Revision as of 20:56, 2 August 2005 editRetired username (talk | contribs)48,708 editsm removing 131.7.251.200's misplaced link, seems irrelevent anyway← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:51, 17 November 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,547,812 edits Move 1 url. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#time.com | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Practice that causes a webpage to have a high rank in Google}} | |||
] on Google. In one of the more well known Google Bombings, the site was manipulated so that the first ''Miserable failure'' result links to ]'s bio on the official White House web site.]] | |||
{{Multiple issues| | |||
A '''Google bomb''' or '''Google wash''' is an attempt to influence the ranking of a given site in results returned by the ] ]. Due to the way that Google's ] ] works, a ] will be ranked higher if the sites that link to that page all use consistent anchor text. ''Googlebomb'' is used both as a ] and a ]. | |||
{{More citations needed|date=August 2011}} | |||
{{Globalize|date=June 2015}} | |||
==Background== | |||
}} | |||
See ] for the practice of deliberately and dishonestly modifying ] pages to increase the chance of them being placed close to the beginning of search engine results, or to influence the category to which the page is assigned in a dishonest manner. | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2011}} | |||
<!-- Do not add any new examples of Google bombs without first discussing them on the talk page. All Misplaced Pages contributions must be properly sourced. If you found a bomb by typing it in yourself, it's original research! Post it on the talk page first. --> | |||
] and ]]] | |||
The terms '''Google bombing''' and '''Google washing''' refer to the practice of causing a ] to rank highly in ] results for irrelevant, unrelated or off-topic search terms by linking heavily. In contrast, ] (SEO) is the practice of improving the ] listings of web pages for ''relevant'' search terms. | |||
Google-bombing is done for either business, political, or comedic purposes (or some combination thereof).<ref name="nytimes1">{{cite news|first=Tom Jr.|last=Zeller|title=A New Campaign Tactic: Manipulating Google Data|work=] (Late Edition (East Coast))|date=October 26, 2006|page=A.20|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/26/us/politics/26googlebomb.html}} (Note: payment required, weblink goes to abstract.)<!-- replace this with a free source --></ref> Google's ] ranks pages higher for a particular search phrase if enough other pages linked to it use similar ]. By January 2007, however, Google had tweaked its search algorithm to counter popular Google bombs such as "miserable failure" leading to ] and ]; now, search results list pages about the Google bomb itself.<ref name="googlebomb halt"/> On 21 June 2015, the first result in a Google search for "miserable failure" was this article.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.google.com/search?q=miserable+failure|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150621133110/https://www.google.com/search?q=miserable+failure&gws_rd=ssl|archive-date = June 21, 2015|title = Miserable failure - Google Search}}</ref> Used both as a ] and a ], "Google bombing" was introduced to the '']'' in May 2005.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050516-184202|title=Google and Google Bombing Now Included New Oxford American Dictionary|work=Search Engine Watch|first=Gary|last=Price|date=May 16, 2005|access-date=January 29, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070127123936/http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050516-184202|archive-date=January 27, 2007|df=mdy-all}}<!--Search Engine Watch article] on addition of "Google Bomb" to dictionary-->.</ref> | |||
For example, if a user registers many ]s and all of them link to a main site with the text "''... is a living legend''" then searching for "living legend" on Google will return the main site higher in the ranking, even if the phrase "living legend" doesn't appear on the main site. A common means of exploiting this is through ]s, where although the entry may disappear from the main page quickly, the short-term effects of a link can dramatically affect the ranking of a given site. Empirical results indicate that it does not take a large number of websites to achieve a Googlebomb. The effect has been achieved with only a handful of dedicated weblogs. | |||
Google bombing is related to ], the practice of deliberately modifying ] to increase the chance of a website being placed close to the beginning of search engine results, or to influence the category to which the page is assigned in a misleading or dishonest manner.<ref>{{citation| first1=Zoltán | last1=Gyöngyi | author-link1=Zoltán Gyöngyi | first2=Hector | last2=Garcia-Molina | contribution=Web spam taxonomy | contribution-url=http://airweb.cse.lehigh.edu/2005/gyongyi.pdf | title=Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb), 2005 in The 14th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2005) May 10, (Tue)-14 (Sat), 2005, Nippon Convention Center (Makuhari Messe), Chiba, Japan. | year=2005 | publisher=ACM Press | place=New York, NY | isbn=1-59593-046-9 | author-link2=Hector Garcia-Molina }}</ref> | |||
The above statement has to be qualified, however. A handful of blog links will not Google bomb someone like Amazon out of the top results for "books," for example. In fact, Googlebombs have generally had an impact on relatively "non-competitive" terms, where there's no particular page that seems to be necessarily the right answer. | |||
The term ''Googlewashing'' was coined by ] in 2003 in order to describe the use of ] to change the perception of a term, or push out competition from ]s (SERPs).<ref>{{cite news|last=Orlowski|first=Andrew|author-link=Andrew Orlowski|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/04/03/antiwar_slogan_coined_repurposed/|title=Anti-war slogan coined, repurposed and Googlewashed ... in 42 days.|date=April 3, 2003|work=The Register|access-date=January 6, 2007}}</ref><ref name="AdamsMcCrindle2008">{{cite book|author1=Andrew A. Adams|author2=Rachel McCrindle|title=Pandora's Box: Social and Professional Issues of the Information Age|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dXmx97UzO6IC&pg=PA122|access-date=30 September 2012|date=15 February 2008|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-0-470-06553-2|pages=122–123}}</ref> | |||
The technique was first discussed on ], ] in an article by ] . In that article, he coined the term "Google bombing" and explained how he discovered that Google used the technique to calculate page rankings. He found that a search for "internet rockstar" returned the website of a Ben Brown as the first result, even though "internet rockstar" did not appear anywhere on Brown's webpage. He reasoned that Google's algorithm returned it as the first result because many fan sites that linked to Brown's website used that phrase on their own pages. | |||
==History== | |||
Mathes began testing his theory by setting out to make the website of his friend Andy Pressman the number one result for a query of "talentless hack". He gave instructions for creating websites and links to Pressman's website with the text of the link reading "talentless hack". Sure enough, as other webloggers joined in his Googlebombing campaign, Pressman's website became the number one result in a Google search for "talentless hack". (Ironically, by 2004, Mathes's own site was the number one Google result of this search term.) | |||
Google bombs date back as far as 1999, when a search for "more ] than ] himself" resulted in the ] homepage as the top result.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.clickz.com/google-bombs-arent-so-scary/61942/|access-date=December 8, 2017|title=Google Bombs Aren't So Scary|first=Danny|last=Sullivan|date=March 18, 2002|work=ClickZ}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/incredible-google-bombs.html|title = The 10 Most Incredible Google Bombs|date = November 9, 2010}}</ref> | |||
In September 2000 the first Google bomb with a verifiable creator was created by ''Hugedisk Men's Magazine'', a now-defunct online humor magazine, when it linked the text "dumb motherfucker" to a site selling ]-related merchandise.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,41401,00.html |last=Manjoo |first=Fahrad |title=Google Link is Bush League |date=January 25, 2001 |work=Wired News |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20010405062025/http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0%2C1282%2C41401%2C00.html |archive-date=April 5, 2001 |access-date=January 26, 2007 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}</ref> Hugedisk had also unsuccessfully attempted to Google bomb an equally derogatory term to bring up an ]-related site. After a fair amount of publicity the George W. Bush-related merchandise site retained lawyers and sent a ] letter to ''Hugedisk'', thereby ending the Google bomb.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/01/earlier_today_m.html|title=Remembering the First Google Bomb|first=Michael|last=Calore|author2=Scott Gilbertson|date=January 26, 2001|work=Wired News|access-date=January 27, 2007 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070225081940/http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2007/01/earlier_today_m.html |archive-date = February 25, 2007}}</ref> | |||
However, the first Google bomb mentioned in the popular press may have occurred accidentally in ], when users discovered that the query "" returned ]'s home page. Now, it returns links to several news articles on the discovery. | |||
Adam Mathes is credited with coining the term "Google bombing" when he mentioned it in an April 6, 2001, article in the online magazine ''uber.nu''. In the article Mathes details his connection of the search term "talentless hack" to the website of his friend, Andy Pressman, by recruiting fellow webloggers to link to his friend's page with the desired term.<ref>{{cite web|first=Adam|last=Mathes|url=http://uber.nu/2001/04/06/|title=Filler Friday: Google Bombing|date=April 6, 2001|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050715083840/http://uber.nu/2001/04/06/|archive-date=July 15, 2005|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Some experts forecast that the practice of Google Bombing is over, as changes to Google's algorithm over the years have minimised the effect of the technique. | |||
Ironically, Google bombs often end their life by being too popular or well known, thereby attaining a mention in well regarded web journals and knocking the bomb off the top spot. It is sometimes commented that Google bombing need not be countered because of this self-disassembly. | |||
==Uses as tactical media== | |||
In addition, the entire notion of "Google bombs" might be better described as "link bombing," given that these campaigns can certainly have an effect on other search engines, as well. All major search engine make use of link analysis and thus can be impacted. Thus, a search for "miserable failure" on ] ] brought up the official George W. Bush biography number one on Google, Yahoo and MSN and number 2 on Ask Jeeves. On ] ] it was | |||
The Google Bomb has been used for ] as a way of performing a "hit-and-run" media attack on popular topics. Such attacks include Anthony Cox's attack in 2003. He created a parody of the "404 – page not found" browser error message in response to the war in Iraq. The page looked like the error page but was titled "These Weapons of Mass Destruction cannot be displayed". This website could be found as one of the top hits on Google after the start of the war in Iraq.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mushon.com/2010/03/23/interface-as-a-conflict-of-ideologies/|title=Interface as a Conflict of Ideologies|date=April 2007}}</ref> Also, in an attempt to detract attention from the far-right group ] (EDL), a parody group has been made known as "]", with the expressed purpose of Google bombing the acronym.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.edl.me|title=EDL - English Disco Lovers NOT English Defence League - Home|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130205082206/http://www.edl.me/|archive-date=5 February 2013}}</ref> | |||
reported by that George Bush is now ranked first for the keyword 'failure' as well as 'miserable failure' in both Google and Yahoo. | |||
==Alternative meanings== | |||
The BBC in on Googlebombs in 2002 actually used the headline of "Google Hit By Link Bombers," acknowledging to some degree the idea of "link bombing." In 2004, the Search Engine Watch site that the term should be "link bombing" because of the impact beyond Google and continues to use that term as more accurate. | |||
The Google bomb is often misunderstood by those in the media and publishing industry who do not retain technical knowledge of Google's ranking factors. For example, talk radio host ] has often conducted what he calls "Google bombs" by dispatching instructions to his radio/Internet listeners.<ref>{{cite web |last=Schoff |first=Hans |url=http://hansschoff.com/mlm/google-bomb-mastering-internet-marketing-strategies |title=How to Google Bomb - Mastering Internet Marketing Strategies | Hans Schoff's Official Home Based Income Blog |publisher=Hansschoff.com |access-date=2013-03-26 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130512030112/http://hansschoff.com/mlm/google-bomb-mastering-internet-marketing-strategies |archive-date=May 12, 2013 |df=mdy-all }}</ref><ref></ref> In this context, the term is used to describe a rapid and massive influx of keyword searches for a particular phrase. The keyword surge gives the impression that the related content has suddenly become popular. The strategy behind this type of Google bombing is to attract attention from the larger mainstream media and influence them to publish content related to the keyword.{{citation needed|date=April 2015}} | |||
==Google bowling== | |||
Nevertheless, "Google bombing" was to the New Oxford American Dictionary in May 2005. | |||
By studying what types of ranking manipulations a search engine is using, a company can provoke a search engine into ''lowering'' the ranking of a competitor's website. This practice, known as '''Google bowling''' or '''negative SEO''', is often done by purchasing Google bombing services (or other ] techniques) not for one's own website, but rather for that of a competitor. The attacker provokes the search company into punishing the "offending" competitor by displaying their page further down in the search results.<ref name="google-bowling">{{cite news|url=https://www.forbes.com/2007/06/28/negative-search-google-tech-ebiz-cx_ag_0628seo.html|title=The Saboteurs Of Search|first=Andy|last=Greenberg|work=Forbes|date=June 28, 2007|access-date=September 8, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first=Michael |last=Pedone |url=http://www.webpronews.com/expertarticles/2005/10/27/google-bowling-how-competitors-can-sabotage-you-what-google-should-do-about-it |title=Google Bowling: How Competitors Can Sabotage You; What Google Should Do About It |publisher=Webpronews.com |date=October 27, 2005 |access-date=December 17, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101201020606/http://www.webpronews.com/expertarticles/2005/10/27/google-bowling-how-competitors-can-sabotage-you-what-google-should-do-about-it |archive-date=December 1, 2010 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> For victims of Google bowling, it may be difficult to appeal the ranking decrease because Google avoids explaining penalties, preferring not to "educate" real offenders. If the situation is clear-cut, however, Google could lift the penalty after submitting a request for reconsideration. Furthermore, after the ] update, Google search rankings now take Google bowling into account and very rarely will a website be penalized due to low-quality "farm" backlinks.{{citation needed|date=December 2018}} | |||
==Other search engines== | |||
== Accomplished Googlebombs == | |||
Other search engines use similar techniques to rank results and are also affected by Google bombs. A search for "]" or "failure" on September 29, 2006, brought up the official George W. Bush biography number one on ], ], and ] and number two on Ask.com. On June 2, 2005, Tooter reported that George Bush was ranked first for the keyword "miserable", "failure", and "miserable failure" in both Google and Yahoo!; Google has since addressed this and disarmed the George Bush Google bomb and many others.{{Citation needed|date=December 2022}} | |||
The ], reporting on Google bombs in 2002, used the headline "Google Hit By Link Bombers",<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1868395.stm|title=Google Hit By Link Bombers|publisher=BBC |date=March 13, 2002}}</ref> acknowledging to some degree the idea of "link bombing". In 2004, ] suggested that the term be "link bombing" because of its application beyond Google, and continues to use that ] as it is considered more accurate.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://yooter.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry050602-180255 |title=Yooter SEO blog |publisher=Yooter.com |access-date=July 9, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090513202317/http://www.yooter.com/blog/index.php?entry=entry050602-180255 |archive-date=May 13, 2009 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | |||
Recent (as of ]) and popular examples are: | |||
* '''''' (] for "Who wants to swindle us?") points to the homepage of Telecom, provider of phone and ADSL services in southern Argentina. This bombing was started at because of the company's announcement to limit download transfer to 4 GB per month (for 512 kbit/s connections). | |||
* '''''' (] for "thieves") points to the homepage of SGAE, (Sociedad General de Autores y Editores), the Spanish equivalent of the ] (RIAA). The SGAE is an extremely unpopular association in Spain since they not only try to prosecute users of ] applications, but also impose surcharges on the price of physical media such as recordable CDs in order to account for the theoretical losses due to P2P exchanges. | |||
* '''''' - points out the correct name for the body of water south of ], the ]. | |||
* Weapons of mass destruction - ''']''' Error look-alike joke page saying "weapons of mass destruction cannot be found". (Note: as of ] ], the joke page, although still available at , had fallen to 20th place in the Google search result.) | |||
* Similarly, '''''', ] for "Weapons of mass destruction", gives a Spanish version of the page above. | |||
* '''''', '''''' and '''''' - whitehouse.gov biography of ]. Due to the search query of "miserable failure," the search terms '''''' and '''''' also point to the biography of ]. Recently, they've added '''''' to point to the biography on the ]'s homepage. Interestingly enough, also points to the same page, and is second in Google's Search for "unelectable." See also ]. With the addition of and Maps, searching for the phrase in ] provides George W. Bush as the first result. | |||
* '''''' used to give the of the ], which initiated the '']'' lawsuit alleging copyright violation in the ]. also worked. | |||
* '''''' - ], an anti-Semitic group, was for a long time the number one hit when searching on Google for "]", perhaps because of its linking pattern. The Misplaced Pages entry replaced it following a Googlebombing campaign organized by ], editor of the blog . Google added an explanation page entitled and placed it in the sponsored link section. | |||
* '''''' - unofficial ] (Italian Prime Minister) biography. "buffone" is the ] for "clown". | |||
* '''''' - official ] (Italian Prime Minister) biography. "miserabile fallimento" is the ] for "miserable failure". | |||
* '''''' - "Spreading Santorum," a campaign to ridicule ] by naming a mixture of bodily substances after him (see ]). | |||
* '''''' - Used to lead to Google's own corporate information page. used to work as well. | |||
* '''''' - Used to lead to ]'s 2004 election site, originated . | |||
* '''''' - Points to "Center for Science in Public Interest" (which advocates strict regulatory oversight of genetically engineered foods). | |||
* '''''' ("Weird Haircut" in ]) - Returns the biography of the ], ], who is known for his distinctive hairstyle. | |||
* '''''' ("smoothie") returns website of ], the leader of the ] Christian-Democrat faction in the ]. | |||
* Searching for '''''' gives you a link to a . | |||
* '''''' (] for "]") - returns a biography of ], the Prime Minister of ]. | |||
* '''''' returns the website of Cal Thomas. The reason was his . | |||
* '''''' used to return the website of ], about the polemic ] . | |||
* '''''' returns the website of ] columnist ]. The phrase is an obscure reference to Tirath Khemlani, a Pakistani commodities trader who was involved in brokering an improbable US$4 billion loan deal to the ]n Government under Prime Minister ] in ]. Khemlani was known derisively by his usual line of trade - ] and ]. As he was involved in commodities and not financial transactions as a rule, it was believed that Khemlani did not have access to the funds as he claimed but would attempt to obligate the Australian Government of the day to pay a huge commission for arranging the proposed loan. The bomb was perpetrated at the suggestion of for reasons unknown. | |||
* '''''' returns the Parliamentary web page of Australian Federal Attorney General ]. This bomb was suggested by and executed by a number of Australian bloggers in protest of Ruddock's protracted political smear of the now exonerated ] | |||
* '''''' used to return ] who is ]. He rose through the ] movement from humble beginnings as a steward in the ], and is renowned for his straight-talking manner. | |||
* '''''' returns the homepage of the ] after the phrase - initially used to describe the party by blogger Anthony Wells - was adopted by several British bloggers. | |||
* '''''' returns Kres Chophouse & Lounge in ], ]. A restaurant that fired a server for blogging about work. | |||
* '''''' returns the homepage of ], the ]n minister of finance. | |||
* '''''' (] for "]") - returns an official homepage of Robert Fico, a left-wing Slovakian politician. | |||
* '''''' on Google - used to return ], the ] ] accused of misleading the public over ]. He is now the number 5 result. | |||
* '''''' - returns the official page of ], a fundamentalist Christian organisation in the UK. | |||
* '''''' (which means in ] '''cretin''') - returns the page with information about ] politician ] | |||
* '''''' returns a fake google error page which suggests "French military defeats" as an alternate search. | |||
* '''''' in Google Images search yields the logo of the ] football team, shortly after their defeat in ]. The same search today also shows a logo of the ] baseball team, in reference to their stunning ALCS loss to the Red Sox in 2004. (As of June 2005, neither of these results are returned) | |||
* '''''' (] for "trivial sheep") - returns the official page of ], Premier of the province of ], in ]. It refers to his curly hairs. | |||
{{blockquote|We don't condone the practice of googlebombing, or any other action that seeks to affect the integrity of our search results, but we're also reluctant to alter our results by hand in order to prevent such items from showing up. Pranks like this may be distracting to some, but they don't affect the overall quality of our search service, whose objectivity, as always, remains the core of our mission.<ref>{{cite web|last=Mayer |first=Marissa |url=http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/09/googlebombing-failure.html |title=Official Google Blog: Googlebombing 'failure' |publisher=Googleblog.blogspot.com |date=September 16, 2005 |access-date=July 9, 2010}}</ref>}} | |||
== Googlebombing competitions == | |||
By January 2007, Google changed its indexing structure<ref name="googlebomb halt"/> so that Google bombs such as "miserable failure" would "typically return commentary, discussions, and articles" about the tactic itself.<ref name="googlebomb halt"/> Google announced the changes on its official blog. In response to criticism for allowing the Google bombs, ], head of Google's Webspam team, said that Google bombs had not "been a very high priority for us".<ref name="googlebomb halt">{{cite news| url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/29/technology/29google.html | work=The New York Times | title=Google Halts 'Miserable Failure' Link to President Bush | first=Noam | last=Cohen | date=January 29, 2007 | access-date=May 3, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/google.asp |title=Urban Legends Reference Pages: Miserable Failure |website=Snopes.com |date=December 9, 2003 |access-date=July 9, 2010}}</ref> | |||
:''Main articles: ], ]'' | |||
{{blockquote|Over time, we’ve seen more people assume that they are Google's opinion, or that Google has hand-coded the results for these Google-bombed queries. That's not true, and it seemed like it was worth trying to correct that misperception.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/01/quick-word-about-googlebombs.html |title=Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: A quick word about Googlebombs |publisher=Googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com |date=January 25, 2007 |access-date=July 9, 2010}}</ref>}} | |||
In ], and teamed up to create what they termed the "SEO Challenge". They offered an ] ] to the person whose page was the first result for the search phrase "]" one month after the competition's start. A ] flat-screen monitor was the prize for being the first result one month later. | |||
==Motivations== | |||
The contest sparked controversy around the Internet, as some groups worried that ] (SEO) companies would abuse the techniques used in the competition to alter queries more relevant to the average user. This fear was offset by the belief that ] would alter their algorithm based on the methods used by the googlebombers. | |||
===Competitions=== | |||
In ], another SEO contest was created. This time, the objective was to get the top result for the phrase "]". | |||
In May 2004, the websites Dark Blue and SearchGuild teamed up to create what they termed the "SEO Challenge" to Google bomb the phrase "]".<ref>{{cite web|last=Karch|first=Marziah|title=Google Bombs Explained|url=http://google.about.com/od/socialtoolsfromgoogle/a/googlebombatcl.htm|work=About.com|access-date=2011-03-30|archive-date=June 30, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110630151012/http://google.about.com/od/socialtoolsfromgoogle/a/googlebombatcl.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
The contest sparked controversy around the Internet, as some groups worried that ] (SEO) companies would abuse the techniques used in the competition to alter queries more relevant to the average user. This fear was offset by the belief that ] would alter their algorithm based on the methods used by the Google bombers. | |||
== Google's response == | |||
In September 2004, another ] was created. This time, the objective was to get the top result for the phrase "]". A large sum of money was offered to the winner, but the competition turned out to be a hoax.{{Citation needed|date=March 2008}} | |||
Google has defended its algorithms as simply a reflection of the opinion on the Web, saying that it is not damaging the overall quality of its services. Google has said it expects Googlebombing to return to obscurity and has dismissed it as "cybergraffiti" and just another internet fad. | |||
In March 2005's issue of ], a contest was created among five professional web developers to make their site the number-one site for the made-up phrase "crystalline incandescence". | |||
On ] ] the entry "Preventing comment spam" declared that Google will henceforth respect a <code>rel="nofollow"</code> attribute on hyperlinks. Their page ranking algorithm now avoids links with this attribute when ranking the destination page. The intended result is that site administrators can modify user-posted links such that the attribute is present, and thus an attempt to googlebomb by posting a link on such a site would yield no increase from that link. | |||
===Political activism=== | |||
== Googlebombing in general == | |||
{{See also|Political Google bombs in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election}} | |||
In some cases, the phenomenon has produced competing attempts to use the same search term as a Googlebomb. As a result, the first result at any given time varies, but the targeted sites will occupy all the top slots using a normal search instead of "I'm feeling lucky". Notable instances of this include and . The primary targets have been the Bush biography above (as well as another biography of ] on the same site), ]'s website at www.michaelmoore.com, and the Senate website of ]. | |||
Some of the most famous Google bombs are also expressions of political opinions (e.g. "liar" leading to ] or "miserable failure" leading to the White House's biography of George W. Bush): | |||
* In 2003, Steven Lerner, creator of ], created a ] webpage titled "French Military Victories".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/victories.html |title=french military victories |publisher=Albinoblacksheep.com |access-date=2012-02-21}}</ref> When typed into Google, the first result (or the "I'm Feeling Lucky" result) led to a webpage resembling a Google error message, reading, "Your search – French military victories – did not match any documents. Did you mean French military ''defeats''?" The page received over 50,000 hits within 18 hours of its release. Links near the top of the page led to a simplified list of ]. The only war listed as a win for the French was the French Revolution, in which they fought themselves. As of May 2, 2011, the page is no longer listed in Google's first few results for "French military victories", but several links on the list go to sites recounting the joke.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/newsday/access/305039401.html?dids=305039401:305039401&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT|title=Internet Parody Hands French Military a Defeat|last=Dalton| first=Richard J. Jr. |date=March 13, 2003|work=Newsday|access-date=February 4, 2007|page=A.27|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071001064144/https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/newsday/access/305039401.html?dids=305039401:305039401&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT|archive-date=October 1, 2007|url-status=bot: unknown}}(payment required, link goes to abstract) October 1, 2007</ref> | |||
Searching for (Italian for "miserable failure") was returning , until the webmaster inserted the ] ] that prevents the page from being indexed by Google (<code><meta name="googlebot" content="noindex, nofollow" /></code>). | |||
* In 2003, columnist ] began his ] after former U.S. Senator ] made several ] regarding homosexuality. A search for "santorum" led to the top result being a website defining it as being related to ]. One search engine expert has argued that this campaign does not qualify as a Google bomb, arguing that it is instead a successful new definition for a word explained by a website.<ref>{{cite web|first=Evan |last=McMorris-Santoro |url=http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/with-his-campaign-lagging-rick-santorum-turns-once-again-to-dan-savage |title=With His Campaign Lagging, Rick Santorum Turns Once Again To Dan Savage |publisher=Talking Points Memo |date=July 21, 2011 |access-date=October 11, 2013}}</ref> (see ]) | |||
* In 2004, Jewish writer and activist ] urged visitors to his blog to link to the ] in response to findings, first publicized by Steven Weinstock,<ref>{{cite web|last=Becker |first=David |url=http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038-5186012.html |title=Google caught in anti-Semitism flap |publisher=News.cnet.com |access-date=July 9, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|author=John Brandon |url=https://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2004/05/63380 |title=Dropping the Bomb on Google |magazine=Wired |access-date=July 9, 2010 |date=May 11, 2004}}</ref> that a search for "Jew" returned the ] website ] at the top of the results.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-5186012.html |title=Google caught in anti-Semitism flap - CNET News |publisher=News.cnet.com |access-date=2012-02-21}}</ref> The campaign was successful in displacing the site from the top result. | |||
* In the same year the ] was the subject of a Google bomb by an Iranian blogger named Pendar Yousefi.<ref>{{cite web|author=Hamid Tehrani |url=http://www.globalvoicesonline.org/2007/05/10/interview-with-pendar-yousefi-blogger-designer-and-google-bomber/ |title=Interview with Pendar Yousefi: Blogger, Designer and Google Bomber |date=May 10, 2007 |publisher=Global Voices Online |access-date=July 9, 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://mahimoto.com/google/ |title=The Google Bomb Story |publisher=Mahimoto |access-date=December 17, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120201070538/http://mahimoto.com/google/ |archive-date=February 1, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thepersiangulf.org/googlebomb.html |title=The Arabian Gulf Google Bomb |publisher=The Persian Gulf |access-date=July 9, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100220095708/http://www.thepersiangulf.org/googlebomb.html |archive-date=February 20, 2010 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | |||
* Also, in 2004, a Google bomb involving searching "ladrones" (Spanish for thieves) on Google linked the ] website.{{Citation needed|date=December 2011}} | |||
* In France, groups opposing the ] copyright bill, proposed by minister ], mounted a Google bombing campaign linking ''ministre blanchisseur'' ("laundering minister") to an article on Donnedieu de Vabres' conviction for ]. The campaign was so efficient that {{As of|2006|lc=on}}, merely searching for ''ministre'' ("minister") or ''blanchisseur'' ("launderer") brings up a news report of his conviction as one of the first results.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://palpitt.free.fr/index.php?2005/12/20/16-google-bomb-a-la-francaise |title=Bombardement Google à la française - Palpitt - Metablog |publisher=Palpitt |access-date=2012-02-21 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070211005142/http://palpitt.free.fr/index.php?2005%2F12%2F20%2F16-google-bomb-a-la-francaise |archive-date=February 11, 2007 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | |||
* In 2004, after the controversy that erupted in the ] over the allegations that President ] had cheated in the elections, the phrase "''pekeng pangulo''" (] for "fake president") was linked to her official website.{{Citation needed|date=December 2011}} | |||
* In December 2004, the "''Yan Ang Pinay''" ("I am a Filipina") campaign<ref> Retrieved 22 October 2009</ref> encouraged bloggers to self-identify as Filipina and link the word ] to target URLs such as the Filipina Women's Network (ffwn.org),<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.filipinasoul.com/2007/02/resurrecting-the-image-of-a-true-filipina/ |title=Resurrecting the image of a true Filipina |publisher=Filipina Soul |date=2007-02-14 |access-date=2013-06-15}}</ref> to displace ] sites in search results. | |||
* In 2004, ''kretyn'' (] for ''moron'') and similar insults referring to stupidity were linked to websites of various Polish politicians including ] and ]. | |||
* In 2005 an Estonian blogger led a successful campaign to link the word ''masendav'' (] for ''dismal'' or ''depressive'') to the homepage of ].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.postimees.ee/211005/online_uudised/180817.php|title=Google'i otsing seob sõnad "masendav" ja "Keskerakond"|date=October 21, 2005|work=]|language=et|access-date=October 5, 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090118000752/http://www.postimees.ee/211005/online_uudised/180817.php|archive-date=January 18, 2009|df=mdy-all}}</ref> The Centre Party's website still ranks first in the results for ''masendav'' {{As of|2011|lc=y}}.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=masendav |title=Google |access-date=December 17, 2011}}</ref> | |||
* In the ], many left-wing bloggers, led by MyDD.com, banded together to propel neutral or negative articles about many Republican House candidates to the top of Google searches for their names.<ref name="nytimes1" /> | |||
* Also in 2006, ''Siedziba szatana'' ('']'s headquarters'') was linked to the website of controversial ] ultra-conservative Catholic broadcaster ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://hacking.pl/5950|title=Siedziba szatana w Radiu Maryja|access-date=January 12, 2011|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101219222740/http://hacking.pl/5950|archive-date=December 19, 2010|df=mdy-all}}</ref> | |||
* In January 2007, Google announced a change in its search engine algorithm to significantly reduce the effectiveness of the technique.<ref name="Googlebombs">{{cite web | |||
|url=https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070126-8714.html | |||
|title=Google defuses Googlebombs | |||
|access-date=January 27, 2007 | |||
|publisher=ARS Technica | |||
|date=January 26, 2007 | |||
|author=Jacqui Cheng | |||
|work=News | |||
}}</ref> | |||
* In March 2007, the '']'' reported that ] was able to Google bomb "Redacted Name" to highlight his website's block on search engines.<ref name="RedacteName">{{cite news | |||
|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/13/AR2007031301854.html | |||
|title=Here Be Dragons | |||
|access-date=March 14, 2007 | |||
|newspaper=Washington Post |date=March 14, 2007 | |||
|author=David Montgomery | |||
}}</ref> | |||
* During the initial stages of the anti-Scientology campaign, ], hackers and other members of an anonymous Internet group Google-bombed the ]'s main website as the first match found when the term "Dangerous Cult" was searched.<ref>{{cite news | |||
|last = Miller | |||
|first = Jason Lee | |||
|title = Scientology Bomb Cruises Past Google | |||
|work = WebProNews: Breaking eBusiness and Search News | |||
|publisher = iEntry, Inc. | |||
|date = January 29, 2008 | |||
|url = http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/01/29/scientology-bomb-cruises-past-google | |||
|access-date = 2008-01-29 | |||
|url-status = dead | |||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080201091551/http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/01/29/scientology-bomb-cruises-past-google | |||
|archive-date = February 1, 2008 | |||
|df = mdy-all | |||
}}</ref> | |||
* In September 2008, ], leader of the ] was Google-bombed with the query "clueless".<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.3news.co.nz/general/google-bomb-targets-john-key-2008091213#axzz3Te69ny5S |title=Google bomb targets John Key |work=] |date=12 September 2008 |access-date=6 March 2015 |archive-date=April 2, 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402100715/http://www.3news.co.nz/general/google-bomb-targets-john-key-2008091213#axzz3Te69ny5S |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
* In January 2009, a successful Google bomb was performed against the site of the ] by a loose group of bloggers and forum users. It was discovered that by mistake, the robots.txt on the government.bg forbade the crawling of the site by indexing machines which allowed for Google bombing. The group linked the search term "failure" ({{langx|bg|провал}}) to the government site. Within a couple of days, the first search result for "провал" was the Bulgarian government's site regardless of the search results language.<ref>{{cite web|author=Rene Beekman |url=http://www.sofiaecho.com/2009/01/27/666229_google-search-results-link-bulgarian-government-with-failure-ruin-collapse |title=Sofia Echo coverage |publisher=Sofiaecho.com |date=February 25, 2009 |access-date=July 9, 2010}}</ref> | |||
* In April 2009, the website Smart Bitches, Trashy Books launched a Google bomb against ] in response to its removal of ] material from their ranking lists, Amazon citing it as "adult material". Within hours of its creation the page appeared on the first page of returned search results for the term "Amazon Rank".<ref>{{cite web|author=SB Sarah |url=http://www.smartbitchestrashybooks.com/index.php/weblog/comments/amazon-rank/ |title=Amazon Rank |publisher=Smartbitchestrashybooks.com |date=April 12, 2009 |access-date=July 9, 2010}}</ref> | |||
* In July 2009, ] successfully performed a new method of Google bombing in which a specific word or phrase is artificially raised in ]. The phrase "Rev Al is a racist" was made #1 on Google Trends on July 8, 2009,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?sa=X&date=2009-7-8 |title=Google Trends: Jul 8, 2009 |access-date=July 9, 2010}}</ref> due to the controversial comments made by Reverend ] during Michael Jackson's Memorial Service. "] is Hurting" was also number 14 on the top Google Trends for the same day in response to Feldman dressing up as Michael Jackson during the memorial service.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.collegenews.com/index.php?/article/corey_feldman_is_hurting_or_is_it_a_google_bomb_29603752352/ |title=Corey Feldman is hurting…or is it a Google bomb? |publisher=Collegenews.com |access-date=July 9, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110122225401/http://www.collegenews.com/index.php?%2Farticle%2Fcorey_feldman_is_hurting_or_is_it_a_google_bomb_29603752352%2F |archive-date=January 22, 2011 |df=mdy-all }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://netcashdaily.net/corey-feldman-is-hurtingor-is-it-a-google-bomb/ |title=Google Bomb Corey Feldman is hurting |publisher=Topgoogletrends.netcashdaily.net |date=July 8, 2009 |access-date=July 9, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100403071831/http://topgoogletrends.netcashdaily.net/google-bomb-corey-feldman-is-hurting |archive-date=April 3, 2010 }}</ref> | |||
* In France, in July 2009, "''trou du cul du web''" ("Asshole of the Internet") returned as the first result the official website of French president ]; in September 2010, the same tactic resulted in President Sarkozy's Facebook page being the first result.{{Citation needed|date=December 2011}} As of May 2014, the top 10 results for the same Google search contain references to Sarkozy. | |||
* In September 2010, ] users tried to Google bomb the phrase "Robert Pisano MPAA CEO arrested for child molestation!", as a related action to DDoS attacks on the ], ] and ] (BPI) websites. This was in retaliation for ] attacks carried out on ] and various other file-sharing sites.<ref>Lance Whitney. http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20016961-83.html?tag=mncol;title</ref> | |||
* In February 2011, several ] activists managed to make it so that the page for abortion on ] was the second highest ranking result for the term "murder".<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/02/10-notorious-google-bombs/71731/ |title=10 Notorious Google Bombs - Nicholas Jackson - Technology |magazine=The Atlantic |access-date=2012-02-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Doctorow |first=Cory |url=http://www.boingboing.net/2011/02/25/googlebombers-turn-a.html |title=Googlebombers turn "Abortion" into second result for "Murder" |publisher=Boing Boing |date=February 25, 2011 |access-date=December 17, 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://uk.jezebel.com/5770210/anti+choicers-link-abortion-to-murder-on-google |title=Anti-Choicers Link "Abortion" To "Murder" On Google |publisher=Jezebel |date=February 25, 2011 |access-date=December 17, 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120321022249/http://uk.jezebel.com/5770210/anti+choicers-link-abortion-to-murder-on-google |archive-date=March 21, 2012 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | |||
* During the summer of 2011, a joke in response to ]’ role in the firing of ] was posted on EveryDayShouldBeSaturday.com. The joke was indexed often enough by a major search engine that typing "Craig James" into the search box at the search engine resulted in the autocomplete function including "killed 5 hookers".<ref>{{cite web|last=Big |first=Bobby |url=http://www.everydayshouldbesaturday.com/2011/7/15/2277242/the-curious-index-7-15-2011 |title=THE CURIOUS INDEX, 7/15/2011 |publisher=Every Day Should Be Saturday |date=2011-07-15 |access-date=2012-01-09}}</ref> Later this humorous search index behavior was characterized as a "Google bomb" in regards to Craig James’ campaign for elected office.<ref>{{cite web|last=Driscoll |first=Matt |url=http://www.weeklyvolcano.com/extremeleisure/cupcheck/2011/12/truth-about-Craig-James-and-those-hookers/ |title=The truth about Craig James and those hookers |publisher=Weekly Volcano |date=December 14, 2011 |access-date=December 17, 2011}}</ref> | |||
* In July 2012, searching for "''plagiator''" (Romanian for "plagiarist/cheater") returns the personal page of Romanian prime minister ], who is accused of plagiarizing his PhD thesis, and various news websites which provide information about the scandal that erupted around the politician. This Google bomb has become itself a piece of news in the Romanian media.<ref>{{cite web|last=Loznianu|first=Ramona|title=Editor|url=http://www.gandul.info/news/cazul-acuzatiilor-de-plagiat-la-adresa-lui-victor-ponta-analiza-pe-text-teza-de-doctorat-a-premierului-versus-cartea-profesorului-dumitru-diaconu-exclusiv-9762345|work=Gândul|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120716074516/http://www.gandul.info/news/cazul-acuzatiilor-de-plagiat-la-adresa-lui-victor-ponta-analiza-pe-text-teza-de-doctorat-a-premierului-versus-cartea-profesorului-dumitru-diaconu-exclusiv-9762345|archive-date=July 16, 2012|df=mdy-all}}</ref> | |||
* In October 2012, searching the phrase "completely wrong" on Google images, returns pictures of ], the Republican Nominee for the U.S. Presidential Election in 2012. However, this was not actually an example of a Google bomb - the result came naturally from a series of comments made by Romney, rather than a concentrated campaign intended to link the two.<ref>{{cite news|last=Worstall|first=Tim|title=The Mitt Romney 'Completely Wrong' Google Bomb|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/10/14/the-mitt-romney-completely-wrong-google-bomb/|work=Forbes|date=October 14, 2012}}</ref> | |||
* In September 2012 the ] campaign was initiated with the intention of replacing the ] (EDL) as the number one result for EDL on Google.<ref name="Guardian">{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/shortcuts/2013/feb/01/disco-dance-edl-google-facebook|title=How to disco dance the EDL off Google and Facebook|access-date=2 February 2012 | location=London|work=The Guardian|first=Dorian|last=Lynskey}}</ref> On 27 August 2013 the English Disco Lovers overtook all English Defence League related items and became the top search result for the acronym "EDL".{{Citation needed|date=September 2018}} | |||
* In June 2015 the search query "top 10 criminals" returned the images of the Indian Prime Minister ], alongside the images of terrorists, murderers and dictators. However, in an official statement Google apologized<ref name="tinm">, June 4, 2015, The Independent.</ref> and said that it was due to an erroneous meta data published by a British daily.<ref name="bbcnm">, June 4, 2015, BBC.</ref> | |||
* In July 2018, the search query "idiot" returned images of President ].<ref>{{cite magazine |last1=Quackenbush |first1=Casey |title=Anti-Trump Activists Are Gaming Google Searches for 'Idiot' |url=https://time.com/5342602/donald-trump-idiot-google/ |access-date=July 21, 2018 |magazine=Time |date=July 19, 2018 |language=en}}</ref> | |||
* In two separate instances – November 2018 and August 2019 – searching for the word ''bhikhari'' (Hindi and Urdu for ''beggar'') turned up images of ] ], alluding to the country's financial crisis. In response to the first instance, the ] passed a resolution to demand answer from Google on the issue.<ref>{{cite news |title='भिखारी' सर्च करने पर दिख रही इमरान खान की फोटो, पाकिस्तान ने Google से मांगा जवाब |language= hi |url=https://hindi.news18.com/news/tech/pakistan-wants-to-summon-google-ask-why-bhikari-shows-imran-khans-photo-1621854.html |access-date=17 August 2019 |work=News18 India |date=17 December 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Google 'bhikhari', search engine shows images of Pakistan PM Imran Khan |url=https://www.businesstoday.in/latest/trends/google-bikhari-search-engine-shows-images-of-pakistan-pm-imran-khan/story/373216.html |access-date=17 August 2019 |work=Business Today |date=16 August 2019}}</ref> In February 2019, following the ], a Google search for ''best toilet paper in the world'' yielded images of the ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Kiggins |first1=Steve |title=Pakistan flag is top result for 'the best toilet paper in the world' on Google. But, why? |url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2019/02/17/google-pakistan-flag-best-toilet-paper-search/2901246002/ |access-date=17 August 2019 |date= 17 February 2019 |work=USA TODAY |language=en}}</ref> | |||
===Commercial use=== | |||
It is interesting to note that because of the popularity of Google, other search engines such as , , and are also affected by Google Bombs. A search of "miserable failure" on the forementioned search engines produce the biography of ] listed at the White House site as the first link on the list. Only a few search engines, such as , and , do not produce the same first links as the rest of the search engines. MetaCrawler and ProFusion are ]s which use multiple search engines... this might explain why they do not produce the biography of ] listed at the White House site as the first link on the list when searching for "miserable failure." | |||
{{main|Spamdexing}} | |||
Some website operators have adapted Google bombing techniques to do "spamdexing". This includes, among other techniques, posting of links to a site in an ] along with phrases the promoter hopes to associate with the site (see ]). Unlike conventional message board spam, the object is not to attract readers to the site directly, but to increase the site's ranking under those search terms. Promoters using this technique frequently target forums with low reader traffic, in hopes that it will fly under the moderators' radar. ]s in particular are often the target of this kind of page rank vandalism, as all of the pages are freely editable. This practice was also called "money bombing" by ] circa 2004.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/01/26/BUG3M4GVDS1.DTL|title=Google targeted by pranksters: Web site operators, bloggers skew results|date=January 26, 2004|access-date=November 27, 2007|author=Kopytoff, Verne|work=San Francisco Chronicle }}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The 100 Best Trends 2006: Emerging Developments You Can't Afford to Ignore|author1=Ochoa, George |author2=Corey, Melinda|page=213|year=2005|access-date=November 27, 2007|publisher=Adams Media|isbn=1-59337-451-8|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=am-c2MR1ZA0C&pg=PA213}}</ref> | |||
Another technique is for the owner of an Internet ] to set up the domain's ] entry so that all ]s are directed to the same server. The operator then sets up the server so that page requests generate a page full of desired Google search terms, each linking to a subdomain of the same site, with the same title as the subdomain in the requested ]. Frequently the subdomain matches the linked phrase, with spaces replaced by ]s or ]s. Since Google treats subdomains as distinct sites, the effect of many subdomains linking to each other is a boost to the ] of those subdomains and of any other site they link to. | |||
== Commercial googlebombing == | |||
On February 2, 2007, many users noticed changes in the Google algorithm. These changes largely affected (among other things) Google bombs: as of February 15, 2007, only roughly 10% of the Google bombs still worked. This change was largely due to Google refactoring its valuation of PageRank.{{citation needed|date=October 2012}}<ref>{{Cite web|title = A quick word about Googlebombs|url = http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/01/quick-word-about-googlebombs.html|website = Official Google Webmaster Central Blog|access-date = 2015-09-22}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://answers.google.com/answers/main?cmd=threadview&id=179922 |title=Google Answers: Google Inc., and the Google Bomb |access-date=2012-02-21}}</ref> | |||
Some unscrupulous website operators have adapted googlebombing techniques to ]. | |||
====Quixtar's bomb==== | |||
One such technique is the posting of links to a site in an ] along with phrases the promoter hopes to associate with the site. Unlike conventional message board spam, the object is not to attract readers to the site directly, but to increase the site's ranking under those search terms. Promoters using this technique frequently target forums with low reader traffic, in hopes that it will fly under the moderators' radar. ]s in particular are often the target of this kind of page rank vandalism, as all of the pages are freely editable. | |||
], a ] company now known as ], has been accused by its critics of using its large network of websites to move sites critical of Quixtar lower in search engine rankings. A Quixtar/Amway independent business owner (IBO) reports that a Quixtar leader advocated the practice in a meeting of Quixtar IBOs. Quixtar/Amway denied wrongdoing and states that its practices are in accordance with search engine rules.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/050601glaser/ |title=Companies subvert search results to squelch criticism |work=Online Journalism Review |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130116120608/http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/050601glaser/ |archive-date=January 16, 2013 |df=mdy-all }}</ref> | |||
====GoDaddy bomb==== | |||
Another technique is for the owner of an Internet ] to set up the domain's ] entry so that all ]s are directed to the same server. The operator then sets up the server so that page requests generate a page full of desired Google search terms, each linking to a subdomain of the same site, with the same title as the subdomain in the requested ]. Frequently the subdomain matches the linked phrase, with spaces replaced by ]s or ]s. Since Google treats subdomains as distinct sites, the effect of a large number of subdomains linking to each other is a boost to the PageRank of those subdomains and of any other site they link to. | |||
{{see also|Protests against SOPA and PIPA}} | |||
On December 26, 2011, a bomb was started against ] to remove them from the #1 place on Google for "]" in retaliation for its support for ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://plus.google.com/115702843161763309837/posts/2QqAe6xP7Xk |title=Rob Kohr - Google+ - A better way to fight SOPA GoDaddy has been a supporter of… |access-date=2012-02-21}}</ref> This was then disseminated through ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3393177 |title=Attack GoDaddy - better than a boycott | Hacker News |publisher=News.ycombinator.com |access-date=2012-02-21}}</ref> | |||
====Other examples of Google bombs==== | |||
As of ] ], many have noticed changes in the Google algorithm that largely affects, among other things, Googlebombs. As evidence of this, ponder that only roughly 10% of the googlebombs listed above work as of ] ]. This is largely due to Google refactoring its valuation of PageRank, mostly in an effort to keep up with the encroaching result relevancy of the Yahoo and MSN search engines, which many people claim are not nearly as easy to "hack" as Google. | |||
In Australia, one of the first examples of Google bombs was when the keyword "old rice and monkey nuts" was used to generate traffic for '']'' columnist ]'s website. The keyword phrase references the alleged $4 billion in loan deals brokered by ] to Australia in 1974.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Cannell|first1=David|title=Google Bomb Tricks To Avoid|date=January 2, 2015|url=http://sydneysearchresultsptyltd.com.au/local/seo-tricks-to-avoid|publisher=Sydney Search Results|access-date=23 June 2015}}</ref> | |||
== The Amway Quixtar Google bombing example == | |||
In May 2019, ] and ] were targets of multiple Google bombs caused by ] users' dissatisfaction with the eighth season of their show '']''. Targeted phrases included "bad writers" and "]".<ref>{{cite web|last1=Porter|first1=Jon|title=Angry Redditors are trying to Google bomb Game of Thrones writers|url=https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/15/18624480/game-of-thrones-google-bomb-db-weiss-david-benioff|date=May 13, 2019|website=]|df=mdy-all|access-date=17 May 2019}}</ref> | |||
In 2005, ] giant ] ] began a "Quixtar Web Initiative" to manipulate Google results. The project was deemed a clear and flagrant violation of . | |||
In Indonesia, President ] was target of Googlebombing on Google Picture Search when typing "Monyet Pakai Jas Hujan" (Monkey Wearing Raincoat) the results were President Joko Widodo wearing green ] when on an official visit.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Fauzie|first1=Amin|title=VIRAL! Ketik "Monyet Pakai Jas Hujan Hijau" Munculnya Pak Jokowi, Kok Bisa?|date=November 22, 2022|url=https://radartuban.jawapos.com/nasional/861329910/viral-ketik-monyet-pakai-jas-hujan-hijau-munculnya-pak-jokowi-kok-bisa|publisher=Jawa Pos Radar Tuban|access-date=22 November 2022}}</ref> | |||
Amway Quixtar leaders told members that the company had "hired geekoids who were spending their time Google bombing positive info about Quixtar so that the negative sites would be buried way down at the bottom of the Google list when a prospect types in . Nobody will even be able to find the negative sites anymore." SOURCE: | |||
==See also== | |||
The goal in this case was to smother anti-Amway and anti-Quixtar sites, , , , and that claim Amway or Quixtar is a ] or ], or uses deceptive business practices. | |||
{{wiktionary|google bomb}} | |||
{{Portal|Internet}} | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==References== | |||
Quixtar's attempt to lower the ranking of such critical web sites backfired, and for its attempted Googlebombing. | |||
{{Reflist|30em}} | |||
===News articles=== | |||
As of ], a search on Google for " " reveals that the Quixtar.com site dropped from the number one search position to the middle of the third page of search results. | |||
* – BBC News, March 13, 2002 | |||
* – Business 2.0, July 2002 – Ego bombing | |||
* – ''NY Times'', January 22, 2004 | |||
* – ''Pittsburgh Tribune-Review'', April 16, 2004 | |||
* – ''San Diego Union-Tribune'', June 14, 2004 | |||
* – ''Direct Traffic News'', April 4, 2007 | |||
* – CollegeNews.com July 8, 2009 | |||
{{Google LLC}} | |||
The organized effort to manipulate search engine results was first brought to light by bloggers which detailed the offenses in an article . | |||
{{spamming}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Google Bomb}} | |||
Ironically the site that reported Quixtar's attempt to Google bomb once occupied the first search position under "Quixtar". In fact a majority of the top ten results for the term "Quixtar" are all now informational sites critical of the Quixtar business opportunity and its lines of sponsorship. | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
Quixtar's initiative to '']'' the internet included at least and numerous other , ] blogs, ] blogs, and various other pages. Immediately after the exposure many of the blogs shut down or reduced their content. | |||
Amway Quixtar also has independent ]. Some of these businesses have been among the largest abusers of Google bombing. These independent lines of sponsorship are lead by Independent Business Owners, often called IBOs, Quixtar Diamonds, Amway Crowns or ]s such as of , , Fred , Orrin Woodward of Team () and other Diamond IBOs. | |||
Googlebombing and similar practices cost Google money and skew search engine results. Users who observe such actions can take action in several ways: | |||
*Write the offending company or individual to complain | |||
*Notify | |||
*Contact | |||
*Notify the ] | |||
*Post your discoveries and observations to blogs and internet message boards | |||
== Search engine bombing before Google == | |||
Before Google existed, eccentric ] poster ], upset with the attention he received from users who found him amusing, posted an angry to two science newsgroups. He accused these people of "SearchEnginebombing," an offshoot of ], that is cluttering the web/USENET with negative comments about him, so a search engine would find more of them than his own postings. Unlike "Google Bombing", the term "Search Engine Bombing" didn't immediately catch on, and initially its use has been primarily limited to Archimedes Plutonium, and USENET posters who mocked him. | |||
== See also == | |||
*] | |||
== External links == | |||
* Preventing comment spam | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* "Googlebomb Watch" (http://blog.outer-court.com/googlebomb/) - Keeping track of Googlebombs | |||
* - BBC News, ], ] | |||
* - Business 2.0, ] ] - Ego bombing | |||
* - ABC News, ], ] | |||
* - NY Times, ], ] | |||
* - MTV News, ], ] | |||
* - The Guardian, ], ] | |||
] ] ] ] ] ] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 05:51, 17 November 2024
Practice that causes a webpage to have a high rank in GoogleThis article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
The terms Google bombing and Google washing refer to the practice of causing a website to rank highly in web search engine results for irrelevant, unrelated or off-topic search terms by linking heavily. In contrast, search engine optimization (SEO) is the practice of improving the search engine listings of web pages for relevant search terms.
Google-bombing is done for either business, political, or comedic purposes (or some combination thereof). Google's search-rank algorithm ranks pages higher for a particular search phrase if enough other pages linked to it use similar anchor text. By January 2007, however, Google had tweaked its search algorithm to counter popular Google bombs such as "miserable failure" leading to George W. Bush and Michael Moore; now, search results list pages about the Google bomb itself. On 21 June 2015, the first result in a Google search for "miserable failure" was this article. Used both as a verb and a noun, "Google bombing" was introduced to the New Oxford American Dictionary in May 2005.
Google bombing is related to spamdexing, the practice of deliberately modifying HTML to increase the chance of a website being placed close to the beginning of search engine results, or to influence the category to which the page is assigned in a misleading or dishonest manner.
The term Googlewashing was coined by Andrew Orlowski in 2003 in order to describe the use of media manipulation to change the perception of a term, or push out competition from search engine results pages (SERPs).
History
Google bombs date back as far as 1999, when a search for "more evil than Satan himself" resulted in the Microsoft homepage as the top result.
In September 2000 the first Google bomb with a verifiable creator was created by Hugedisk Men's Magazine, a now-defunct online humor magazine, when it linked the text "dumb motherfucker" to a site selling George W. Bush-related merchandise. Hugedisk had also unsuccessfully attempted to Google bomb an equally derogatory term to bring up an Al Gore-related site. After a fair amount of publicity the George W. Bush-related merchandise site retained lawyers and sent a cease-and-desist letter to Hugedisk, thereby ending the Google bomb.
Adam Mathes is credited with coining the term "Google bombing" when he mentioned it in an April 6, 2001, article in the online magazine uber.nu. In the article Mathes details his connection of the search term "talentless hack" to the website of his friend, Andy Pressman, by recruiting fellow webloggers to link to his friend's page with the desired term. Some experts forecast that the practice of Google Bombing is over, as changes to Google's algorithm over the years have minimised the effect of the technique.
Uses as tactical media
The Google Bomb has been used for tactical media as a way of performing a "hit-and-run" media attack on popular topics. Such attacks include Anthony Cox's attack in 2003. He created a parody of the "404 – page not found" browser error message in response to the war in Iraq. The page looked like the error page but was titled "These Weapons of Mass Destruction cannot be displayed". This website could be found as one of the top hits on Google after the start of the war in Iraq. Also, in an attempt to detract attention from the far-right group English Defence League (EDL), a parody group has been made known as "English Disco Lovers", with the expressed purpose of Google bombing the acronym.
Alternative meanings
The Google bomb is often misunderstood by those in the media and publishing industry who do not retain technical knowledge of Google's ranking factors. For example, talk radio host Alex Jones has often conducted what he calls "Google bombs" by dispatching instructions to his radio/Internet listeners. In this context, the term is used to describe a rapid and massive influx of keyword searches for a particular phrase. The keyword surge gives the impression that the related content has suddenly become popular. The strategy behind this type of Google bombing is to attract attention from the larger mainstream media and influence them to publish content related to the keyword.
Google bowling
By studying what types of ranking manipulations a search engine is using, a company can provoke a search engine into lowering the ranking of a competitor's website. This practice, known as Google bowling or negative SEO, is often done by purchasing Google bombing services (or other SEO techniques) not for one's own website, but rather for that of a competitor. The attacker provokes the search company into punishing the "offending" competitor by displaying their page further down in the search results. For victims of Google bowling, it may be difficult to appeal the ranking decrease because Google avoids explaining penalties, preferring not to "educate" real offenders. If the situation is clear-cut, however, Google could lift the penalty after submitting a request for reconsideration. Furthermore, after the Google Penguin update, Google search rankings now take Google bowling into account and very rarely will a website be penalized due to low-quality "farm" backlinks.
Other search engines
Other search engines use similar techniques to rank results and are also affected by Google bombs. A search for "miserable failure" or "failure" on September 29, 2006, brought up the official George W. Bush biography number one on Google, Yahoo!, and MSN and number two on Ask.com. On June 2, 2005, Tooter reported that George Bush was ranked first for the keyword "miserable", "failure", and "miserable failure" in both Google and Yahoo!; Google has since addressed this and disarmed the George Bush Google bomb and many others.
The BBC, reporting on Google bombs in 2002, used the headline "Google Hit By Link Bombers", acknowledging to some degree the idea of "link bombing". In 2004, Search Engine Watch suggested that the term be "link bombing" because of its application beyond Google, and continues to use that term as it is considered more accurate.
We don't condone the practice of googlebombing, or any other action that seeks to affect the integrity of our search results, but we're also reluctant to alter our results by hand in order to prevent such items from showing up. Pranks like this may be distracting to some, but they don't affect the overall quality of our search service, whose objectivity, as always, remains the core of our mission.
By January 2007, Google changed its indexing structure so that Google bombs such as "miserable failure" would "typically return commentary, discussions, and articles" about the tactic itself. Google announced the changes on its official blog. In response to criticism for allowing the Google bombs, Matt Cutts, head of Google's Webspam team, said that Google bombs had not "been a very high priority for us".
Over time, we’ve seen more people assume that they are Google's opinion, or that Google has hand-coded the results for these Google-bombed queries. That's not true, and it seemed like it was worth trying to correct that misperception.
Motivations
Competitions
In May 2004, the websites Dark Blue and SearchGuild teamed up to create what they termed the "SEO Challenge" to Google bomb the phrase "nigritude ultramarine".
The contest sparked controversy around the Internet, as some groups worried that search engine optimization (SEO) companies would abuse the techniques used in the competition to alter queries more relevant to the average user. This fear was offset by the belief that Google would alter their algorithm based on the methods used by the Google bombers.
In September 2004, another SEO contest was created. This time, the objective was to get the top result for the phrase "seraphim proudleduck". A large sum of money was offered to the winner, but the competition turned out to be a hoax.
In March 2005's issue of .net magazine, a contest was created among five professional web developers to make their site the number-one site for the made-up phrase "crystalline incandescence".
Political activism
See also: Political Google bombs in the 2004 U.S. Presidential electionSome of the most famous Google bombs are also expressions of political opinions (e.g. "liar" leading to Tony Blair or "miserable failure" leading to the White House's biography of George W. Bush):
- In 2003, Steven Lerner, creator of Albino Blacksheep, created a parody webpage titled "French Military Victories". When typed into Google, the first result (or the "I'm Feeling Lucky" result) led to a webpage resembling a Google error message, reading, "Your search – French military victories – did not match any documents. Did you mean French military defeats?" The page received over 50,000 hits within 18 hours of its release. Links near the top of the page led to a simplified list of French military history. The only war listed as a win for the French was the French Revolution, in which they fought themselves. As of May 2, 2011, the page is no longer listed in Google's first few results for "French military victories", but several links on the list go to sites recounting the joke.
- In 2003, columnist Dan Savage began his campaign to define the word "santorum" after former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum made several controversial statements regarding homosexuality. A search for "santorum" led to the top result being a website defining it as being related to anal sex. One search engine expert has argued that this campaign does not qualify as a Google bomb, arguing that it is instead a successful new definition for a word explained by a website. (see search engine optimization)
- In 2004, Jewish writer and activist Daniel Sieradski urged visitors to his blog to link to the Misplaced Pages article for "Jew" in response to findings, first publicized by Steven Weinstock, that a search for "Jew" returned the anti-Semitic website Jew Watch at the top of the results. The campaign was successful in displacing the site from the top result.
- In the same year the Persian Gulf naming dispute was the subject of a Google bomb by an Iranian blogger named Pendar Yousefi.
- Also, in 2004, a Google bomb involving searching "ladrones" (Spanish for thieves) on Google linked the SGAE website.
- In France, groups opposing the DADVSI copyright bill, proposed by minister Renaud Donnedieu de Vabres, mounted a Google bombing campaign linking ministre blanchisseur ("laundering minister") to an article on Donnedieu de Vabres' conviction for money laundering. The campaign was so efficient that as of 2006, merely searching for ministre ("minister") or blanchisseur ("launderer") brings up a news report of his conviction as one of the first results.
- In 2004, after the controversy that erupted in the Philippines over the allegations that President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo had cheated in the elections, the phrase "pekeng pangulo" (Tagalog for "fake president") was linked to her official website.
- In December 2004, the "Yan Ang Pinay" ("I am a Filipina") campaign encouraged bloggers to self-identify as Filipina and link the word Filipina to target URLs such as the Filipina Women's Network (ffwn.org), to displace mail-order bride sites in search results.
- In 2004, kretyn (Polish for moron) and similar insults referring to stupidity were linked to websites of various Polish politicians including Andrzej Lepper and Roman Giertych.
- In 2005 an Estonian blogger led a successful campaign to link the word masendav (Estonian for dismal or depressive) to the homepage of Estonian Centre Party. The Centre Party's website still ranks first in the results for masendav as of 2011.
- In the 2006 U.S. midterm elections, many left-wing bloggers, led by MyDD.com, banded together to propel neutral or negative articles about many Republican House candidates to the top of Google searches for their names.
- Also in 2006, Siedziba szatana (satan's headquarters) was linked to the website of controversial Polish ultra-conservative Catholic broadcaster Radio Maryja.
- In January 2007, Google announced a change in its search engine algorithm to significantly reduce the effectiveness of the technique.
- In March 2007, the Washington Post reported that Nikolas Schiller was able to Google bomb "Redacted Name" to highlight his website's block on search engines.
- During the initial stages of the anti-Scientology campaign, Project Chanology, hackers and other members of an anonymous Internet group Google-bombed the Church of Scientology's main website as the first match found when the term "Dangerous Cult" was searched.
- In September 2008, John Key, leader of the New Zealand National Party was Google-bombed with the query "clueless".
- In January 2009, a successful Google bomb was performed against the site of the Bulgarian government by a loose group of bloggers and forum users. It was discovered that by mistake, the robots.txt on the government.bg forbade the crawling of the site by indexing machines which allowed for Google bombing. The group linked the search term "failure" (Bulgarian: провал) to the government site. Within a couple of days, the first search result for "провал" was the Bulgarian government's site regardless of the search results language.
- In April 2009, the website Smart Bitches, Trashy Books launched a Google bomb against Amazon in response to its removal of LGBT material from their ranking lists, Amazon citing it as "adult material". Within hours of its creation the page appeared on the first page of returned search results for the term "Amazon Rank".
- In July 2009, Opie and Anthony successfully performed a new method of Google bombing in which a specific word or phrase is artificially raised in Google Trends. The phrase "Rev Al is a racist" was made #1 on Google Trends on July 8, 2009, due to the controversial comments made by Reverend Al Sharpton during Michael Jackson's Memorial Service. "Corey Feldman is Hurting" was also number 14 on the top Google Trends for the same day in response to Feldman dressing up as Michael Jackson during the memorial service.
- In France, in July 2009, "trou du cul du web" ("Asshole of the Internet") returned as the first result the official website of French president Nicolas Sarkozy; in September 2010, the same tactic resulted in President Sarkozy's Facebook page being the first result. As of May 2014, the top 10 results for the same Google search contain references to Sarkozy.
- In September 2010, 4chan users tried to Google bomb the phrase "Robert Pisano MPAA CEO arrested for child molestation!", as a related action to DDoS attacks on the RIAA, MPAA and British Phonographic Industry (BPI) websites. This was in retaliation for DDoS attacks carried out on The Pirate Bay and various other file-sharing sites.
- In February 2011, several anti-abortion activists managed to make it so that the page for abortion on English Misplaced Pages was the second highest ranking result for the term "murder".
- During the summer of 2011, a joke in response to Craig James’ role in the firing of Mike Leach was posted on EveryDayShouldBeSaturday.com. The joke was indexed often enough by a major search engine that typing "Craig James" into the search box at the search engine resulted in the autocomplete function including "killed 5 hookers". Later this humorous search index behavior was characterized as a "Google bomb" in regards to Craig James’ campaign for elected office.
- In July 2012, searching for "plagiator" (Romanian for "plagiarist/cheater") returns the personal page of Romanian prime minister Victor Ponta, who is accused of plagiarizing his PhD thesis, and various news websites which provide information about the scandal that erupted around the politician. This Google bomb has become itself a piece of news in the Romanian media.
- In October 2012, searching the phrase "completely wrong" on Google images, returns pictures of Mitt Romney, the Republican Nominee for the U.S. Presidential Election in 2012. However, this was not actually an example of a Google bomb - the result came naturally from a series of comments made by Romney, rather than a concentrated campaign intended to link the two.
- In September 2012 the English Disco Lovers campaign was initiated with the intention of replacing the English Defence League (EDL) as the number one result for EDL on Google. On 27 August 2013 the English Disco Lovers overtook all English Defence League related items and became the top search result for the acronym "EDL".
- In June 2015 the search query "top 10 criminals" returned the images of the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, alongside the images of terrorists, murderers and dictators. However, in an official statement Google apologized and said that it was due to an erroneous meta data published by a British daily.
- In July 2018, the search query "idiot" returned images of President Donald Trump.
- In two separate instances – November 2018 and August 2019 – searching for the word bhikhari (Hindi and Urdu for beggar) turned up images of Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, alluding to the country's financial crisis. In response to the first instance, the Provincial Assembly of the Punjab passed a resolution to demand answer from Google on the issue. In February 2019, following the Pulwama attack, a Google search for best toilet paper in the world yielded images of the Flag of Pakistan.
Commercial use
Main article: SpamdexingSome website operators have adapted Google bombing techniques to do "spamdexing". This includes, among other techniques, posting of links to a site in an Internet forum along with phrases the promoter hopes to associate with the site (see spam in blogs). Unlike conventional message board spam, the object is not to attract readers to the site directly, but to increase the site's ranking under those search terms. Promoters using this technique frequently target forums with low reader traffic, in hopes that it will fly under the moderators' radar. Wikis in particular are often the target of this kind of page rank vandalism, as all of the pages are freely editable. This practice was also called "money bombing" by John Hiler circa 2004.
Another technique is for the owner of an Internet domain name to set up the domain's DNS entry so that all subdomains are directed to the same server. The operator then sets up the server so that page requests generate a page full of desired Google search terms, each linking to a subdomain of the same site, with the same title as the subdomain in the requested URL. Frequently the subdomain matches the linked phrase, with spaces replaced by underscores or hyphens. Since Google treats subdomains as distinct sites, the effect of many subdomains linking to each other is a boost to the PageRank of those subdomains and of any other site they link to.
On February 2, 2007, many users noticed changes in the Google algorithm. These changes largely affected (among other things) Google bombs: as of February 15, 2007, only roughly 10% of the Google bombs still worked. This change was largely due to Google refactoring its valuation of PageRank.
Quixtar's bomb
Quixtar, a multi-level marketing company now known as Amway North America, has been accused by its critics of using its large network of websites to move sites critical of Quixtar lower in search engine rankings. A Quixtar/Amway independent business owner (IBO) reports that a Quixtar leader advocated the practice in a meeting of Quixtar IBOs. Quixtar/Amway denied wrongdoing and states that its practices are in accordance with search engine rules.
GoDaddy bomb
See also: Protests against SOPA and PIPAOn December 26, 2011, a bomb was started against GoDaddy to remove them from the #1 place on Google for "domain registration" in retaliation for its support for SOPA. This was then disseminated through Hacker News.
Other examples of Google bombs
In Australia, one of the first examples of Google bombs was when the keyword "old rice and monkey nuts" was used to generate traffic for Herald Sun columnist Andrew Bolt's website. The keyword phrase references the alleged $4 billion in loan deals brokered by Tirath Khemlani to Australia in 1974.
In May 2019, David Benioff and D. B. Weiss were targets of multiple Google bombs caused by Reddit users' dissatisfaction with the eighth season of their show Game of Thrones. Targeted phrases included "bad writers" and "Dumb and Dumber".
In Indonesia, President Joko Widodo was target of Googlebombing on Google Picture Search when typing "Monyet Pakai Jas Hujan" (Monkey Wearing Raincoat) the results were President Joko Widodo wearing green raincoat when on an official visit.
See also
- Adversarial information retrieval
- Googlewhack
- Link building
- Political Google bombs in the 2004 U.S. presidential election
- Twitter bomb
References
- ^ Zeller, Tom Jr. (October 26, 2006). "A New Campaign Tactic: Manipulating Google Data". The New York Times (Late Edition (East Coast)). p. A.20. (Note: payment required, weblink goes to abstract.)
- ^ Cohen, Noam (January 29, 2007). "Google Halts 'Miserable Failure' Link to President Bush". The New York Times. Retrieved May 3, 2010.
- "Miserable failure - Google Search". Archived from the original on June 21, 2015.
- Price, Gary (May 16, 2005). "Google and Google Bombing Now Included New Oxford American Dictionary". Search Engine Watch. Archived from the original on January 27, 2007. Retrieved January 29, 2007..
- Gyöngyi, Zoltán; Garcia-Molina, Hector (2005), "Web spam taxonomy" (PDF), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Adversarial Information Retrieval on the Web (AIRWeb), 2005 in The 14th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2005) May 10, (Tue)-14 (Sat), 2005, Nippon Convention Center (Makuhari Messe), Chiba, Japan., New York, NY: ACM Press, ISBN 1-59593-046-9
- Orlowski, Andrew (April 3, 2003). "Anti-war slogan coined, repurposed and Googlewashed ... in 42 days". The Register. Retrieved January 6, 2007.
- Andrew A. Adams; Rachel McCrindle (February 15, 2008). Pandora's Box: Social and Professional Issues of the Information Age. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 122–123. ISBN 978-0-470-06553-2. Retrieved September 30, 2012.
- Sullivan, Danny (March 18, 2002). "Google Bombs Aren't So Scary". ClickZ. Retrieved December 8, 2017.
- "The 10 Most Incredible Google Bombs". November 9, 2010.
- Manjoo, Fahrad (January 25, 2001). "Google Link is Bush League". Wired News. Archived from the original on April 5, 2001. Retrieved January 26, 2007.
- Calore, Michael; Scott Gilbertson (January 26, 2001). "Remembering the First Google Bomb". Wired News. Archived from the original on February 25, 2007. Retrieved January 27, 2007.
- Mathes, Adam (April 6, 2001). "Filler Friday: Google Bombing". Archived from the original on July 15, 2005.
- "Interface as a Conflict of Ideologies". April 2007.
- "EDL - English Disco Lovers NOT English Defence League - Home". Archived from the original on February 5, 2013.
- Schoff, Hans. "How to Google Bomb - Mastering Internet Marketing Strategies | Hans Schoff's Official Home Based Income Blog". Hansschoff.com. Archived from the original on May 12, 2013. Retrieved March 26, 2013.
- The New Activism — Alex Jones and the Next Phase of the InfoWar
- Greenberg, Andy (June 28, 2007). "The Saboteurs Of Search". Forbes. Retrieved September 8, 2010.
- Pedone, Michael (October 27, 2005). "Google Bowling: How Competitors Can Sabotage You; What Google Should Do About It". Webpronews.com. Archived from the original on December 1, 2010. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
- "Google Hit By Link Bombers". BBC. March 13, 2002.
- "Yooter SEO blog". Yooter.com. Archived from the original on May 13, 2009. Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- Mayer, Marissa (September 16, 2005). "Official Google Blog: Googlebombing 'failure'". Googleblog.blogspot.com. Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- "Urban Legends Reference Pages: Miserable Failure". Snopes.com. December 9, 2003. Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- "Official Google Webmaster Central Blog: A quick word about Googlebombs". Googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com. January 25, 2007. Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- Karch, Marziah. "Google Bombs Explained". About.com. Archived from the original on June 30, 2011. Retrieved March 30, 2011.
- "french military victories". Albinoblacksheep.com. Retrieved February 21, 2012.
- Dalton, Richard J. Jr. (March 13, 2003). "Internet Parody Hands French Military a Defeat". Newsday. p. A.27. Archived from the original on October 1, 2007. Retrieved February 4, 2007.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)(payment required, link goes to abstract) October 1, 2007 - McMorris-Santoro, Evan (July 21, 2011). "With His Campaign Lagging, Rick Santorum Turns Once Again To Dan Savage". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved October 11, 2013.
- Becker, David. "Google caught in anti-Semitism flap". News.cnet.com. Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- John Brandon (May 11, 2004). "Dropping the Bomb on Google". Wired. Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- "Google caught in anti-Semitism flap - CNET News". News.cnet.com. Retrieved February 21, 2012.
- Hamid Tehrani (May 10, 2007). "Interview with Pendar Yousefi: Blogger, Designer and Google Bomber". Global Voices Online. Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- "The Google Bomb Story". Mahimoto. Archived from the original on February 1, 2012. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
- "The Arabian Gulf Google Bomb". The Persian Gulf. Archived from the original on February 20, 2010. Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- "Bombardement Google à la française - Palpitt - Metablog". Palpitt. Archived from the original on February 11, 2007. Retrieved February 21, 2012.
- Yan Ang Filipina Archived Retrieved 22 October 2009
- "Resurrecting the image of a true Filipina". Filipina Soul. February 14, 2007. Retrieved June 15, 2013.
- "Google'i otsing seob sõnad "masendav" ja "Keskerakond"". Postimees (in Estonian). October 21, 2005. Archived from the original on January 18, 2009. Retrieved October 5, 2009.
- "Google". Retrieved December 17, 2011.
- "Siedziba szatana w Radiu Maryja". Archived from the original on December 19, 2010. Retrieved January 12, 2011.
- Jacqui Cheng (January 26, 2007). "Google defuses Googlebombs". News. ARS Technica. Retrieved January 27, 2007.
- David Montgomery (March 14, 2007). "Here Be Dragons". Washington Post. Retrieved March 14, 2007.
- Miller, Jason Lee (January 29, 2008). "Scientology Bomb Cruises Past Google". WebProNews: Breaking eBusiness and Search News. iEntry, Inc. Archived from the original on February 1, 2008. Retrieved January 29, 2008.
- "Google bomb targets John Key". 3 News. September 12, 2008. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 6, 2015.
- Rene Beekman (February 25, 2009). "Sofia Echo coverage". Sofiaecho.com. Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- SB Sarah (April 12, 2009). "Amazon Rank". Smartbitchestrashybooks.com. Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- "Google Trends: Jul 8, 2009". Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- "Corey Feldman is hurting…or is it a Google bomb?". Collegenews.com. Archived from the original on January 22, 2011. Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- "Google Bomb Corey Feldman is hurting". Topgoogletrends.netcashdaily.net. July 8, 2009. Archived from the original on April 3, 2010. Retrieved July 9, 2010.
- Lance Whitney. http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-20016961-83.html?tag=mncol;title
- "10 Notorious Google Bombs - Nicholas Jackson - Technology". The Atlantic. Retrieved February 21, 2012.
- Doctorow, Cory (February 25, 2011). "Googlebombers turn "Abortion" into second result for "Murder"". Boing Boing. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
- "Anti-Choicers Link "Abortion" To "Murder" On Google". Jezebel. February 25, 2011. Archived from the original on March 21, 2012. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
- Big, Bobby (July 15, 2011). "THE CURIOUS INDEX, 7/15/2011". Every Day Should Be Saturday. Retrieved January 9, 2012.
- Driscoll, Matt (December 14, 2011). "The truth about Craig James and those hookers". Weekly Volcano. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
- Loznianu, Ramona. "Editor". Gândul. Archived from the original on July 16, 2012.
- Worstall, Tim (October 14, 2012). "The Mitt Romney 'Completely Wrong' Google Bomb". Forbes.
- Lynskey, Dorian. "How to disco dance the EDL off Google and Facebook". The Guardian. London. Retrieved February 2, 2012.
- Google apologises to Indian PM Narendra Modi after he appears in list of top 10 criminals, June 4, 2015, The Independent.
- Google sorry for Narendra Modi images in 'Top 10 criminals' list, June 4, 2015, BBC.
- Quackenbush, Casey (July 19, 2018). "Anti-Trump Activists Are Gaming Google Searches for 'Idiot'". Time. Retrieved July 21, 2018.
- "'भिखारी' सर्च करने पर दिख रही इमरान खान की फोटो, पाकिस्तान ने Google से मांगा जवाब". News18 India (in Hindi). December 17, 2018. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
- "Google 'bhikhari', search engine shows images of Pakistan PM Imran Khan". Business Today. August 16, 2019. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
- Kiggins, Steve (February 17, 2019). "Pakistan flag is top result for 'the best toilet paper in the world' on Google. But, why?". USA TODAY. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
- Kopytoff, Verne (January 26, 2004). "Google targeted by pranksters: Web site operators, bloggers skew results". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved November 27, 2007.
- Ochoa, George; Corey, Melinda (2005). The 100 Best Trends 2006: Emerging Developments You Can't Afford to Ignore. Adams Media. p. 213. ISBN 1-59337-451-8. Retrieved November 27, 2007.
- "A quick word about Googlebombs". Official Google Webmaster Central Blog. Retrieved September 22, 2015.
- "Google Answers: Google Inc., and the Google Bomb". Retrieved February 21, 2012.
- "Companies subvert search results to squelch criticism". Online Journalism Review. Archived from the original on January 16, 2013.
- "Rob Kohr - Google+ - A better way to fight SOPA GoDaddy has been a supporter of…". Retrieved February 21, 2012.
- "Attack GoDaddy - better than a boycott | Hacker News". News.ycombinator.com. Retrieved February 21, 2012.
- Cannell, David (January 2, 2015). "Google Bomb Tricks To Avoid". Sydney Search Results. Retrieved June 23, 2015.
- Porter, Jon (May 13, 2019). "Angry Redditors are trying to Google bomb Game of Thrones writers". The Verge. Retrieved May 17, 2019.
- Fauzie, Amin (November 22, 2022). "VIRAL! Ketik "Monyet Pakai Jas Hujan Hijau" Munculnya Pak Jokowi, Kok Bisa?". Jawa Pos Radar Tuban. Retrieved November 22, 2022.
News articles
- Google hit by link bombers – BBC News, March 13, 2002
- Top of the Heap – Business 2.0, July 2002 – Ego bombing
- Engineering Google Results to Make a Point – NY Times, January 22, 2004
- Student trying to 'bomb' Kerry – Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, April 16, 2004
- Dropping 'Google-bombs' – San Diego Union-Tribune, June 14, 2004
- Inbound Links most important for Google ranking and bombs BBC – Direct Traffic News, April 4, 2007
- Corey Feldman is hurting…or is it a Google bomb? – CollegeNews.com July 8, 2009
Unsolicited digital communication | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocols |
| ||||
Anti-spam | |||||
Spamdexing | |||||
Internet fraud |