Misplaced Pages

:Notice board for vaccine-related topics: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:22, 13 February 2008 editOmbudsman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,258 edits copy edits← Previous edit Revision as of 22:03, 13 February 2008 edit undoOmbudsman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,258 edits →Assessment table: copy editsNext edit →
Line 147: Line 147:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
⚫ * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 162: Line 161:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
⚫ * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
⚫ * ]
⚫ * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 180: Line 176:
* ] * ]
|| <!-- Low --> '''X''' || <!-- Low --> '''X'''
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 188: Line 183:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
⚫ * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 211: Line 207:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
⚫ * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 221: Line 218:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
⚫ * ]
⚫ * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 230: Line 229:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* [[William Tebb * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]

Revision as of 22:03, 13 February 2008

This page is a notice board for matters particularly relevant to articles to vaccines and vaccine-related topics. Please refer to the talk pages of these articles for related discussions.

Notice board for vaccine-related topics.

Shortcut
  • ]
If you are Wikipedian interested in vaccine-related topics, this notice board is for you. See also Vaccine controversy, Vaccination.


You may also choose to watch the List of vaccine topics.

Announcements (please update as needed)

Open tasks/article requests

Expansion requests

NPOV requests

Vaccine-related alerts

Vaccine-related articles in need of attention

New vaccine-related articles

Vaccine stubs

Vaccine-related requested moves

Vaccine-related candidates for deletion

Vaccine-related articles which have survived AfD

Vaccine-related articles which have not survived AfD

Assessment criteria

Assessment of autism spectrum-related articles:

  • Importance
    • Top = Core article or primary definition; central vaccine difinition/person or necessary for basic coverage of the topic (e.g.; Vaccine controversy, Vaccine injury)
    • High = Core daughter article or significant related topic/person, hard to write the article comprehensively and NPOV without this article, enjoys widespread notability and consensus (e.g.; Thimerosal controversy, Maurice Hilleman)
    • Mid = Daughter article or broad/basic definition, important for comprehensive coverage of the top issues, but not an integral definition component (e.g.; Thomas Verstraeten, Safe Minds)
    • Low = Non-core, the topic could be covered without this article (e.g., Paul Offit, Autism Speaks
  • Quality
    • Has attained FA
    • A-class or could attain with a bit of work
    • GA-class or could attain GA with a bit of work
    • B-equivalent, mostly cited and accurate, but has some issues, could be citations, OR, POV, or incomprehensive. Not too much work needed to bring to decent standard, but may still be a stub or start.
    • Some cleanup/work needed, below B-class, has some issues like lack of citations, OR, POV, incomprehensive. Sustained attention needed to bring to standard.
    • More work needed, multiple issues such as uncited, essay, POV, dubious accuracy or questionable notability. Lots of attention needed.

Assessment table

Autism
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low
Quality
FA A B C D
almost
ready for A 		E F G H
almost
ready for GA 		I J K L
B-equiv. M N O P
Some

cleanup
needed

Q R S T
More work

needed:
Uncited,
essay,
notability,
or POV

U V W X

Active contributors on vaccine-related topics

Feel free to add or remove yourself from this list.

Discussions

Editors need to keep a close eye on a number of other editors' activities. There is a great deal of vaccination damage being done and covered up by officials and health professionals across Europe. Parents who try to get medical help for vaccine damage cases can find themselves being accused of MSbP (now legally recognised in only two countries as having no scientific basis) and having their children taken away and into care (where the children are even less likely to get the medical care they need). The following news release is particularly informative and those who recklessly censor valid NPOV information they do not agree with need to be watched most carefully. There is a vociferous band whose activities are likely to be compounding the damage already being done by exaggerating the risks of disease and downplaying the hazards of vaccines. The ones to really suffer are in the third world, whose nutrition is so low they are at the greatest risk from vaccine viruses and of course the mercury which is not being removed from vaccines for the third world.81.111.172.198 12:30, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
"European Forum for Vaccine Vigilance
The EFVV has completed a 6 year study and collected over 1000 cases of vaccine reaction. A report is available in FIVE languages, as paper copy or CD. This report has been sent to various MEPs ......
www.efvv.org
Document for journalists
Who we are
The EFVV is a European group comprised of the .... parents' associations, doctors and other practitioners who are concerned about the undesirable secondary effects of vaccines, and - in countries where vaccination is compulsory - lack of freedom to choose:
· Association Liberté Information Santé (ALIS) (France)
· Liga para la Libertad de Vacunaciones (Spain)
· The Informed Parent (United Kingdom)
· Society of Homeopaths (United Kingdom)
· The Alliance of Registered Homeopaths (United Kingdom)
· Nederlandse Vereniging Kritisch Prikken (Holland)
· Stichting Vaccinatieschade (Holland)
· Groupe Médical de Réflexion sur les Vaccins (Switzerland)
· COMILVA (Italy)
· Associazione vittime dei vaccini (Italy)
· AEGIS (Luxembourg)
· LiSa (Germany)
Preventie vaccinatieschade (Belgium)
and numerous medical and other professionals
Over six years the EFVV conducted a study of the secondary effects of vaccinations, using a questionnaire translated into five languages, which was made available to health practitioners and members of the public.
The analysis of the collected data is published in a REPORT, available in five languages (English, French, Spanish, German, Dutch), and also on a CD which contains our complete work in all five langauages.
These documents show that, contrary to official information, secondary

effects of vaccinations are:

  • Much more frequent
  • Much more serious
  • More numerous with successive vaccinations
  • Responsible for the onset of new and more complex degenerative pathologies (fibromyalgia, diabetes, autism, many different auto immune illnesses)
  • Usually dismissed by medical staff, remaining unreported.
Our suggestions
· Exhaustive information on the secondary effects of vaccination should be made available to everyone,
· The setting up of a strict, independent vaccinovigilance that collects all side effects from vaccination,
· Victims of vaccination-damage should automatically receive compensation, irrespective of who they are,
· Laws that guarantee fundamental rights should be respected,
· Absence of discrimination between vaccinated and unvaccinated people (school, work,

services.)

· Abolition of compulsory vaccination.
Artificial induction of immunity / Immunization: Vaccines, Vaccination, Infection, Inoculation (J07)
Development
Classes
Administration
Vaccines
Bacterial
Viral
Protozoan
Helminthiasis
Other
Inventors/
researchers
Controversy
Related