Russian intervention in Ukraine}}
{{Russian invasion of Ukraine}}
{{Politics of Ukraine footer}}
{{Territorial disputes in Europe}}
{{Authority control}}


]
==References==
]
{{reflist|2}}
]

==External links==
{{Commons category|Annexation of Crimea}}
*

{{2014 Crimean crisis}}
{{2014 pro-Russian conflict in Ukraine}}

]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Revision as of 02:10, 24 December 2024

2014 annexation of Ukrainian territory For more details, see Russian occupation of Crimea.

Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation
Part of the Russo-Ukrainian War

Vladimir Putin signs the treaty of accession with Russian-installed Crimean leaders in Moscow, 18 March 2014
Date
  • Annexation: 18 March 2014
  • Military operation: 27 February – 26 March 2014
LocationCrimea
Result Russian victory
Belligerents
Commanders and leaders
Units involved

Based in Crimea,
elements of

Navy

  • 510th Naval Inf Bde (Feodosiia)
  • 810th Naval Inf Bde (Simferopol)

Deployed to Crimea, elements of

Ground Forces

(GRU command)

Airborne

Navy

  • 382nd Naval Inf Bn (Temryuk)
  • 727th Naval Inf Bn (Astrakhan)

Special Operations Forces

Armed forces

Navy

Paramilitary

Interior troops

  • 9th Bde (Simferopol)
  • 15th Bn (Yevpatoriia)
  • 18th Spec Mot Militia Bn (Haspra)
  • 42nd Operational Rgt (Sevastopol)
  • 47th Bde (Feodosiia)

Border guards

  • Special-Purpose Border Guard Bn (Yalta)
Strength

Protesters

Volunteer units

  • 5,000 (Sevastopol)
  • 1,700 (Simferopol)

Russian military forces

  • 20,000–30,000 troops

Protesters

  • 4,000–10,000 (Simferopol)

Ukrainian military forces

  • 5,000–22,000 troops
  • 40,000 reservists, partly mobilised (outside Crimea)
Casualties and losses
1 Crimean SDF trooper killed
  • 2 soldiers killed
  • 60–80 soldiers detained
  • 9,268 military servicemen and 7,050 civilian employees defected
2 civilian deaths (during the protests), 1 civilian killed (by Crimean SDF under command of a former Russian serviceman)

In February and March 2014, Russia invaded the Crimean Peninsula, part of Ukraine, and then annexed it. This took place in the relative power vacuum immediately following the Revolution of Dignity. It marked the beginning of the Russo-Ukrainian War.

The events in Kyiv that ousted Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych on 22 February 2014 sparked pro-Russian and anti-separatism demonstrations in Crimea. At the same time, Russian president Vladimir Putin discussed Ukrainian events with security chiefs, remarking that "we must start working on returning Crimea to Russia". On 27 February, Russian special forces without insignia seized strategic sites across Crimea. Although Russia at first denied its military involvement, Putin later admitted that troops were deployed to "stand behind Crimea's self-defence forces". As Russian troops occupied Crimea's parliament, it dismissed the Crimean government, installed the pro-Russian Aksyonov government, and announced a referendum on Crimea's status. The referendum was held under Russian occupation and, according to the Russian-installed authorities, the result was overwhelmingly in favor of joining Russia. The next day, 17 March 2014, Crimea's authorities declared independence and requested to join Russia. Russia formally incorporated Crimea on 18 March 2014 as the Republic of Crimea and federal city of Sevastopol. Following the annexation, Russia built up its military presence on the peninsula and warned against any outside intervention.

Ukraine and many other countries condemned the annexation and consider it to be a violation of international law and Russian agreements safeguarding the territorial integrity of Ukraine. The annexation led to the other members of the G8 suspending Russia from the group and introducing sanctions. The United Nations General Assembly also rejected the referendum and annexation, adopting a resolution affirming the "territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognised borders", and referring to the Russian action as a "temporary occupation".

The Russian government opposes the "annexation" label, with Putin defending the referendum as complying with the principle of the self-determination of peoples.

Other names

In Ukraine

The names of the Crimean annexation vary. In Ukraine, the annexation is known as the temporary occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol by Russia (Ukrainian: тимчасова окупація Автономної Республіки Крим і Севастополя Росією, romanizedtymchasova okupatsiia Avtonomnoi Respubliky Krym i Sevastopolia Rosiieiu), the illegal occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, the fall of Crimea, and the invasion of Crimea.

In Russia

In the Russian Federation, it is also known as the accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation (Russian: присоединение Крыма к Российской Федерации, romanizedprisoyedineniye Kryma k Rossiyskoy Federatsii), the return of Crimea (Russian: возвращение Крыма, romanizedvozvrashcheniye Kryma), and the reunification of Crimea.

Background

Main article: 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine See also: 1954 transfer of Crimea, Crimea in the Soviet Union, and Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Empire
Post-Soviet conflicts
Caucasus

Central Asia

Eastern Europe
Euromaidan in Kyiv, 11 December 2013

Crimea was part of the Crimean Khanate from 1441 until it was annexed by the Russian Empire in 1783 by a decree of Catherine the Great.

After the downfall of Russian empire in 1917 during the first stages of the Russian Civil War there were a series of short-lived independent governments (Crimean People's Republic, Crimean Regional Government, Crimean SSR). They were followed by White Russian governments (General Command of the Armed Forces of South Russia and later South Russian Government).

In October 1921, the Bolshevik Russian SFSR gained control of the peninsula and instituted the Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic as a member of Russian Federation. In the following year Crimea joined the Soviet Union as a part of Russia (the RSFSR).

After the Second World War and the 1944 deportation of all of the indigenous Crimean Tatars by the Soviet government, the Crimean ASSR was stripped of its autonomy in 1946 and downgraded to the status of an oblast of the Russian SFSR. In 1954, the Crimean Oblast was transferred from the Russian SFSR to the Ukrainian SSR by decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union to commemorate the 300th anniversary of Ukraine's union with Russia. In 1989, under Gorbachev's perestroika, the Supreme Soviet declared that the deportation of the Crimean Tatars under Stalin had been illegal and the mostly Muslim ethnic group was allowed to return to Crimea.

In 1990, the Soviet of the Crimean Oblast proposed the restoration of the Crimean ASSR. The oblast conducted a referendum in 1991, which asked whether Crimea should be elevated into a signatory of the New Union Treaty (that is, become a union republic on its own). By that time, though, the dissolution of the Soviet Union was well underway. The Crimean ASSR was restored for less than a year as part of Ukrainian SSR before the restoration of Ukrainian independence. Newly independent Ukraine maintained Crimea's autonomous status, while the Supreme Council of Crimea affirmed the peninsula's "sovereignty" as a part of Ukraine.

The confrontation between the government of Ukraine and Crimea deteriorated between 1992 and 1995. In May 1992 the regional parliament declared an independent "Crimean republic." In June 1992, the parties reached a compromise, that Crimea would have considerable autonomy but remain part of Ukraine. Yuri Meshkov, a leader of the Russian movement was elected President of Crimea in 1994 and his party won a majority in the regional parliamentary elections in the same year. The pro-Russian movement was then weakened by internal disagreements and in March 1995 the Ukrainian government gained the upper hand. The office of the elected President of Crimea was abolished and a loyal head of region was installed instead of Meshkov; the 1992 constitution and a number of local laws were repealed. According to Gwendolyn Sasse the conflict was defused due to Crimea's multi-ethnic population, fractures within the pro-Russian movement, Kyiv's policy of avoiding escalation and the lack of active support from Russia.

During the 1990s, the dispute over control of the Black Sea Fleet and Crimean naval facilities were source of tensions between Russia and Ukraine. In 1992, Vladimir Lukin, then chairman of the Russian Duma's Committee on Foreign Affairs, suggested that in order to pressure Ukraine to give up its claim to the Black Sea Fleet, Russia should question Ukrainian control over Crimea. In 1998 the Partition Treaty divided the fleet and gave Russia a naval base in Sevastopol, and the Treaty of Friendship recognized the inviolability of existing borders. However, in 2003 Tuzla Island conflict issues over maritime border resurfaced.

In September 2008, the Ukrainian Foreign Minister Volodymyr Ohryzko accused Russia of giving Russian passports to the population in Crimea, and described it as a "real problem", given Russia's declared policy of military intervention abroad to protect Russian citizens.

On 24 August 2009, anti-Ukrainian demonstrations were held in Crimea by ethnic Russian residents. Sergei Tsekov (of the Russian Bloc and then deputy speaker of the Crimean parliament) said then that he hoped that Russia would treat Crimea the same way as it had treated South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Crimea is populated by an ethnic Russian majority and a minority of both ethnic Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars, and thus demographically possessed one of Ukraine's largest ethnically Russian populations.

As early as in 2010, some analysts already speculated that the Russian government had irredentist plans. Taras Kuzio said that "Russia has an even more impossible time recognizing Ukraine's sovereignty over the Crimea and the port of Sevastopol – as seen by public opinion in Russia, statements by politicians, including members of the ruling United Russia party, experts and journalists". In 2011, William Varettoni wrote that "Russia wants to annex Crimea and is merely waiting for the right opportunity, most likely under the pretense of defending Russian brethren abroad".

Euromaidan and the Revolution of Dignity

Main articles: Euromaidan and Revolution of Dignity

The Euromaidan protest movement began in Kyiv in late November 2013 after President Viktor Yanukovych, of the Party of Regions, failed to sign the Ukraine–European Union Association Agreement. Yanukovych won the 2010 presidential election with strong support from voters in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and southern and eastern Ukraine. The Crimean autonomous government strongly supported Yanukovych and condemned the protests, saying they were "threatening political stability in the country". The Crimean autonomous parliament said that it supported the government's decision to suspend negotiations on the pending association agreement and urged Crimeans to "strengthen friendly ties with Russian regions".

On 4 February 2014, the Presidium of the Supreme Council "promised" to consider holding a referendum on the peninsula's status. Speaker Vladimir Klychnikov asked to appeal to the Russian government to "guarantee the preservation of Crimean autonomy". The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) responded by opening a criminal case to investigate the possible "subversion" of Ukraine's territorial integrity. On 20 February 2014, during a visit to Moscow, Chairman of the Supreme Council of Crimea Vladimir Konstantinov stated that the 1954 transfer of Crimea from the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic had been a mistake.

The Euromaidan protests came to a head in late February 2014, and Yanukovych and many of his ministers fled the capital on 22 February. After his flight, opposition parties and defectors from the Party of Regions put together a parliamentary quorum in the Verkhovna Rada (the Ukrainian parliament), and voted on 22 February to remove Yanukovych from his post on the grounds that he was unable to fulfill his duties. Arseniy Yatsenyuk was appointed by the Rada to serve as the head of a caretaker government until new presidential and parliament elections could be held. This new government was recognised internationally. Russian government and propaganda have described these events as a "coup d'état" and have said that the caretaker government was illegitimate, while researchers consider the subsequent annexation of Crimea to be a true military coup, because the Russian military seized Crimea's parliament and government buildings and instigated the replacement of its government with Russian proxies.

Annexation

See also: Anti-Maidan and Russo-Ukrainian War Further information: Timeline of the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation

Russian invasion of Crimea

"Crimean self-defence forces", 2 March 2014
A pro-Ukrainian demonstration in Simferopol (Ukrainian flag on the left, Crimean Tatar flag on the right) during the Russian military intervention in Crimea, 9 March 2014
Medal of the Russian Defense Ministry "For the return of Crimea" (Russian: За возвращение Крыма), 20 February – 18 March 2014

The February 2014 revolution of Dignity that ousted Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych sparked a political crisis in Crimea, which initially manifested as demonstrations against the new interim Ukrainian government, but rapidly escalated. In January 2014, the Sevastopol city council had already called for formation of "people's militia" units to "ensure firm defence" of the city from "extremism".

On February 20 several buses with Crimean license plates were stopped at a pro-Maidan checkpoint in a town in Cherkasy oblast. Their passengers were violently intimidated and some buses were burned. This incident was subsequently used by Russian propaganda which made unsubstantiated claims that the passengers were killed in gruesome ways.

The Verkhovna Rada of Crimea members called for an extraordinary meeting on 21 February. In response to Russian separatist sentiment, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) said that it would "use severe measures to prevent any action taken against diminishing the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine". The party with the largest number of seats in the Crimean parliament (80 of 100), the Party of Regions of Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych, did not discuss Crimean secession, and were supportive of an agreement between President Yanukovych and Euromaidan activists to end the unrest that was struck on the same day in Kyiv.

Russia was concerned that the new government avowedly committed to closer relations with the West put its strategic positions in Crimea at risk. On 22–23 February, Russian president Vladimir Putin convened an all-night meeting with security services chiefs to discuss extrication of the deposed Ukrainian president, Viktor Yanukovych, and at the end of that meeting Putin had remarked that "we must start working on returning Crimea to Russia". After that GRU and FSB began negotiating deals with local sympathizers to ensure that when the operation began there would be well‑armed "local self‑defense groups" on the streets for support. On 23 February pro-Russian demonstrations were held in the Crimean city of Sevastopol.

Crimean prime minister Anatolii Mohyliov said that his government recognised the new provisional government in Kyiv, and that the Crimean autonomous government would carry out all laws passed by the Ukrainian parliament. In Simferopol, following a pro-Russian demonstration the previous day where protesters had replaced the Ukrainian flag over the parliament with a Russian flag, a pro-Euromaidan rally of between 5,000 and 15,000 was held in support of the new government, and demanding the resignation of the Crimean parliament; attendees waved Ukrainian, Tatar, and European Union flags. Meanwhile, in Sevastopol, thousands protested against the new Ukrainian government, voted to establish a parallel administration, and created civil defence squads with the support of the Russian Night Wolves motorcycle club. Protesters waved Russian flags, chanted "Putin is our president!" and said they would refuse to further pay taxes to the Ukrainian state. Russian military convoys were also alleged to be seen in the area.

In Kerch, pro-Russian protesters attempted to remove the Ukrainian flag from atop city hall and replace it with the flag of Russia. Over 200 attended, waving Russian, orange-and-black St. George, and the Russian Unity party flags. Mayor Oleh Osadchy attempted to disperse the crowd and police eventually arrived to defend the flag. The mayor said "This is the territory of Ukraine, Crimea. Here's a flag of Crimea," but was accused of treason and a fight ensued over the flagpole. On 24 February, more rallied outside the Sevastopol city state administration. Pro-Russian demonstrators accompanied by neo-Cossacks demanded the election of a Russian citizen as mayor and hoisted Russian flags around the city administration; they also handed out leaflets to sign up for a self-defence militia, warning that the "Blue-Brown Europlague is knocking".

Volodymyr Yatsuba, head of Sevastopol administration, announced his resignation, citing the "decision of the city's inhabitants" made at a pro-Russian rally, and while caretaker city administration initially leaned towards recognition of new Ukrainian government, continued pressure from pro-Russian activists forced local authorities to concede. Consequently, Sevastopol City Council illegally elected Alexei Chaly, a Russian citizen, as mayor. Under the law of Ukraine, it was not possible for Sevastopol to elect a mayor, as the Chairman of the Sevastopol City State Administration, appointed by the president of Ukraine, functions as its mayor. A thousand protesters present chanted "A Russian mayor for a Russian city".

On 25 February, several hundred pro-Russian protesters blocked the Crimean parliament demanding non-recognition of the central government of Ukraine and a referendum on Crimea's status. On the same day, crowds gathered again outside Sevastopol's city hall on Tuesday as rumours spread that security forces could arrest Chaly, but police chief Alexander Goncharov said that his officers would refuse to carry out "criminal orders" issued by Kyiv. Viktor Neganov, a Sevastopol-based adviser to the Internal Affairs Minister, condemned the events in the city as a coup. "Chaly represents the interests of the Kremlin which likely gave its tacit approval," he said. Sevastopol City State Administration chairman Vladimir Yatsuba was booed and heckled on 23 February, when he told a pro-Russian rally that Crimea was part of Ukraine. He resigned the next day. In Simferopol, the Regional State Administration building was blockaded with hundreds of protesters, including neo-Cossacks, demanding a referendum of separation; the rally was organized by the Crimean Front.

On 26 February, near the Verkhovna Rada of Crimea building, 4,000–5,000 Crimean Tatars and supporters of the Euromaidan-Crimea movement faced 600–700 supporters of pro-Russian organizations and the Russian Unity Party. Tatars leaders organised the demonstration in order to block the sitting of the Crimean parliament which is "doing everything to execute plans of separation of Crimea from Ukraine". Supreme Council Chairman Vladimir Konstantinov said that the Crimean parliament would not consider separation from Ukraine, and that earlier reports that parliament would hold a debate on the matter were provocations. Tatars created self-defence groups, encouraged collaboration with Russians, Ukrainians, and people of other nationalities, and called for the protection of churches, mosques, synagogues, and other important sites. By nightfall the Crimean Tatars had left; several hundred Russian Unity supporters rallied on.

The new Ukrainian government's acting Internal Affairs Minister Arsen Avakov tasked Crimean law enforcement agencies not to provoke conflicts and to do whatever necessary to prevent clashes with pro-Russian forces; and he added "I think, that way – through a dialogue – we shall achieve much more than with standoffs". New Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) chief Valentyn Nalyvaichenko requested that the United Nations provide around-the-clock monitoring of the security situation in Crimea. Russian troops took control of the main route to Sevastopol on orders from Russian president Vladimir Putin. A military checkpoint, with a Russian flag and Russian military vehicles, was set up on the main highway between the city and Simferopol.

Russian takeover

On 27 February, unmarked Russian forces in cooperation with local nationalist paramilitaries took over the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol, with Russian special forces seizing the building of the Supreme Council of Crimea and the building of the Council of Ministers in Simferopol. Russian flags were raised over these buildings and barricades were erected outside them. Pro-Russian forces also occupied several localities in Kherson Oblast on the Arabat Spit, which is geographically a part of Crimea.

Whilst the "little green men" were occupying the Crimean parliament building, the parliament held an emergency session. It voted to terminate the Crimean government, and replace Prime Minister Anatolii Mohyliov with Sergey Aksyonov. Aksyonov belonged to the Russian Unity party, which received 4% of the vote in the last election. According to the Constitution of Ukraine, the prime minister of Crimea is appointed by the Supreme Council of Crimea in consultation with the president of Ukraine. Both Aksyonov and speaker Vladimir Konstantinov stated that they viewed Viktor Yanukovych as the de jure president of Ukraine, through whom they were able to ask Russia for assistance.

The parliament also voted to hold a referendum on greater autonomy set for 25 May. The troops had cut all of the building's communications, and took MPs' phones as they entered. No independent journalists were allowed inside the building while the votes were taking place. Some MPs said they were being threatened and that votes were cast for them and other MPs, even though they were not in the chamber. Interfax-Ukraine reported "it is impossible to find out whether all the 64 members of the 100-member legislature who were registered as present at when the two decisions were voted on or whether someone else used the plastic voting cards of some of them" because due to the armed occupation of parliament it was unclear how many MPs were present.

The head of parliament's information and analysis department, Olha Sulnikova, had phoned from inside the parliamentary building to journalists and had told them 61 of the registered 64 deputies had voted for the referendum resolution and 55 for the resolution to dismiss the government. Donetsk People's Republic separatist Igor Girkin said in January 2015 that Crimean members of parliament were held at gunpoint, and were forced to support the annexation. These actions were immediately declared illegal by the Ukrainian interim government.

On the same day, more troops in unmarked uniforms, assisted this time by what appeared to be local Berkut riot police (as well as Russian troops from the 31st Separate Airborne Assault Brigade dressed in Berkut uniforms), established security checkpoints on the Isthmus of Perekop and the Chonhar Peninsula, which separate Crimea from the Ukrainian mainland. Within hours, Ukraine had been cut off from Crimea. Shortly afterwards, Ukrainian TV channels became unavailable for Crimean viewers, and some of them were replaced with Russian stations.

The blockade of military units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine during the capture of Crimea by Russia in February–March 2014

On 1 March 2014, Aksyonov said that he would exercise control of all Ukrainian military and security installations on the peninsula. He also asked Putin for "assistance in ensuring peace and tranquillity" in Crimea. Putin promptly received authorisation from the Federation Council of Russia for a Russian military intervention in Ukraine until the "political-social situation in the country is normalized". Putin's swift manoeuvre prompted protests of some Russian intelligentsia and demonstrations in Moscow against a Russian military campaign in Crimea. By 2 March, Russian troops moving from the country's naval base in Sevastopol and reinforced by troops, armour, and helicopters from mainland Russia exercised complete control over the Crimean Peninsula. Russian troops operated in Crimea without insignia. On 3 March they blockaded Southern Naval Base.

On 4 March, Ukrainian General Staff said there were units of the 18th Motor Rifle Brigade, 31st Air Assault Brigade and 22nd Spetsnaz Brigade deployed and operating in Crimea, instead of Russian Black Sea Fleet personnel, which violated international agreements signed by Ukraine and Russia. At a press conference on the same day, Russian president Vladimir Putin said that Russia had no plans to annex Crimea. He also said that it had no plans to invade Ukraine, but that it might intervene if Russians in Ukraine were threatened. This was part of a pattern of public denials of the ongoing Russian military operation.

Numerous media reports and statements by the Ukrainian and foreign governments noted the identity of the unmarked troops as Russian soldiers, but Russian officials concealed the identity of their forces, claiming they were local "self-defence" units over whom they had no authority. As late as 17 April, Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov said that there were no "excessive Russian troops" in Ukraine. At the same press conference, Putin said of the peninsula that "only citizens themselves, in conditions of free expression of will and their security can determine their future". Putin later acknowledged that he had ordered "work to bring Crimea back into Russia" as early as February. He also acknowledged that in early March there were "secret opinion polls" held in Crimea, which, according to him, reported overwhelming popular support for Crimea's incorporation into Russia.

Russia eventually admitted its troops' presence. Defence Minister Sergey Shoygu said the country's military actions in Crimea were undertaken by forces of the Black Sea Fleet and were justified by "threat to lives of Crimean civilians" and danger of "takeover of Russian military infrastructure by extremists". Ukraine complained that by increasing its troop presence in Crimea, Russia violated the agreement under which it headquartered its Black Sea Fleet in Sevastopol and violated the country's sovereignty. The United States and United Kingdom accused Russia of breaking the terms of the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances, by which Russia, the US, and the UK had reaffirmed their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine. The Russian government said the Budapest Memorandum did not apply due to "circumstances resulting from the action of internal political or socio-economic factors". In March 2015, retired Russian Admiral Igor Kasatonov [ru] stated that according to his information the Russian troop deployment in Crimea included six helicopter landings and three landings of an IL-76 with 500 people.

Legal issues

See also: Declaration of Independence of Crimea
Part of a series on the
2014 annexation of Crimea
Map of Crimea
Main topics
Background
Ukraine Autonomous Republic of Crimea Russia

The obligations between Russia and Ukraine with regard to territorial integrity and the prohibition of the use of force are laid down in a number of multilateral or bilateral agreements to which Russia and Ukraine are signatories.

Vladimir Putin said that Russian troops in the Crimean Peninsula were aimed "to ensure proper conditions for the people of Crimea to be able to freely express their will," whilst Ukraine and other nations argue that such intervention is a violation of Ukraine's sovereignty.

In the 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances Russia was among those who affirmed to respect the territorial integrity of Ukraine (including Crimea) and to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine. The 1997 Russian–Ukrainian Treaty on Friendship,[176] Cooperation, and Partnership again reaffirmed the inviolability of the borders between both states, and required Russian forces in Crimea to respect the sovereignty of Ukraine, honor its legislation and not interfere in the internal affairs of the country.

The Russian–Ukrainian Partition Treaty on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet signed in 1997 and prolonged in 2010, determined the status of Russian military presence in Crimea and restricted their operations, including requirement to show their "military identification cards" when crossing the international border and that operations beyond designated deployment sites was permitted only after coordination with Ukraine. According to Ukraine usage of navigation stations and troop movements were improperly covered by the treaty and were violated many times as well as related court decisions. February's troop movements were in "complete disregard" of the treaty.

"Little green men" and trucks after the seizure of Perevalne military base, 9 March 2014

According to the Constitution of Russia, the admission of new federal subjects is governed by federal constitutional law (art. 65.2). Such a law was adopted in 2001, and it postulates that admission of a foreign state or its part into Russia shall be based on a mutual accord between the Russian Federation and the relevant state and shall take place pursuant to an international treaty between the two countries; moreover, it must be initiated by the state in question, not by its subdivision or by Russia.

On 28 February 2014, Russian MP Sergey Mironov, along with other members of the Duma, introduced a bill to alter Russia's procedure for adding federal subjects. According to the bill, accession could be initiated by a subdivision of a country, provided that there is "absence of efficient sovereign state government in foreign state"; the request could be made either by subdivision bodies on their own or on the basis of a referendum held in the subdivision in accordance with corresponding national legislation.

On 11 March 2014, both the Supreme Council of Crimea and the Sevastopol City Council adopted a declaration of independence, which stated their intent to declare independence and request full accession to Russia should the pro-Russian option receive the most votes during the scheduled status referendum. The declaration directly referred to the Kosovo independence precedent, by which the Albanian-populated Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija declared independence from Russia's ally Serbia as the Republic of Kosovo in 2008—a unilateral action Russia staunchly opposed. The Russian government used Kosovo independence precedent as a legal justification for the annexation of Crimea Many analysts saw the Crimean declaration as an overt effort to pave the way for Crimea's annexation by Russia and reject Russia's Kosovo precedent justification as being different compared to Crimea events, comparing the annexation to the Nazi Germany's anschluss of Austria and Czechoslovak Sudetes instead.

Crimean authorities' stated plans to declare independence from Ukraine made the Mironov bill unnecessary. On 20 March 2014, two days after the treaty of accession was signed, the bill was withdrawn by its initiators.

At its meeting on 21–22 March, the Council of Europe's Venice Commission stated that the Mironov bill violated "in particular, the principles of territorial integrity, national sovereignty, non-intervention in the internal affairs of another state and pacta sunt servanda" and was therefore incompatible with international law.

Crimean status referendum

Main article: 2014 Crimean status referendum

On 27 February 2014, following the takeover of its building and replacement of Ukrainian-elected officials with Russian-controlled actors by Russian special forces, the Supreme Council of Crimea voted to hold a referendum on 25 May, with the initial question as to whether Crimea should upgrade its autonomy within Ukraine. The referendum date was later moved from 25 May to 30 March. A Ukrainian court declared the referendum to be illegal.

On 6 March, the Supreme Council moved the referendum date to 16 March and changed its scope to ask a new question: whether Crimea should apply to join Russia as a federal subject or restore the 1992 Crimean constitution within Ukraine, which the Ukrainian government had previously invalidated. This referendum, unlike one announced earlier, contained no option to maintain the status quo of governance under the 1998 constitution. Ukraine's acting president, Oleksandr Turchynov, stated that "The authorities in Crimea are totally illegitimate, both the parliament and the government. They are forced to work under the barrel of a gun and all their decisions are dictated by fear and are illegal".

On 14 March, the Crimean status referendum was deemed unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine, and a day later, the Verkhovna Rada formally dissolved the Crimean parliament. With a referendum looming, Russia massed troops near the Ukrainian eastern border, likely to threaten escalation and stymie Ukraine's response.

The referendum was held despite the opposition from the Ukrainian government. Official results reported about 95.5% of participating voters in Crimea (turnout was 83%) were in favour of seceding from Ukraine and joining Russia. Crimean Tatars mostly boycotted the referendum. A report by Evgeny Bobrov, a member of the Russian President's Human Rights Council, suggested the official results were inflated and between 50 and 60% of Crimeans voted for the reunification with Russia, with the turnout of 30-50%, meaning that 15% to 30% of Crimeans eligible to vote voted for the Russian annexation (the support was higher in administratively separate Sevastopol). According to a survey carried out by Pew Research Center in 2014, 54% of Crimean residents supported the right of regions to secede, 91% believed the referendum was free and fair and 88% believed that the government in Kyiv ought to recognize the results of the vote.

The means by which the referendum was conducted were widely criticised by foreign governments and in the Ukrainian and international press, with reports that anyone holding a Russian passport regardless of residency in Crimea was allowed to vote. OSCE refused to send observers to the referendum, stating that invitation should have come from an OSCE member state in question (i.e. Ukraine), rather than local authorities. Russia invited a group of observers from various European far-right political parties aligned with Putin, who stated the referendum was conducted in a free and fair manner.

Proclamations of independence of the Republic of Crimea

"Republic of Crimea (country)" redirects here. For other uses, see Republic of Crimea (disambiguation). See also: Declaration of Independence of the Republic of Crimea

The Republic of Crimea was short lived. On 17 March, following the official announcement of the referendum results, the Supreme Council of Crimea declared the formal independence of the Republic of Crimea, comprising the territories of both the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, which was granted special status within the breakaway republic. The Crimean parliament declared the "partial repeal" of Ukrainian laws and began nationalising private and Ukrainian state property located on the Crimean Peninsula, including Ukrainian ports and property of Chornomornaftogaz. Parliament also formally requested that the Russian government admit the breakaway republic into Russia, with Sevastopol asking to be admitted as a "city of federal significance". On the same day, the de facto Supreme Council renamed itself the State Council of Crimea, declared the Russian ruble an official currency alongside the hryvnia, and in June the Russian ruble became the only form of legal tender.

Putin officially recognised the Republic of Crimea 'as a sovereign and independent state' by decree on 17 March.

On 21 March the Republic of Crimea became a federal Subject of Russia.

Accession treaty and finalization of the annexation

See also: Republic of Crimea (Russia), Crimean Federal District, and Political status of Crimea
President Putin with Vladimir Konstantinov, Sergey Aksyonov and Alexey Chaly at the Kremlin, 18 March 2014

The Treaty on Accession of the Republic of Crimea to Russia was signed between representatives of the Republic of Crimea (including Sevastopol, with which the rest of Crimea briefly unified) and the Russian Federation on 18 March 2014 to lay out terms for the immediate admission of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol as federal subjects of Russia and part of the Russian Federation. On 19 March, the Russian Constitutional Court decided that the treaty is in compliance with the Constitution of Russia. The treaty was ratified by the Federal Assembly and Federation Council by 21 March. A Just Russia's Ilya Ponomarev was the only State Duma member to vote against the treaty. The Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol became the 84th and 85th federal subjects of Russia.

During a controversial incident in Simferopol on 18 March, some Ukrainian sources said that armed gunmen that were reported to be Russian special forces allegedly stormed the base. This was contested by Russian authorities, who subsequently announced the arrest of an alleged Ukrainian sniper in connection with the killings, but later denied the arrest had occurred.

The two casualties had a joint funeral attended by both the Crimean and Ukrainian authorities, and both the Ukrainian soldier and Russian paramilitary "self-defence volunteer" were mourned together. As of March 2014 the incident was under investigation by both the Crimean authorities and the Ukrainian military.

In response to shooting, Ukraine's then acting defense minister Ihor Tenyukh authorised Ukrainian troops stationed in Crimea to use deadly force in life-threatening situations. This increased the risk of bloodshed during any takeover of Ukrainian military installations, yet the ensuing Russian operations to seize the remaining Ukrainian military bases and ships in Crimea did not bring new fatalities, although weapons were used and several people were injured. The Russian units involved in such operations were ordered to avoid usage of deadly force when possible. Morale among the Ukrainian troops, which for three weeks were blockaded inside their compounds without any assistance from the Ukrainian government, was very low, and the vast majority of them did not offer any real resistance.

On 24 March, the Ukrainian government ordered the full withdrawal of all of its armed forces from Crimea. Approximately 50% of the Ukrainian soldiers in Crimea had defected to the Russian military. On 26 March the last Ukrainian military bases and Ukrainian Navy ships were captured by Russian troops.

Occupation

May Day parade in Simferopol, 1 May 2019.
Main article: Russian occupation of Crimea

On 27 March, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a non-binding resolution, which declared the Crimean referendum and subsequent status change invalid, by a vote of 100 to 11, with 58 abstentions and 24 absent.

Crimea and Sevastopol switched to Moscow Time at 10 p.m. on 29 March.

On 31 March, Russia unilaterally denounced the Kharkiv Pact and Partition Treaty on the Status and Conditions of the Black Sea Fleet. Putin cited "the accession of the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol into Russia" and resulting "practical end of renting relationships" as his reason for the denunciation. On the same day, he signed a decree formally rehabilitating the Crimean Tatars, who were ousted from their lands in 1944, and the Armenian, German, Greek, and Bulgarian minority communities in the region that Stalin also ordered removed in the 1940s.

Also on 31 March 2014, the Russian prime minister Dmitry Medvedev announced a series of programmes aimed at swiftly incorporating the territory of Crimea into Russia's economy and infrastructure. Medvedev announced the creation of a new ministry for Crimean affairs, and ordered Russia's top ministers who joined him there to make coming up with a development plan their top priority. On 3 April 2014, the Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol became parts of Russia's Southern Military District. On 7 May 2015, Crimea switched its phone code system from the Ukrainian number system to the Russian number system.

On 11 April, the Constitution of the Republic of Crimea and City Charter of Sevastopol were adopted by their respective legislatures, coming into effect the following day in addition the new federal subjects were enumerated in a newly published revision of the Russian Constitution.

On 14 April, Vladimir Putin announced that he would open a ruble-only account with Bank Rossiya and would make it the primary bank in the newly annexed Crimea as well as giving the right to service payments on Russia's $36 billion wholesale electricity market – which gave the bank $112 million annually from commission charges alone.

Crimea (dark green), Rest of Ukraine (light green) and Russia (light red) in Europe

Russia withdrew its forces from southern Kherson in December 2014.

In July 2015, Russian prime minister, Dmitry Medvedev, declared that Crimea had been fully integrated into Russia. Until 2016 these new subjects were grouped in the Crimean Federal District.

On 8 August 2016, Ukraine reported that Russia had increased its military presence along the demarcation line. In response to this military buildup Ukraine also deployed more troops and resources closer to the border with Crimea. The Pentagon has downplayed a Russian invasion of Ukraine, calling Russian troops along the border a regular military exercise. On 10 August, Russia claimed two servicemen were killed in clashes with Ukrainian commandos, and that Ukrainian servicemen had been captured with a total of 40 kg of explosives in their possession. Ukraine denied that the incident took place.

Russian accounts claimed that Russian FSB detained "Ukrainian saboteurs" and "terrorists" near Armiansk. The ensuing gunfight left one FSB officer and a suspect dead. A number of individuals were detained, including Yevhen Panov, who is described by Russian sources as a Ukrainian military intelligence officer and leader of the sabotage group. The group was allegedly planning terror attacks on important infrastructure in Armiansk, Crimea.

Ukrainian media reported that Panov was a military volunteer fighting in the east of the country, however he has more recently been associated with a charitable organization. Russia also claimed that the alleged border infiltration was accompanied by "heavy fire" from Ukrainian territory, resulting in the death of a Russian soldier. The Ukrainian government called the Russian accusations "cynical" and "senseless" and argued that since Crimea was Ukrainian territory, it was Russia which "has been generously financing and actively supporting terrorism on Ukrainian territory".

A pro-war propaganda event in Sevastopol, Crimea, 29 April 2022

In 2017, a survey performed by the Centre for East European and International Studies showed that 85% of the non-Crimean Tatar respondents believed that if the referendum would be held again it would lead to the same or "only marginally different" results. Crimea was fully integrated into the Russian media sphere, and links with the rest of Ukraine were hardly existent.

On 26 November 2018, lawmakers in the Ukraine Parliament overwhelmingly backed the imposition of martial law along Ukraine's coastal regions and those bordering Russia in response to the firing upon and seizure of Ukrainian naval ships by Russia near the Crimean Peninsula a day earlier. A total of 276 lawmakers in Kyiv backed the measure, which took effect on 28 November 2018 and was ended on 26 December.

On 28 December 2018, Russia completed a high-tech security fence marking the de facto border between Crimea and Ukraine.

In 2021, Ukraine launched the Crimea Platform, a diplomatic initiative aimed at protecting the rights of Crimean inhabitants and ultimately reversing the annexation of Crimea.

Transition and aftermath

Economic implications

See also: Economic history of the Russian Federation and Russian financial crisis (2014–2016)

Initially after the annexation, salaries rose, especially those of government workers. This was soon offset by the increase in prices caused by the depreciation of the ruble. Wages were cut back by 30% to 70% after Russian authority became established. Tourism, previously Crimea's main industry, suffered in particular, down by 50% from 2014 in 2015. Crimean agricultural yields were also significantly impacted by the annexation. Ukraine cut off supplies of water through the North Crimean Canal, which supplies 85% of Crimea's fresh water, causing the 2014 rice crop to fail, and greatly damaging the maize and soybean crops. The annexation had a negative influence on Russians working in Ukraine and Ukrainians working in Russia.

The number of tourists visiting Crimea in the 2014 season was lower than in the previous years due to a combination of "Western sanctions", ethical objections by Ukrainians, and the difficulty of getting there for Russians. The Russian government attempted to stimulate the flow of tourists by subsidizing holidays in the peninsula for children and state workers from all Russia which worked mostly for state-owned hotels. In 2015, overall 3 million tourists visited Crimea according to official data, while before annexation it was around 5.5 million on average. The shortage is attributed mostly to stopped flow of tourists from Ukraine. Hotels and restaurants are also experiencing problems with finding enough seasonal workers, who were most arriving from Ukraine in the preceding years. Tourists visiting state-owned hotels were complaining mostly about low standard of rooms and facilities, some of them still unrepaired from Soviet times.

According to the German newspaper Die Welt, the annexation of Crimea is economically disadvantageous for the Russian Federation. Russia will have to spend billions of euros a year to pay salaries and pensions. Moreover, Russia will have to undertake costly projects to connect Crimea to the Russian water supply and power system because Crimea has no land connection to Russia and at present (2014) gets water, gas and electricity from mainland Ukraine. This required building a bridge and a pipeline across the Kerch Strait. Also, Novinite claims that a Ukrainian expert told Die Welt that Crimea "will not be able to attract tourists".

The then first Deputy to Minister of Finance of Russian Federation Tatyana Nesterenko said that the decision to annex Crimea was made by Vladimir Putin exclusively, without consulting Russia's Finance Ministry.

The Russian business newspaper Kommersant expresses an opinion that Russia will not acquire anything economically from "accessing" Crimea, which is not very developed industrially, having just a few big factories, and whose yearly gross product is only $4 billion. The newspaper also says that everything from Russia will have to be delivered by sea, higher costs of transportation will result in higher prices for everything, and to avoid a decline in living standards Russia will have to subsidise Crimean people for a few months. In total, Kommersant estimates the costs of integrating Crimea into Russia in $30 billion over the next decade, i.e. $3 billion per year.

Western oil expertsestimate that Russia's seizing of Crimea, and the associated control of an area of Black Sea more than three times its land area gives it access to oil and gas reserves potentially worth trillions of dollars. It also deprives Ukraine of its chances of energy independence. Moscow's acquisition may alter the route along which the South Stream pipeline would be built, saving Russia money, time and engineering challenges. It would also allow Russia to avoid building in Turkish territorial waters, which was necessary in the original route to avoid Ukrainian territory. This pipeline was later canceled in favour of TurkStream, however.

Vladimir Putin and his close confidant Arkady Rotenberg before the opening of the Crimean Bridge in May 2018

The Russian Federal Service for Communications (Roskomnadzor) warned about a transition period as Russian operators have to change the numbering capacity and subscribers. Country code will be replaced from the Ukrainian +380 to Russian +7. Codes in Crimea start with 65, but in the area of "7" the 6 is given to Kazakhstan which shares former Soviet Union +7 with Russia, so city codes have to change. The regulator assigned 869 dialling code to Sevastopol and the rest of the peninsula received a 365 code. At the time of the unification with Russia, telephone operators and Internet service providers in Crimea and Sevastopol are connected to the outside world through the territory of Ukraine. Minister of Communications of Russia, Nikolai Nikiforov announced on his Twitter account that postal codes in Crimea will now have six-figures: to the existing five-digit number the number two will be added at the beginning. For example, the Simferopol postal code 95000 will become 295000.

In the area that now forms the border between Crimea and Ukraine mining the salt lake inlets from the sea that constitute the natural borders, and in the spit of land left over stretches of no-man's-land with wire on either side was created. On early June that year Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev signed a Government resolution No.961 dated 5 June 2014 establishing air, sea, road and railway checkpoints. The adopted decisions create a legal basis for the functioning of a checkpoint system at the Russian state border in the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol.

In the year following the annexation, armed men seized various Crimean businesses, including banks, hotels, shipyards, farms, gas stations, a bakery, a dairy, and Yalta Film Studio. Russian media have noted this trend as "returning to the 90's," which is perceived as a period of anarchy and rule of gangs in Russia.

After 2014 the Russian government invested heavily in the peninsula's infrastructure—repairing roads, modernizing hospitals and building the Crimean Bridge that links the peninsula to the Russian mainland. Development of new sources of water was undertaken, with huge difficulties, to replace closed Ukrainian sources. In 2015, the Investigative Committee of Russia announced a number of theft and corruption cases in infrastructure projects in Crimea, for example; spending that exceeded the actual accounted costs by a factor of three. A number of Russian officials were also arrested for corruption, including head of federal tax inspection.

(According to February 2016 official Ukrainian figures) after Russia's annexation 10% of Security Service of Ukraine personnel left Crimea; accompanied by 6,000 of the pre-annexation 20,300 people strong Ukrainian army.

As result of the disputed political status of Crimea, Russian mobile operators never expanded their operations into Crimea and all mobile services are offered on the basis of "internal roaming," which caused significant controversy inside Russia. Telecoms however argued that expanding coverage to Crimea will put them at risk of Western sanctions and, as result, they will lose access to key equipment and software, none of which is produced locally.

The first five years of Crimean occupation cost Russia over $20 billion, roughly equal to two years of Russia's entire education budget.

Human rights situation

According to the United Nations and multiple NGOs, Russia is responsible for multiple human rights abuses, including torture, arbitrary detention, forced disappearances and instances of discrimination, including persecution of Crimean Tatars in Crimea since the illegal annexation. The UN Human Rights Office has documented multiple human rights violations in Crimea. Noting that minority Crimean Tatars have been disproportionately affected. In December 2016, the UN General Assembly voted on a resolution on human rights in occupied Crimea. It called on the Russian Federation "to take all measures necessary to bring an immediate end to all abuses against residents of Crimea, in particular reported discriminatory measures and practices, arbitrary detentions, torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment, and to revoke all discriminatory legislation". It also urged Russia to "immediately release Ukrainian citizens who were unlawfully detained and judged without regard for elementary standards of justice".

After the annexation, Russian authorities banned Crimean Tatar organizations, filed criminal charges against Tatar leaders and journalists, and targeted the Tatar population. The Atlantic Council have described this as the practice of collective punishment, and therefore as a war crime prohibited under international humanitarian law and Geneva convention.

In March 2014, Human Rights Watch reported that pro-Ukrainian activists and journalists had been attacked, abducted, and tortured by "self-defense" groups. Some Crimeans were simply "disappeared" with no explanation.

On 9 May 2014, the new "anti-extremist" amendment to the Criminal Code of Russia, passed in December 2013, came into force. Article 280.1 designated incitement of violation of territorial integrity of the Russian Federation (incl. calls for secession of Crimea from Russia) as a criminal offense in Russia, punishable by a fine of 300 thousand roubles or imprisonment up to 3 years. If such statements are made in public media or the internet, the punishment could be obligatory works up to 480 hours or imprisonment up to five years.

According to a report released on the Russian government-run President of Russia's Council on Civil Society and Human Rights website, Tatars who were opposed to Russian rule have been persecuted, Russian law restricting freedom of speech has been imposed, and the new Russian authorities "liquidated" the Kyiv Patriarchate Orthodox church on the peninsula. The Crimean Tatar television station was also shut down by the Russian authorities.

Russian president Putin meeting with representatives of the Crimean Tatars, 16 May 2014

On 16 May the new Russian authorities of Crimea issued a ban on the annual commemorations of the anniversary of the deportation of the Crimean Tatars by Stalin in 1944, citing "possibility of provocation by extremists" as a reason. Previously, when Crimea was controlled by Ukraine, these commemorations had taken place every year. The Russian-installed Crimean authorities also banned Mustafa Dzhemilev, a human rights activist, Soviet dissident, member of the Ukrainian parliament, and former chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatars from entering Crimea. Additionally, Mejlis reported, that officers of Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) raided Tatar homes in the same week, on the pretense of "suspicion of terrorist activity". The Tatar community eventually did hold commemorative rallies in defiance of the ban. In response Russian authorities flew helicopters over the rallies in an attempt to disrupt them.

In May 2015, a local activist, Alexander Kostenko, was sentenced to four years in a penal colony. His lawyer, Dmitry Sotnikov, said that the case was fabricated and that his client had been beaten and starved. Crimean prosecutor Natalia Poklonskaya accused Kostenko of making Nazi gestures during the Maidan protests, and that they were judging "not just , but the very idea of fascism and Nazism, which are trying to raise their head once again". Sotnikov responded that "There are fabricated cases in Russia, but rarely such humiliation and physical harm. A living person is being tortured for a political idea, to be able to boast winning over fascism". In June 2015, Razom released a report compiling human rights abuses in Crimea. In its 2016 annual report, the Council of Europe made no mention of human rights abuses in Crimea because Russia had not allowed its monitors to enter.

In February 2016 human rights defender Emir-Usein Kuku from Crimea was arrested and accused of belonging to the Islamist organization Hizb ut-Tahrir although he denies any involvement in this organization. Amnesty International has called for his immediate release.

On 24 May 2014, Ervin Ibragimov, a former member of the Bakhchysarai Town Council and a member of the World Congress of Crimean Tatars went missing. CCTV footage from a camera at a nearby shop documents that Ibragimov had been stopped by a group of men and that he is briefly speaking to the men before being forced in their van. According to the Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group Russian authorities refuse to investigate the disappearance of Ibragimov.

In May 2018 Server Mustafayev, the founder and coordinator of the human rights movement Crimean Solidarity was imprisoned by Russian authorities and charged with "membership of a terrorist organisation". Amnesty International and Front Line Defenders demand his immediate release.

On 12 June 2018, Ukraine lodged a memorandum weighing about 90 kg, consisting of 17,500 pages of text in 29 volumes to the UN's International Court of Justice about racial discrimination by Russian authorities in occupied Crimea and state financing of terrorism by Russian Federation in Donbas.

Between 2015 and 2019 over 134,000 people living in Crimea applied for and were issued Ukrainian passports.

Crimean public opinion

Concert to mark the fifth anniversary of annexation in Simferopol, Crimea, 18 March 2019

Prior to Russian occupation, support for joining Russia was 23% in a 2013 poll, down from 33% in 2011. A joint survey by American government agency Broadcasting Board of Governors and polling firm Gallup was taken during April 2014. It polled 500 residents of Crimea. The survey found that 82.8% of those polled believed that the results of the Crimean status referendum reflected the views of most residents of Crimea, whereas 6.7% said that it did not. 73.9% of those polled said that they thought that the annexation would have a positive impact on their lives, whereas 5.5% said that it would not. 13.6% said that they did not know.

A comprehensive poll released on 8 May 2014 by the Pew Research Centre surveyed local opinions on the annexation. Despite international criticism of 16 March referendum on Crimean status, 91% of those Crimeans polled thought that the vote was free and fair, and 88% said that the Ukrainian government should recognise the results.

In a survey completed in 2019 by a Russian company FOM 72% of surveyed Crimean residents said their lives have improved since annexation. At the same time only 39% Russians living in the mainland said the annexation was beneficial for the country as a whole which marks a significant drop from 67% in 2015.

Whilst the Russian government actively cited local opinion polls to argue that the annexation was legitimate (i.e. supported by the population of the territory in question), some authors have cautioned against using surveys concerning identities and support for the annexation conducted in "oppressive political environment" of Russian-held Crimea.

Ukrainian response

See also: Do not buy Russian goods!, Boycott Russian Films, Putin khuylo!, and Day of Resistance to Occupation of Crimea and Sevastopol

Immediately after the treaty of accession was signed in March, the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned the Provisional Principal of Russia in Ukraine to present note verbale of protest against Russia's recognition of the Republic of Crimea and its subsequent annexation. Two days later, the Verkhovna Rada condemned the treaty and called Russia's actions "a gross violation of international law". The Rada called on the international community to avoid recognition of the "so-called Republic of Crimea" or the annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol by Russia as new federal subjects.

On 15 April 2014, the Verkhovna Rada declared the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol to be under "provisional occupation" by the Russian military and imposed travel restrictions on Ukrainians visiting Crimea. The territories were also deemed "inalienable parts of Ukraine" subject to Ukrainian law. Among other things, the special law approved by the Rada restricted foreign citizens' movements to and from the Crimean Peninsula and forbade certain types of entrepreneurship. The law also forbade activity of government bodies formed in violation of Ukrainian law and designated their acts as null and void.

Following Russia's annexation of Crimea, Ukraine blocked the North Crimean Canal, which provided 85% of Crimea's drinking water.

Ukrainian authorities greatly reduced the volume of water flowing into Crimea via the North Crimean Canal due to huge debt for water supplied in the previous year, threatening the viability of the peninsula's agricultural crops, which are heavily dependent on irrigation.

The Ukrainian National Council for TV and Radio Broadcasting instructed all cable operators on 11 March 2014 to stop transmitting a number of Russian channels, including the international versions of the main state-controlled stations, Russia-1, Channel One and NTV, as well as news channel Russia-24.

In March 2014, activists began organising flash mobs in supermarkets to urge customers not to buy Russian goods and to boycott Russian gas stations, banks, and concerts. In April 2014, some cinemas in Kyiv, Lviv, and Odesa began shunning Russian films.

On 2 December 2014, Ukraine created a Ministry of Information Policy, with one of its goals being, according to first Minister of Information, Yuriy Stets, to counteract "Russian information aggression".

In December 2014, Ukraine halted all train and bus services to Crimea.

On 16 September 2015, the Ukrainian parliament voted for the law that sets 20 February 2014 as the official date of the Russian temporary occupation of the Crimean Peninsula. On 7 October 2015, the president of Ukraine signed the law into force.

The Ministry of Temporarily Occupied Territories and IDPs was established by the Ukrainian government on 20 April 2016 to manage occupied parts of Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea regions affected by Russian military intervention of 2014. By 2015, the number of IDPs registered in Ukraine who had fled from Russian-occupied Crimea was 50,000.

Russian response

See also: Crimean speech of Vladimir Putin and 2022 Moscow rally
At least 30,000 people at 15 March protests, named March of Peace, which took place in Moscow a day before the Crimean referendum.

In a poll published on 24 February 2014 by the state-owned Russian Public Opinion Research Center, only 15% of those Russians polled said 'yes' to the question: "Should Russia react to the overthrow of the legally elected authorities in Ukraine?"

The State Duma Committee on Commonwealth of Independent States Affairs, headed by Leonid Slutsky, visited Simferopol on 25 February 2014 and said: "If the parliament of the Crimean autonomy or its residents express the wish to join the Russian Federation, Russia will be prepared to consider this sort of application. We will be examining the situation and doing so fast". They also stated that in the event of a referendum for the Crimea region joining the Russian Federation, they would consider its results "very fast". Later Slutsky announced that he was misunderstood by the Crimean press, and no decision regarding simplifying the process of acquiring Russian citizenship for people in Crimea had been made yet. He also added that if "fellow Russian citizens are in jeopardy, you understand that we do not stay away". On 25 February, in a meeting with Crimean politicians, he stated that Viktor Yanukovych was still the legitimate president of Ukraine. That same day, the Russian Duma announced it was determining measures so that Russians in Ukraine who "did not want to break from the Russian World" could acquire Russian citizenship.

On 26 February, Russian president Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian Armed Forces to be "put on alert in the Western Military District as well as units stationed with the 2nd Army Central Military District Command involved in aerospace defence, airborne troops and long-range military transport". Despite media speculation that this was in reaction to the events in Ukraine, Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu said it was for reasons separate from the unrest in Ukraine. On 27 February 2014, the Russian government dismissed accusations that it was in violation of the basic agreements regarding the Black Sea Fleet: "All movements of armored vehicles are undertaken in full compliance with the basic agreements and did not require any approvals".

On 27 February, the Russian governing agencies presented the new law project on granting citizenship.

The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs called on the West and particularly NATO to "abandon the provocative statements and respect the neutral status of Ukraine". In its statement, the ministry claims that the agreement on settlement of the crisis, which was signed on 21 February and was witnessed by foreign ministries from Germany, Poland and France had to this date, not been implemented (Vladimir Lukin from Russia had not signed it).

On 28 February, according to ITAR-TASS, the Russian Ministry of Transport discontinued further talks with Ukraine in regards to the Crimean Bridge project. However, on 3 March Dmitry Medvedev, then Prime Minister of Russia, signed a decree creating a subsidiary of Russian Highways (Avtodor) to build a bridge at an unspecified location along the Kerch Strait.

On Russian social networks, there was a movement to gather volunteers who served in the Russian army to go to Ukraine. Many political researchers consider that after the annexation a social period in Russia coined as "Crimean consensus" begun, during which the "Rally 'round the flag" effect was observed in the population.

On 28 February, President Putin stated in telephone calls with key EU leaders that it was of "extreme importance of not allowing a further escalation of violence and the necessity of a rapid normalisation of the situation in Ukraine". Already on 19 February the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs had referred to the Euromaidan revolution as the "Brown revolution".

In Moscow, on 2 March, an estimated 27,000 rallied in support of the Russian government's decision to intervene in Ukraine. The rallies received considerable attention on Russian state TV and were officially approved by the government.

Meanwhile, on 1 March, five people who were picketing next to the Federation Council building against the invasion of Ukraine were arrested. The next day about 200 people protested at the building of the Russian Ministry of Defence in Moscow against Russian military involvement. About 500 people also gathered to protest on the Manezhnaya Square in Moscow, and the same number of people on the Saint Isaac's Square in Saint Petersburg. On 2 March, about eleven protesters demonstrated in Yekaterinburg against Russian involvement, with some wrapped in the Ukrainian flag. Protests were also held in Chelyabinsk on the same day. Opposition to the military intervention was also expressed by rock musician Andrey Makarevich, who wrote in particular: "You want war with Ukraine? It will not be the way it was with Abkhazia: the folks on the Maidan have been hardened and know what they are fighting for – for their country, their independence. ... We have to live with them. Still neighborly. And preferably in friendship. But it's up to them how they want to live". The Professor of the Department of Philosophy at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations Andrey Zubov was fired for his article in Vedomosti, criticising Russian military intervention.

On 2 March, one Moscow resident protested against Russian intervention by holding a "Stop the war" banner, but he was immediately harassed by passers-by. Police then proceeded to arrest him. A woman came forward with a fabricated charge against him, of beating up a child; however, her claim, due to lack of a victim and obviously false, was ignored by the police. Andrei Zubov, a professor at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations, who compared Russian actions in Crimea to the 1938 Annexation of Austria by Nazi Germany, was threatened. Alexander Chuyev, the leader of the pro-Kremlin Spravedlivaya Rossiya party, also objected to Russian intervention in Ukraine. Boris Akunin, a popular Russian writer, predicted that Russia's moves would lead to political and economic isolation.

Russian president Vladimir Putin (seated, middle) speaks to the press on 4 March 2014, denouncing the Revolution of Dignity as an "unconstitutional coup", and insisting that Moscow has a right to protect Russians in Ukraine.

President Putin's approval rating among the Russian public increased by nearly 10% since the crisis began, up to 71.6%, the highest in three years, according to a poll conducted by the All-Russian Center for Public Opinion Research, released on 19 March. Additionally, the same poll showed that more than 90% of Russians supported unification with the Crimean Republic. According to a 2021 study in the American Political Science Review, "three quarters of those who rallied to Putin after Russia annexed Crimea were engaging in at least some form of dissembling and that this rallying developed as a rapid cascade, with social media joining television in fueling perceptions this was socially desirable".

On 4 March, at a press conference in Novo-Ogaryovo, President Putin expressed his view on the situation that if a revolution took place in Ukraine, it would be a new country with which Russia had not concluded any treaties. He offered an analogy with the events of 1917 in Russia, when as a result of the revolution the Russian Empire fell apart and a new state was created. However, he stated Ukraine would still have to honour its debts.

Around 100,000 people gathered in Crimean Sevastopol at Victory Day parade

Russian politicians speculated that there were already 143,000 Ukrainian refugees in Russia. The Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs refuted those claims of refugee increases in Russia. At a briefing on 4 March 2014, the director of the department of information policy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Yevhen Perebiynis said that Russia was misinforming its own citizens as well as the entire international community to justify its own actions in the Crimea.

On 5 March, an anchor of the Russian-controlled TV channel RT America, Abby Martin, criticized her employer's biased coverage of the military invervention. Also on 5 March 2014, another RT America anchor, Liz Wahl, of the network's Washington, DC bureau, resigned on air, explaining that she could not be "part of a network that whitewashes the actions of Putin" and citing her Hungarian ancestry and the memory of the Soviet repression of the Hungarian Uprising as a factor in her decision.

In early March, Igor Andreyev, a 75-year-old survivor of the Siege of Leningrad, attended an anti-war rally against the Russian intervention in Crimea and was holding a sign that read "Peace to the World". The riot police arrested him, and a local pro-government lawyer then accused him of being a supporter of "fascism". The retiree, who lived on a 6,500-ruble monthly pension, was fined 10,000 rubles.

Prominent dissident Mikhail Khodorkovsky said that Crimea should stay within Ukraine with broader autonomy.

Tatarstan, a republic within Russia populated by Volga Tatars, has sought to alleviate concerns about the treatment of Tatars by Russia, as Tatarstan is an oil-rich and economically successful republic in Russia. On 5 March, President of Tatarstan Rustam Minnikhanov signed an agreement on co-operation between Tatarstan and the Aksyonov government in Crimea that implied collaboration between ten government institutions as well as significant financial aid to Crimea from Tatarstan businesses. On 11 March, Minnikhanov was in Crimea on his second visit and attended as a guest in the Crimean parliament chamber during the vote on the declaration of sovereignty pending 16 March referendum. The Tatarstan's Mufti Kamil Samigullin invited Crimean Tatars to study in madrasas in Kazan, and declared support for their "brothers in faith and blood". Mustafa Dzhemilev, a former leader of the Crimean Tatar Majlis, believed that forces that were suspected to be Russian forces should leave the Crimean Peninsula, and asked the UN Security Council to send peacekeepers into the region.

Hotel in Kerch, Crimea, 2015

On 15 March, thousands of protesters (estimates varying from 3,000 by official sources up to 50,000 claimed by the opposition) in Moscow marched against Russian involvement in Ukraine, many waving Ukrainian flags. At the same time, a pro-government (and pro-referendum) rally occurred across the street, counting in the thousands as well (officials claiming 27,000 with the opposition claiming about 10,000).

In February 2015, the leading independent Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta obtained documents, allegedly written by oligarch Konstantin Malofeev and others, which provided the Russian government with a strategy in the event of Viktor Yanukovych's removal from power and the break-up of Ukraine, which were considered likely. The documents outline plans for annexation of Crimea and the eastern portions of the country, closely describing the events that actually followed after Yanukovych's fall. The documents also describe plans for a public relations campaign that would seek to justify Russian actions.

In June 2015 Mikhail Kasyanov stated that all Russian Duma decisions on Crimea annexation were illegal from the international point of view and the annexation was provoked by false accusations of discrimination of Russian nationals in Ukraine.

As of January 2019, Arkady Rotenberg through his Stroygazmontazh LLC and his companies building the Crimean Bridge along with Nikolai Shamalov and Yuri Kovalchuk through their Rossiya Bank have become the most important investors in Russia's development of the annexed Crimea.

International response

Main article: International reactions to the annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation Further information: Political status of Crimea and United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 See also: Crimea Platform
International reaction to the 2014 Crimean crisis according to official governmental statements.   Condemnation of Russian actions as a military intervention or invasion  Condemnation of Russian actions  Support for Ukrainian territorial integrity  Statements only voicing concern or hope for peaceful resolution to the conflict  Recognition of Russian interests  Support for Russian actions and/or condemnation of the Ukrainian interim government
  Ukraine  Russia  No official statements / No data available

There has been a range of international reactions to the annexation. In March 2014, the UN General Assembly passed a non-binding resolution 100 in favour, 11 against and 58 abstentions in the 193-nation assembly that declared Crimea's Moscow-backed referendum invalid. In a move supported by the Lithuanian president, the United States government imposed sanctions against persons they deem to have violated or assisted in the violation of Ukraine's sovereignty. The European Union suspended talks with Russia on economic and visa-related matters, and is considering more stringent sanctions against Russia in the near future, including asset freezes. while Japan announced sanctions which include suspension of talks relating to military, space, investment, and visa requirements. The United Kingdom qualified the referendum vote in Crimea of being "farcical", "illegal" and "illegitimate".

Ukraine and other countries claim that Russia has signed a number of treaties guaranteeing Ukrainian territorial integrity. These include the 1991 Belavezha Accords that established the Commonwealth of Independent States, the 1975 Helsinki Accords, the 1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances and the 1997 Treaty on friendship, cooperation and partnership between the Russian Federation and Ukraine.

The European Commission decided on 11 March 2014 to enter into a full free-trade agreement with Ukraine within the year. On 12 March, the European Parliament rejected the upcoming referendum on independence in Crimea, which they saw as manipulated and contrary to international and Ukrainian law. The G7 bloc of developed nations (the G8 minus Russia) made a joint statement condemning Russia and announced that they would suspend preparations for the planned G8 summit in Sochi in June. NATO condemned Russia's military escalation in Crimea and stated that it was a breach of international law while the Council of Europe expressed its full support for the territorial integrity and national unity of Ukraine. The Visegrád Group has issued a joint statement urging Russia to respect Ukraine's territorial integrity and for Ukraine to take into account its minority groups to not further break fragile relations. It has urged for Russia to respect Ukrainian and international law and in line with the provisions of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.

China said "We respect the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine". A spokesman restated China's belief of non-interference in the internal affairs of other nations and urged dialogue.

The Indian government called for a peaceful resolution of the situation. Both Syria and Venezuela openly support Russian military action. Syrian president Bashar al-Assad said that he supports Putin's efforts to "restore security and stability in the friendly country of Ukraine", while Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro condemned Ukraine's "ultra-nationalist" coup. Sri Lanka described Yanukovych's removal as unconstitutional and considered Russia's concerns in Crimea as justified.

Polish prime minister Donald Tusk called for a change in EU energy policy as Germany's dependence on Russian gas poses risks for Europe.

On 13 March 2014, German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned the Russian government it risks massive damage to Russia, economically and politically, if it refuses to change course on Ukraine, though close economic links between Germany and Russia significantly reduce the scope for any sanctions.

After Russia moved to formally incorporate Crimea, some worried whether it may do the same in other regions. US deputy national security advisor Tony Blinken said that the Russian troops massed on the eastern Ukrainian border may be preparing to enter the country's eastern regions. Russian officials stated that Russian troops would not enter other areas. US Air Force Gen. Philip M. Breedlove, NATO's supreme allied commander in Europe, warned that the same troops were in a position to take over the separatist Russian-speaking Moldovan province of Transnistria. President of Moldova Nicolae Timofti warned Russia with not attempting to do this to avoid damaging its international status further.

On 9 April, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe deprived Russia of voting rights.

On 14 August, while visiting Crimea, Vladimir Putin ruled out pushing beyond Crimea. He undertook to do everything he could to end the conflict in Ukraine, saying Russia needed to build calmly and with dignity, not by confrontation and war which isolated it from the rest of the world.

United Nations resolutions

UN Security Council vote on a draft resolution condemning the 2014 Crimean referendum.   Voted in favour of the resolution   Abstained   Vetoed the resolutionUN General Assembly vote on the resolution condemning the 2014 Crimean referendum.   In favour of considering the referendum illegal   Abstained   Absent when the vote took place   Against adopting the resolution For a more comprehensive list, see List of vetoed United Nations Security Council resolutions.

On 15 March 2014, a US-sponsored resolution that went to a vote in the UN Security Council to reaffirm that council's commitment to Ukraine's "sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity" was not approved. Though a total of 13 council members voted in favour of the resolution and China abstained, Russia vetoed the resolution.

On 27 March 2014, the UN General Assembly approved a resolution describing the referendum leading to annexation of Crimea by Russia as illegal. The draft resolution, which was titled "Territorial integrity of Ukraine", was co-sponsored by Canada, Costa Rica, Germany, Lithuania, Poland, Ukraine and the US. It affirmed the council's commitment to the "sovereignty, political independence, unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognised borders". The resolution tried to underscore that 16 March referendum held in Crimea and the city of Sevastopol has no validity and cannot form the basis for any alteration of the status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or of the city of Sevastopol. The resolution got 100 votes in its favour, while 11 nations voted against and 58 countries abstained from the vote. The resolution was non-binding and the vote was largely symbolic.

Since 2014, the UN General Assembly has voted several times, most recently in December 2019, to affirm Ukraine's territorial integrity, condemn the 'temporary occupation' of Crimea, and reaffirm nonrecognition of its annexation.

International recognition

Afghanistan, Cuba, North Korea, Kyrgyzstan, Nicaragua, Sudan, Syria, and Zimbabwe have recognised the result of the 2014 referendum in Crimea.

Four non-UN member states recognised the results of the referendum: Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Artsakh and Transnistria. The Transnistrian foreign minister, Nina Shtanski, recognized Crimea's annexation by Russia. Transnistria sent a request on 18 March 2014 to join the Russian Federation following the Crimean example and in compliance with the Admission Law provisions. The regional councils of Italy's northern regions Lombardy, Liguria and Veneto adopted a non-binding resolution on recognizing Crimea as part of Russia, but they revoked it in 2022 after Russia invaded Ukraine.

Sanctions

Further information: International sanctions during the Ukrainian crisis and List of individuals sanctioned during the Ukrainian crisis
Ukrainian checkpoint at Kalanchak, entering Kherson Oblast from Russian-occupied Crimea.

Sanctions were imposed to prevent officials and politicians from travelling to Canada, the United States, or the European Union. They were the most wide-ranging applied to Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union.

Japan announced milder sanctions than the US and EU. These include suspension of talks relating to military, space, investment, and visa requirements.

In response to the sanctions introduced by the US and EU, the Russian Duma unanimously passed a resolution asking for all members of the Duma to be included on the sanctions list. Head of the Just Russia party Sergei Mironov said he was proud of being included on the sanctions list: "It is with pride that I have found myself on the black list, this means they have noticed my stance on Crimea". Russian companies started pulling billions of dollars out of Western banks to avoid having their asset frozen.

Three days after the lists were published, the Russian Foreign Ministry published a reciprocal sanctions list of US citizens, which consisted of 10 names, including House Speaker John Boehner, Senator John McCain, and two advisers to President Obama. The ministry said in a statement: "We have repeatedly warned that sanctions are a double-edged instrument and would hit the United States like a boomerang". Several of those sanctioned responded with pride at their inclusion on the list, including John Boehner, John McCain, Bob Menendez, Dan Coats, Mary Landrieu, and Harry Reid.

On 24 March, Russia imposed retaliatory sanctions on 13 Canadian officials including members of the Parliament of Canada, banning them from entering Russia. Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird, said the sanctions were "a badge of honour". Former Minister of Justice Irwin Cotler also said that he considered the sanctions a badge of honour, not a mark of exclusion.

"The good news is that so far, Russia has shown no inclination to use the Northern Distribution Network as leverage in the wake of US retaliation for its troop movements in Crimea".

Expanded Western sanctions in mid-March coursed through financial markets, hitting the business interests of some of Russia's richest people. The Americans centred on the heart of Moscow's leadership, though the EU's initial list shied from targeting Putin's inner circle. As ratings agencies Fitch and Standard & Poor's downgraded Russia's credit outlook, Russian banks warned of a sanctions-induced recession, the country braced for capital outflows for the first three months of 2014 to reach $70 billion, more than the entirety of outflows for 2013, and Russian government-bond issues plummeted by three-quarters compared with the same period the previous year. Novatek, Russia's second-largest gas producer, saw $2.5bn in market value wiped out when its shares sank by nearly 10%, rendering Putin's close friend Gennady Timchenko, who has a 23% stake in the company, $575m poorer. "I do hope that there is some serious diplomatic activity going on behind the scenes," said one Russian banker, though others were more sanguine on the question of whether the sanctions would have any enduring effect, and Russians, top and bottom, seemed defiant. The official Russian response was mixed.

The then Minister of Economic Development of the Russian Federation Alexey Ulyukaev said that introduction of sectoral sanctions will lead to a serious decline of the Russian economy: economic growth of Russia will become seriously negative, the growth of volumes of investment will be even more negative, inflation will rise, and government revenues and reserves will go down.

As well as differences between the United States and Europe as a whole as to how to respond to the Russian-backed incursion, those same differences have played out among Eastern European countries.

A number of Russian citizens reported that they have been denied European visas after they visited Crimea after annexation. A Russian consumer protection watchdog OZPP published a warning for Russian tourists about this risk, explaining that from the international law point of view, Crimea is an occupied territory, after which Roskomnadzor blocked the OZPP website "for threatening territorial integrity of Russian Federation".

In response to having its voting rights revoked, Russia in June 2017 suspended its budget payments to the Council of Europe, with Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov stating payments would not resume until all rights of Russia's delegation were fully restored. Council Secretary General Thorbjørn Jagland has suggested lifting the sanctions to avoid the impact of mounting budgetary restraints. However, Council members such as Ukraine and its supporters have argued that readmitting Russia without demanding concessions in return would amount to "caving to Russian 'blackmail'".

Mapping

Further information: Cartographic aggression
Location of the Crimea Federal District within Russia in 2014.
  • The United Nations maps Crimea as belonging to Ukraine.
  • National Geographic Society stated that their policy is "to portray current reality" and "Crimea, if it is formally annexed by Russia, would be shaded gray", but also further remarked that this step does not suggest recognising the legitimacy of such. As of April 2014, Crimea was still displayed as part of Ukraine.
  • As of April 2014, Google Maps displays Crimea as a disputed territory to most viewers. For the Russian and Ukrainian versions of the website, Crimea is marked as belonging to the corresponding country (Russia or Ukraine respectively). Google stated that it "work(s) with sources to get the best interpretation of the border or claim lines".
  • Yandex displays Crimea as part of Russia for .ru and .com domains since the end of March 2014. According to the official statement, the company works with users from different countries and "displays reality that surrounds them".
  • As of March 2014, Bing Maps, OpenStreetMap and HERE displayed Crimea as belonging to Ukraine. In particular, OpenStreetMap requested its users to refrain from editing borders and administrative relations of subdivisions located in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol until 31 May 2014. On 5 June 2014, OpenStreetMap switched to a territorial dispute option, displaying Crimea as a disputed territory belonging to both countries.
  • In 2015, on the PepsiCo website, a Russian-language map was visible for a few days that depicted Crimea as a part of Russia.
  • The 2016 edition of a French atlas published by Larousse shows Crimea as part of Russian territory: Oleh Shamshur, Ukrainian Ambassador to France, expressed shock. Shortly after, Larousse changed the map to reflect Crimea as part of Ukraine on the Atlas on their internet version.
  • The Italian-language magazine of geopolitics Limes maps Crimea as a part of Russia since December 2015. Following protests from the Ukrainian embassy in Italy, the magazine editor Lucio Caracciolo wrote that "the map reflects reality. When Crimea and Sevastopol will be back under effective Ukrainian sovereignty, we will produce a map that reflects such reality".
  • The Russian version of Apple's App Store began to show Crimea as part of Russia on 27 November 2019.

Analysis

Researchers consider the subsequent annexation of Crimea to be a coup, because the Russian military seized Crimea's parliament and government buildings and instigated the replacement of its government with Russian proxies. In particular, political scientist Olga Burlyuk defines Crimea events as "a coup d’état of a regional scale".

See also

Notes

  1. There are "some contradictions and inherent problems" regarding the date on which the Russian operation began. The Ukrainian Government maintains, and the European Court of Human Rights agrees, that Russia controlled Crimea from 27 February 2014, when unmarked Russian special forces took control of its political institutions. The Russian Government later made 27 February "Special Operations Forces Day". In 2015, the Ukrainian parliament officially designated 20 February 2014 as "the beginning of the temporary occupation of Crimea and Sevastopol by Russia", citing the date inscribed on the Russian medal "For the Return of Crimea". In 2018, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed that the earlier "start date" on the medal was due to a "technical misunderstanding". President Putin stated in a film about the annexation that he ordered the operation to "restore" Crimea to Russia following an all-night emergency meeting on 22–23 February 2014.
  2. It also noted that "certain politicians, local government officials, leaders of civil society organizations, and radically inclined individuals have attempted to create grounds for escalating the civil conflict, and have spread autonomous and separatist attitudes among the people, which could lead to the demise of our as a united nation and loss of its national sovereignty." In addition, the statement said that certain lawmakers of every level have begun separatist negotiations with representatives of foreign nations. "Open consultations are being held on the possible division of the country into separate parts in violation of the Ukrainian constitution," read the statement. "This could lead to an escalation of conflict between different sectors of society, inciting ethnic or religious hatred and military conflict."
  3. The date was given by Putin in Russian film commemorating the annexation of Crimea, however, the inscription on the Medal "For the Return of Crimea", awarded by the Russian Ministry of Defence state put 20 February as the starting date
  4. Dilanian (2014) on 3 March, "CIA director John Brennan told a senior lawmaker Monday that a 1997 treaty between Russia and Ukraine allows up to 25,000 Russia troops in the vital Crimea region, so Russia may not consider its recent troop movements to be an invasion, U.S. officials said."
  5. The treaty between Russia and pro-Russian Aksyonov government of Crimea, signed on that date, specified that Crimea would be considered incorporated into Russia since the date of signing. The document entered into force on 1 April 2014, but pending that was applied provisionally since very signing.
  6. If an official position can be sorted in more than one category, the "strongest" position was marked (from the "call for a peaceful resolution" to "interpretation as a military intervention" consecutively). For the sources see the image description.

References

  1. ^ McDermott, Roger N. (2016). "Brothers Disunited: Russia's use of military power in Ukraine". In Black, J.L.; Johns, Michael (eds.). The Return of the Cold War: Ukraine, the West and Russia. London: Routledge. pp. 99–129. doi:10.4324/9781315684567-5. ISBN 978-1-138-92409-3. OCLC 909325250.
  2. "Ukraine v. Russia (re Crimea) (decision)". European Court of Human Rights. January 2021. The Ukrainian Government maintains that the Russian Federation has from 27 February 2014 exercised effective control over the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol ... There was sufficient evidence that during the relevant period the respondent State had exercised effective control over Crimea.
  3. Sasse, Gwendolyn (2023). Russia's War Against Ukraine. Wiley & Sons. p. 2004. Russia's war against Ukraine began with the annexation of Crimea on 27 February 2014. On that day, Russian special forces without any uniform insignia appeared in Crimea, quickly taking control of strategic, military and political institutions.
  4. DeBenedictis, Kent (2022). Russian 'Hybrid Warfare' and the Annexation of Crimea. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 140. During the night of 26–27 February, Russian special forces without insignia departed Sevastopol ... They arrived at the Crimean Rada and Council of Ministers buildings in Simferopol, disarmed the security and took control of the buildings ... Putin later signed a decree designating 27 February as Special Operations Forces Day in Russia.
  5. "'Няша' Поклонська обіцяє бійцям 'Беркута' покарати учасників Майдану". www.segodnya.ua (in Ukrainian). Retrieved 3 February 2022.
  6. "7683rd meeting of the United Nations Security Council. Thursday, 28 April 2016, 3 p.m. New York". Mr. Prystaiko (Ukraine): I have to remind the Council that the official medal that was produced by the Russian Federation for the so-called return of Crimea has the dates on it, starting with 20 February, which is the day before that agreement was brought to the attention of the Security Council by the representative of the Russian Federation. Therefore, the Russian Federation started – not just planned, but started – the annexation of Crimea the day before we reached the first agreement and while President Yanukovych was still in power.
  7. "Russia's Orwellian 'diplomacy'". unian.info. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  8. ^ "Putin reveals secrets of Russia's Crimea takeover plot". BBC News. 9 March 2015.
  9. ^ "Vladimir Putin describes secret meeting when Russia decided to seize Crimea". The Guardian. Agence France-Presse. 9 March 2015. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
  10. Kofman, Michael (2017). Lessons from Russia's Operations in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine (PDF). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. ISBN 978-0-8330-9617-3. OCLC 990544142. By March 26, the annexation was essentially complete, and Russia began returning seized military hardware to Ukraine.
  11. ^ Galeotti, Mark (2019). Armies of Russia's War in Ukraine. Elite 228. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. pp. 11–12. ISBN 978-1-4728-3344-0.
  12. У Севастополі росіяни пригнали «Тигр» для штурму українців Archived 10 November 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  13. "Russian Citizen Elected Sevastopol Mayor Amid Pro-Moscow Protests in Crimea". The Moscow Times. 24 February 2014.
  14. ^ "Ukraine leader Turchynov warns of 'danger of separatism'". Euronews. 25 February 2014. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
  15. "Russian flags flood Crimean capital as thousands back takeover by Russia". The Straits Times. 9 March 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  16. "Pro-Russian rally in Crimea decries Kiev 'bandits'". The Washington Post. 25 February 2014.
  17. Pollard, Ruth (13 March 2014). "Russia closing door on Crimea as troops build up". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
  18. "Crimean Tatars, pro-Russia supporters approach Crimean parliament building". UA. Interfax. 20 October 2012.
  19. "Russia puts military on high alert as Crimea protests leave one man dead". The Guardian. 26 February 2014. Retrieved 27 February 2014.
  20. Ewen MacAskill, defence correspondent (28 February 2014). "Ukraine military still a formidable force despite being dwarfed by neighbour". The Guardian. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  21. "Putin Talks Tough But Cools Tensions Over Ukraine". NPR. 4 March 2014. Archived from the original on 5 March 2014. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
  22. Faiola, Anthony (17 March 2014). "Ukraine mobilizes reservists but relies on diplomacy". The Washington Post. Retrieved 24 March 2014.
  23. Heather Saul; Kim Sengupta (19 March 2014). "Ukraine crisis: Pro-Russian troops storm naval base as Clinton warns of 'aggression' from Putin". The Independent. Retrieved 24 March 2015.
  24. "Russian marine kills Ukraine navy officer in Crimea, says ministry". Reuters. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
  25. Aleksander Vasovic; Gabriela Baczynska (24 March 2014). "Ukraine military to pull out from Crimea". The Sudbury Star. Reuters. Retrieved 24 March 2014.
  26. "Russia employs over 16,000 former servicemen and personnel of Ukrainian armed forces". TASS. 15 April 2014. Retrieved 6 April 2020.
  27. "Бывшие украинские военнослужащие вливаются в Вооруженные Силы РФ" [Former Ukrainian military join the Russian Armed Forces]. Novyy Sevastopol (new-sebastopol.com). 25 April 2014. Retrieved 6 April 2020.
  28. "Two die in rallies outside Crimean parliament, says ex-head of Mejlis". Kyiv Post. 26 February 2014. Retrieved 27 February 2014.
  29. JC Finley (27 February 2014). "Unrest in Crimea leaves 2 dead; government buildings seized". United Press International. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  30. Погибший крымский татарин шел в военкомат, захваченный 'дружинниками' [The deceased was a Crimean Tatar on his way to enlist when he was captured "vigilantes"]. LB.ua (in Russian). 17 March 2014. Archived from the original on 18 March 2014. Retrieved 24 March 2015.
  31. Зверски убитого крымского татарина звали Решат Аметов. Трое малолетних детей осиротели. [Brutally murdered Crimean Tatar's name was Reshat Ametov. Three toddlers left orphaned.]. censor.net.ua (in Russian). 18 March 2014. Retrieved 3 April 2014.
  32. ФСБ и крымские "потеряшки" (tr. "FSB and Crimean "losses"") — RFEL, 13 June 2016
  33. "Гюндуз Мамедов, прокурор АР Крим: 'Під процесуальним керівництвом прокуратури АР Крим розкрито викрадення кримськотатарського активіста Решата Аметова'" . Prosecutor's office of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol city, 10 September 2019
  34. Lessons from Russia's Operations in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, page 19, published by RAND Corporation in 2017. "Ukraine's government was in transition following the ouster of Yanukovych. As a result, it did not react to the Russian operation when launched. Russia's task was made relatively easy by the confusion and chaos that generally follows an uprising, such as what happened in Kyiv. Moscow capitalized on the tensions and uncertainty in Crimea, as well as on the inexperience of Ukraine's provisional government. Meeting notes of the discussion among Ukrainian leadership reveal a great deal of anxiety, uncertainty, and unwillingness to take action for fear of escalation."
  35. "Parliament of ARC is doing everything possible to separate Crimea from Ukraine, Chubarov said". Archived from the original on 21 June 2015.
  36. Weaver, Courtney (15 March 2015). "Putin was ready to put nuclear weapons on alert in Crimea crisis". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 11 February 2021. Retrieved 23 January 2022.
  37. Simon Shuster (10 March 2014). "Putin's Man in Crimea Is Ukraine's Worst Nightmare". Time. Retrieved 8 March 2015. Before dawn on Feb. 27, at least two dozen heavily armed men stormed the Crimean parliament building and the nearby headquarters of the regional government, bringing with them a cache of assault rifles and rocket propelled grenades. A few hours later, Aksyonov walked into the parliament and, after a brief round of talks with the gunmen, began to gather a quorum of the chamber's lawmakers.
  38. De Carbonnel, Alissa (13 March 2014). "RPT-INSIGHT-How the separatists delivered Crimea to Moscow". Reuters. Retrieved 8 March 2015. Only a week after gunmen planted the Russian flag on the local parliament, Aksyonov and his allies held another vote and declared parliament was appealing to Putin to annex Crimea
  39. ^ Baczynska, Gabriela; Toyer, Julien (5 March 2014). Gutterman, Steve (ed.). "Russia says cannot order Crimean 'self-defense' units back to base". Reuters.
  40. ^ "Putin reveals secrets of Russia's Crimea takeover plot". BBC News. 9 March 2015. Retrieved 9 March 2015.
    Soldatkin, Vladimir; Stamp, David (9 March 2014). "Putin says plan to take Crimea hatched before referendum". Reuters. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
  41. ^ Ilya Somin (6 May 2014). "Russian government agency reveals fraudulent nature of the Crimean referendum results". The Washington Post.
  42. ^ Про дострокове припинення повноважень Верховної Ради Автономної Республіки Крим [On the dissolution of the Verkhovna Rada of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea]. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (in Ukrainian). 15 March 2014.
  43. "Four years since Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea". Government.no. 14 March 2018. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
  44. "Annexation of Crimea". UaWarExplained.com. 29 March 2022. Archived from the original on 6 June 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  45. ""Russia Threatens Nuclear Strikes Over Crimea"". The Diplomat. 11 July 2014. Retrieved 22 September 2021.
  46. Bruno Waterfield; Peter Dominiczak; David Blair; The Daily Telegraph (24 March 2014). "Russia Temporarily Kicked Out of G8 Club of Rich Countries". Business Insider. Retrieved 8 March 2015.
  47. "UN General Assembly adopts resolution affirming Ukraine's territorial integrity". China Central Television. 28 March 2014. Archived from the original on 4 March 2018. Retrieved 8 March 2015.
  48. "United Nations A/RES/68/262 General Assembly" (PDF). United Nations. 1 April 2014. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  49. "ODS HOME PAGE" (PDF). documents-dds-ny.un.org.
  50. ^ Mike Collett-White; Ronald Popeski (16 March 2014). "Crimeans vote over 90 percent to quit Ukraine for Russia". Reuters. Retrieved 8 March 2015.
  51. Boris N. Mamlyuk (6 July 2015). "The Ukraine Crisis, Cold War II, and International Law". The German Law Journal. SSRN 2627417.
  52. "Указ Президента України «Про рішення Ради національної безпеки і оборони України від 11 березня 2021 року "Про Стратегію деокупації та реінтеграції тимчасово окупованої території Автономної Республіки Крим та міста Севастополя"» № 117/2021" [Decree of the President of Ukraine "On the decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine of March 11, 2021" On the Strategy of deoccupation and reintegration of the temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol № 117/2021]. Президента України. 24 March 2021. Archived from the original on 24 March 2021. Retrieved 24 March 2021.
  53. "Seven Years of Illegal Occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea". 4 March 2021.
  54. The Fall of Crimea: One Marine's Story Jesse Granger 29 January 2015 http://www.army.mil, accessed 27 February 2022
  55. "Bitter Crimean Anniversary – Victims of Russian Annexation". khpg.org.
  56. "Минобороны России учредило медаль "За возвращение Крыма"" [Ministry of Defense of Russia established a medal 'For the Return of Crimea'] (in Russian). Gazeta.ru. 25 March 2014. Retrieved 30 August 2014.
  57. "Right of Reply to Russia – "Seventh Anniversary of the Reunification of Crimea with Russia"". U.S. Mission to the OSCE. 18 March 2021. Retrieved 27 February 2022.
  58. Redhouse, J. W. Art. XI.—A Turkish Circle Ode, by Shahin-Ghiray, Khan of the Crimea. With Translation, Memoir of the Author, and a brief Account of the Khanate of the Crimea, its Connexion with Turkey, and its Annexation by Catherine the Second of Russia. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain & Ireland 18, 400-415 (1861). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0035869X00013733
  59. Schönle, A. Garden of the empire: Catherine's appropriation of the Crimea. Slavic Review 60, 1-23 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2307/2697641
  60. {{Cite generic Griffiths, D. M. date = 2008 title = Catherine II discovers the Crimea journal = Jahrbuecher fuer Geschichte Osteuropas doi = volume = 56 issue = Issue pages = 339-348 url = http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.2.041015 accessdate = 2013-02-05 }}
  61. Ragozin, Leonid (16 March 2019). "Annexation of Crimea: A masterclass in political manipulation". Al Jazeera.
  62. Crimea profile – Overview BBC News. Retrieved 30 December 2015
  63. "gorbachev-perestroika". UaWaExplained.com. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  64. Декларация Верховного Совета СССР "О признании незаконными и преступными репрессивных актов против народов, подвергшихся насильственному переселению, и обеспечении их прав" [Declaration of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR "On the recognition of illegal and criminal acts of repression against peoples subjected to forced resettlement, and ensuring their rights"]. www.alexanderyakovlev.org (in Russian). 1989.
  65. "The Crimean Tatars began repatriating on a massive scale beginning in the late 1980s and continuing into the early 1990s. The population of Crimean Tatars in Crimea rapidly reached 250,000 and leveled off at 270,000 where it remains as of this writing . There are believed to be between 30,000 and 100,000 remaining in places of former exile in Central Asia." Greta Lynn Uehling, The Crimean Tatars (Encyclopedia of the Minorities, Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn) iccrimea.org
  66. ДЕКЛАРАЦИЯ О ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОМ И ПРАВОВОМ СТАТУСЕ КРЫМА [DECLARATION ON THE STATE AND LEGAL STATUS OF CRIMEA] (in Russian). 1990.
  67. "Dukrainian-independence-referendum". UaWarExplained. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  68. "Про внесення змін і доповнень до Конституції... від 19 June 1991 № 1213а-XII" [On Amendments to the Constitution ... of 19 June 1991 № 1213a-XII] (in Ukrainian). 19 June 1991.
  69. Parliament of Ukraine (17 November 1994). Декларация о государственном суверенитете Крыма [Declaration on State Sovereignty of Crimea] (in Russian). Government of Ukraine. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  70. Parliament of Ukraine (20 October 1999). О Республике Крым как официальном названии демократического государства Крым [On the Republic of Crimea as the official name of the democratic state of Crimea] (in Russian). Government of Ukraine. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  71. ^ Sasse, Gwendolyn (14 September 2023). Russia's War Against Ukraine. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-5095-6061-5.
  72. Subtelny, Orest (2009). Ukraine: A History Fourth Edition. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-0-8020-8390-6.
  73. Crimea and the Black Sea Fleet in Russian- Ukrainian Relations, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Victor Zaborsky, September 1995
  74. Tsukanova, Anya. Cheney urges divided Ukraine to unite against Russia 'threat' The Sydney Morning Herald (via Associated Press). 6 September 2008.
  75. "media13_files2F26.pdf (Archived copy)" (PDF). www.taraskuzio.net. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 May 2020. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  76. "media24_files2F15.pdf (Archived copy)" (PDF). www.taraskuzio.net. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 January 2020. Retrieved 17 January 2022.
  77. Levy, Clifford J. (28 August 2009). "Russia and Ukraine in Intensifying Standoff". The New York Times. Retrieved 28 February 2014.
  78. Ukraine's sharp divisions". BBC News. 23 April 2014.
  79. "The Crimea: Europe's Next Flashpoint?" (PDF). Peacepalacelibrary.nl. 30 November 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2016. Retrieved 11 April 2017.
  80. Varettoni, William (21 June 2011). "Crimea's Overlooked Instability". The Washington Quarterly. 34 (3): 87–99. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2011.588128. ISSN 0163-660X. S2CID 154003492.
  81. "political-part-of-the-association-agreement-with-eu". UaWarExplained.com. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  82. ^ "yanukovych". UaWarExplained.com. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  83. Крымский парламент решил ещё раз поддержать Азарова и заклеймить оппозицию (The Crimean parliament has decided to once again support Azarov and condemn the opposition) – Европейская правда, 27 ноября 2013
  84. Решение ВР АРК от 27 November 2013 № 1477-6/13 "О политической ситуации" [Decision of the Verkhovna Rada of the ARC of November 27, 2013 № 1477–6 / 13 "On the political situation"]. rada.crimea.ua (in Russian). 27 November 2013. Archived from the original on 29 March 2014.
  85. Заявление ВР АРК от 22 January 2014 № 29-6/14-ВР "О политической ситуации" [Statement of the Verkhovna Rada of the ARC of 22 January 2014 № 29-6 / 14-VR "On the political situation"]. rada.crimea.ua (in Russian). 22 January 2014. Archived from the original on 26 January 2014.
  86. ^ The Chronicles of Alienation; The annexation of Crimea from 2 December 2013, through 4 April 2014, The Ukrainian Week (16 March 2015)
  87. Защитить статус и полномочия Крыма! [Protect the status and powers of Crimea!]. rada.crimea.ua (in Russian). 4 February 2014. Archived from the original on 3 March 2014.
  88. "Крымские татары готовы дать отпор попыткам отторжения автономии от Украины – Чубаров" [Crimean Tatars are ready to repel attempts to reject autonomy from Ukraine – Chubarov.]. Ukrainian Independent Information Agency. 16 February 2014. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  89. "Ukraine crisis: Timeline". BBC News. 13 November 2014. Retrieved 20 October 2015.
  90. "Archrival Is Freed as Ukraine Leader Flees". The New York Times. 22 February 2014. Retrieved 23 February 2014.
  91. "Rada removes Yanukovych from office, schedules new elections for May 25". Interfax-Ukraine. 22 February 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2015.
  92. Sindelar, Daisy (23 February 2014). "Was Yanukovych's Ouster Constitutional?". Rferl.org. Radio Free Europe, Radio Liberty. Retrieved 25 February 2014.
  93. "Ukraine MPs appoint interim president as Yanukovych allies dismissed – 23 February as it happened". The Guardian. 23 February 2014. Retrieved 12 June 2014.
  94. RICHTER, ANDREI G. (2015). International Journal of Communication (19328036). 9: 3125–3126 https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=110802762&site=eds-live&scope=site. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  95. Gerber, Theodore P; Zavisca, Jane (Summer 2016). "Does Russian Propaganda Work?". Washington Quarterly. 39 (2): 79–98. doi:10.1080/0163660X.2016.1204398.
  96. Tomkiw, Lydia. "For Ukraine's Wartime Fact-Checkers, the Battle Rages On". Wilson Quarterly. Winter2018: 1.
  97. ^ Putin on Ukraine crisis: 'It is an unconstitutional coup', BBC News (4 March 2014)
  98. ^ Ukraine defends vote despite unrest, Putin pledges 'respect', Reuters (24 March 2014)
  99. ^ Maria Popova, Oxana Shevel (8 November 2023). Russia and Ukraine: Entangled Histories, Diverging States. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-5095-5738-7.
  100. ^ Wilson, Andrew (18 November 2014). Ukraine Crisis: What It Means for the West. Yale University Press. pp. 108, 110. ISBN 978-0-300-21292-1.
  101. ^ Mychailo Wynnyckyj (30 April 2019). Ukraine's Maidan, Russia's War. BoD – Books on Demand. p. 28. ISBN 978-3-8382-1327-9.
  102. In Yalta was organized Euromaidan, in Sevastopol were demanding to imprison the opposition Archived 28 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine19 February 2014
  103. Рокировки в СБУ. Кто такие Маликов, Остафийчук и Фролов [Castling the SBU. Who are Malikov, Ostafiychuk and Frolov]. Novoe Vremia (in Russian). 25 June 2015. Retrieved 1 January 2016.
  104. Arel, Dominique; Driscoll, Jesse (5 January 2023). Ukraine's Unnamed War: Before The Russian Invasion of 2022. Cambridge University Press. pp. 105–106. ISBN 9781316511497.
  105. "EuroMaidan rallies in Ukraine". Kyiv Post. 21 February 2014. Archived from the original on 21 February 2014.
  106. "Regions Party gets 80 of 100 seats on Crimean parliament". Interfax-Ukraine. 11 November 2010. Archived from the original on 1 December 2008.
  107. "Regions of Crimea meeting didn't address separation of Crimea from Ukraine – deputy prime minister of Crimea". Interfax-Ukraine. 21 February 2014. Archived from the original on 1 December 2008.
  108. "putin-as-heir-of-yeltsin". UaWarExplained.com. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  109. Прем'єр Криму Могильов заявляє, що виконуватиме нові закони [Crimean Prime Minister Mogilev says it will comply with new laws] (in Ukrainian). Radio Svoboda. 23 February 2014. Archived from the original on 1 December 2008.
  110. "Protesters set a flag of Russia on the building of Crimean Parliament".
  111. У Криму вимагають розпуску парламенту автономії і знесення пам'ятника Леніну [Crimea demands the dissolution of the parliament of autonomy and the demolition of the monument to Lenin] (in Ukrainian). Radio Svoboda. 23 February 2014. Archived from the original on 1 December 2008.
  112. "Ukraine crisis fuels secession calls in pro-Russian south". The Guardian. 24 February 2014. Archived from the original on 1 December 2008.
  113. ^ Bogdan Huzar (23 February 2014). "Rosja przygotowuje się do zbrojnej interwencji na Ukrainie?" [Russia is preparing for military intervention in Ukraine?]. Newsweek Polska (in Polish). Archived from the original on 24 February 2014.
  114. "В Керчи митингующие сорвали украинский флаг и мэрии и повесили российский: Новости УНИАН" [In Kerch, protesters tore down the Ukrainian flag and the mayor's office and hung up the Russian one: News from UNIAN]. Ukrainian Independent Information Agency. Retrieved 24 February 2014.
  115. "У Севастополі вимагають віддати владу вибраному на мітингу меру ; Українська правда" [In Sevastopol demand to hand over power to the "chosen" at the "mayor" rally; Ukrainian Pravda]. Ukrayinska Pravda. Retrieved 24 February 2014.
  116. "Ukraine Liveblog: Day 7 – Decoding Documents & Indicting Dictators". The Interpreter. 24 February 2014. Archived from the original on 1 March 2014.
  117. Влада Севастополя визнала нову Верховну Раду [Sevastopol authorities recognised new Verkhovna Rada]. unian.ua (in Ukrainian). Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  118. Севастопольцы чуть не разгромили администрацию, но все же добились обещания передать все дела Алексею Чалому [Sevastopolitans nearly destroyed city administration, but got a promise to hand all affairs over to Chaly]. News of Sevastopol (in Russian). 24 February 2014. Archived from the original on 17 October 2016. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  119. Mark Nordberg (1998). "3. State and Institution Building in Ukraine". In Taras Kuzio (ed.). Contemporary Ukraine: Dynamics of Post-Soviet Transformation. M.E. Sharpe. p. 44. ISBN 978-0-7656-3150-3.
  120. ^ Howard Amos (25 February 2014). "Ukraine: Sevastopol installs pro-Russian mayor as separatism fears grow". The Guardian.
  121. От парламента Крыма потребовали провести референдум об отделении от Украины [ demand that Crimean parliament hold referendum on separation from Ukraine]. "e-Crimea" News agency (in Russian). 25 February 2014. Archived from the original on 3 March 2014. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  122. Противники центральной власти пригрозили захватом парламента Крыма [Opponents of the central government threatened to seize Crimean parliament]. "e-Crimea" News agency (in Russian). 25 February 2014. Archived from the original on 8 March 2014. Retrieved 30 January 2019.
  123. Пророссийские силы заблокировали ВР Крыма, требуют референдума о независимости: парламент собирается на внеочередное заседание. [Pro-Russian forces blocked the Verkhovna Rada of Crimea demanding an independence referendum: Parliament to meet in an extraordinary session.] (in Russian). censor.net.ua. 25 February 2014.
  124. Активисты Крыма требуют отделения полуострова от Украины [Activists demand separation of Crimea from Ukraine] (in Russian). rbc.ru. 25 February 2014. Archived from the original on 23 December 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2015.
  125. Crimean Tatars, pro-Russia supporters approach Crimean parliament building, Interfax-Ukraine (26 February 2014)
  126. У парламенті Криму заявили, що не планують відділятись від України [Crimean parliament stated they did not plan to separate from Ukraine]. Ukrayinska Pravda (in Ukrainian). 26 February 2014.
  127. "Crimean Parliament doesn't raise a question of separation from Ukraine, speaker said".
  128. Татари розійшлися створювати самооборону, щоб захищати Крим [Tartars dispersed to organise themselves to defend Crimea]. Ukrayinksa Pravda (in Ukrainian). 26 February 2014.
  129. Crimean Tatars leave parliament square; Russian Unity supporters continue rally, Interfax-Ukraine (26 February 2014)
  130. Crimean police ordered to prevent clashes at any cost, Interfax-Ukraine (26 February 2014)
  131. Ukraine asking UN to monitor security situation in Crimea round the clock, says security service chief, Interfax-Ukraine (26 February 2014)
  132. Mark MacKinnon (26 February 2014). "Globe in Ukraine: Russian-backed fighters restrict access to Crimean city". The Globe and Mail.
  133. "Lessons identified in Crimea – does Estonia's national defence model meet our needs?". Estonian World. 5 May 2014. Retrieved 26 June 2022. about 30–50 Russian special forces members entered and occupied the parliament and government buildings of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea
  134. Andrew Higgins; Steven Erlanger (27 February 2014). "Gunmen Seize Government Buildings in Crimea". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 February 2015.
  135. Gumuchian, Marie-Louise; Smith-Spark, Laura; Formanek, Ingrid (27 February 2014). "Gunmen seize government buildings in Ukraine's Crimea, raise Russian flag". CNN.
  136. ^ "Бывший СССР: Украина: Украинский депутат объявил о бунте крымского "Беркута"" [Former USSR: Ukraine: Ukrainian MP announces riot of Crimean "Golden eagle"]. lenta.ru.
  137. ^ "Number of Crimean deputies present at referendum resolution vote unclear". Interfax-Ukraine. Retrieved 28 August 2022.
  138. ^ De Carbonnel, Alissa (13 March 2014). "RPT-INSIGHT-How the separatists delivered Crimea to Moscow". Reuters. Retrieved 28 November 2020.
  139. Crimea sets date for autonomy vote amid gunmen, anti-Kiev protests, (27 February 2014).
  140. Crimean parliament to decide on appointment of autonomous republic's premier on Tuesday, Interfax Ukraine (7 November 2011).
  141. (in Ukrainian) The new prime minister is the leader of Russian Unity, Ukrayinska Pravda (27 February 2014).
  142. Крымские власти объявили о подчинении Януковичу [Crimean authorities declared submission to Yanukovych]. lenta.ru (in Russian). 28 February 2014.
  143. ^ Number of Crimean deputies present at referendum resolution vote unclear, Interfax-Ukraine (27 February 2014).
  144. "Putin's narrative on Crimea annexation takes an evolutionary leap". Kyiv Post. 11 March 2015. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
  145. Турчинов издал указ о незаконности избрания нового премьера Крыма [Turchynov issued a decree on the illegality of the election of a new prime minister of Crimea] (in Ukrainian). 1 March 2014.
  146. "How 'Ukrainian Berkut Officer' from Russian Ulyanovsk Assaulted Crimean Parliament Back in 2014". InformNapalm. 9 July 2015. Retrieved 20 October 2015.
  147. "ПОСТ "ЧОНГАР" КОНТРОЛИРУЕТ КРЫМСКИЙ "БЕРКУТ" ПОДЧИНЕННЫЙ ЯНУКОВИЧУ видео) – 27 Февраля 2014 – "Новый Визит" Генический информационный портал" [POST "CHONGAR" CONTROLS CRIMEAN "BERKUT" SUBJECT TO YANUKOVYCH (video) – February 27, 2014 – "New Visit" Genetic Information Portal]. vizit.ks.ua. Archived from the original on 14 March 2014.
  148. На Чонгарском перешейке дежурит «Беркут» и некие гражданские лица ["Berkut" and some civilians act as sentries at Chongarsky Isthmus] (in Russian). news.allcrimea.net. 27 February 2014. Retrieved 24 March 2015.
  149. Армянск Информационный (Armyansk Informational). "Армянск Информационный – Под Армянск стянулись силовики из "Беркута"" [Armyansk Informational – Security forces from "Berkut" gathered near Armyansk].
  150. "Lenta.ru: Бывший СССР: Украина: СМИ сообщили о блокпостах "Беркута" на въездах в Крым" [Former USSR: Ukraine: media reported about Berkut checkpoints at the entrances to Crimea]. lenta.ru.
  151. Mirovalev, Mansur (1 March 2014). "Crimea PM Takes Control Of Army, Police And Seeks Russian Help". NBC News. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  152. "Federation Council Approves Putin's Request for Troop Deployment in Ukraine". The Moscow Times. 1 March 2014. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  153. Council of the Federation: Russia may introduce troops into Crimea. Ukrainska Pravda. 1 March 2014.
  154. Radyuhin, Vladimir (March 2014). "Russian Parliament approves use of army in Ukraine". The Hindu.
  155. Walker, Shaun (4 March 2014). "Russian takeover of Crimea will not descend into war, says Vladimir Putin". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
  156. Yoon, Sangwon; Krasnolutska, Daryna; Choursina, Kateryna (4 March 2014). "Russia Stays in Ukraine as Putin Channels Yanukovych Request". Bloomberg News. Retrieved 29 August 2014.
  157. Генштаб ЗСУ: у Криму – не лише військові з частин Чорноморського флоту [General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces: in Crimea – not just soldiers from units of Black Sea Fleet]. Ukrayinska Pravda (in Ukrainian). 5 March 2014. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  158. В Крыму находятся российские военнослужащие не только из частей ЧФ РФ, утверждают в Генштабе ВСУ [The Black Sea Fleet are not the only Russian fighting forces to be found in Crimea, says the General Staff of AF of Ukraine] (in Russian). 4 March 2014. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  159. ^ Kofman, Michael; Migacheva, Katya; Nichiporuk, Brian; Radin, Andrew; Tkacheva, Olesya; Oberholtzer, Jenny (2017). Lessons from Russia's Operations in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine (PDF) (Report). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. pp. 14–15.
  160. McCarthy, Tom; Tran, Mark (17 April 2014). "Ukraine crisis: Obama says Russia has 'hand' in 'disruption and chaos'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  161. Россия не рассматривает вариант присоединения Крыма к России [Russia is not considering the option of annexing Crimea to Russia] (in Russian). Interfax. 4 March 2014.
  162. Путин: Россия не планировала присоединять Крым [Putin: Russia did not plan to annex Crimea] (in Russian). Information Telegraph Agency of Russia. 10 April 2014.
  163. "Путин: наши военные "встали за спиной" самообороны Крыма" [Putin: our military "stood behind the back" of the self-defense of Crimea]. BBC News Russian (in Russian). 17 April 2014. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  164. Шойгу: действия Минобороны РФ в Крыму были вызваны угрозой жизни мирного населения [Shoigu: the actions of the Russian Defense Ministry in Crimea were caused by a threat to the lives of civilians] (in Russian). Information Telegraph Agency of Russia. 4 April 2014.
  165. "Russia redeploys ships of Baltic and Northern fleets to Sevastopol, violates agreement with Ukraine". Ukrinform. 3 March 2014. Archived from the original on 26 November 2015. Retrieved 21 October 2015.
  166. ^ Charles Crawford (10 March 2014). "Vladimir Putin's illegal occupation of Crimea is an attempt to put Europe's borders up for grabs". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 10 March 2014. Retrieved 24 March 2015.
  167. ^ "Joint Statement by the United States and Ukraine". mfa.gov.ua. 25 March 2014. Archived from the original on 19 April 2014. Retrieved 24 March 2015.
  168. ^ "budapest-memorandum". UaWarExplained.com. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  169. "Медведев: Россия не гарантирует целостность Украины" [Medvedev: Russia does not guarantee the integrity of Ukraine]. BBC News Russian (in Russian). 20 May 2014. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  170. Urbanskaya, Tatyana (22 February 2018). "Operation "Crimea is Ours"". Ukrainian Independent Information Agency.
  171. "Касатонов: Черноморский флот был плацдармом для аннексии Крыма" [Kasatonov: the Black Sea Fleet was a springboard for the annexation of Crimea]. Current Time TV (in Russian). 13 March 2015.
  172. ^ Oleksandr Turchynov (20 March 2014). Декларація "Про боротьбу за звільнення України" [Declaration "On the struggle for the liberation of Ukraine"] (in Ukrainian). Parliament of Ukraine. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  173. ^ Fred Dews (19 March 2014). "NATO Secretary-General: Russia's Annexation of Crimea Is Illegal and Illegitimate". Brookings. Retrieved 8 March 2015.
  174. ^ Marxsen, Christian (17 April 2014). "The Crimea Crisis – An International Law Perspective". Heidelberg Journal of International Law. SSRN 2520530. Retrieved 7 November 2014.
  175. "Direct Line with Vladimir Putin". kremlin.ru. 17 April 2014. Retrieved 17 April 2014.
  176. "russian-ukrainian-friendship-treaty". UaWarExplained.com. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  177. ^ "Bound by treaty: Russia, Ukraine and Crimea". Deutsche Welle. 11 March 2014. Retrieved 17 December 2020.
  178. Yeroshko, Iryna (4 March 2014). "Ukraine: Russia shows 'complete disregard' for Black Sea Fleet agreement in Crimea". Kyiv Post. Archived from the original on 5 March 2014.
  179. Dilanian, Ken (3 March 2014). "CIA reportedly says Russia sees treaty as justifying Ukraine moves". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
  180. "Constitution of the Russian Federation". Official site. 30 December 2008. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  181. "Opinion on "Whether Draft Federal constitutional Law No. 462741-6 on amending the Federal constitutional Law of the Russian Federation on the procedure of admission to the Russian Federation and creation of a new subject within the Russian Federation is compatible with international law" Endorsed by the Venice Commission at Its 98th Plenary Session (Venice, 21–22 March 2014)". Venice Commission. 21–22 March 2014.
  182. "Draft Federal Constitutional Law of the Russian Federation 'amending the Federal Constitutional Law on the Procedure of Admission to the Russian Federation and creation of a new subject of the Russian Federation in its composition' of the Russian Federation (translation)". 10 March 2014.
  183. Millar, Daniel (18 March 2019). "The Kosovan Precedent for the Annexation of Crimea".
  184. Jusufa, Elvina (2015). "The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea". ILIRIA International Review. 5 (1): 267–286. doi:10.21113/iir.v5i1.20. ISSN 2192-7081.
  185. Rossi, Christopher R. (2015–2016). "Impaled on Morton's Fork: Kosovo, Crimea, and the Sui Generis Circumstance". Emory International Law Review. 30: 353.
  186. "Has the Advisory Opinion's finding that Kosovo's Declaration of Independence was not Contrary to International Law Set an Unfortunate Precedent? by Anne Peters :: SSRN". SSRN 2461153.
  187. Крым определился, каким способом войдет в Россию [Crimea decided how to enter Russia]. Vedomosti (in Russian). 11 March 2014.
  188. Šućur, Adam (2014). "Observing the Question of Secession in the Wake of Recent Events in Kosovo, Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Crimea". Zagrebačka pravna revija. 3 (3): 275–301. ISSN 1848-6118.
  189. Kosumi, Vebi (27 February 2018). Can Crimea Claim Secession and Accession to Russian Federation in Light of Kosovo'S Independence?. AuthorHouse. ISBN 978-1-5462-8888-6.
  190. "Преса Британії: Путін запозичив аргументи фюрера?". BBC News Україна (in Ukrainian). 19 March 2014. Retrieved 10 September 2024.
  191. "Мюнхенское согласие на аннексию: земля Чехословакии в обмен на мир с Гитлером". Radio Prague International (in Russian). 30 September 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2024.
  192. Законопроект № 462741-6 О внесении изменений в Федеральный конституционный закон "О порядке принятия в Российскую Федерацию и образования в ее составе нового субъекта Российской Федерации" (в части расширения предмета правового регулирования названного Федерального конституционного закона) [Draft Law No. 462741-6 On Amendments to the Federal Constitutional Law "On the Procedure for Admission to the Russian Federation and the Formation of a New Subject of the Russian Federation within it" (in terms of expanding the subject of legal regulation of the named Federal Constitutional Law)]. duma.gov.ru (in Russian). Archived from the original on 3 November 2014. Retrieved 3 May 2014.
  193. "Venice Commission gives damning verdict on Crimean". Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group. 22 March 2014. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  194. "CDL-AD(2014)004-e Opinion on "Whether Draft Federal constitutional Law No. 462741-6 on amending the Federal constitutional Law of the Russian Federation on the procedure of admission to the Russian Federation and creation of a new subject within the Russian Federation is compatible with international law" endorsed by the Venice Commission at its 98th Plenary Session (Venice, 21–22 March 2014)". Venice Commission. March 2014.
  195. ^ Coynash, Halya; Charron, Austin (2 January 2019). "Russian-occupied Crimea and the state of exception: repression, persecution, and human rights violations". Eurasian Geography and Economics. 60 (1): 28–53. doi:10.1080/15387216.2019.1625279. ISSN 1538-7216. ... The referendum was a transparent attempt to validate a violent coup of the Crimean government, and was accordingly held under hostile occupation by the military of a foreign state aided by Russian and pro-Russian paramilitary forces. ...
  196. Постановление ВР АРК "Об организации и проведении республиканского (местного) референдума по вопросам усовершенствования статуса и полномочий Автономной Республики Крым" [Decree of the Verkhovna Rada of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea "On organizing and holding a republican (local) referendum on improving the status and powers of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea"]. rada.crimea.ua (in Russian). 9 March 2014. Archived from the original on 29 March 2014. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  197. Аксенов: перенос референдума в Крыму связан с тем, что конфликт вышел за пределы разумного [Aksyonov: referendum postponement in Crimea is due to the fact that the conflict went beyond reasonable limits] (in Russian). Interfax.
  198. "Суд признал незаконными назначение Аксенова премьером и проведение референдума в Крыму" [The court ruled that Aksenov's appointment as prime minister and the holding of a referendum in Crimea were illegal]. Ukrainian Independent Information Agency. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
  199. Референдум в Крыму: ответ "нет" не предусмотрен [Referendum in Crimea: the answer "no" is not provided] (in Russian). Voice of America. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 22 April 2014.
  200. "Crimean authorities work under barrel of a gun – Ukraine leader". Reuters. 6 March 2014. Retrieved 8 May 2014.
  201. "КС признал неконституционным постановление о проведении референдума в Крыму – Видео" [The Constitutional Court declared unconstitutional the decision to hold a referendum in Crimea – Video]. 14 March 2014.
  202. Myers, Steven Lee; Smale, Alison (13 March 2014). ""Russian Troops Mass at Border With Ukraine"". The New York Times.
  203. Collett-White, Mike; Popeski, Ronald (15 March 2014). "Crimeans vote over 90 percent to quit Ukraine for Russia". Reuters.
  204. "Crimea referendum Wide condemnation after region votes to split from Ukraine Fox News". Fox News Channel. 16 March 2014.
  205. Halimah, Halimah (17 March 2014). "Crimea's vote: Was it legal?". CNN. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
  206. Paul Roderick Gregory (5 May 2014). "Putin's 'Human Rights Council' Accidentally Posts Real Crimean Election Results". Forbes.
  207. "Проблемы жителей Крыма". Совет при Президенте РФ (in Russian). Archived from the original on 8 October 2014.
  208. "Despite Concerns about Governance, Ukrainians Want to Remain One Country". Pew Research Center. 8 May 2014. Archived from the original on 1 October 2015. Retrieved 19 May 2014.
  209. "Crimea referendum: Voters 'back Russia union'". BBC News. 16 March 2014.
  210. "Declaring victory, Crimean and Russian officials pledge fast integration". Kyiv Post. 17 March 2014. Archived from the original on 17 March 2014.
  211. Наблюдатели ОБСЕ не приедут на референдум в Крым [OSCE observers won't monitor referendum in Crimea] (in Russian). Deutsche Welle. 11 March 2014. Retrieved 27 September 2021.
  212. "Extreemrechtse partijen uitgenodigd op referendum Krim" [Far-right parties invited to Crimea referendum] (in Dutch). De Redactie. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 12 June 2014.
  213. "Referendum day in Crimea's Simferopol". Deutsche Welle. 16 March 2014. Retrieved 12 June 2014.
  214. Постановление ГС РК № 1745-6/14 – О независимости Крыма [Resolution State Council Republic of Crimea № 1745-6/14 – On the independence of Crimea] (in Russian). rada.crimea.ua. 17 March 2014. Archived from the original on 19 March 2014.
  215. Парламент Крыма национализировал порты полуострова и их имущество [The Parliament of Crimea nationalized the ports of the peninsula and their property] (in Russian). nbnews.com.ua. 17 March 2014. Archived from the original on 7 April 2014.
  216. Крым национализировал "Черноморнефтегаз" [Crimea nationalized "Chernomorneftegaz"] (in Russian). glavred.info. 17 March 2014.
  217. "Crimea applies to be part of Russian Federation after vote to leave Ukraine". The Guardian. 17 March 2014.
  218. Herszenhorn, David M.; Cowell, Alan (17 March 2014). "Lawmakers in Crimea Move Swiftly to Split From Ukraine". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 March 2014.
  219. Крым начал процедуру присоединения к РФ, объявив о независимости [Crimea began the process of joining the Russian Federation, declaring independence] (in Russian). RIA Novosti. 17 March 2014.
  220. "Russian ruble announced Crimea's official currency". Information Telegraph Agency of Russia. 17 March 2014. Archived from the original on 1 December 2014.
  221. Verbyany, Volodymyr (1 June 2014). "Crimea Adopts Ruble as Ukraine Continues Battling Rebels". Bloomberg. Retrieved 25 June 2022.
  222. "Putin Approves Draft Treaty On Crimea". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Retrieved 17 February 2021.
  223. "Executive Order on recognising Republic of Crimea". Kremlin. 17 March 2014. Retrieved 17 March 2014.
  224. Myers, Steven Lee; Barry, Ellen (18 March 2014). "Putin Reclaims Crimea for Russia and Bitterly Denounces the West". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  225. "Ukraine crisis: Putin signs Russia-Crimea treaty". BBC News. 18 March 2014. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  226. ^ Договор между Российской Федерацией и Республикой Крым о принятии в Российскую Федерацию Республики Крым и образовании в составе Российской Федерации новых субъектов [Treaty between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea on the acceptance of the Republic of Crimea into Russian Federation and education of new subjects of the Russian Federation] (in Russian). Kremlin.ru. 18 March 2014. Retrieved 2 January 2016. (and a PDF copy of signed document)
  227. "Constitutional Court Approves Russia-Crimea Treaty". The Moscow Times. 19 March 2014. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  228. Pifer, Steven (18 March 2019). "Five years after Crimea's illegal annexation, the issue is no closer to resolution". Brookings Institution. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  229. Conrad, Naomi (1 May 2014). "The deputy who voted against annexing Crimea". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  230. Распоряжение Президента Российской Федерации от 17 March 2014 No. 63-рп 'О подписании Договора между Российской Федерацией и Республикой Крым о принятии в Российскую Федерацию Республики Крым и образовании в составе Российской Федерации новых субъектов'. Archived from the original on 18 March 2014. Retrieved 25 June 2016.
  231. "Ukraine officer 'killed in attack on Crimea base'". BBC. Retrieved 18 March 2014. Crimean police later said both Ukrainian and pro-Russian forces had been fired on from a single location ... None of the accounts can be independently confirmed.
  232. "Crimean prosecutors do not confirm info on Simferopol shooter detention". Interfax-Ukraine. Retrieved 15 July 2017.
  233. Roland Oliphant (22 March 2014). "Ukraine's unlikeliest funeral: the only two foes to die in Russia's Crimea takeover are mourned together". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  234. "Joint Funeral2" 'Opposing sides in Crimean conflict come together today for Simferopol funeral of two men killed, one Ukrainian, the other Russian', Kyiv Post, 22 March 2014
  235. "Joint Funeral3" 'Funeral held for Crimea's first casualties', Agence France-Presse, 22 March 2014
  236. Lavrov, Anton (2015). "Russian Again: The Military Operation for Crimea". In Pukhov, Ruslan (ed.). Brothers Armed: Military Aspects of the Crisis in Ukraine (Second ed.). Minneapolis: East View Press. ISBN 978-1-879944-65-7. OCLC 921141500.
  237. "Ukraine orders Crimea troop withdrawal as Russia seizes naval base". CNN. 24 March 2014. Retrieved 24 March 2014.
  238. "Defense Ministry: 50% Of Ukrainian Troops in Crimea Defect To Russia". Ukrainian News Agency. 24 March 2014. Archived from the original on 26 March 2014. Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  239. Jonathan Marcus (24 March 2014). "Ukrainian forces withdraw from Crimea". BBC. Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  240. (in Ukrainian) Russian troops captured all Ukrainian parts in the Crimea, BBC Ukrainian (26 March 2014)
  241. "United Nations News Centre – Backing Ukraine's territorial integrity, UN Assembly declares Crimea referendum invalid". United Nations. 27 March 2014. Retrieved 1 April 2014.
  242. Charbonneau, Louis; Donath, Mirjam (27 March 2014). Chizu Nomiyama; Tom Brown (eds.). "U.N. General Assembly declares Crimea secession vote invalid". Reuters. Retrieved 1 April 2014.
  243. "В 22.00 в Крыму и в Севастополе стрелки часов переведут на два часа вперёд – на московское время" [At 22.00 in the Crimea and in Sevastopol, the clock hands will be moved two hours ahead – to Moscow time]. 29 March 2014. Retrieved 29 March 2014.
  244. "Crimea to set clocks to Russia time". Business Standard India. 30 March 2014 – via Business Standard.
  245. "kharkiv-agreements". UaWarExplained.com. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  246. "Россия денонсировала соглашения с Украиной о флоте" [Russia denounced the agreements with Ukraine on the fleet]. BBC News Ukrainian (in Russian). 31 March 2014. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  247. See Presidential explanatory note to the denunciation bill Archived 19 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine (in Russian)
  248. Lukas I. Alpert, Alexander Kolyandr. "Medvedev visits Crimea, vows development aid". Market Watch.
  249. Crimea switches to Russian telephone codes, Interfax-Ukraine (7 May 2015)
  250. Nikiforov, Vadim (12 March 2014). Крым и Севастополь ожидают представления свыше [Crimea and Sevastopol await submission from above]. Kommersant (in Russian). Retrieved 23 April 2014.
  251. Sputnik (11 April 2014). "Crimean Parliament Approves New Constitution". ria.ru.
  252. Nezamyatnyj, Ivan (11 April 2014). Крым прописался в конституции России [Crimea registered in the Russian constitution] (in Russian). mk.ru.
  253. Thomas D. Grant (1 January 2015). "Annexation of Crimea". The American Journal of International Law. 109 (1): 68–95. doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.109.1.0068. JSTOR amerjintelaw.109.1.0068. S2CID 146943718.
  254. Hobson, Peter (14 April 2014). "Sanctioned Bank Rossiya to Service $36Bln Domestic Electricity Market". The Moscow Times.
  255. Россия убрала войска с Арабатской стрелки [Russian troops removed from the Arabat Spit] (in Russian). Ukrinform. 9 December 2014. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
  256. Jess McHugh (15 July 2015). "Putin Eliminates Ministry of Crimea, Region Fully Integrated into Russia, Russian Leaders Say". International Business Times. Retrieved 13 April 2016.
  257. Sharkov, Damien (31 July 2016). "Ukraine Reports Russian Military Activity on Crimea Border". Newsweek. Retrieved 11 December 2017.
  258. Kaplan, Allison (9 August 2016). "Ukraine prepares for Russian 'attack' by moving troops to the border with Crimea". Haaretz. Retrieved 11 December 2017.
  259. "pentagon-downplays-talk-russian-troop-buildup-near-ukraine-putin-visits-crimea". Japan Times.
  260. Shaun Walker in Moscow. "Putin raises stakes over alleged Ukrainian terror plot in Crimea". The Guardian. Retrieved 11 December 2017.
  261. Roland Oliphant (10 August 2016). "Putin accuses Ukraine of 'terror' over alleged Crimea raid". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 11 December 2017.
  262. ^ Sheena McKenzie. "Ukraine troops on high alert amid growing tension with Russia". CNN. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  263. ^ Moscow, Laura Mills in; Cullison, Alan; Washington, Carol E. Lee in (11 August 2016). "Dispute Between Russia and Ukraine Over Crimea Accusations Escalates". The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Retrieved 12 August 2016.
  264. "Putin Accuses Ukraine of Terror as Crimea Tensions Escalate". Bloomberg.com. Bloomberg. 10 August 2016. Retrieved 11 December 2017.
  265. Sasse, Gwendolyn (6 November 2017). "What Is the Public Mood Like in Crimea?". Carnegie Europe. Retrieved 19 November 2017.
  266. "ZOiS Report № 3. Terra Incognita: The public mood in Crimea" (PDF). November 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 February 2019. Retrieved 31 January 2019.
  267. "Kiev declares martial law after Russian seizure of Ukrainian ships in Black Sea". The Independent. Archived from the original on 7 May 2022. Retrieved 26 November 2018.
  268. "Poroshenko Ends Martial Law in Ukraine As Tensions With Russia Continue". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 26 December 2018. Retrieved 27 December 2018.
  269. "Ukraine conflict: Russia completes Crimea security fence". BBC. 28 December 2018. Retrieved 31 December 2018.
  270. "'Crimea is Ukraine': Zelenskyy opens inaugural Crimea summit". euronews. 23 August 2021. Retrieved 29 August 2021.
  271. Christian Streib (20 March 2015). "Back in the USSR? Spying and control in the new Crimea". CNN. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  272. Berman, Ilan (8 September 2015). "Paradise Lost in Crimea: How Russia Is Paying for the Annexation". Foreign Affairs. Retrieved 31 August 2016.
  273. "Crimea Rice Crop Fails Over Water War With Ukraine". The Moscow Times. 6 May 2014. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  274. Naidenova, Iuliia; Nesseler, Cornel; Parshakov, Petr; Chusovliankin, Aleksei (2020). "After the Crimea crisis: Employee discrimination in Russia and Ukraine". PLOS ONE. 15 (10): e0240811. Bibcode:2020PLoSO..1540811N. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240811. PMC 7592748. PMID 33112927.
  275. Ash, Lucy (8 August 2014). "Tourism takes a nosedive in Crimea". BBC News Magazine. Retrieved 29 December 2015.
  276. "Крым готовится к референдуму и ожидает Русских сезонов" [Crimea prepares for a referendum and expects Russian seasons]. РИА Оренбуржье. 17 March 2014. Archived from the original on 9 November 2014. Retrieved 17 March 2014.
  277. "Снова в "Артек"" [Back to Artek]. Vzglyad. 17 March 2014.
  278. Titov, Evgeny (11 September 2015). "Полуостров в тени материка" [Peninsula in the shadow of the mainland]. Novaya Gazeta (in Russian). Retrieved 12 September 2015.
  279. Steiner, Eduard (17 March 2014). "Krim-Annexion wird zur Milliardenlast für Russland" [The annexation of Crimea is becoming a billion dollar burden for Russia]. Die Welt (in German).
  280. "Decision to annex Crimea 'taken by Putin personally'". UNIAN. 3 March 2015.
  281. "Расходный полуостров" [Expendable Peninsula]. Kommersant. 7 March 2014.
  282. Broad, William (17 March 2014). "In Taking Crimea, Putin Gains a Sea of Fuel Reserves". The New York Times.
  283. "In taking Crimea, Putin gains a sea of fuel reserves". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 19 May 2014. Retrieved 18 May 2014.
  284. "Central Telegraph to set Russian tariffs on telegrams in Crimea Apr 3". Prime. 26 March 2014. Archived from the original on 31 October 2021. Retrieved 30 March 2014.
  285. "Крымчанам придется поменять номера телефонов и SIM-карты" [Crimeans will have to change phone numbers and SIM cards]. comnews.ru. 19 March 2014. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
  286. ""Почта России" переводит почтовое сообщение с Крымом на российские тарифы" ["Post of Russia" translates postal communication with the Crimea to Russian tariffs]. comnews.ru. 25 March 2014. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
  287. "Sneaking into Crimea – Or Maybe Not". Forbes. 30 May 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2014.
  288. О пунктах пропуска через государственную границу России в Республике Крым и городе Севастополе
  289. "Government Order on checkpoints at the Russian border in the Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol". Government of Russia. 7 June 2014. Retrieved 7 June 2014.
  290. Mills, Laura; Dahlburg, John-Thor (2 December 2014). "Change of leadership in Crimea means property grab". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 3 December 2014.
  291. MacFarquhar, Neil (10 January 2015). "Seizing Assets in Crimea, From Shipyard to Film Studio". The New York Times.
  292. Antonova, Maria (27 February 2015). "Under Russia, isolated Crimea is twilight zone for business". Yahoo News. Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on 1 March 2015.
  293. Murtazin, Irek (3 September 2015). "На часах – "девяностые"" ["Nineties" on the clock]. Novaya Gazeta (in Russian). Retrieved 12 September 2015.
  294. "New maps appear to show Crimea is drying up". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 13 July 2018.
  295. "Second Russian Official in 2 Days Arrested in Crimea Over Corruption". The Moscow Times. 30 June 2015. Retrieved 12 September 2015.
  296. (in Ukrainian) After the annexation of Crimea left only 10% of staff SBU, Ukrayinska Pravda (8 February 2016)
  297. "Crimea will not have large telecom operators of Russian Federation because of sanctions". CrimeaSOS. Archived from the original on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
  298. Роуминг МТС в Крыму: есть или нет в 2018 году [MTS roaming in Crimea: yes or no in 2018]. mts-guide.ru (in Russian). Archived from the original on 11 July 2018. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
  299. "Crimea's Water Crisis Is an Impossible Problem for Putin". Bloomberg.com. Bloomberg. 19 March 2021. Retrieved 30 August 2021.
  300. "Crimea: Persecution of Crimean Tatars Intensifies | Human Rights Watch". 14 November 2017.
  301. "UN accuses Russia of multiple human rights abuses". The Independent. 16 November 2016. Retrieved 21 June 2017.
  302. "Report on the situation of human rights in the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol" (PDF). OHCHR. 30 June 2018. Retrieved 24 September 2021.
  303. "Human Rights Situation in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol". OHCHR. 6 March 2020. Retrieved 24 September 2021.
  304. "UN General Assembly votes for resolution on human rights in Crimea". Retrieved 21 June 2017.
  305. "Russia's collective punishment of the Crimean Tatars is a war crime". 25 February 2021.
  306. "Crimea: Attacks, 'Disappearances' by Illegal Forces". Human Rights Watch. 14 March 2014.
  307. ^ Rainsford, Sarah (25 August 2015). "Ukraine crisis: Crimean Tatars uneasy under Russia rule". BBC News. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  308. ^ Федеральный закон от 28 December 2013 N 433-ФЗ "О внесении изменения в Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации" (in Russian)
  309. Автор статьи: Мария Макутина. "За призывы вернуть Крым Украине можно будет лишиться свободы сроком до пяти лет – РБК daily" [For calls to return the Crimea to Ukraine, it will be possible to lose freedom for up to five years– RBC daily]. Rbcdaily.ru. Retrieved 1 April 2014.
  310. "Timeline: Escalation of The Crisis in Crimea". UNPO. 2 November 2009. Retrieved 24 September 2021.
  311. Крымским татарам запретили митинговать [Crimean Tatars have been banned from holding protest rallies]. gazeta.ru (in Russian). 17 May 2014. Retrieved 24 March 2014.
  312. ^ Hille, Katherine (18 May 2014). "Crimean Tatars defy ban on rallies to commemorate deportation". Financial Times. Retrieved 19 May 2014.
  313. ^ Winning, Alexander (18 May 2014). "Crimean Tatars commemorate Soviet deportation despite ban". Reuters. Archived from the original on 18 May 2014. Retrieved 19 May 2014.
  314. "Crimea helicopters try to disrupt Tatar rallies". BBC News. 18 May 2014. Retrieved 19 May 2014.
  315. "Russia jails Crimea activist for 4 years over Kiev protest allegations". Agence France-Presse. 15 May 2015. Retrieved 8 December 2021 – via NDTV.
  316. Bilych, Ivanna; Neumann, Andreas; Okpara, Victor C.; Pichaipillai, Ajitha; de Moura Sena, Matheus; Sharvan, Olena (15 June 2015). "Human Rights on Occupied Territory: Case of Crimea". Razom.
  317. Chalupa, Andrea (23 June 2015). "Crimean Gangland: Putin's Seaside Mafia State". The Daily Beast.
  318. Melkozerova, Veronika (21 June 2016). "Ukrainian lawmakers fume over omission of Ukraine from human rights report". Kyiv Post.
  319. "Jailed Crimean Tatar Human Rights Activist on Hunger Strike in Russian World Cup city". Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group. 4 July 2018. Retrieved 18 October 2019.
  320. "CRIMEAN TATAR: NEVER SILENT IN THE FACE OF INJUSTICE". Amnesty International. February 2018. Retrieved 18 October 2019.
  321. "URGENT ACTION: CRIMEAN TATAR ACTIVIST FORCIBLY DISAPPEARED" (PDF). Amnesty International. 25 May 2016.
  322. "Russia refuses to investigate the abduction of prominent Crimean Tatar activist Ervin Ibragimov". Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group.
  323. "Russian Federation/Ukraine: Further information: Rights defender facing trumped-up charges: Server Mustafayev". Amnesty International. 29 November 2019.
  324. "ARREST OF SERVER MUSTAFAYEV". 23 September 2020.
  325. "UAWire – Ukraine files memorandum with UN Court of Justice containing evidence of Russia's involvement in 'financing of terrorism'".
  326. "Ukraine submits to ICJ evidence of Russian crimes in Crimea, Donbas | UNIAN".
  327. "Более ста тысяч крымчан получили украинские загранпаспорта | Новые Известия" [More than a hundred thousand Crimeans received Ukrainian passports | Novye Izvestia]. newizv.ru (in Russian). Retrieved 21 March 2019.
  328. "Public Opinion Survey Residents of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea May 16 – 30, 2013" (PDF). International Republican Institute. p. 17. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 April 2022. Retrieved 31 January 2022.
  329. ^ "News-gathering and policy perceptions in Ukraine" (PDF). Broadcasting Board of Governors. 3 June 2014. Retrieved 23 March 2015.
  330. ^ "Despite Concerns about Governance, Ukrainians Want to Remain One Country" (PDF) (Press release). Pew Research Centre. 8 May 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 May 2014. Retrieved 8 May 2014.
  331. The Moscow Times (15 March 2019). "Russians Conflicted Over Crimea Annexation's Value". The Moscow Times. Retrieved 17 March 2019.
  332. O'Loughlin, John; Toal, Gerard (28 February 2019). "The Crimea conundrum: legitimacy and public opinion after annexation". Eurasian Geography and Economics. 60: 6–27. doi:10.1080/15387216.2019.1593873.
  333. Toal, Gerard; O'Loughlin, John; Bakke, Kristin M. (18 March 2020). "Analysis | Six years and $20 billion in Russian investment later, Crimeans are happy with Russian annexation". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
  334. Charron, Austin (2016). "Whose is Crimea? Contested Sovereignty and Regional Identity". Region. 5 (2): 225–256. ISSN 2166-4307. JSTOR 24896628.
  335. Knott, Eleanor (2022). Kin majorities: identity and citizenship in Crimea and Moldova. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press. ISBN 978-0-2280-1150-7. OCLC 1280277016.
  336. МИД вызвал Временного поверенного в делах РФ в Украине для вручения ноты-протеста [The Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned the Charge d'Affaires of the Russian Federation in Ukraine to present a protest note] (in Russian). unn.com.ua. 18 March 2014. Archived from the original on 19 March 2014.
  337. Декларація "Про боротьбу за звільнення України" [Declaration "On the Struggle for the Liberation of Ukraine"] (in Ukrainian). Verkhovna Rada.
  338. Верховна Рада України ухвалила Закон "Про забезпечення прав і свобод громадян та правовий режим на тимчасово окупованій території України" [The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted the Law "On Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and the Legal Regime in the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Ukraine"] (in Ukrainian). Verkhovna Rada. 15 April 2014. Archived from the original on 24 September 2021. Retrieved 30 April 2014.
  339. "Ukraine Parliament declares Crimea temporarily occupied territory". news.biharprabha.com. Indo-Asian News Service. Retrieved 15 April 2014.
  340. Верховная Рада Украины приняла Закон "Об обеспечении прав и свобод граждан и правовом режиме на временно оккупированной территории Украины" [The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine adopted the Law "On Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and the Legal Regime in the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Ukraine"] (in Russian). Verkhovna Rada. 15 April 2014. Archived from the original on 25 September 2015. Retrieved 30 April 2014.
  341. Рада приняла закон о защите прав граждан "оккупированного Крыма" [The Rada adopted a law on the protection of the rights of citizens of the "occupied Crimea"]. Vzglyad (in Russian). 15 April 2014.
  342. "Dam leaves Crimea population in chronic water shortage". Al-Jazeera. 4 January 2017.
  343. "Russia fears Crimea water shortage as supply drops". BBC News. 25 April 2014. Retrieved 26 April 2014.
  344. "Pray For Rain: Crimea's Dry-Up A Headache For Moscow, Dilemma For Kyiv". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 29 March 2020.
  345. Ennis, Stephen (12 March 2014). "Ukraine hits back at Russian TV onslaught". BBC. Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  346. Цензор.НЕТ (11 April 2014). "Некоторые кинотеатры Киева, Львова и Одессы объявили бойкот российской кинопродукции" [Some cinemas in Kyiv, Lviv and Odesa announced a boycott of Russian film production]. Цензор.НЕТ (in Russian). Retrieved 5 June 2023.
  347. "Journalists, free speech activists demand abolishing of newly-formed 'Ministry of Truth'". Kyiv Post. 4 December 2014. Retrieved 1 January 2016.
  348. "Ukraine conflict: Crimea hit by shortages". BBC News. 8 January 2015.
  349. Rada names 20 February 2014 as official date of Crimea, Sevastopol occupation by Russia. Interfax Ukraine. 16 September 2015
  350. Rada names 20 Feb. 2014 as official date of Crimea, Sevastopol occupation by Russia. Kyiv Post. 15 September 2015
  351. President recognised 20 February as the official date of Crimean occupation. Ukrinform. 7 October 2015
  352. (in Ukrainian) The Cabinet decided to create the Ministry of temporarily occupied territories and internally displaced persons, Ukrayinska Pravda (20 April 2016)
  353. "Years After Crimea's Annexation, Integration of Ukraine's Internally Displaced Population Remains Uneven – Ukraine". ReliefWeb. 19 September 2019. Retrieved 14 March 2022.
  354. "4 Reasons Putin Is Already Losing in Ukraine". Time. 3 March 2014.
  355. Rothkopf, David (25 February 2014). "All (Not) Quiet on Ukraine's Eastern Front". Foreign policy.
  356. "Российские паспорта и присоединение к РФ: Депутаты Госдумы прибыли в Крым (Rossiyskiye pasporta i prisoyedineniye k RF: Deputaty Gosdumy pribyli v Krym)" [Russian passports and joining Russia: State Duma deputies arrived in Crimea]. Gordonua (in Ukrainian). 25 February 2014.
  357. "В Госдуме опровергли данные о выдаче паспортов РФ жителям Крыма (V Gosdume oprovergli dannyye o vydache pasportov RF zhitelyam Kryma)" [The State Duma has denied information about issuing passports to residents of Crimea RF]. Argumenty i Fakty (in Ukrainian). 25 February 2014.
  358. "Росія обіцяє втрутитися, якщо росіянам в Україні буде загроза (Rosiya obitsyaye vtrutytysya, yakshcho rosiyanam v Ukrayini bude zahroza)" [Russia promises to intervene if the Russians in Ukraine threatened]. Українська правда (Ukrayins'ka pravda) (in Ukrainian). UA. 25 February 2014.
  359. "У Росії Януковича все ще вважають президентом – Слуцький (U Rosiyi Yanukovycha vse shche vvazhayut' prezydentom – Sluts'kyy)" [In Russia Yanukovych's still the president – Slutsky]. Українська правда (Ukrayins'ka pravda) . UA. 25 February 2014.
  360. "Госдума России обсуждает меры по защите крымчан (Gosduma Rossii obsuzhdayet mery po zashchite krymchan)" [Russian State Duma discusses measures to protect the Crimean]. RU: Интерфакс (Interfax).
  361. Alpert, Lukas I. (27 February 2014). "Russia Orders Military Exercises Amid Ukraine Tension". The Wall Street Journal.
  362. "Russian Foreign Ministry commented on the movement of armored vehicles in Crimea". Ukrayinska Pravda. 27 February 2014.
  363. "Ukraine crisis: Russia mulls new land-grab law". BBC News. 28 February 2014. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  364. ^ "MID of Russia made another statement on Ukraine: militants, NATO, provocations". Ukrayinska Pravda. 27 February 2014.
  365. "Tensions high at Kiev protest camp despite ground-breaking deal". CTV News. 21 February 2014. Archived from the original on 1 December 2008.
  366. "Russia has suspended negotiations with Ukraine on the project of Kerch bridge". Ukrinform. 28 February 2014.
  367. "Medvedev Signs Decree Creating Contractor for Kerch Strait Bridge Project". The Moscow Times. 3 March 2014.
  368. "Медведев распорядился создать компанию для строительства моста через Керченский пролив" [Medvedev ordered to create a company to build a bridge across the Kerch Strait]. TV Rain (in Russian). Russia. 3 March 2014.
  369. "Kerch Dam". UaWarExplained.com. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  370. "In Russia there are gathering "tourists" to Ukraine who served in the military". Ukrayinska Pravda. 28 February 2014.
  371. "After the Crimean Consensus - The American Interest". 30 November 2022. Archived from the original on 30 November 2022. Retrieved 20 November 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  372. "Ukraine crisis live: Russia admits its troops are moving in Crimea". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 28 February 2014.
  373. "Russian Foreign Ministry called the Ukrainian revolution "brown"". lenta.ru. RU. 19 February 2014.
  374. "Russian Foreign Ministry: In Ukraine the "brown" revolution, we will apply all the influence". Ukrayinska Pravda. UA. 19 February 2014.
  375. ^ "Vladimir Putin sees small protests, mass support for troops in Ukraine (+video)". The Christian Science Monitor. 2 March 2014.
  376. "In Russia were detained activists who protested against the war with Ukraine". Ukrainian Independent Information Agency. 1 March 2014.
  377. "На антивоенных акциях в Москве задержаны 300 человек (Na antivoyennykh aktsiyakh v Moskve zaderzhany 300 chelovek)" [At the anti-war actions in Moscow detained 300 people] (in Russian). RU: Utro. 2 March 2014. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  378. "В Москве и Перебурге проходят митинги против российской оккупации Крыма. Уже есть задержанные (V Moskve i Peterburge prokhodyat mitingi protiv rossiyskoy okkupatsii Kryma. Uzhe yest' zaderzhannyye)" [In Moscow and St. Petersburg rallies against the Russian occupation of the Crimea. Already have detained] (in Russian). Центр журналистских расследований (Tsentr zhurnalistskikh rassledovaniy) . 2 March 2014. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  379. "Жители Екатеринбурга провели пикеты против ввода российских войск в Крым (Zhiteli Yekaterinburga proveli pikety protiv vvoda rossiyskikh voysk v Krym)" [Inhabitants of Ekaterinburg picketed against Russian troops in the Crimea]. Komsomolskaya Pravda (in Russian). RU. 2 March 2014. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  380. ""Сколько детей ты готов похоронить, чтобы Крым стал частью России?" Первые антивоенные пикеты прошли на Урале ("Skol'ko detey ty gotov pokhoronit', chtoby Krym stal chast'yu Rossii?" Pervyye antivoyennyye pikety proshli na Urale)" ["How many children are you willing to bury to Crimea became part of Russia?" First anti-war pickets were held in the Urals] (in Russian). RU: Ura. 2 March 2014. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  381. "Не стреляй! Антивоенные реплики Юрия Шевчука, Бориса Гребенщикова, Андрея Макаревича" [Do not shoot! Antiwar remarks by Yuri Shevchuk, Boris Grebenshchikov, Andrey Makarevich]. Novaya Gazeta (in Russian). 4 March 2014. Retrieved 4 March 2014.
  382. Bershidsky, Leonid (25 March 2014). "Comparing Putin to Hitler Will Get You Fired". Bloomberg News. Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved 25 March 2014.
  383. ^ "Ukraine crisis: Russians opposed to Putin". BBC News Magazine. 12 March 2014.
  384. "Putin defends Ukraine stance, cites lawlessness". The Washington Post. 4 March 2014.
  385. ^ "Putin's move on Crimea bolsters popularity back home". USA Today. 19 March 2014. Retrieved 20 March 2014.
  386. Luhn, Alec (18 March 2014). "Red Square rally hails Vladimir Putin after Crimea accession". The Guardian. Moscow. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
  387. Hale, Henry E. (2021). "Authoritarian Rallying as Reputational Cascade? Evidence from Putin's Popularity Surge after Crimea". American Political Science Review. 116 (2): 580–594. doi:10.1017/S0003055421001052. ISSN 0003-0554. S2CID 239196888.
  388. ^ "Putin shares the view that if in Ukraine "revolution" – then on its territory is a new state". Mirror Weekly. 4 March 2014.
  389. "Russia claims thousands fleeing Ukraine". Nine MSN. AU. 2 March 2014.
  390. "мзс україні спростувало зростання кількості бігентсив до росії (MZS Ukrayini sprostuvalo zrostannya kil'kosti bihent·syv do rosiyi)" [Ukraine Foreign Ministry refuted the growing number of refugees in Russia]. Ukrinform. 4 March 2014.
  391. "мзс путін продовґуе дезінформувати весь світ заради виправдання своїх дії (MZS Putin prodovgue dezinformuvaty ves' svit zarady vypravdannya svoyikh diyi)" [Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Putin continues to mislead the whole world for justification of own actions]. UA. Ukrinform. 4 March 2014.
  392. "Russia Today presenter hits out at Moscow over Ukraine". The Guardian. 5 March 2014. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  393. Abby Martin: Russia Today supports me. CNN. 5 March 2014.
  394. Kirchick, James (5 March 2014). "Exclusive: RT Anchor Liz Wahl Explains Why She Quit". The Daily Beast. Retrieved 6 March 2014.
  395. Dolgov, Anna (7 March 2014). "Leningrad Blockade Survivor Arrested, Fined For Anti-War Protest". The Moscow Times.
  396. "Khodorkovsky: Crimea should stay within Ukraine with broad autonomous status". Interfax. 10 March 2014. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 10 March 2015.
  397. ^ "Crimea crisis: The Tatarstan factor". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  398. "Crimean Tatar Leader Calls For UN Peacekeeping Troops". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 1 April 2014. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  399. Huw Griffith; Anna Malpas (15 March 2014). "50,000 rally in Moscow against Crimea intervention". Yahoo News. Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on 15 March 2014.
  400. Lipsky, Andrey (24 February 2015). ""Представляется правильным инициировать присоединение восточных областей Украины к России"" [«It seems right to initiate the accession of eastern regions of Ukraine to Russia»]. Novaya Gazeta (in Russian). No. 19. Retrieved 1 January 2016.
  401. Matthew Schofield (21 February 2015). "Russian news report: Putin approved Ukraine invasion before Kiev government collapsed". McClatchy DC. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  402. "Report to Allege Direct Kremlin Link to Ukraine Invasion". Voice of America. 15 February 2014. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  403. "World War 3: Vladimir Putin Plotted Ukraine Invasion Early As February 2014, New Report Says". Inquisitr.com. 22 February 2015. Retrieved 24 February 2015.
  404. Mikhail Sokolov (12 June 2015). Михаил Касьянов: "Все решения по Крыму незаконны" [Mikhail Kasyanov: "All decisions about Crimea are unlawful"]. Радио Свобода (in Russian). Radio Svoboda. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  405. Vasiliev, Andrey (25 January 2019). "После Ротенберга хоть камни с неба. Как Крым стал прибыльным бизнесом для друзей Путина" [After Rotenberg, even stones from the sky. How Crimea became a profitable business for Putin's friends]. The Insider (in Russian). Archived from the original on 28 November 2020. Retrieved 20 November 2020.
  406. Charbonneau, Mirjam; Donath, Louis (27 March 2014). "U.N. General Assembly declares Crimea secession vote invalid". Reuters. Archived from the original on 1 October 2015. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
  407. ^ "Russia sanctions 9 US officials in response to US sanctions on Russian officials". CNBC. 20 March 2014.
  408. "Executive Order 13660 – Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine" (Press release). White House Office of the Press Secretary. 6 March 2014. Retrieved 6 March 2014.
  409. "EU Slaps Initial Sanctions on Russia". ABC News. Associated Press. 6 March 2014. Archived from the original on 6 March 2014. Retrieved 7 March 2014.
  410. "Sanctions threat grows as Ukraine tensions rise". Mainichi Shimbun. Japan. 4 March 2014.
  411. "Japan imposes sanctions against Russia over Crimea independence". Fox News Channel. 18 March 2014. Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  412. "Position of the United Kindown about the Crimean referendum". Bloomberg News. Bloomberg. 14 March 2014. Retrieved 26 July 2014.
  413. "Budapest Memorandum". UaWarExplained.com. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  414. "Treaty of Friendship". UaWarExplained.com. 29 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  415. Baker, Luke. "EU to offer 500 million euros of trade benefits to Ukraine". Reuters. Archived from the original on 11 March 2014. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
  416. "Ukraine: MEPs call for firm action on Russia to prevent further escalation". European Parliament. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 24 March 2015.
  417. "Lawmakers call for suspension of Russia from G8, swift action against Putin". Political ticker (World Wide Web log). CNN. 2 March 2014. Archived from the original on 3 March 2014.
  418. "Russia G8 status at risk over 'incredible act of aggression' in Crimea, says Kerry". The Guardian. UK. 2 March 2014.
  419. "North Atlantic Council statement on the situation in Ukraine". Nato.int. Retrieved 3 March 2014.
  420. "PACE: News". Assembly.coe.int. 22 November 2013. Archived from the original on 19 February 2015. Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  421. "Statement of the Prime Ministers of the Visegrád Countries on Ukraine" (Press release). Hungary: Prime Minister's Office. Archived from the original on 5 March 2014.
  422. FlorCruz, Jaime (6 March 2014). "Russia may find ally in China – albeit a passive one for now". CNN. Retrieved 5 March 2014.
  423. Economy, Elizabeth (6 March 2014). "China's Soft 'Nyet' To Russia's Ukraine Intervention". Forbes. Retrieved 5 March 2014.
  424. Bhattacherjee, Kallol (27 January 2017). "Ukraine lauds India for support over Crimea". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  425. "Syria's Assad expresses support to Putin on Ukraine". euronews. 18 May 2013.
  426. "Putin on Ukraine Supported by China-Syria-Venezuela Minority". Bloomberg News. 12 March 2014. Archived from the original on 13 March 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
  427. "Sri Lanka regrets removal of Ukrainian president". Business Standard. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 24 March 2015.
  428. "Tusk warns Merkel against Russian gas addiction". www.euractiv.com. 11 March 2014. Retrieved 25 February 2023.
  429. "Russia risks political and economic damage over Ukraine, says Merkel". The Guardian. 13 March 2014. Archived from the original on 11 April 2014.
  430. Bryant, Chris (27 March 2014). "German business concerns grow over Russia ties". Financial Times. Retrieved 27 March 2014. German entities have invested roughly €20bn in Russia and some 6,200 companies – mostly small and medium-sized Mittelstand businesses – are active there. Last year trade between the two countries totalled more than €76bn. ... Russia supplies 35 per cent of German gas and 30 per cent of its oil.
  431. ^ Freeman, Colin (24 March 2014). "Russian troops poised to 'run' into Moldova, Nato commander warns". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 24 March 2014.
  432. "Președintele Nicolae Timofti avertizează Rusia să nu încerce să anexeze regiunea transnistreană" [President Nicolae Timofti warns Russia not to try to annex the Transnistrian region]. Radio Europa Liberă Moldova (in Romanian). 18 March 2014.
  433. Călugăreanu, Vitalie (19 March 2014). "Chișinăul vrea să știe unde se va opri Rusia" [Chisinau wants to know where Russia will stop]. Deutsche Welle (in Romanian).
  434. Rfe/Rl (10 April 2014). "PACE Deprives Russia of Voting Rights". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved 20 April 2014.
  435. "Putin talks of peace in annexed Crimea". ABC (AU). 14 August 2014. Retrieved 15 August 2014.
  436. "Russia vetoes U.N. resolution on Crimea's future". USA Today. Associated Press. 15 March 2014. Retrieved 28 March 2014.
  437. "General Assembly Adopts Resolution Calling upon States Not to Recognize Changes in Status of Crimea Region". United Nations. 27 March 2014. Retrieved 28 March 2014.
  438. "Ukraine: UN condemns Crimea vote as IMF and US back loans". BBC News. 27 March 2014. Retrieved 28 March 2014.
  439. ^ Resolution adopted by the General Assembly Archived 15 February 2022 at the Wayback Machine on 18 December 2019], UN General Assembly
  440. "Afghan president Hamid Karzai backs Russia's annexation of Crimea". The Guardian. 24 March 2014. Retrieved 30 November 2014.
    "Visiting Russia, Fidel Castro's Son Scoffs at U.S. Sanctions Over Crimea". The Moscow Times. 31 March 2014.
    "Kyrgyzstan Says Crimea Referendum 'Legitimate'". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. 20 March 2014. Retrieved 2 June 2016.
    "Nicaragua recognizes Crimea as part of Russia". Kyiv Post. 27 March 2014.
    "В КНДР издали атлас мира, где Крым находится в составе России:Как пояснили посольству РФ в МИД республики, Пхеньян "уважает результаты состоявшегося в Крыму референдума о вхождении полуострова в состав Российской Федерации"" [North Korea published an atlas of the world, where Crimea is part of Russia: As the Russian Foreign Ministry explained to the Russian Embassy, Pyongyang "respects the results of the referendum held in Crimea on the peninsula joining the Russian Federation"]. TASS. 12 October 2017.
  441. "Nina Ştanski, "ministrul de Externe" de la Tiraspol, îi cere lui Vladimir Putin să anexeze Transnistria". 24 March 2014.
  442. "Transnistria wants to merge with Russia". Vestnik Kavkaza. 18 March 2014. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
  443. "Moldova's Trans-Dniester region pleads to join Russia". BBC. 18 March 2014. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
  444. "Dniester public organizations ask Russia to consider possibility of Transnistria accession". Information Telegraph Agency of Russia. 18 March 2014. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
  445. "Italian Region of Lombardy Joins Liguria and Veneto in Recognizing Crimea as Part of Russia". Ukrayinska Pravda. 6 July 2016. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  446. "Lombardia revoca mozione su annessione Crimea. Astuti: "C'è voluta una guerra per far ravvedere la Lega"". Varese Noi (in Italian). 30 March 2022. Retrieved 13 September 2022.
  447. Rakteem Katakey (25 March 2014). "Russian Oil Seen Heading East Not West in Crimea Spat". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  448. Peter Shuklinov (21 March 2014). Ближний круг Путина: кто попал в новый список санкций США [Putin's inner circle: who's in the new list of US sanctions]. liga.net (in Russian). Archived from the original on 7 February 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2016.
  449. "Japan imposes sanctions against Russia over Crimea independence". Fox News Channel. Associated Press. 18 March 2014. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  450. Gutterman, Steve; Grove, Thomas; Tsvetkova, Maria; Piper, Elizabeth; Soldatkin, Vladimir (18 March 2014). Boulton, Ralph (ed.). "Russia scoffs at Western sanctions over Crimea". Reuters. Moscow.
  451. "'I don't need a visa to hear Tupac': Russians mock sanctions". Channel 4. 18 March 2014.
  452. Patrick Jenkins; Daniel Schäfer; Courtney Weaver; Jack Farchy (14 March 2014). "Russian companies withdraw billions from west, say Moscow bankers". Financial Times. Retrieved 27 March 2014.
  453. ^ Wesley Lowery; Ed O'Keefe (20 March 2014). "Reacting to sanctions, Russians ban Reid, Boehner and four other lawmakers". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  454. Darryl Isherwood (20 March 2014). "Bob Menendez is banned from Russia". NJ. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  455. David Weigel (20 March 2014). "Senators Celebrate Being Sanctioned by Russia". Slate. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  456. ^ Steven Chase (24 March 2014). "Russia imposes sanctions on 13 Canadians, including MPs". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  457. Susana Mas (24 March 2014). "Russian sanctions against Canadians a 'badge of honour'". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  458. Anna Mulrine (4 March 2014). "Punish Russia? Why some Pentagon officials would prefer restraint". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  459. ^ Jack Farchy; Neil Hume (21 March 2014). "Russian share prices drop as sanctions bite". Financial Times. Retrieved 21 March 2014.
  460. Neil Buckley (21 March 2014). "Putin feels the heat as sanctions target president's inner circle". Financial Times. Retrieved 21 March 2014.
  461. Ian Traynor (22 March 2014). "European Union prepares for trade war with Russia over Crimea". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  462. ^ Olga Tanas (21 March 2014). "Russia's Credit Outlook Cut as U.S., EU Widen Sanction Lists". Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  463. Andra Timu; Henry Meyer; Olga Tanas (23 March 2014). "Russia Staring at Recession on Sanctions That Could Get Tougher". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 23 March 2014.
  464. Kathrin Hille; Richard McGregor (24 March 2014). "Russia braced for $70bn in outflows". Financial Times. Retrieved 24 March 2014.
  465. Courtney Weaver; Jack Farchy (25 March 2014). "Funds cut Russian holdings after sanctions". Financial Times. Retrieved 27 March 2014. Deputy economy minister Andrei Klepach estimates that Russian capital outflows will total up to $70bn in the first quarter, more than the $63bn that left the country during the whole of 2013.
  466. Jack Farchy; Martin Arnold (18 April 2014). "Banks retreat from Moscow deals". Financial Times. Retrieved 19 April 2014.
  467. Jack Farchy; Kathrin Hille; Courtney Weaver (21 March 2014). "Russian executives quake as US sanctions rattle markets". Financial Times. Retrieved 21 March 2014.
  468. Halia Pavliva (23 March 2014). "EU's Muted Crimea Response Triggers Russian Stock Rebound". Bloomberg L.P. Archived from the original on 23 March 2014. Retrieved 23 March 2014.
  469. Eric Matzen; Michelle Martin (21 March 2014). "Russian sanctions ripple through corporate boardrooms". Reuters. Archived from the original on 4 February 2016. Retrieved 21 March 2014.
  470. Kathrin Hille (21 March 2014). "Putin boosted by defiant tone at top and among people". Financial Times. Retrieved 21 March 2014.
  471. Paul Sonne; Sarah Kent (21 March 2014). "Russia Sends Mixed Signals in Response to U.S. Sanctions". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 21 March 2014.
  472. Mishchenko, Olga (28 June 2014). "Минэкономразвития РФ опасается негативного влияния западных санкций" [Ministry for Economic Development of the Russian Federation fears the negative impact of Western sanctions]. Deutsche Welle (in Russian). Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  473. John Fraher (18 April 2014). "Energy Needs Curb Eastern EU Hunger for Russian Sanctions". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  474. Maria Bondarenko (22 June 2015). Правозащитники рассказали об отказах в выдаче виз после поездок в Крым [Human rights activists have reported visa denials after trips to Crimea]. rbc.ru (in Russian). Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  475. Роскомнадзор распорядился заблокировать сайт Общества защиты прав потребителей\ [Roskomnadzor ordered the blocking of the Consumer Rights Protection Society site]. tvrain.ru (in Russian). 22 June 2015. Retrieved 3 January 2016.
  476. "Russia suspends payments to Council of Europe over Crimea row". uk.reuters.com. Archived from the original on 26 December 2017. Retrieved 19 September 2018.
  477. Miller, Christopher (27 November 2017). "Ukraine 'Extremely Concerned' Council of Europe Caving To Russian 'Blackmail'". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved 19 September 2018.
  478. Buckley, Neil (26 November 2017). "Russia tests Council of Europe in push to regain vote". Financial Times.
  479. "Map of Ukraine". United Nations. March 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
  480. "Statement Regarding the Mapping of Crimea". National Geographic Society. 19 March 2014. Archived from the original on 20 March 2014. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  481. ^ Крым на картах мира: ситуация поменялась [Crimea on maps of the world: the situation has changed]. hi-tech.mail.ru (in Russian). 11 April 2014. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  482. J. Kyle O'Donnell; Julie Johnsson (22 March 2014). "Russian Cartographers Add Crimea to Maps Amid Sanctions". Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  483. "BMW обозначила на своих картах Крым российским. Как поступают другие производители?" [BMW marked Crimea as Russian on its maps. How are other manufacturers doing?]. BBC News Русская служба (in Russian). Retrieved 20 June 2021.
  484. Daniil Aleksandrov (22 March 2014). "Republic.ru" "Яндекс" показывает разные карты в России и на Украине ["Yandex" displays different maps in Russia and in Ukraine]. slon.ru (in Russian). Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  485. "Parliament challenges mapmakers to mark Crimea Russian territory". en.itar-tass.com. 26 March 2014. Retrieved 2 January 2016.
  486. "Statement by the DWG on edit conflicts in Crimea". OpenStreetMap Foundation. 5 June 2014. Retrieved 2 January 2016. In the short-term Crimea shall remain in both the Ukraine and Russia administrative relations, and be indicated as disputed. We recognize that being in two administrative relations is not a good long-term solution, although the region is likely to be indicated as disputed for some time.
  487. "Ukraine investigates Coca Cola and Pepsi". Fortune. 2016. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  488. "Ukraine's France ambassador slams atlas for placing Crimea in Russia". Yahoo! News. 13 October 2016. Retrieved 9 January 2016.
  489. "Larousse official Internet website". Larousse. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  490. "Official position of Larousse on Crimea". 2015. Retrieved 7 July 2016.
  491. L'attivismo militare della Russia nel 2015, Russia's military activism in 2015, Limes
  492. Perché Limes rappresenta la Crimea sotto la sovranità della Russia, Because Limes represents Crimea under the sovereignty of Russia 11 January 2016 Limes, accessed 28 February 2022
  493. "Apple changes Crimea map to meet Russian demands". BBC News. 27 November 2019. Retrieved 19 June 2021.
  494. Hamid, Linda; Wouters, Jan (29 January 2021). Rule of Law and Areas of Limited Statehood: Domestic and International Dimensions. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 73. ISBN 978-1-78897-904-7.

Further reading

See also: Bibliography of Ukrainian history and List of Slavic studies journals

External links

Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation
Part of the Russo-Ukrainian War
Main topics
Background
Main places
Pro-Russian
Organizations
Lead figures (Russia)
Lead figures (Crimea)
Pro-Ukrainian
Organizations
Lead figures (Ukraine)
Lead figures (Crimea)
Irredentism
Africa
North America
South America
Western Asia
Southern Asia
Eastern and Southeastern Asia
Central and Eastern Europe
Southern Europe
Italy
Northern Europe
Western Europe
Oceania
Related concepts: Border changes since 1914 · Partitionism · Reunification · Revanchism · Revisionism · Rump state
Russo-Ukrainian War
Background
Main events
Impact and
reactions
Cyberwarfare
Media
Related
Russian invasion of Ukraine
Part of the Russo-Ukrainian War
Overview
General
Prelude
Background
Foreign
relations
Military engagements
Southern
Ukraine
Eastern
Ukraine
Northern
Ukraine
Russia
Airstrikes
by city
Airstrikes
on military
targets
Resistance
Russian-occupied Ukraine
Belarus and Russia
Russian
occupations
Ongoing
Previous
Potentially
related
Other
War crimes
General
Attacks on
civilians
Crimes
against
soldiers
Legal cases
Reactions
States
and
official
entities
General
Ukraine
Russia
United States
Other countries
United Nations
International
organizations
Other
Public
Protests
Companies
Technology
Spies
Other
Impact
Effects
Human
rights
Terms and
phrases
Popular
culture
Songs
Films
Other
Key people
Ukrainians
Russians
Other
Related
Politics of Ukraine
Political system
Government of Ukraine
Events
Related articles
Territorial disputes in Europe
States with limited recognition
Land
  • Islands
  • Waters
Categories: