Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jpark3909 (talk | contribs) at 19:50, 6 December 2009 (added another dispute topic, i dont think its necessary but it has a link to prove it). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Japanese-Korean disputes

File:Japan South Korea North Korea Locator.PNG
Japan	North Korea	South Korea

There have been disputes between Japan and Korea (both North and South) on many issues over the years. The two nations have a complex history of cultural exchange, trade, and war, underlying their relations today. In ancient times, cultural exchanges of ideas between Japan and Korea were common through Koreans immigrating to Japan or via Japanese trade and diplomacy with Korea. However the Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–1598), and the 1910–1945 annexation of Korea, have scarred the relations of both countries ever since.

Today, Japan and South Korea are major trading partners, and many students, tourists, entertainers, and business people travel between the two countries. Conversely, North Korea has few political or economic relations with Japan.

Korea under Japanese rule

With the Treaty of Ganghwa in 1875, Japan started to be involved in Korean politics. In 1895, Empress Myeongseong was assassinated by Japanese agents. In 1897, Joseon was renamed the Korean Empire (1897-1910), and King Gojong became Emperor Gojong. Nevertheless, In 1905, Japanese forced Korea to sign the Eulsa Treaty. Korea effectively became a protectorate of Japan on 25 July 1905, the 1905 Protectorate Treaty having been promulgated without Emperor Gojong's required seal. Following the signing of the treaty An Jung-geun assassinated Itō Hirobumi, the Resident-General of Korea, in 1909.

In 1910, Japan annexed Korea, although neither is considered to be legally valid.

Many Koreans suffered under Japanese rule. Korean resistance to the Japanese occupation was manifested in the massive nonviolent March 1st Movement of 1919. Thereafter the Korean liberation movement, coordinated by the Northeast Anti-Japanese United Army in exile, was largely active in neighboring Manchuria, China and Siberia. Japanese control of Korea ended in 1945 with Japan's surrender on the USS Missouri.

Much of this argument has been discredited in recent years, as overall development of the Korean Peninsula did not start until after the end of the Korean War (1950–1953). Japanese control of Korea ended in 1945 with Japan's surrender on the USS Missouri. Many Koreans suffered under Japanese rule.

Apology of Korea under Japanese rule

Following their independence from Imperial Japan, both North and South Korea have demanded official apologies for what they view as a harsh and unjustified occupation of the Korean Peninsula.

Although some liberal Japanese cabinet members have since made apologies, many Koreans view them as merely paying insincere lip service, since subsequent Japanese Prime Ministers and members of the Japanese Diet including the Japanese Ambassador to Seoul have made statements either whitewashing or justifying outright the Japanese occupation.

Proponents of Japanese nationalism and Japanese imperialism as well as scholars, such as Professor Carter Eckert at Harvard University and Professor Lee, Jong-Wha at Korea University have made attempts at justifying the colonial era by citing industrial advances made during that time. However, much of this assertion has been opposed in South Korea.

Yasukuni Shrine

National relations

Yasukuni Shrine is a Shinto shrine which memorializes Japanese armed forces members killed in wartime. It was constructed as a memorial during the Meiji era. The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal convicted 148 Koreans of Class B and C war crimes, 23 of whom were sentenced to death. Yasukuni shrine serves, among other functions, as memorial for 23 executed Koreans B and C war criminals and 14 Japanese A-class war criminals. As such, it has been the subject of continued controversy.

Nakasone Yasuhiro discontinued visits to Yasukuni shrine in 1986. However, Former Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi resumed visits to Yasukuni Shrine, starting on August 13, 2001. He visited the shrine six times as Prime Minister, stating that he was "paying homage to the servicemen who died for defense of Japan." These visits drew strong condemnation and protests from Japan's neighbors, mainly China. As a result, China and South Korea refused to meet with Koizumi, and there were no mutual visits between Chinese and Japanese leaders after October 2001 and between South Korean and Japanese leaders after June 2005. President of South Korea Roh Moo-hyun has suspended all summit talks between South Korea and Japan.

Comfort women

This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Japan–Korea disputes" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Many in Korea have been demanding compensation for so-called comfort women who were compelled to work in military brothels during the World War II for Japanese soldiers. As the few surviving comfort women continue to struggle for acknowledgment and an apology, Japanese court system has rejected such claims due to the length of time and claiming that there is no evidence.

So far, the Japanese government refused to fully apologize and has taken a minor action to settle the problem. They arranged a small private organization that gives small amounts of money to the victims. Today, many of the surviving comfort women are in their 70s and 80s. Many suspect that the Japanese government is waiting and hoping for these witnesses to die in which case there will be no more evidence and memories will start to fall apart, allowing people to forget about this event.

On the other hand, the European Parliament has recently adopted a resolution that demands the Japanese government to apologize to the former comfort women. This resolution was passed with 54 ayes out of 57 parliament members present. This is the fourth time a foreign country has demanded an official apology from Japan to Korea, following ones from U.S, Canada, and Netherlands. The Japanese government, however, has refused to do this so far.

History textbooks

The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) reviews and approves the content of school history textbooks available for selection by Japanese schools. Foreign scholars, as well as many Japanese historians, have criticized the political slant and factual errors of some approved textbooks. After the Tsukurukai's textbook passed inspection in April 2001, South Korea demanded, to no avail, the revision of 25 passages in the textbook. This demand aroused resentment among those who felt that Korea was interfering in Japanese domestic affairs. So far, Tsukurukai's textbook has been adopted by less than 0.1% of the schools, but has become a bestseller in the general book market, and has caused the viewpoint of textbooks to shift to the right. For example, it omits any reference to "comfort women". However, it should be noted that there are many Japanese teacher unions that are against the textbook. In contrast, in North Korea, only one series of history textbooks published by the government is allowed for use in schools. South Korea uses 6 history text books which the schools can choose from. Some conservative Japanese scholars claim that Korean textbooks have a bias in criticizing Japan and the Japanese occupation of Korea, but thus far there has been no massive protest against Korean textbooks in Japan.

Compensation

Twenty years after the end of World War II, South Korea and Japan re-established diplomatic relations with the 1965 signing of the Treaty on Basic Relations. In 2005, South Korea disclosed diplomatic documents that detailed the proceedings of the treaty. Kept secret for 40 years, the documents revealed that Japan provided 500 million dollars in soft loans and 300 million in grants to South Korea as compensation for its 1910-45 occupation, and that South Korea agreed to demand no more compensations after the treaty, either at the government to government level or individual to government level. It was also revealed that the South Korean government assumed the responsibility for compensating individuals on a lump sum basis while rejecting Japan's proposal for direct compensation. However, the South Korean government used most of the loans for economic development and have failed to provide adequate compensation to victims, paying only 300,000 won per death, with only a total of 2,570 million won to the relatives of 8,552 victims who died in forced labor. As the result, the Korean victims are preparing to file a compensation suit against the South Korean government as of 2005. The treaty does not preclude individual suits against Japanese individuals or corporations but such suits are often constrained by the statute of limitation. The Women's International War Crimes Tribunal 2000 on Japan Military Sexual Slavery, a mock trial organised by Asian women and human rights organizations and supported by international NGOs, issued a ruling that "states cannot agree by treaty to waive the liability of another state for crimes against humanity."

Apology

Several Japanese Prime Ministers have issued several official apologies, including Prime Minister Obuchi in the Japan-Republic of Korea Joint Declaration of 1998, and Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi in the Japan-DPRK Pyongyang Declaration of 2002. Koizumi said, "I once again express my feelings of deep remorse and heartfelt apology, and also express the feelings of mourning for all victims, both at home and abroad, in the war." While Koreans welcomed the apologies at the time, many Koreans now view the statements as insincere, because of the continuing actions of Japanese officials that contradict such statements of remorse. In one example, hundreds of Japanese politicians made a tributary visit to the Yasukuni Shrine to honor Japan's war dead while Prime Minister Koizumi was simultaneously issuing an apology. This was seen by South Koreans as a conflict between actions and words and has caused many South Koreans to distrust Japanese statements of apology. In addition, almost all politicians who have apologized at official international forums would later retract or contradict their apologies at home in Japan causing confusion internationally. Template:CFact

Geographic disputes

Liancourt Rocks (Dokdo/Takeshima)

The Liancourt Rocks (Korean: Dokdo "solitary island"; Japanese: Takeshima "bamboo island") are a group of islets in the Sea of Japan (East Sea) whose ownership is disputed between Japan and South Korea. South Korea currently occupies the islands, an action that continues to draw official protests from Japan. There are valuable fishing grounds around the islets and potentially large reserves of natural gas.

The neutrality of this section is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (April 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Perceptions of Dokdo in Korea and Japan

• According to Samguksagi ("Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms"), an island state known as "Usanguk" was incorporated into Korea's Silla Dynasty in A.D. 512 when Lee Sa-bu, a governor of the ancient kingdom of Silla, conquered Usanguk. The eastern islands Ulleungdo and Dokdo that composed Usanguk have been part of the Korean history ever since. Template:CFact but Seokdo or Dokdo came to gain widespread currency since the late 19th century.

• Template:CFact Some Japanese scholars have tried to deny the existence of Usando, asserting that "there is a view claiming that Ulleungdo and Usando are in fact one island known by different names." However, this view appears in such documents as the Sinjeung donggug yeoji seungnam (Revised and Augmented Version of the Survey of National Geography of Korea) (published in 1481, revised in 1531) merely as a way of briefly introducing a view held by a minority of people, and the official view clearly distinguishes Ulleungdo and Usando as two separate groups of islets, demonstrating Korea's perception of Dokdo as part of its territory in those days.

• Many maps clearly distinguish between Ulleungdo and Usando. Though some old maps incorrectly indicate the position and size of Dokdo, this does not mean that they are denying the existence of Usando. Maps manufactured in old times, before the development of science and technology, lacked accuracy in terms of geographic information and measurement, and relied on the subjective perception of each map's creators (at this time, islands were often geographically inaccurately drawn; in most cases closer to the mainland to express the nation's sovereignty over the land in question). The key point here is that most of the old Korean maps, whether produced by the government or by civilians, show both Ulleungdo and Dokdo, demonstrating that even in the past, Dokdo was recognized as a territory of Korea.

• The first document in Japan to make reference to Dokdo is the Onshu shicho goki ("Records on Observations in Oki Province") compiled in 1667. Onshu shicho goki is a topographical survey of Onshu (present-day Oki Island) compiled by a government official of Izumo. The survey stating, “Onshu is in the middle of the North Sea... two-days of sailing northwest brings one to Songdo, and then Jukdo after one more day... therefore, Japan's boundary shall be limited to this state (shu),” explicitly recognizes Onshu as the boundary of Japan.

• Despite Japanese claims that it has recognized Dokdo for a long time, old Japanese maps produced by the government consistently omit Dokdo, and many civilian-made Japanese maps place Dokdo as part of Korean territory.

In Dec 1949 the Soviet Union decided Dokdo belongs to Korea.

In August 1951, South Korea requested that the USA have Japan give up their claim to Dokto/Takeshima, but the USA Secretary of State David Dean Rusk decided not to get involved in South Korea's request. 1P 2P3P4P

In January 1952, South Korea's Syngman Rhee line declaration included Liancourt Rocks as Korean territory. Since September 1954, Japan has proposed adjudicating this problem in the International Court of Justice but South Korea has both refused to accept this proposal or to acknowledge the dispute. North Korea supports the South Korean claim.

In 2007, Japan proposed to South Korea to bring the matter to the International Justice Court, but the offer was rejected by the South Korean government. Template:CFact

Tsushima

Koreans claim this island to be Korean, although the South Korean government does not make this claim. Called "Tsushima" in Japanese and "Daemado" in Korean, this island was briefly Korean-controlled during the Joseon Dynasty, and possibly during the Silla era.

In 1948, the South Korean government formally demanded that the Island be ceded to South Korea based on "historical claims." However, the claim was rejected by SCAP in 1949. As of July 19, 1951, South Korean government agreed that the demand of Tsushima had already been omitted.

In 2005, when Japan's Shimane Prefecture announced Takeshima Day claiming Liancourt Rocks as part of its jurisdiction, Korea's Masan city council proclaimed Daemado Day and declared Tsushima Island Korean territory.

Sea of Japan (East Sea) naming dispute

The name "Sea of Japan" is claimed to have been geographically and historically established in Europe from the late 18th century to the early 19th century and is currently used all over the world. However, both North and South Korean governments protest that Japan promoted the usage of the name "Sea of Japan" while Korea lost effective control over its foreign policy under Japanese imperial expansion. South Korea argues that the name "East Sea," which was one of the most common names found on ancient European maps of this sea, should be the official name instead of (or at least used concurrently with) "Sea of Japan." Japan claims that Western countries named it the "Sea of Japan" prior to 1860, before the growth of Japanese influence over Korean foreign policy after the outbreak of the First Sino-Japanese War in 1894. It was in 1928, when Limits of Oceans and Seas officially took the name Sea of Japan, which eventually influenced other official international documents such as the United Nations. South Korea claims that Korea was occupied by the Japanese and effectively had no international voice to protest in 1928.

Miscellaneous issues

Boycotting of Japanese products

After the end of Japanese rule, Japanese cultural products such as music, film, and books were banned in both North and South Korea. The boycott was gradually lifted in South Korea starting in 1998. Some Japanese cultural items, including but not limited to manga, anime and music, have been introduced into South Korea even while they were banned (the Korean public was not informed of their Japanese origin). Template:CFact

Template:CFact This is in spite of the fact that a Korean character does not appear in any episode of the animated series. The animation continues to see distribution through mobile networks and internet streaming.

Return of Korean remains

During the Japanese period of Korea (notably during World War II), Japan mobilised hundreds of thousands of laborers from Korea to sustain industrial productions, mainly in mining. Most of them were eventually returned to Korea by the surviving navy vessels after the war, the rest had died in Japan. The South requested for help in finding the dead bodies of these kidnapped laborers for proper burials. Instead, the Japanese government passed the responsibilities of finding and identifying these bodies to the corporations that committed the kidnappings. Corporations, such as Mitsubishi, Mitsumi and others, stated that the culpability should fall on the governments and not on private companies. The situation prevented South Korea from properly coordinating their efforts and they have only identified a couple of hundred bodies rather than the larger amount they had hoped for. With neither the Japanese government nor the Japanese corporations actively seeking to find and identify the missing Korean remains, this issue is another reason for anti-Japanese enmity on the part of the Koreans. It is likely that this issue will also not be resolved in the near future.

Kidnapping of Japanese citizens

A junior high school student from Niigata, Megumi Yokota, was kidnapped by North Korea on November 15, 1977. In addition to her, many other Japanese citizens were kidnapped by North Korean agents. In 2002, North Korea admitted to kidnapping 13 Japanese citizens during the 1970s and 1980s, in order to train spies to infiltrate U.S. military installations in Japan. Five people have been released, but the North Korean government claimed that there were eight dead. Japan has pressed for the return of the bodies. However, the Japanese government believes that there are still kidnapped Japanese citizens being held captive in North Korea. North Korea's official statement is that the issue has been settled. Because of the overwhelming number of South Koreans also kidnapped by North Korea, there has been some joint efforts of South Korea and Japan in retrieving their citizens.

Plagiarism of Japanese products

In recent years certain aspects of Korean pop culture have been accused of unoriginality, plagiarizing Japanese pop culture in areas such as animation, pop music, video games, and television programs. Copyright violation issues have been arising as a result. In 2007, a K-pop singer Ivy was accused of copying a scene from the Japanese video game movie adaptation Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children in one of her music videos. The court ordered that the video be banned from airing on television, stating that "most of the clip is noticeably similar to scenes from the film".

Origin of Japanese culture

This article may need to be rewritten to comply with Misplaced Pages's quality standards. You can help. The talk page may contain suggestions. (September 2009)

While most mainstream anthropologists and historians would probably readily acknowledge that the Japanese and Korean peoples share closely-linked ethnic, cultural and anthropological histories, a point of contention between nationalist scholars in Japan and Korea rests on which culture came first, and can thus be considered the forebearer of the other. In brief, the Korean assertion is that through a long history of contact, several important Korean innovations in culture and technology were transferred to Japan. Several linguistic theories also make claims based upon the similarities between the languages of the respective cultures. Koreans feel there was a plagiarism of their culture in Buddhism, grammar, iron processing for swords, rice cultivation, rituals or customs, and pottery and that Japanese seems to cover up cultural and familial transfers from Korea to Japan. For example the New York times writes when looking at Japans national treasures like the Miroku and Koryuji sculptures; "It is also a symbol of Japan itself and an embodiment of qualities often used to define Japanese-ness in art: formal simplicity and emotional serenity. To see it was to have an instant Japanese experience. I had mine. As it turns out, though, the Koryuji sculpture isn't Japanese at all. Based on Korean prototypes, it was almost certainly carved in Korea" and "The obvious upshot of the show's detective work is to establish that certain classic "Japanese" pieces are actually "Korean."" In addition, in 1976 Japan stopped all foreign archeologist from studying the Gosashi tomb which is suppose to be the resting place of Emperor Jingu. Recently in 2008, Japan has allowed controlled limited access to foreign archeologists, but the international community still has many unanswered questions. National geographics wrote Japan "has kept access to the tombs restricted, prompting rumors that officials fear excavation would reveal bloodline links between the "pure" imperial family and Korea"　Experts still hope Japan will be more forthright in the future and see this limited access as the first step in the right direction.

Zainichi Koreans

Zainichi (在日, Resident Japan) refers to Koreans currently residing in Japan. Most of them are second-, third-, or fourth-generation Koreans who have not yet applied for Japanese citizenship. Template:CFact while others entered Japan illegally in order to escape the Korean War that took place after the Japanese occupation. They lost their Japanese citizenship after the signing of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which officially ended the Japanese annexation of Korea and their country of origin, Korea, no longer existed when South Korea and North Korea became separate states. Zainichi communities are split based upon affiliation with North or South Korea, (Chongryon and Mindan). It is claimed that two or three of the leaders of the smaller organized crime syndicates found on a list of more than twenty such groups as specified by the National Police Agency in Japan may be ethnic Koreans. More positively speaking, Masayoshi Son, Japan's businessman and chief of Softbank, is of Zainichi background. In addition, some of Japan's popular stars, athletes and high ranking businessmen are Zainichi background. Rikidōzan, Mas Oyama etc. In order to escape discrimination, there are Koreans living in Japan who use Japanese names to hide their origin. Today, however, as the relationship between Japan and Korea has improved, there also exist many Zainichi Koreans or former Zainichi Koreans with Japanese nationality who don't hide their origin and are in full activity, just like Tadanari Lee, a Japanese football player of Korean origin.

Kimchi

In 1996, Japan proposed making kimchi as the official Atlanta Olympics food, and decided to export Japanese made "kimuchi" (キムチ) to other countries. Korea is opposed to Japan's rapid increase of the amount of "imitated" kimchi export and questions that there was no international appropriate standard to inspect and evaluate the quality of imported kimchi, as kimchi is a traditional Korean food. To this day, Japanese kimchi export excesses that of Korean kimchi export. Korea could not tolerate Japanese "low quality kimchi", floating around in the world market and insisted on an urgent need for international kimchi standard to "protect consumers' health and to ensure fair practices in the food trade" (KFRI).

References

1. Association for Asian Research. The Japanese Roots (Part III)
2. "Assassin's Grandson Speaks of Emotional Journey". The Chosun Ilbo. 10 May 2005.
3. Lee, Yoon-sang (Dec. 2007) The Status of ‘Royal-Family of Joseon' and the role of ‘Office of Yi Royal-Family' During the Japanese Occupation Hanguk Munhwa (Korean Culture), Kyujanggak, Vol.40, pp. 315-342
4. Pak, Chʻi-yŏng (2000) Korea and the United Nations, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, p.6, ISBN 9041113827(quote) "the 35-year Japanese colonial rule was illegal since it was based on the invalid protectorate treaty of 1905. The view was also confirmed in the communique issued at the Moscow Conference of the Foreign Ministers of the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and the United States on December 27, 1945, which stated that "With a view to the reestablishment of Korea as an independent state"
5. ^ "INSIDE KOREA > HISTORY". KBS Global. Retrieved 2008-07-27. The Japanese annexation of Korea concluded in 1910, and Korean people had to suffer under the Japanese colonial rule until the surrender of Japan in 1945, which ended World War II.
6. Lee, Jong-Wha. "Economic Growth and human Production in the Republic of Korea, 1945 - 1992". United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved 2007-02-19. "the Japanese government attempted to integrate completely the Korean economy with Japan, and thus introduced many modern economic and social institutions, and invested heavily in infrastructure, including schools, railroads and utilities. Most of these physical facilities remained in Korea after the Liberation. But, under Japanese rule, all the Korean resources were utilized only for the Japanese."
7. Official interview of Koizumi Junichiro in August 15, 2006
8. "Koizumi Move Sparks Anger In China and South Korea" International Herald Tribune: August 14, 2001.
9. 노무현 대통령, “고이즈미 일본총리가 신사참배 중단하지 않으면 정상회담도 없을 것” (영문기사 첨부)
10. http://www.korea.net/News/issues/issueDetailView.asp?board_no=18677&menu_code=A
11. Comfort Women used as sex slaves during World War II
12. YaleGlobal Online. Asia Battles over War History
13. http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200809/200809090023.html
14. The Washington Times. S. Korea discloses sensitive documents
15. ^ The Chosun Ilbo. Compensation for Colonial Victims Is Not Just a Legal Problem
16. The Chosun Ilbo. 「韓国政府、韓日会談で個別請求権放棄」
17. The Chosun Ilbo. Seoul Demanded $364 Million for Japan's Victims
18. VAWW-NET Japan. The Women's International War Crimes Tribunal
19. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Japan-DPRK Pyongyang Declaration
20. Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet. Statement by Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi
21. "Why the Koreans will not go to the ICJ over Liancourt Rocks, http://www.geocities.com/mlovmo/page10.html
22. Homer B. Hulbert, History of Korea Volume I, The Methodist Publishing House (1905)
23. The Foreign Relations Series (FRUS) 1951 VolumeVI P1203. Subject:Japanese Peace Treaty, Participants:Dr. Yu Chan Yang, Korean Ambassador and John Foster Dulles U.S. Ambassador
24. http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2009-01-13/korean-protests-call-for-hetalia-anime-cancellation
25. http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/01/16/koreans-force-cancellation-of-criminal-hetalia/
26. http://english.yna.co.kr/Engnews/20060605/480100000020060605105721E6.html
27. Key Issues: Nuclear Weapons: History: Cold War: Survivors: Korean Atomic Bomb Survivors
28. ZNet |Japan | Mitsubishi, Historical Revisionism and Japanese Corporate Resistance to Chinese Forced Labor Redress
29. Chris Fortson (2002-10-28). "Expert speaks on 1980s Japanese kidnappings". Yale Daily News. Retrieved 2007-10-11.
30. Choe Sang-Hun (2006-04-21). "Abductions unite South Korea and Japan". International Herald Tribune. Retrieved 2007-10-11.
31. 최승현 (2006-01-12). "방송 일본 TV 베끼기 "아직도 그대로네"" (in Korean). The Chosun Ilbo. Retrieved 2007-10-11.
32. 유아정 기자 (2007-10-11). "SC 매거진 TV 오락프로 이대로 좋은가...끊임없는 표절 논란" (in Korean). 스포츠조선 (Naver). Retrieved 2007-10-11.
33. 장진리 (2007-10-11). "한국 인기 먹거리, 일본 제품 표절 심하네" (in Korean). 일간스포츠. Retrieved 2007-10-11.
34. 이주영 (2005-08-23). "MBC´일밤´´추격남녀´도 표절의혹" (in Korean). 데일리안. Retrieved 2007-10-11.
35. 강지훈 (2007-01-26). "가수 노블레스 뮤비, 드라마 '프라이드' 표절 의혹" (in Korean). 데일리안. Retrieved 2007-10-11.
36. 고재열 (2006-01-12). "<하늘이시여> 표절 의혹" (in Korean). 시사저널. Retrieved 2007-10-11.
37. Kim, Tong-hyong (2007-04-06). "Court Bans Ivy's Music Video". The Korea Times. Retrieved 2007-10-11.
38. Metropolitan Museum of Art "Metallurgy was also introduced from the Asian mainland during this time. Bronze and iron were used to make weapons, armor, tools, and ritual implements such as bells (dotaku)"
39. Choson Sinbo "Kitora Tomb Originates in Koguryo Murals" By Chon Ho Chon
40. http://www2.gol.com/users/hsmr/Content/East%20Asia/Japan/History/roots.html
41. http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/prehistory/japan/yayoi/yayoi.html
42. http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2131.html
43. http://www.asiasocietymuseum.com/
44. "Pottery - MSN Encarta". Archived from the original on 2009-10-31. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
45. http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2046.html
46. http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0824820304&id=dCNioYQ1HfsC&pg=PA84&lpg=PA84&dq=japanese+pottery+sue&sig=hLLMdsk0qfSWbVVTI-_w-5Y1fDs
47. http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN4770029780&id=hhOj8JrLQBMC&pg=PA218&lpg=PA218&q=korean&vq=korean&dq=japanese+pottery+sue&sig=qwA36UHFscvAvtia-F0_-RYycW8#PPA219,M1
48. ^ http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Reln275/Jap-Kor-art.htm
49. ^ http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080428-ancient-tomb.html
50. Japan Korea Kimchi Dispute, http://www1.american.edu/TED/kimchi.htm

Further reading

• Cha, Victor D. (1999). Alignment despite Antagonism: the US-Korea-Japan Security Triangle (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

• Dudden, Alexis (2008). Troubled Apologies Among Japan, Korea, and the United States (New York: Columbia University Press).

• Lee, Chong-Sik (1985). Japan and Korea: The Political Dimension (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

• Lee, Chong-Sik (1963). The Politics of Korean Nationalism (Berkeley: University of California Press).

• Lind, Jennifer (2008). Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

• Meyers, Ramon Hawley, et al. (1984). The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895-1945 (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

• Morley, James (1965). Japan and Korea (New York: Walker, 1965).

External links

• Transclusion error: {{En}} is only for use in File namespace. Use {{langx|en}} or {{in lang|en}} instead. History of Mindan
• Transclusion error: {{En}} is only for use in File namespace. Use {{langx|en}} or {{in lang|en}} instead. Online Newspaper covering Zainichi Korean and Mindan

v t e Foreign relations of Japan
Bilateral relations Africa Algeria Angola Botswana Djibouti Egypt Ethiopia Kenya Mozambique Namibia Nigeria Somalia South Africa Americas Argentina Barbados Bolivia Brazil Canada Chile Colombia Cuba Ecuador Honduras Mexico Paraguay Peru Trinidad and Tobago United States Uruguay Venezuela Asia Afghanistan Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Bangladesh Bhutan Brunei Cambodia China East Timor Georgia India Indonesia Iran Israel Laos Malaysia Maldives Mongolia Myanmar Nepal North Korea Pakistan Palestine Philippines Qatar Saudi Arabia Singapore South Korea Sri Lanka Syria Taiwan Thailand Turkey Vietnam Europe Albania Austria Belgium Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Holy See Iceland Ireland Italy Kosovo Liechtenstein Lithuania Malta Montenegro Netherlands Poland Portugal Russia Serbia Spain Sweden Ukraine United Kingdom Oceania Australia Fiji New Zealand Palau Tonga Former Russian Empire Soviet Union Yugoslavia
Multilateral relations Africa Arab world Latin America Oceania Southeast Asia European Union United Nations
Diplomatic history Missions to Imperial China Red seal ships Nanban trade Sakoku Joseon missions to Japan Japanese missions to Joseon Dutch missions to Edo Ryukyuan missions to Edo Foreign relations of Meiji Japan Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere Korea China Marcos scandals
Territorial disputes Japan–Korea Joint Development Zone Kuril Islands dispute Liancourt Rocks dispute Senkaku Islands dispute
Related topics Ministry of Foreign Affairs Minister for Foreign Affairs Diplomatic missions of Japan / in Japan Development assistance JICA JOCV Economic relations JETRO JPEPA Pacific Alliance Leaders Meeting

v t e Foreign relations of South Korea
Africa	Egypt Ethiopia Ghana Kenya Libya Nigeria Somalia South Africa Tanzania
Americas	Argentina Brazil Canada Chile Colombia Cuba Mexico Panama Paraguay Peru United States Uruguay Venezuela
Asia	Afghanistan Azerbaijan Bangladesh Brunei China History India Indonesia Iran Israel Japan History Joint Development Zone Kazakhstan Malaysia Maldives Mongolia Myanmar Nepal North Korea Pakistan Palestine Philippines Saudi Arabia Singapore Taiwan Thailand Turkey Uzbekistan Vietnam
Europe	Austria Bulgaria Czech Republic Denmark France Germany Greece Holy See Hungary Iceland Italy Netherlands Poland Russia Serbia Spain Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom
Oceania	Australia Fiji New Zealand
Multilateral relations	Africa European Union Inter-Korean Liaison Office Inter-Korean summits 2000 2007 April 2018 May 2018 September 2018 Latin America Six-party talks United Nations 2019 Koreas–United States DMZ Summit
Ambassadors Diplomatic missions of / in South Korea International presidential trips Ministry of Foreign Affairs Politics of South Korea

v t e Foreign relations of North Korea
Africa	Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Central African Republic Comoros Egypt Equatorial Guinea Gambia Ghana Guinea-Bissau Kenya Libya Mauritania Namibia Nigeria Rwanda Seychelles Somalia South Africa Tanzania Togo
Americas	Argentina Brazil Canada Cuba Grenada Mexico Peru United States Venezuela
Asia	Bangladesh Cambodia China History Hong Kong India Indonesia Iran Iraq Israel Japan Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Nepal Pakistan Palestine Philippines Singapore South Korea Syria Taiwan Thailand Turkey Vietnam
Europe	Albania Denmark Finland France Germany Hungary Iceland Italy Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia Serbia Spain Sweden Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom
Oceania	Australia New Zealand
Former states	Yugoslavia
Multilateral relations	United Nations Security Council resolutions Sanctions 1983 NAM Education and Culture Conference European Union Inter-Korean Liaison Office Inter-Korean summits 2000 2007 April 2018 May 2018 September 2018 Six-party talks 2018 North Korea–United States Singapore Summit reactions 2019 North Korea–United States Hanoi Summit 2019 Koreas–United States DMZ Summit
Diplomatic missions of / in North Korea Ministry of Foreign Affairs (includes list of ministers)

• Articles lacking sources from September 2007
• Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from March 2008
• Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from August 2008
• Misplaced Pages neutral point of view disputes from April 2009
• Misplaced Pages articles needing rewrite from September 2009
• Japan–Korea relations
• Anti-Japanese sentiment in Korea