Misplaced Pages

Enviga: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:45, 19 October 2006 editPetegranger (talk | contribs)41 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:48, 15 December 2024 edit undoJohn baost (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,701 editsmNo edit summaryTags: Manual revert Visual edit 
(233 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Carbonated canned green tea drink}}
{{Not verified}}
{{Infobox Beverage {{Infobox beverage
| name = Enviga |name=Enviga
|image=
| image = ]
|type=Canned sparkling green tea
| type = ] ]
| manufacturer = ] |manufacturer= Beverage Partners Worldwide (North America)
| origin = {{USA}} |origin= United States
| introduced = ] |introduced=2006
}} }}
'''Enviga''' is a ]/caffeinated, carbonated drink being marketed by the ] Company and Nestle Switzerland. <ref>Coca Cola Company Press Release: http://www2.coca-cola.com/presscenter/pdfs/enviga.pdf</ref>. The first company to can green tea appears to be Ito En, Japan in 1985.
]
According to Coca Cola, Enviga burns 60 to 100 calories per 3 x 12-oz. <ref>BBC News audio interview: http://news.bbc.co.uk/nolavconsole/ukfs_news/hi/newsid_6040000/newsid_6043700/bb_rm_6043792.stm</ref> It is worth emphasizing Coca Cola quotes 60–100 calorie loss for three drinks – the loss for just one drink being only 20–33 calories.


'''Enviga''' is a ] carbonated ] ] drink. Enviga is a trademark of ] licensed to ], a joint venture between ] and ]. It is available in three flavors: Green Tea, Tropical Pomegranate, and Mixed Berry.<ref>Coca Cola Company Press Release: http://www2.coca-cola.com/presscenter/pdfs/enviga.pdf</ref> According to Coca-Cola, Enviga burns 60 to 100 calories per three 12-oz.(330 ml) cans due to its high ] and ] content. The makers of the drink were sued for making fraudulent health claims about weight loss, and agreed to settle and cease repeating them.<ref name=magic/>
The ] is said to derive from the process of ] – in effect, accelerating metabolism as a means of burning calories. was the first product marketed to make this claim.


==Nutritional facts==
When launched, industry analysts predicted Enviga would target active lifestyle consumers. The principal active ingredient – ] or epigallocatechin gallate – has been extensively researched for its medicinal properties. There are many studies suggesting EGCG protects against cancer. However, a recent study of 40,530 Japanese adults <ref>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov</ref> surprisingly failed to confirm this. However it did demonstrate protective ability against stroke/heart disease. EGCG is also claimed to be a calorie burner when the nervous system is stimulated by accompaning caffeine.
A can of Enviga has 5 calories, 100&nbsp;mg of ], 35&nbsp;mg of sodium, and 20% of the daily recommended calcium based on a 2,000 calorie diet. It is sweetened with ] and has no carbohydrates, fat, or protein.<ref>BBC News audio interview: http://news.bbc.co.uk/nolavconsole/ukfs_news/hi/newsid_6040000/newsid_6043700/bb_rm_6043792.stm</ref>


== Lawsuits over health claims ==
It is suggested by one trade source <ref>http://www.nutraingredients.com/news/ng.asp?id=67594-dsm-green-tea-catechin-egcg</ref> that EGCG increases energy metabolism and fatty acid oxidation; inhibits fat cell development (apidogenesis); and/or reduces lipid absorption and increases fat excretion. Coca Cola is claiming 90 milligrams of EGCG per can – assuming it is not degraded during processing and non-refrigerated distribution. This is not a significantly different level to that provided in a 100ml of brewed green tea. <ref>http://www.leaonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327914NC4502_13?journalCode=nc</ref>
In February 2007, the watchdog group ] (CSPI) filed a lawsuit over company claims that Enviga acts as a calorie-burning and weight-loss product, as a "]" drink. The group claims that if Coca-Cola and Nestlé stop marketing the product as a calorie-burner, they would drop possible litigation. The beverage makers responded that they have deliberately avoided claims that Enviga is a weight-loss product, and that there exists independent research to substantiate the effects of the product. The watchdog group alleged that it was only a three-day study, and that it was only presented in a conference by the ], the editors of journal '']'', where their conclusions were rejected.<ref name="bw">{{citation |title= Coke and Nestle Hit with a Lawsuit for 'Negative Calories' |author= Burt Helm |date= January 31, 2007 |url= http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2007-01-31/coke-and-nestle-hit-with-a-lawsuit-for-negative-calories |archive-url= https://archive.today/20130407214838/http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2007-01-31/coke-and-nestle-hit-with-a-lawsuit-for-negative-calories |url-status= dead |archive-date= April 7, 2013 }}</ref><ref name="cspi1">{{citation |title= 'Calorie Burning' Enviga Tea Drink a Fraud, Group Says. CSPI to Sue Coke, Nestlé if Weight Loss Claims Persist |work= CSPI |date= December 4, 2006 |url= http://www.cspinet.org/new/200612041.html }}</ref><ref name="cspi2">{{citation |title= Watchdog Group Sues Coke, Nestlé For Bogus "Enviga" Claims. Green Tea-Flavored Diet Soda Won't Help You Lose Weight, Despite Claims of "Negative Calories" |work= CSPI |date= February 1, 2007 |url= http://www.cspinet.org/new/200702011.html |access-date= February 8, 2013 |archive-date= February 17, 2013 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130217070746/http://www.cspinet.org/new/200702011.html |url-status= dead }}</ref> The lack of validity of the study was later referred to by the Attorney General in the settlement.<ref name="settlement"/> Studies on the combination of caffeine and green tea anti-oxidant have given mixed results, and the results are not conclusive.<ref>{{citation |title= Does new Enviga tea drink really deliver "negative calories in a can"?(Product Watch) |date= March 1, 2007 |work= Environmental Nutrition newsletter |url= http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-160229838.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130515090156/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-160229838.html |url-status=dead |archive-date= May 15, 2013 }}</ref>


The ] also investigated the calorie-burning qualities of the drink. The ], ], demanded <ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250364,00.html|title=FOXNews.com - Coca-Cola Energy Drink Investigated by Connecticut AG - Health News &#124; Current Health News<!-- Bot generated title -->|website=]|date=25 March 2015 }}</ref> all scientific research associated with its calorie-burning qualities.<ref name=magic>{{Cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/02/05/health/main2434316.shtml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070207033356/http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/02/05/health/main2434316.shtml|url-status=dead|archive-date=February 7, 2007|title=Connecticut Probing Diet Drink Claims, Attorney General Says Enviga's Boast Must Be Supported By "Science, Not Magic" - CBS News<!-- Bot generated title -->|website=]}}</ref>
Whilst the 20–30 calorie per can benefit of Enviga is not insignificant, it should also be seen in the context of the typical diet of around 2500–3000 calories/day in Coke's target market. <ref>http://www.guardian.co.uk/health/story/0,,1866485,00.html</ref> Clearly, consumption of multiple cans of Enviga will be required to achieve a significant weight loss benefit. By way of comparison, a moderate 30 minute walk by a 150 lb person expends about 150 calories – equivalent to 5–7 cans of Enviga. <ref>http://exercise.about.com/cs/fitnesstools/l/blcalorieburn.htm</ref>


In February 2009 the companies made a settlement with ] ], affecting several US states. They agreed to pay $650,000 to the states, remove any claims about weight loss, and add disclaimers that weight loss can only occur via diet and exercise.<ref name="settlement"/> According to the US Federal News Service, the settlement requires that "any marketing of Enviga, or a similarly formulated beverage, that uses the terms 'the calorie burner,' 'negative calories,' 'drink negative,' or makes any claims explicitly or implicitly that consumers will burn calories by drinking Enviga, there must be a clear and conspicuous disclosure that the product does not produce weight loss without diet and exercise."<ref name="settlement">{{citation |title= Attorney General Announces Settlement Resolving Weight Loss, Calorie-burning Claims About Enviga |author= US Fed News Service, Including US State News |date= February 28, 2009 |url= http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1653286791.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130515104459/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1653286791.html |url-status=dead |archive-date= May 15, 2013 }} (requires registration)</ref>
Unfortunately, most bottled green tea beverages contain significant calorific content in the form of added sugars. Coca Cola states Enviga is ''calorie-negative'' – suggesting a lower sugar content than most bottled green teas.


In 2010, a ] did not allow a woman to sue Coca-Cola for weight-loss false advertising, and CSPI reported that it would not appeal the decision.<ref name=CSPI2012/> CSPI said that the sales of Enviga had collapsed after its 2009 settlement, and that it had already met its goal of informing customers about the lack of efficacy of the beverage.<ref name=CSPI2012>{{citation |title= CSPI to Drop Litigation Over Coke's Faded "Enviga". Sales Reportedly Plummeted After State Attorneys General Won Labeling Concessions |work= CSPI |date= August 17, 2010 |url= http://www.cspinet.org/new/201008171.html |access-date= December 11, 2013 |archive-date= December 11, 2013 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131211220734/http://www.cspinet.org/new/201008171.html |url-status= dead }}</ref> CSPI announced that it was suing Coca-Cola again, but this time for its new beverage ].<ref name=CSPI2012/>
Enviga appears to have added calcium, and green teas are naturally high in fluoride – which can be a health/dental advantage and/or disadvantage depending on your point of view on this controversial subject.


== Sales ==
Coke is claiming to source green tea from tea plants with particularly high levels of EGCG – "several times higher than that of other green-tea products." <ref>http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/cokes-enviga-it-may-burn-calories-but-it/20061013075409990001</ref>
As reported in the ''Sydney Morning Herald'', flavoured bottled water, sports drinks and teas, are increasing sales with the decline in sales of sugary soft drinks – with cold tea the fastest growing non-carbonated beverage category in the ] during the first half of 2006. Prior to launch, Coke had been trailing and losing market share<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.smh.com.au/business/coke-serves-green-tea-to-a-world-with-calories-to-burn-20061013-gdol59.html|title=Coke serves green tea to a world with calories to burn|first=Duane Stanford in|last=Atlanta|date=October 13, 2006|website=The Sydney Morning Herald}}</ref> in this sector to ], ] and ].


== Flavors ==
This appears to be a misleading and irrelevent statement inasmuch the EGCG level in Enviga (100 mgs) should be capable of ready adjustment upwards or downwards simply by adding more or less tea extract to the formula.
Discontinued:


*Berry
Another active ingredient in green tea is ], which is a relaxant and remarkably counteracts the jittery effect of caffeine. It is not clear how much L-Theanine is in Enviga, but its presence could permit additional caffeine in the formula. A can of Enviga contains 100 mgs of caffeine, which is about three times the level in a can of Coke. This additional caffeine may perhaps increase metabolism independent of the EGCG content. Nonetheless, the use of high caffeine levels in beverages is a fairly blunt instrument in achieving weight loss.
*Pomegranate
*Peach


Since the brand's inception, and the launch of the three original flavors, peach was the first to be dropped in favor of pomegranate as the third flavor.
Of additional concern is the added sugar in most bottled green tea beverages. This counteracts its calorie burning capabilities. For example, each bottle of Lipton's Green Tea contains 139 calories, which is far exceeds its calorie-burning potential. Whilst it may not be a an ideal comparison, Enviga (at 5 calories) has only one seventh the calorific level of Coke, and slightly more than its diet range of cola's. <ref>http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/cokes-enviga-it-may-burn-calories-but-it/20061013075409990001</ref>


== See also ==
Those attempting to lose weight may be better advised to brew their own fresh, unsweetened green tea or ] beverage rather than purchasing a sweetened, bottled green tea product. Despite the comparatively high cost, white tea is a more naturally sweet tea beverage than green tea, and contains marginally higher levels of EGCG.
* ]


== References==
Additional levels of EGCG and L-theanine can also be obtained at very low cost (about 10 cents per equivalent 2 cups of green tea) in capsule form from a number of supplement makers.
{{reflist|2}}


== External links ==
In summary, Coke is referring to Enviga's unique formula, but in the absence of further scientific information, its active ingredients do not appear to substantially differ from any other still or carbonated green tea products on the market. There are probable cardiovascular and other health benefits in consuming any green tea, including Enviga. However the quantity required to achieve weight loss is substantial – particularly in sweetened tea. Good quality supplements containing high EGCG levels are probably a cheaper, more efficient, and (for some) a more convenient means of obtaining EGCG. Ideally, the requirement is for unsweetened green tea beverages that have broad appeal to children, the overweight, and the obese as nutritionally superior substitutes for traditional sweetened and diet cola's. Whilst the overweight and obese may gain a modest weight benefit from Enviga, its high caffeine level is potentially problematic in children, and those allergic to caffeine.
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928151658/http://www.ausu.org/voicemagazine/articles/featuredisplay.php?ART=5201 |date=2007-09-28 }}


{{Coca-Cola brands}}
Coke and its business partner, Nestle, plan to introduce Enviga to the north eastern United States in November 2006. It will launch nationally in January 2007 <ref>Coca Cola Company Press Release: http://www2.coca-cola.com/presscenter/pdfs/enviga.pdf</ref> and in Latin America, Europe and Asia later that year. <ref>http://www.dailyadvance.com/biz/content/hared/money/stories/2006/COKE_1012_COX.html</ref>
{{Nestlé}}


⚫ ]

]

]

]

== Footnotes ==
<references/>

{{drink-stub}}

⚫ ]

Latest revision as of 21:48, 15 December 2024

Carbonated canned green tea drink
Enviga
TypeCanned sparkling green tea
ManufacturerBeverage Partners Worldwide (North America)
Country of origin United States
Introduced2006

Enviga is a Nestea carbonated canned green-tea drink. Enviga is a trademark of Nestlé licensed to Beverage Partners Worldwide, a joint venture between The Coca-Cola Company and Nestlé. It is available in three flavors: Green Tea, Tropical Pomegranate, and Mixed Berry. According to Coca-Cola, Enviga burns 60 to 100 calories per three 12-oz.(330 ml) cans due to its high EGCG and caffeine content. The makers of the drink were sued for making fraudulent health claims about weight loss, and agreed to settle and cease repeating them.

Nutritional facts

A can of Enviga has 5 calories, 100 mg of caffeine, 35 mg of sodium, and 20% of the daily recommended calcium based on a 2,000 calorie diet. It is sweetened with aspartame and has no carbohydrates, fat, or protein.

Lawsuits over health claims

In February 2007, the watchdog group Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) filed a lawsuit over company claims that Enviga acts as a calorie-burning and weight-loss product, as a "negative calorie" drink. The group claims that if Coca-Cola and Nestlé stop marketing the product as a calorie-burner, they would drop possible litigation. The beverage makers responded that they have deliberately avoided claims that Enviga is a weight-loss product, and that there exists independent research to substantiate the effects of the product. The watchdog group alleged that it was only a three-day study, and that it was only presented in a conference by the Obesity Society, the editors of journal Obesity, where their conclusions were rejected. The lack of validity of the study was later referred to by the Attorney General in the settlement. Studies on the combination of caffeine and green tea anti-oxidant have given mixed results, and the results are not conclusive.

The State of Connecticut also investigated the calorie-burning qualities of the drink. The State Attorney General, Richard Blumenthal, demanded all scientific research associated with its calorie-burning qualities.

In February 2009 the companies made a settlement with Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, affecting several US states. They agreed to pay $650,000 to the states, remove any claims about weight loss, and add disclaimers that weight loss can only occur via diet and exercise. According to the US Federal News Service, the settlement requires that "any marketing of Enviga, or a similarly formulated beverage, that uses the terms 'the calorie burner,' 'negative calories,' 'drink negative,' or makes any claims explicitly or implicitly that consumers will burn calories by drinking Enviga, there must be a clear and conspicuous disclosure that the product does not produce weight loss without diet and exercise."

In 2010, a US court of appeals did not allow a woman to sue Coca-Cola for weight-loss false advertising, and CSPI reported that it would not appeal the decision. CSPI said that the sales of Enviga had collapsed after its 2009 settlement, and that it had already met its goal of informing customers about the lack of efficacy of the beverage. CSPI announced that it was suing Coca-Cola again, but this time for its new beverage Vitaminwater.

Sales

As reported in the Sydney Morning Herald, flavoured bottled water, sports drinks and teas, are increasing sales with the decline in sales of sugary soft drinks – with cold tea the fastest growing non-carbonated beverage category in the U.S. during the first half of 2006. Prior to launch, Coke had been trailing and losing market share in this sector to Pepsi, AriZona and Snapple.

Flavors

Discontinued:

  • Berry
  • Pomegranate
  • Peach

Since the brand's inception, and the launch of the three original flavors, peach was the first to be dropped in favor of pomegranate as the third flavor.

See also

References

  1. Coca Cola Company Press Release: http://www2.coca-cola.com/presscenter/pdfs/enviga.pdf
  2. ^ "Connecticut Probing Diet Drink Claims, Attorney General Says Enviga's Boast Must Be Supported By "Science, Not Magic" - CBS News". CBS News. Archived from the original on February 7, 2007.
  3. BBC News audio interview: http://news.bbc.co.uk/nolavconsole/ukfs_news/hi/newsid_6040000/newsid_6043700/bb_rm_6043792.stm
  4. Burt Helm (January 31, 2007), Coke and Nestle Hit with a Lawsuit for 'Negative Calories', archived from the original on April 7, 2013
  5. "'Calorie Burning' Enviga Tea Drink a Fraud, Group Says. CSPI to Sue Coke, Nestlé if Weight Loss Claims Persist", CSPI, December 4, 2006
  6. "Watchdog Group Sues Coke, Nestlé For Bogus "Enviga" Claims. Green Tea-Flavored Diet Soda Won't Help You Lose Weight, Despite Claims of "Negative Calories"", CSPI, February 1, 2007, archived from the original on February 17, 2013, retrieved February 8, 2013
  7. ^ US Fed News Service, Including US State News (February 28, 2009), Attorney General Announces Settlement Resolving Weight Loss, Calorie-burning Claims About Enviga, archived from the original on May 15, 2013 (requires registration)
  8. "Does new Enviga tea drink really deliver "negative calories in a can"?(Product Watch)", Environmental Nutrition newsletter, March 1, 2007, archived from the original on May 15, 2013
  9. "FOXNews.com - Coca-Cola Energy Drink Investigated by Connecticut AG - Health News | Current Health News". Fox News. 25 March 2015.
  10. ^ "CSPI to Drop Litigation Over Coke's Faded "Enviga". Sales Reportedly Plummeted After State Attorneys General Won Labeling Concessions", CSPI, August 17, 2010, archived from the original on December 11, 2013, retrieved December 11, 2013
  11. Atlanta, Duane Stanford in (October 13, 2006). "Coke serves green tea to a world with calories to burn". The Sydney Morning Herald.

External links

The Coca-Cola Company
Brands
Soft drinks
Juices and teas
Sports drinks
Monster Beverage
(17.9% stake)
Bottled water
Coffee-based
Dairy-based
Purchased from Bisleri
The Coca-Cola Company logo
Joint ventures
Former holdings
Legal
Campaigns
and slogans
Other
Nestlé
Divisions
Divested
Subsidiaries
Joint ventures
Other assets
Brands
Appliances
Baby nutrition
Baking
Bottled water
Cereals
Chocolate
and desserts
Coffee and
beverages
Dairy products
Ice cream
Prepared and
packaged food
and snacks
Purina PetCare
Uncle Tobys
Former brands and
subsidiaries
People
Related
Related articles
  • Currently manufactured by General Mills in the U.S. and Canada. Produced by Cereal Partners under the Nestlé brand elsewhere. Brand owned by General Mills; U.S. and Canadian production rights controlled by Nestlé under license. U.S. production rights owned by The Hershey Company. U.S. rights and production owned by the Smarties Candy Company with a different product. U.S. rights and specific trade dress owned by Nestlé; rights elsewhere owned by Associated British Foods. Produced by Cereal Partners, branded as Nestlé. Produced by Cereal Partners and branded as Nestlé in the U.K. and Ireland. Produced by Post Foods elsewhere. Philippine production rights owned by Alaska Milk Corporation. Singaporean, Malaysian and Thai production rights owned by Fraser and Neave. Used only in Indonesia, Thailand, and Cambodia. Used only in the Philippines. U.S. production rights owned by the Ferrara Candy Company. NA rights and specific trade dress to all packaged coffee and other products under the Starbucks brand owned by Nestlé since 2019. Brand owned by Mars, sold by Nestlé in Canada. Produced by Froneri in the U.S. since 2020.
Categories: